Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
2 o- U3 D" k/ O$ m. O* w! u2 N0 f% F1 n; s7 w* A& P% b1 W3 B
/ c$ A0 Q" i& i( ~7 G
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

" J7 J' v3 T( m3 l# f6 }$ ?) w' C
: ?6 @# p2 r) ]
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:: b; J0 @9 h0 s5 p0 o# N

* R4 U: L# g: N8 q# t& Y8 t$ Y8 l% w; q* _
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

5 z9 X8 n2 z1 m5 w$ c7 D1 P

5 z' q5 {& K; T- e; J+ |" soh really...
& h$ y) `) D, a; Chahhaa, thx a lot^^"
! O' x' X6 o; M& \' T' pi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
8 Q5 S, t8 K) y0 ?* N! m( v& Y
$ f! c1 ]9 ]( g* l6 ]當然這是個假設性問題1 l. w, b$ f( m! f  ^# H) J
但將人數倍大
* }' F) n6 G1 a5 Q% H4 Q例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
; h* J1 i7 a% d(情況可以換作其他)
/ {# q+ ^( [/ g% z# Y8 v始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...+ Y" B: `' ?; o
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...6 x) D2 b4 J* Y) I; h' T$ B" q
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
% R/ U8 ]: A# F/ U絕情谷既問題...6 t5 {& |8 F# y' t
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...4 c3 a' ~8 w1 J0 s6 p9 S7 W' i# `
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

4 m+ H# u" I' {" ]$ n1 k殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
: b4 V9 x: [0 F+ u於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
9 {7 }# h8 A  I) V0 h但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
: r# y8 b+ K! j* }* V好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
& v( k$ a, i1 k, c( c$ Q其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢+ c! J9 N+ }! t, T# \7 r3 B2 n5 G

& s" V; b' k: X) a3 r4 W& \! I  o我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命1 o$ d0 [( W8 x% \
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
0 S- I* @2 a+ e% g其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

+ W% {6 R, r# Y

. o+ ?: c: V! Z# d3 ]5 fhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣; A# f/ h  h$ {+ W9 Q1 g0 ?+ ~
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....8 _: E  R  H6 u, l
. V% x4 x' r! v! J/ [
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
1 g# u0 r8 W! D5 u) Qyes, my reason is helping more( W  g6 x1 K; J6 J; H- d* d
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
6 s- \" j. ]. n) L- e/ Zif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child6 b2 w3 f9 C, q/ P, v  t1 ?
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
" `  H3 C0 S  F3 s& E. aalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
) T! @0 @7 k" }: l$ M1 Omay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!9 w' c$ r0 K6 K4 b9 S
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
1 V+ C; v5 m1 y+ G! T7 L. _當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~$ s; C4 B" p5 j6 u- h5 C" e0 B8 i4 Z; d
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
% o2 u- Y7 u/ Z, c- O正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~' X5 g+ g) O0 _/ i: B
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~2 g: [* B6 K6 I1 W# z. [! |
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
. ~" }9 z% Z& v" W7 F+ t( _( c- [但如果o係當時o既情況中~~2 c8 c& N3 y4 |5 t* I: i
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）