Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
3 l9 ^7 M8 K* Q) }2 X; N, T1 G7 F( {0 S4 U  ^# v( o& n
7 g. Y3 m$ H1 f; ^# k( H! y
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

7 J( Y: G: c! Y6 G" y
8 b* \; z1 R2 \0 K1 S/ |) X- Z
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:; Z7 \0 P$ Q- e- H3 ]
3 G/ c  F; @; h" L( `8 K
- Q- I% E4 h0 @' \. D  y: U! X
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

; P! b, i4 ]) l- f5 q; O0 r3 F! X. @' \  m9 f
oh really...
! y! g5 U+ R/ |2 }; j. P2 O0 A& ^4 }hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
! l3 p3 v; g& h. e$ j, v5 X* t# \i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
0 R- I8 K1 j& [
& U) z+ b! H, e6 l) V/ [當然這是個假設性問題
$ E( V6 T* v' G+ e$ ?但將人數倍大
5 v$ r3 K1 e/ E) L3 @+ Q例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
5 \( N! P  d% |' S4 a5 ^(情況可以換作其他)! @  S) J3 c$ B' }) V  X! D
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題.... W. J% q* j, q/ O: Z' [
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...% ?/ x3 q4 t/ v: l7 c
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
; w) j% u- i5 W絕情谷既問題...
6 L8 ]+ m- j) X/ v, u  m; r如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
4 t& G6 K5 P, j如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

3 M: h4 s2 B& }/ D; ^4 a& X殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好/ m8 Z. r: L  _% S8 U+ K7 Q& T5 y
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生# ~( h( q1 ?  i9 ?/ V
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩+ V( v- e+ K. ]2 N
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
. t! z$ z- {+ M3 C7 [' I其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
  S* r' ^, k, P9 G
  y+ _4 K5 N  D2 ]9 x; L. o5 ~我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
0 Y# C3 c4 f' q" C& W  S4 O5 i不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:4 l' N. ^. c& L% k0 r; I
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

$ J8 C. l, e! h5 `4 p8 [: k8 a- o! Z! Y
5 X* B- K2 U6 }+ J3 khaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣& l3 ^7 _; ^, l
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
. W7 T# L3 k; s& n( T. h
# T1 E- i. C% _) t+ r' e# a, I2 @p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
1 Y4 v/ ?2 ~3 Q* Y# Vyes, my reason is helping more
+ v" D- Y! z' m( rfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!) \( q/ t8 ?8 k. F
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child! m3 w8 P7 {2 N. t
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
$ i  g! D8 Q# H+ ]also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!/ U3 }1 f. R6 p' n
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!9 ~! F# n$ D" x: j9 d* K4 e% }
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~( a1 z- {* z9 N$ `5 M9 K
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~/ p5 R$ {- u7 P/ T6 t
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~- _2 r; j, l/ r  e; i- o
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
* r. g" _) V7 Y/ A  \即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~! R8 b" R/ H/ B3 E5 [1 J8 }
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~- m4 T( F) a8 L) d. M
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~8 [# m  e3 D' H2 @. r) D
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）