Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
: y# w$ ~4 Z- R( P0 J) K% W) `( S9 @( e
" R. ]( i# w6 l9 X! j& ~9 t! b. m, n
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

0 |+ k7 f; S& u8 @+ y  A- [/ D- |  a3 g  b/ p0 Y4 L% e
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:, k  F% _9 O% j. q

$ S. ]5 H# d" b$ m. s
& c3 _! d2 z, p7 sIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

3 t  v+ M/ e( p: V- O7 p

& \5 @: V/ O+ h& |4 E  X; R1 @oh really.... Q9 D+ Q4 s; c5 J+ T& C
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"7 `$ W0 o% g0 p5 F0 g3 T* y
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題* |* W8 B- \6 m- S

5 w8 W0 P9 k2 N! F$ ]6 X當然這是個假設性問題
8 G3 v7 I0 t+ s2 }  _但將人數倍大
! }6 S( Y1 ~: a, U! j* [8 f例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個& r! w& D. b  K! Y
(情況可以換作其他); h/ I: j2 `1 r3 C- b  |& I8 X* w- q( r
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...+ W0 M% |9 t) c3 A
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
* x. g' M, p) F( S' R: z$ @如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:1 m5 p: @( Y' ?1 h7 s! D: u/ i
絕情谷既問題...6 C9 N/ I2 u& c
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
% c/ b* @) m( u' l+ E# e: ~如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

4 @0 R- N8 U4 H  |# H  _, a
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好7 O3 J3 I& E  r! Q
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
4 v! B7 h9 @% i; X' N  a9 s0 w但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
4 F* u- z+ Z: K, C: d. N" O好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
' Y4 u. [* G6 F2 K3 b其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢8 a/ [4 z8 i9 l" R3 _! U
: m( [& b& v: o9 X; u5 E
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命+ n' I+ D3 C! V# U+ x: i7 d2 M
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
+ ^2 ^' Q) a) f1 D& C1 I' l其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

4 p) m1 {" e, A/ T+ T- ^5 f
8 T! a* V2 r$ R0 q( G0 e8 f! J$ ~haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣3 Q$ G, G$ y" n0 ]  I# s9 L+ E
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
9 y0 D8 S' T/ {: v1 O! b
4 c# |0 R; p! M7 x8 Ip.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
# c& O/ }: W! U5 o" Yyes, my reason is helping more
' d% _/ X- t" R, t3 ]for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
( H, _2 N& r0 c" p: Vif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child( g# A5 M( l, W8 T3 P2 e
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
. H* X1 z; v7 galso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
" x4 S1 @9 S0 Amay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
! w0 J9 e  |" Yunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~0 S5 M/ l# K! {# M! w$ t) T, o
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
% A; ]9 E" i! H0 @9 [6 o0 _我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~- ?% v: F6 @: l7 _+ X
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
* h8 n  l3 N; \! E) R& }9 u( {即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
( u2 R* u; ~2 T( W我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~6 O" r# U! a+ H% ?( K3 W6 m1 M. I
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
' m9 R) d. }2 a我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）