vivienna

Originally posted by 28083003 at 2005-6-18 01:07 AM:
* ]$ m9 [# `( m反轉黎諗5 x& M/ C# Y# C0 E) M3 i& H
ps2之所以o係香港咁流行就因為有翻版
1 ]6 k: U) I! x' n你睇下DC,X-box
# o" k' ?/ g( q3 x) {" _; `7 {  Z同ps2 o既機o既銷售量真係無得比  P) Q( I; J% b" ~- S$ U" H
你估ps2無老翻會唔會有咁多人買呢??

& }& H4 S- _6 {
講中曬!!!
/ O, X* ]. T1 @
4 O7 J( p& L' x5 \仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。3 G7 q( P7 N4 t' Q' G: G$ m
* Z" X! ?( c) z
講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

bodycharge

物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行改車先算犯法.  同樣道理, 改機, 無錯, intension係要玩老番(但係仲未玩喎), 但係就算依家連買老番都算犯法的話, 政府大不了只可捉用改機來玩老番(如果真的立了法). 改機呢個行為, 又點可以算犯法呢?  明唔明呢??

vivienna

Originally posted by bodycharge at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:4 w0 h6 L# ^+ ?; Y- V
物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行...

' ^2 B! m8 i' M: b! h
o甘政府當初立法嚴禁運毒咪立錯左囉﹖話曬都未販賣﹖又未用﹖
/ Y( N, s: h4 z8 J$ b: q9 t
3 D+ a7 j. G& ?* Q3 Q" s7 o要斷米路﹐政府就係要甘絕﹐條條路都要封斷曬。

bodycharge

哩個例子, 即係: 毒品=老番.  針筒=PS機.  政府唔可以禁針筒喎.  如果係咁, 全區碼DVD機都唔可以賣啦.

細驚

針筒應該係等同改左機既ps2
1 V1 ^8 e. [& W# B
1 V  X% b1 `7 w1 a9 E/ w其實政府今次立法原意係岩
8 X' W! I2 H# z  H! f" R但正如bodycharge兄咁講, 改左機, 但未玩翻版, 唔算有損版權
/ N* h4 B' H& {) Y* [2 r" h唔可以用販毒唻比喻 而且部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管3 v+ p" U, B5 E( x: m
: {' Y' d4 T6 g
另外, 政府咁搞係好心做壞事
+ n7 B3 T. G1 |- x: B/ H4 d一個唔該令sony賺少左硬件既錢- B6 O! F6 Y' `* ?+ k; n* _: ~1 |: b
眾所周知1 |1 d4 p/ L1 t6 u9 r: _9 B& {
ps2咁好賣, 同之前ps, gb, gba一樣原因 有翻版
$ _4 _1 T/ d: {' V2 O: y) I; ?6 A佢假如真係立法成功 相信唔會再有咩人買ps28 \) N  y( _  M
到時希望真係正版軟件可以支持到佢地香港分公司既運作

abc123aa

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:
- k  Q1 `( g$ D( ]
! h7 y4 S# i0 j講中曬!!!
1 o  [8 Y0 \) Q( {6 V% i: m7 S; E
仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。& {* `7 l1 O) ?

& z& w% K- o$ f& O講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

3 k5 M. ?0 v# n" L1 ~) h對~我得好少 game,因為冇咩錢,但係我唔會買翻版,因為都唔知玩唔玩整既,加上正版game畫面都靚d啦~' q. i# v( N0 B8 z6 U
2 R. E& Z9 |$ P# y: x' t
ps2要睇vcd果d野買多一條唔知咩線就得

waterfire

唔係翻版, 點會有咁多人買...; N* d. M( v: f/ D+ E1 w
其實最簡單一樣野9 g( x, P7 U) r1 i
正版好似翻版咁平/ {5 k+ D% J' ^; r; h
或者, 香港人個個好有錢, 買正版game 好似食餐飯咁) d" W' {: F: L0 s
咁就可以解決問題la

sheraton

I think PS2 piracy should not be an immediate concern to HK Gov't, who cares when we're only stealing, pirating, copying Japanese/American developed products?  Japanese "adapted" many Chinese culture and called it their own, who's going to pay us back for that?, d& j% P' I; N! K+ n4 T
+ Q( S6 E- L+ M4 C+ s3 @1 n- {
But I agree, Copyrights should be supported if it's on HK developed products like Movies and Music.  Coz HK, we should care, I could care less about Japan

bigg

我覺得唔可以apply毒品呢個例子: v, G$ U0 r! ~/ N
因為你本身藏有大量毒品已經犯法, 咁你運毒就一定犯法啦,
, Z2 D+ `( a' S3 \% `/ [但ps2本身係合法既, 咁我買左番黎點改係我既事, 唔通我將部ps2放落屎坑都話我犯法
. i8 K5 r& r2 n1 R0 O. O1 _我覺得政府應該係立例加重賣老翻既刑罰, 等佢地覺得冇錢賺就唔會賣
# T! V4 f; U+ u4 L; a再講而家d人都用bt download game落ps2玩, 立呢條例都冇咩用

Miz

我就覺得係關..8 C3 C4 q3 J+ w
改機既用途: J8 F( `: _1 ~. i, q( B- V! h
如果改機既用途一定係用黎玩老番 so先要改既咁就可能會犯法囉
) r2 h" F9 N, n4 m5 C4 E政府咁做都係想阻止d人玩老番啫(其實邊阻到架)...冇做錯架~ / A& h2 Y3 i8 g, v$ \7 ~7 o
我亦同意樓上話..『部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管』