Rika

由最好排到最壞! K1 t/ m# R. q; F
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong% j- v! _. E  O8 W
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount8 a  A, \& T! k( e7 y8 S; H
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her8 `, n" o0 @1 C6 H4 Y8 C( z
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure: N9 S* e* z7 J. o. l
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:* j' W1 s" n" g1 g, L0 h
+ o- `5 {/ a* j" K) r3 ]0 c; R
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
5 _) |9 `* u8 w9 q9 H) t9 @
* K" D9 ?. l5 v' d/ }- Z" {S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
3 ^& o) x) o7 v     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
5 V* G0 y0 N: h# X4 b+ D- J* ]7 L
* e9 r4 ]# {& O# kB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做. U8 G1 V* r) K" L5 V9 w1 n# \- h
3 B4 D8 y8 L; v* Z# d- [- t
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志) d0 ^$ R- S& Y; s- ?" n* V. j

: \7 ~6 T" d' hF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
1 c% i; R) N. J3 M7 w8 w) x     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好7 g. W/ \, y8 }0 |  X

9 S) F1 V8 G  p% v& y7 \[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案, N( L9 X0 ^2 I, C+ z
而家答多次9 i  g2 q3 P! p
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽' E' l) b$ f% _/ m( {
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架* R; K: m+ T3 T* D
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢, @- Q" c4 B6 h+ a- n
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
. p  ~+ G8 {* M- G7 c) Xm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
( [( w3 s3 [# O- {9 o  d3 q+ E* ~3 J5 Y6 ^- V
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
8 b( r- P9 {8 b1 z& K2 u6 x5 bF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度& G  K  D% k; o3 h6 \
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
% y6 C  Y& \' [1 s/ `S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢% D- }) [' L: s: V1 C
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞' M  c4 q; e6 X0 J
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
1 G- `9 t+ u6 t- ]4 _7 q' zS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取3 ?$ W: E/ ~; S/ [' x
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
# i/ `: y# m* {+ ^- |L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
- O, N: S, X  |. J) N5 HB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
( W4 @# d5 M7 v# @8 T! F6 p  _0 Z/ J. i- I/ T( B
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:7 u7 N) P* g) Z, b" E
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
' t# x& ^. m, ^3 R2 k  D) GB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
0 M  Q9 W, G% w, D% N3 DS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
: M) g  m: V  {2 X; z/ p+ MF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方, u& K' M9 p4 w- o7 d
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

. R# g9 J* u6 e0 {8 ]* M  |3 _- W6 O5 |
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
- s% y2 B! D3 K5 f9 ^
8 S5 y% n2 D+ L+ _& g" K* hB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  $ E+ S" l' ~) ?  E1 {. A* i

' L- l- U6 p  E+ m; b% n/ v9 PS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
& ]9 p5 ^, G# r* s) t' D: ?& u3 c# \6 b$ e
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome ; T+ k) `" U% e5 k4 P, \

7 L2 P* J# C9 y* {% S8 ~5 U! rM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......: `5 t- W, r1 E) O
8 L. T' \) f4 q  ^6 i9 j+ Z% f) W
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
+ p' ?6 t  Y* I# H+ A  bM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
4 T( d2 I' X- n8 m& GL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點5 t$ \* u# t) R( ]
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
/ [& b) Z; f. I- \( ]( l) W; T+ d6 [& H8 `2 d( H
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
, \" [1 D% q& T有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，! x7 K. z! D0 W# ~+ J3 [/ K
由最好開始排起既話，) p! l7 d5 `# g- a. y0 _
L B M F S 啦，: r" Z; J* v/ K$ G6 V

2 D* o  C: z. d! T, e其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
- D* X/ m9 C% W! n* D& C7 w5 `! B但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
. c0 J" D0 v" B9 P9 N如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？9 P, N6 K8 G' E4 l; Z8 j% w# S
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。# ^/ x6 o  \: U9 Y5 Q7 f+ q

; \* C2 N: ?# p# _0 }/ W而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，, k% E! G+ b5 u
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
# t* A: m+ ?3 o7 H* C2 j8 u明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。: f0 X) Y$ G) I: x
: y1 m7 x$ U( r! x5 @* \6 u
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
6 y9 P) d! N# B M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，$ a* z1 `) n3 n$ v' `* R0 |
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，* \: ~/ y5 a. D- C
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
0 U( O0 ^0 G6 y" v# |; c/ N- m M 都可算壞了。
/ x7 L3 J" H0 P% N/ X* g* Z1 Y
  ?6 e$ c# J0 ~+ Y" F F 呢個人仲掂，
2 m  H/ c- F1 [0 }) c8 g知道既唔等於要講，
" Z9 q" A) [4 \8 u3 I如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
8 X1 h+ J; Y7 S: K% t& F4 S我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。! r7 m& _# n1 @' n
, X+ M, k: v, @& W9 ?
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
+ C0 w4 ^# y' V* t7 e2 N7 D始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
  p; X5 A' l: Q+ H! n) Q$ j1 Z6 C8 z. q

: i( e9 o, ]3 L; Y4 c3 O
5 D4 ]& K( s. {+ r1 @9 Y題外話：
$ \: x9 b& n$ g3 E/ R5 e唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
8 m2 `, T  J+ I" q( w睇到 S 呢條友，8 H+ R: ]: w( w& ~
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L& I3 x  V( g" P5 E/ N1 t

* Q" o3 i; T5 s' i. ?' k! b+ KS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
- o% s7 ^( O) t# j* CF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
' c- p* i6 j4 i# `; ~4 W& U2 @M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她6 n6 ~! s5 z/ M5 X5 V5 C
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害: ^6 M& V$ d1 \
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...