Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:  {- ?1 S1 y& X6 Z; K& w1 O, c% i
; H  `/ j8 [1 u# p; t. y

1 P6 M' c7 y( N! ^. F我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

- S: M1 j9 g% J4 C4 V7 g+ i( X! ]: {4 T( A% ]$ j- k! _$ B
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
: c9 V$ e/ `, I* a$ i! [; o* R8 z& h. h

! O* Z5 O+ `3 p1 AIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

3 r; _( S) D5 L/ @. h9 s" l
# V4 ]' L4 R, |7 c
oh really...# ], |+ a/ x! M8 a4 j
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
$ ~  p+ ?2 v( \/ Vi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題: {+ N$ ]# W7 Q1 W* e
8 A5 G3 v! ]' Q
當然這是個假設性問題
9 G9 T* y- F  l1 m" \4 R但將人數倍大5 \7 H7 S9 e3 g7 `4 {; f
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個4 Q* n! q& {0 ]- X$ [" H
(情況可以換作其他)
- m0 o, d. X3 j5 ^' u2 ?始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
6 g4 j( p; @+ s* v' B如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
# P. F2 D6 C+ h* ~如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
: B5 p7 i8 o7 X' }# q( U絕情谷既問題...
, G$ ^- R+ x# ?# ~* A# `如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...% ^' S1 U* w; C7 L8 |8 @2 N
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

, w  y% I. k) r6 P3 h" ?殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好$ c0 J8 t; J+ x% J, e: H0 ~
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
0 d3 ~5 H+ Y" R, W7 G/ i  |3 I( |但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩* A' W2 l* }& V+ C. F- I# W! D
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
" s- D6 ]  T  p; n$ h( c其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
! L( C- d: q: g. I
0 @2 P, q+ B. j' B; E( f0 t我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
( n# A+ f. C+ N$ d不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:4 Z* R6 ]& g/ K6 N
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

  @5 L, `7 c& k4 t8 v* l6 y( ?) n0 \+ w8 N% }. s6 X9 H$ t
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
3 O/ U& f6 ~- ?0 N" R7 e你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....: K0 g: e8 b: q

0 N, K. ~/ \$ p$ A7 y! v5 y: jp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
& Q# ~: z! Z/ [) h' P: h, yyes, my reason is helping more
8 Y! _: o/ _7 Dfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!3 ~4 Y# c/ t2 n, ^7 X/ g
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child& C- E& x$ s3 w# F7 C
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
2 r" R6 n5 `8 M' \6 p/ t5 W9 aalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!8 c4 X5 J/ u# M2 m, L6 Y) q
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
  V+ d3 A2 [" f  Gunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
+ {8 F3 ^4 ^( m  x當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~. p* f  _8 d& M; ~
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
4 T% z$ C  L5 ]0 j- R正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~% V* i( t& H1 ^  M! I% c
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
2 S/ N5 i. `, M( s; W1 x7 u我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
" U* j! K5 w4 e0 m但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
- `7 B, B3 ^* P6 E我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）