Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
2 \& x: y2 ~  n& q/ [: @% Z( @4 [% H& X8 ^; M# [4 I

, M; P1 F* m3 t' h' j$ z5 _0 k# c我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

; k0 C  p% w% c6 j  y3 t* Z

+ x" i. T6 s# [6 xIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
. L1 v! N9 {2 Y1 m8 C, Z4 f) L4 m# P4 n, I1 E4 I

9 R" l0 E# ~6 `7 qIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

* E- x% F) q# S6 P7 f# f# ^9 Q/ y' y# ]' c( G$ i
oh really...
+ N$ ]8 }" _, w" p( w# Nhahhaa, thx a lot^^"3 u1 L/ l* g3 N2 Z
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題3 j3 A  S6 h5 j- J
. ]. s) V/ a: i: n3 G" W7 `% [( @
當然這是個假設性問題1 m8 a% q9 r9 y5 h* ^, \% ?
但將人數倍大
1 r& }! \5 y2 t+ z% n; }5 r例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
, r+ A6 V6 e) Z- l( D(情況可以換作其他)0 S# f# r" u, ]  i$ D5 M
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題.... f. n' E" @: H' a
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...4 U9 X" i, X" z
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:, v, \1 z! ~4 X& `& _; h
絕情谷既問題...
; K' j+ C) n! L5 W. V" x8 `如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
6 p6 A& n0 L& x: z9 z* B如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

" y* n6 Y  L# ^$ i4 j! i殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
& }# J* y7 T1 d6 A1 n3 r1 N7 D8 o於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
9 i- K6 d; g9 B! a0 b7 b# M5 {( R但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩: Z# h5 M# S0 Z, r. j; Q
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
6 Q8 c3 I6 P, h其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢+ ?/ i' [7 G! ?

# R" Z5 _! H7 x& S# o我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命/ T7 E" u1 w  J# m+ F+ e; y& B3 |% H
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
" X/ c7 g( |0 {) }  W其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

1 D# A& T* w2 C1 N) x6 U
: g# t1 w, V! z" B4 y6 }
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
+ `- U- `% `9 m1 T0 _9 `( p你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
# A" j( G4 m; ~3 ]* V( U4 i7 K$ Z
9 M  u) h% e! @4 s9 ]/ j6 `9 fp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child' ^) D, Y8 Z, ^/ Z
yes, my reason is helping more9 k% ]- Y: |9 A/ l
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
7 L" F2 m( K' e( Q- O1 Pif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child4 [. A, n9 V8 f. v. y
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?" M: c3 h5 J  l
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
0 c* Z: x& q; `- gmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
% R/ O+ {$ ]3 w& \! Cunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
4 e$ g' w7 \2 t3 V! U當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~5 B6 D/ G; P* ?$ z( x
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~4 X& \2 L. [, J8 F- d9 H8 Y' r
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~( Z- H1 Y8 N1 _% I( W9 n$ ^
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
, J0 G3 S& Z2 H) U% K3 P9 ?% O我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
2 B' o1 V, I, u但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
3 D- b4 A) A  G& E我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）