Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
+ C3 w7 b2 [/ L2 A5 e& T1 t3 }, e4 ?0 s
+ B  S" }+ M# @8 L; N& n$ y1 Y& A
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

# i) [% X7 D0 l! L! y; x% h, G
1 ?2 Y4 e2 @/ B5 l, o) `
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
5 S0 a) J5 K3 ^$ [7 a1 u# E* B! G; O0 Q# G7 D) Z/ w

# E. }' a" l" p8 D! rIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

2 R+ ]$ G& E9 O8 A$ z0 |) F: d* e0 ^' A( C) r
oh really...# t0 u  v/ u4 ]
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
6 f! f3 W9 Z4 ]7 ni didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
7 E, L, y; X/ y: i7 `0 D- g' [8 l; p0 G2 Y
當然這是個假設性問題
8 [$ K$ t7 B) x6 U0 L但將人數倍大  u9 o7 Z4 J% T& g
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個3 S! P# T6 h* [" s$ l3 l, C
(情況可以換作其他)2 n' J: G! ?3 T  ^% g- [+ l
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...* G  l& x, I3 m/ x5 N
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...9 g, Y3 q+ n0 R/ c( I% a. @7 m6 ^
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:& Z; ~7 V7 z' a3 r
絕情谷既問題...
  e  X- E: W& Q如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...2 `$ Y! z5 {5 \4 I: R4 O
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

. Q5 v' n. }$ C$ L/ D3 G! {8 k殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
. L, i! p& ~6 b! @6 T於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生' X: d9 C2 r6 Q0 |
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
* A. S8 g% x; H7 }( W4 M7 H好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢, V' N* d* j( X7 [9 c, h9 w$ f
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
6 H, C0 @, B0 F* c0 l3 c: [- i
. k; A, P  e$ B7 ^! y# z1 q我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命2 r) a/ G; Y8 U8 ?: L
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:' A9 v/ j% g' G: f8 }8 a# R9 |
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

8 L5 E, r0 O& m0 E4 X9 u
4 J9 p, t, l" W) g6 @# ]9 Ghaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
$ F. ^9 Z1 ^, F9 ~你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....6 g. S% h- n  A, v$ U
5 ?( t; l8 e/ k/ S
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
# ^4 p2 I* v% H9 B7 N- F1 i% Kyes, my reason is helping more" H" T2 x/ t" n7 k6 p
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
- z6 ^% \5 |1 Eif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child' T7 x( V8 V8 |' }" W9 p# m$ Z
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?+ l$ O/ |& C# N5 {! \$ S" s$ Y5 D
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!1 U9 A/ G1 h7 e; F( Z& D: l; j
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!+ h, k2 Z3 c$ d  l1 l6 Y) ], q* q
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
* e( R1 z4 z" ~) h當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~/ H+ K6 Z  D1 ~9 L/ M, f& M
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
5 N6 B& v* i) t, K- G正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
! S( |) H* \( v5 ]即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
* J4 m- G- y7 W! D) G2 Q我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~' v1 j% r. K, N& ~2 q4 d
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~) U/ U7 h/ E. |; }2 W# l# S
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）