Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
, b: v8 k0 u6 [& E! w) O5 t
" k* i) Y1 C) V7 a2 @% R' C( U9 U4 |8 }$ }. `0 q+ j
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

! g+ V) r* r8 ~# C7 i5 L6 R' r9 I/ s' r2 W7 _: @9 f
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
7 M$ D7 B8 R' z* E( q5 J1 S4 N! ~' b+ i1 f4 ^0 C( c
  I. g/ i  s( r$ B. \/ R8 k
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

1 ~3 Z$ i9 X* h3 b2 d7 q8 x, i1 o) Y
oh really...
8 a" ]8 N; Y7 |; Shahhaa, thx a lot^^"; ^) P5 b: m( |: @6 t$ ~
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題5 s6 p+ ~  q+ \; ~/ W

0 ?* h! w" c8 S5 R5 N當然這是個假設性問題; t$ O0 p" ~+ M$ `
但將人數倍大5 D0 q+ `' n0 q' ]* U  ?: t
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
4 W" M1 J- Z, S(情況可以換作其他)  y7 x( ~+ E& d0 ?5 v. K1 {! O4 x
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
; i4 n. `0 N/ |$ ?8 Q如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
8 W" c& o$ A2 M. K! [0 A) ^3 A如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:& @* F' r/ g  `/ ~3 h
絕情谷既問題...
% N! [6 Y5 M0 j, N! G* P如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
# }2 Z6 L8 Z7 L0 e6 M4 B1 s9 _& g如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

, b; Q" G- r1 e6 v  {* n1 u0 |殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好0 w. o3 N5 t; M4 H, ^; f2 w
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
, [3 P' j3 n% y7 F但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
7 \8 |7 V2 q$ g6 k! h1 R好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢% p5 Y0 X3 X/ S/ |& {+ i
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢$ R* a& B; h: m; A: Y2 y
7 D7 e- M( T* X$ t2 @
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命$ W7 t( M6 N, ]% k: P6 o3 P. K
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
9 n. B5 k3 N( W8 ?( ~: i: R( [其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

0 c# L% K0 x4 T% M3 G, E; S
; g6 `! d) a8 {" @) z1 m
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣- x( ]; R7 L+ E
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
' W& E& ^# e( `) Y' A( f' y
, u. ?# t% D" w8 z, Gp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child+ ]/ d( A8 e# t3 n6 ?
yes, my reason is helping more
2 C; }+ o. k3 Y$ F) H3 `for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!) U. \% t' r3 r# |' c
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
2 t! E! j: X6 m  y- h8 o. hbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?/ f+ _, M4 K8 C  k, [: Z
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!2 [" z* I. r' C2 m+ N7 F
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
4 B, Z8 A% Z0 z# M+ Aunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~2 m1 H" O  G$ [  N
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~: q" o4 X; O$ I; n" v
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
6 L1 ~; p, S! q& h正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~( Z/ L5 V2 R  ~  F
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
9 \1 D( P. i( P0 a我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~3 r, ^6 Q# l1 d# a
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~- @& j  [* @1 j! v
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）