Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:* k$ o& }7 D' M! R

& T* H9 V4 u( @6 K1 \
. l- E3 f  h5 p  y- U我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

# m0 J- q. P& U0 R+ r: C

8 L2 c  h6 h4 QIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:, K7 D5 ~- ^& @6 b1 |( ?

5 H: j% H: d! H4 a$ s
) W5 @8 o7 q# hIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

, J$ ]) b4 H/ N4 B) i$ C
4 ~$ K5 l+ I# L: L+ j( k8 f- e2 F' |
oh really...1 p; u4 {% W! }& v2 h
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
, P: d" \' ], X3 si didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
; M! z3 b2 Q. q2 i3 S6 A3 r# t: V9 W- o
當然這是個假設性問題4 z8 q2 h) J& Y! Z4 x& p- v
但將人數倍大
! j4 n- D& i6 Q3 C3 N0 e& R  t例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
7 W9 P; q! Y; k/ t  n' v& I5 `" u(情況可以換作其他)
( f# z6 O. v9 c$ w& U1 i- K  q始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...: C. V* s: W+ \$ P0 e( ?( z
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
9 K1 e" d4 \) s- u如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:& }4 j) d# M  b  W6 Y9 }
絕情谷既問題...+ X! p. D6 d- Z1 y
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
/ h: r9 _9 c# g9 f- ^3 p如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

" o7 @% m: H" d! F% d/ F# @2 j殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好* Z; W9 v7 o6 _/ ?
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
' c  R; I! O* E- f# M' H8 [但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
: q5 N" M8 Q2 V$ r0 l好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢% A6 p! B3 u. v2 h( d
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢5 k) V0 T; S$ e! \8 ]2 ^

$ A- N: e7 I3 t5 ?( C/ M我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
: _$ Q( I0 E, t7 g( U5 t& y( n不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:- `9 H7 }0 O" U9 s* W- u6 z
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

, A# i5 s8 [! D: o3 w- g% x; }. _
# S& S% i* U! M" }$ y' j) Y5 Mhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
  P0 ?$ @" U/ Y0 z你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
8 P) R" ]$ A# o% K4 ^/ @! E0 X$ m, t, n3 v% }4 j5 p
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child$ J" R0 q8 Q! d7 O1 v+ t
yes, my reason is helping more
- ]# D# {9 [2 C( _% V" Ffor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!+ L& x2 M% h- d, |
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
  X+ z. x) F2 g) \3 R. B5 m) bbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?9 o1 ]) Q! m" l6 i
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
* m3 B$ T$ w/ R5 k# W3 Wmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
4 j6 B; Q# L+ k% X9 |3 q4 f$ uunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
3 j% I' Q7 ~9 f7 y- P7 m+ s當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
0 @6 O) G9 y7 @, e1 R2 g7 `, r' c1 k我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~: k4 _, x, f0 d! `% p
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~3 U8 W$ x( m  e  F' R
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
9 U7 P- d' F; [3 c我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~. }# @: z4 r$ a/ Z# I2 n
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
7 O2 J/ n, ?/ g$ R4 m2 j# w我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）