data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07e1e/07e1e63996ad98132e371ace14df4d98a3af28b8" alt="Rank: 2" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07e1e/07e1e63996ad98132e371ace14df4d98a3af28b8" alt="Rank: 2"
- 帖子
- 1232
- 精華
- 2
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 22
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
8#
發表於 2005-5-27 11:11 PM
| 只看該作者
for a couple:
; x- w, h* x: K8 n3 s0 [) O" ~
2 O k/ p2 k( n8 Lfor my view, i agree concubinage b4 getting married, Y% y9 Q( M& [- i5 _$ w( ]. Q
because u can know much more about her/his daily life and comportment(also for them to know these about u), living together, nothing can be suppressed so easily6 j, q( ~: @& [& j7 T
so that u can know much more about she/he is suitable for u or not
4 e* H- x0 L1 U' v- }9 ^avoiding divorse which will come out much more serious and trouble problems!!!0 @, v% Y$ d8 `9 H' A* r* Z
) d+ j2 P+ i |0 zafter comparing with the moral and rational analysis, i think actuality is much more important!!!* c& [% w; v, r# a3 e
( B; }" V+ j5 Lhowever for fds, i think no, i have tried to live with a guy at hall
3 E$ j$ W( U6 Y1 d& Xliving together with fds really a trouble, because must need to stand for other bad point
^+ F* _3 ?6 M2 ieasily getting worse for yr relationship$ m0 ^0 E* j4 f9 v, k
/ w( e2 a1 e/ Q9 S
[ Last edited by jason williams on 2005-5-27 at 11:14 PM ] |
|