Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
6 e: m' \1 W  d1 X( C( M+ o5 T0 J) `& J  {0 P# a. W
, q$ |/ L! {- g! r
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

1 \6 h2 M" t) [" O

% [1 _0 v1 r( l7 @In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:- o" |; Q$ ?4 m$ P

% n/ L! B! i! a/ f" @& P
) i* W5 W" C$ ]In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

" y4 N1 s  B. {) x0 k" Y- B7 V/ y3 ~
oh really...  Z/ t6 @, L* s4 O% i: D4 i# R
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
( |( J0 w6 {$ k* Q  {i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題# z1 }9 {) V" b, {! V

: w1 D+ ]8 p; D) H8 A' N/ x+ K當然這是個假設性問題
! U: A$ x+ Q' l但將人數倍大1 p- A$ Q2 j) Z9 \2 S' t
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個2 e/ Q0 P) V1 H$ a
(情況可以換作其他)/ a% n8 Z  c: Q$ B# S
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
: @5 {1 i! _  ~4 [6 Q( K如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
/ p3 w' i: o2 m4 \如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
) v% M9 Z0 ~/ E/ L7 }$ g絕情谷既問題...$ Z+ z  ?) ~3 T" ^8 \- ?! T- S
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...7 G" P0 y. M7 ]) |2 m* T
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

% J% s1 M( j8 t" S& l
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好) \1 q1 e6 ~, y. e3 G0 i
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
/ m5 S* r/ H( R7 E% _但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
# f6 [" n, X2 t& s& x# c$ g好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢, j' Z, B3 H& a1 E
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢/ h8 F; l7 c% v: q

# m9 m; E/ ^0 g7 z我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
% e0 f! H9 R# c! `! f. r不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
1 M/ X( H9 q6 n+ ?- m7 W其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

! h( K7 ]3 P: N* A
* Y- ^( n3 V, K. [* k5 K  ^haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
2 p: N* [. a) f  C4 H$ Y4 O" d你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....( ^! Z/ H) N* y( |
. q! }4 Q9 G0 @  U5 s9 Z% A4 c' t/ x
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child' L3 I+ J# k" m1 Q6 r: f( J
yes, my reason is helping more
" a3 O) _' y: H, `6 `for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!' Y) U& I, V( c1 u% {. {7 a
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child5 z8 b7 P3 ^0 ?, e) s
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?5 \. f: E1 |4 p1 r, b+ g9 P7 h
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
) a% w/ M- x6 `1 a8 lmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
7 l# ]; t3 X# z# {under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~; G* k  _/ r% m; M: [$ y5 l
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
* }3 y4 j2 E7 U2 }# l我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~" T8 z( T- F9 L) J/ F4 Q
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
$ K" c0 p" l8 [8 c; T+ C- o, G+ L' Y2 h即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
  u8 Q- F2 p* j6 k: R2 }我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~. d2 O4 L9 [" @. P* z# j5 r
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~0 r. p; r- N. B5 M
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）