vivienna

Originally posted by 28083003 at 2005-6-18 01:07 AM:
1 j/ @3 T! L9 [& e, s3 F反轉黎諗. k$ E. H0 Z! @/ Z: h) {
ps2之所以o係香港咁流行就因為有翻版
" w$ n$ p& Y2 `0 z3 ~# ^4 L  b7 W你睇下DC,X-box
8 I! M( M2 I+ i5 j0 x  m1 [同ps2 o既機o既銷售量真係無得比
$ V0 x& q4 n8 I0 t! ?8 m. u你估ps2無老翻會唔會有咁多人買呢??

8 @, k' q" u9 ^/ |講中曬!!!+ k5 X" w- H: i0 m' ?( S' p: \

4 S$ R9 ^# c3 [" h8 u$ ~4 f* ~仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。# |, C. g: t6 v8 `

) J0 G( n. `1 d" |' e2 Q) f講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

bodycharge

物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行改車先算犯法.  同樣道理, 改機, 無錯, intension係要玩老番(但係仲未玩喎), 但係就算依家連買老番都算犯法的話, 政府大不了只可捉用改機來玩老番(如果真的立了法). 改機呢個行為, 又點可以算犯法呢?  明唔明呢??

vivienna

Originally posted by bodycharge at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:. o0 T5 E$ d# z
物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行...

. `' O0 h( @9 @0 W7 ^. V: R5 o
o甘政府當初立法嚴禁運毒咪立錯左囉﹖話曬都未販賣﹖又未用﹖
( n  `2 G2 h- w; B  f. V! s
# O" v. O1 O8 ~+ a- f4 }要斷米路﹐政府就係要甘絕﹐條條路都要封斷曬。

bodycharge

哩個例子, 即係: 毒品=老番.  針筒=PS機.  政府唔可以禁針筒喎.  如果係咁, 全區碼DVD機都唔可以賣啦.

細驚

針筒應該係等同改左機既ps23 ~7 l/ e( k8 S9 R% @; A$ K
' ^5 |# l2 m. M; q
其實政府今次立法原意係岩
+ d" v: m5 ?( t2 B7 C/ U但正如bodycharge兄咁講, 改左機, 但未玩翻版, 唔算有損版權9 E% l, s( ?; F: `% F2 S8 k3 x
唔可以用販毒唻比喻 而且部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管; ]1 B" U% i9 a/ ~
7 D) G: x9 Z" `5 y/ h
另外, 政府咁搞係好心做壞事
7 d2 U/ j7 H6 F5 Q: O" r一個唔該令sony賺少左硬件既錢& a- ]' [7 ?6 b: C% u
眾所周知4 z4 o$ ~4 E) n
ps2咁好賣, 同之前ps, gb, gba一樣原因 有翻版
1 z  d4 S9 y1 n+ s佢假如真係立法成功 相信唔會再有咩人買ps2
$ h) G/ `7 ]! g到時希望真係正版軟件可以支持到佢地香港分公司既運作

abc123aa

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:
3 C0 B+ r! F8 U+ T; s8 }
$ I' \8 _4 a! M0 r, d) s) t* [講中曬!!!) q, i4 @8 H* s+ l  |! F$ C' L- P

+ U, @2 @# a( ]5 Y; s$ C6 b) K2 P仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。+ Y& j8 Q' d6 Z1 ~& ]
6 x% W2 H$ k" d% y7 g* h
講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

. _; A# I" L& a; s對~我得好少 game,因為冇咩錢,但係我唔會買翻版,因為都唔知玩唔玩整既,加上正版game畫面都靚d啦~1 A# w& A: V' |9 [0 J- Q1 P$ F

' H: b) F( w3 {! t! l3 ?ps2要睇vcd果d野買多一條唔知咩線就得

waterfire

唔係翻版, 點會有咁多人買...  \' x" ~! {% {, H/ w% O6 o
其實最簡單一樣野+ w8 G8 j  y" J3 P  K0 V
正版好似翻版咁平
% r0 p( S$ y7 }; Y8 b或者, 香港人個個好有錢, 買正版game 好似食餐飯咁
- y/ @% y" E( f# e咁就可以解決問題la

sheraton

I think PS2 piracy should not be an immediate concern to HK Gov't, who cares when we're only stealing, pirating, copying Japanese/American developed products?  Japanese "adapted" many Chinese culture and called it their own, who's going to pay us back for that?
" J& @1 m% v( E2 p5 i% ~7 @# ~8 G! i9 u) u6 q
But I agree, Copyrights should be supported if it's on HK developed products like Movies and Music.  Coz HK, we should care, I could care less about Japan

bigg

我覺得唔可以apply毒品呢個例子
7 _1 y/ @' ?& K+ a- J* A' [8 X8 H3 j因為你本身藏有大量毒品已經犯法, 咁你運毒就一定犯法啦,
0 ]7 t% F$ p" t4 z9 ]( \2 v" r但ps2本身係合法既, 咁我買左番黎點改係我既事, 唔通我將部ps2放落屎坑都話我犯法: L8 V) Y: r/ x" d
我覺得政府應該係立例加重賣老翻既刑罰, 等佢地覺得冇錢賺就唔會賣
4 k; y8 [. z8 z再講而家d人都用bt download game落ps2玩, 立呢條例都冇咩用

Miz

我就覺得係關..
# X. J  X& U# E- B2 u4 h, x改機既用途
, l3 G! l  Y. K/ X- n! T如果改機既用途一定係用黎玩老番 so先要改既咁就可能會犯法囉
8 V3 g5 k0 t* g" ]3 s6 H% m0 S政府咁做都係想阻止d人玩老番啫(其實邊阻到架)...冇做錯架~
6 Z' F* G, a# u: i7 A3 [# e我亦同意樓上話..『部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管』