Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
$ z; _: x6 W% e+ i
3 T, [/ ~- u3 |( {7 z! P+ h0 U7 d& g; u, o8 {) V# p
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

6 b" X8 D2 W) N# \
- R$ G  ~: ~7 l; _! ~, H
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:2 J0 C0 s8 ]4 Z9 h* `
& e6 O+ z" T% Y0 U+ Q
* Y6 |8 ?" X  B9 g7 H$ N5 n# \5 D
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

" ?" m0 m: b- ^5 J
" z* {# ~' i# `0 J1 T4 H/ I* z3 u
oh really..., C: |9 M8 }. n; d1 P3 Z
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
1 h  R0 Q) G. A( j- i# Yi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
# m0 l' \& I) i' l; ~* K8 B% X, ~7 q
1 s! Q; R8 Y% A4 K當然這是個假設性問題5 @( m/ H6 e, ^8 l1 G& D
但將人數倍大5 O4 _" W5 g# h) `. R" b$ V9 E
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個. }$ r2 f6 J& b# u9 t6 |9 E
(情況可以換作其他)8 [, n+ h5 [' d& [
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...+ ?$ w! n. m) X+ c
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...9 X/ c: J3 Y1 k
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
; J& S( B3 o. M2 @  B% d1 [- l絕情谷既問題...* K- M4 C8 k  l6 f  T8 d/ h) s
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢..." u$ L* D- R6 Q4 j1 M' Y' _! N
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

9 S1 ]- w6 i6 ?$ @殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好5 z2 h6 H1 B  L, `8 u9 [. T( d
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生. T! g, S9 q$ x% W. w: L. e4 d
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩% D: L! a1 n* ]% f: q7 s- Q% B
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
2 h, H9 j; C* U7 c, t) l5 f5 }其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
6 h; u# z; ~; K; G0 G- A2 l
0 J/ d: U( z8 _7 x我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命* y* ^- z  r$ }1 U8 X% F: |" L
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:4 q* }& L5 p5 n, Y
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

9 {+ c# Q+ r3 N5 x

. f( b9 Q1 c3 l. Ohaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣* i) C5 z( y7 z% K
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....) ^6 q; o9 O+ U6 _: G/ m

5 i+ [: A0 ^5 N) I0 ]  b8 N+ zp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
4 ^" U* V' X# i( D  G; o0 R$ ?yes, my reason is helping more1 |) p$ t8 s# M/ \. D! o5 ?, d# r/ O
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
# f  ^, K# ~( J$ _* }8 e. hif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
* e$ B$ F$ c" H1 N% u( z" z9 zbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?$ r+ u( x- L7 i
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!" q$ z# l) L& Z* i  t3 j
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
5 }1 c4 W# f, G1 s2 }: Dunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
2 M: l$ e8 n& z9 a- X當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
9 i. H# B: N; r- S我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~+ q* c3 t* o) J2 L
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
% i0 V! _$ z1 g  M  q2 x  V即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
( n# `0 q  X; l$ W# F我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
) ~) G4 H7 o' A2 S  t/ w7 ~但如果o係當時o既情況中~~: Z/ B$ }' G$ U" V! c6 L" v$ `+ D# ^
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）