Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
( z6 u0 m/ ]& j" J3 B5 M! f! \; H  c- {( f4 t; l
+ I. K/ C( v1 q2 |  f2 [. [
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

4 y  H; |* u; G! r. {- ^2 d, F- |& L0 X% ?( t6 z
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:) L' ~6 ]5 Q' I- E

- D0 u( W+ }# T: a% p
0 l9 [; r5 q( @7 j8 c. fIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

# z- u1 Z5 ]$ }0 s) p6 z
; W( j: B) C+ e$ t6 a6 I
oh really...
: l- j. K" P! q! e5 chahhaa, thx a lot^^"
3 e; L6 k6 r0 @% zi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
; Q0 D& z4 s  g. B
% Z9 p& j+ g' n; D當然這是個假設性問題4 E/ V9 q* Z- b' H6 y! h4 e% j
但將人數倍大
$ [) Z+ [3 Z  S例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
0 r9 l+ H4 |- X2 _) w) s  S(情況可以換作其他)! C# N5 t1 h  ~, P; o
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題..." v; B* v8 F+ x. `. M8 n
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
& H, H+ N. ?+ Y8 G5 H; K* E  Y如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
- _. C, i" L0 m絕情谷既問題...+ b* |+ g0 k8 Q4 P  N  [
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢.../ `! Y" \5 y8 m, I9 E4 O: I$ l
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

2 ?- t6 I/ D6 {殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好7 A7 r- t$ S: j2 Z' _& s
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
. d$ K+ G) G# ?% _8 L6 v8 C2 f但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
1 N( K' c; z# n5 w5 q3 y: w, Z好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
1 L: q+ _$ n+ l2 X2 w+ c其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢- `* S# y/ }# O. U0 p

% F' p* K9 O9 Y我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命# ]/ Z& Q7 x. E
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
. [1 W& l' ~/ U" i5 q* V其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

! G) f# Y0 _7 v, W5 z* W/ K: \
5 K: _* Y7 e) m( m# y% ~5 ]haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
) K  k! d2 S% x( v' x- T你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....2 |% @% c! c/ ]1 }! @( X! d  s

2 n# r3 [1 k- |/ A) [p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
$ Y' I: t& l& b" Byes, my reason is helping more" k1 y, s0 F4 t8 z! Q8 y
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!: z4 ?* X# E4 Q* \" D4 i
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child- \$ M3 K" k* L- h2 e$ [
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?! e7 D3 I! Q' z+ f5 b* b( _0 t
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
" _2 v$ A$ {+ W& }6 D7 G, F; gmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!1 q  f4 b, ~' Z4 S6 M
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
! k: a; X* h( L  o* m當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
2 e. [( |/ D8 Q# f) o; U我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~0 X* y8 f; q2 x$ ]
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~4 I7 v* m# L3 n* }' `
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~3 D7 ~. h" ~7 N7 K, y
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~8 s/ p% v! z: [2 }/ T3 R
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
; [% p. Y6 c0 E  f2 D我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）