Rika

由最好排到最壞) i0 b# }  i6 Z$ C1 j9 ^2 m
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong$ `* a  z  b7 z& R& H  c2 \: s
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount. ?! B* X7 o+ H2 b  W: ?
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her; a0 n8 _& K# w6 l5 q4 p4 P" Q
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
- L8 Y8 j3 R5 y( z/ `( VL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:) W$ P* o( x# ]# l

& Y0 H$ P: _& t3 s) b0 JM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
- o, n; s! d. n7 P' O9 Z
* ?0 a# @2 a0 M# H9 A5 c/ R9 X5 WS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)$ @4 G' j( q- p# O9 P6 V3 K
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
, Q6 A" I3 p- B6 q; ^/ W/ @
6 k: l6 Q8 X2 a# f' ?: Q3 xB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
. w- O2 [' }$ Q4 `; E+ z& l, c% y2 O8 k0 B3 V& h: H" |* N% O
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志/ c- T. G) W3 ?& j6 g- c' I' ~& p
& U$ ?' r. {4 C) s% \) P6 [, V
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
. c( c3 d1 X. l4 k0 N( Y$ o     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
0 U( U  F7 `6 \) W' A/ W; N
) @( t: i1 _0 }: v% X[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
& ~/ r! Q; m9 B; M% Z$ Y& t6 K而家答多次
; g5 D! Z# t9 N( Af: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽' Z. s0 t" L9 ]* e8 `
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架7 I" A) z8 ]1 b0 }3 M' h4 |
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
+ K, h, ?  {. }! _$ \+ zs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.9 ~  z; `  U( i* O4 P
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
" i: n; A. {. Q' L& s4 ~$ ]8 i- n! L% }; l+ y+ O! v. W4 Z
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大# _& w4 f5 ]! K( E4 s
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度+ O8 [- C* {5 E% U/ t. e- {
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
* L1 C) O( Y! w3 f  v' TS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
' b/ W. d8 i0 j2 q( J: WB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞8 D9 T' U. r) b
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
. I% L, }& g2 K% X4 Z2 v# cS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取& h. q3 I. ?5 p
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
8 T6 O& P7 S3 l! ~- Y" ?L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果5 [# r; m; d1 i6 S7 I8 P! R4 a$ ~
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
1 C' \9 R, x7 R; J: h1 U
* R& Z- c$ i( s5 T, X3 [7 j$ V3 D世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
) V7 {6 g4 A) O$ w& D& bL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己- W4 E' z$ S% w0 J' X
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
' o4 c7 s# s. _5 d7 @- nS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件' ?) v: n; a4 k6 s
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
! F) K$ t6 }" v7 wM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

7 v. T6 j8 D3 D7 Y% Y- Y
0 V7 U! D) G& y1 Y; ]
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
' w5 _+ \0 ~- ]2 {# m
* C8 T" q4 o, i8 A) W0 @: n9 [; sB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  8 Z6 P! i, _9 S8 ^, `! [
( T2 x% u2 T) M2 X  ?( u' j: L. Y. M) D
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )$ T5 {/ v" S6 F1 t6 g8 |: G( W

- n2 R1 c: n' W5 zF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
  {* m3 ]( v4 t
! `, c2 X; s" ?" jM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
7 P5 |6 d* Z3 H6 x2 Z& w$ g. _. E' f) E$ v
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge2 X, i) G/ q4 l2 I. B
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢' S0 y, Y9 ^+ L0 Y/ `
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點* ~1 D/ K8 W6 p. l! t
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma- `* }$ T# }2 D7 Z1 b/ C
1 m, T5 x- F9 X+ y$ T1 o
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....  }8 x" v! ]& I1 `8 s" M3 I- F
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
) B! P/ @0 R: \由最好開始排起既話，2 j* m$ k7 }. g0 _9 e
L B M F S 啦，
% t8 n8 S* Y' }
* ?% X7 e4 y$ s7 S: c- v其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，6 G( _1 W8 |' e. \
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
6 g8 H7 _2 @3 ~9 [# E# i# A+ v如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
9 y1 }& A! Q" x/ y& ]4 x6 O$ R& ^又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
9 L: U" O9 f: u
. F. q+ [, V7 Z* S而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
$ N8 c  T6 R2 d- z- o( `所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
4 u1 q0 E8 J: e" A5 k明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
% h7 p2 o& ~* s0 Y5 r1 N' F8 b# B# r- m" K  ^. w  a/ g
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
$ E  s( {. `' e5 v! p; ~. e- B" k M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
& C# u4 K+ X8 h" v: r/ {+ }, a亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，/ X; w" _1 i" ~" @$ |! }2 w
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
. q# }0 d# Q) L( B* ?2 n M 都可算壞了。) l% R- l* A6 r0 l& q/ m2 k% `  Y! B. `
! x# e; O) a# |9 {- A
F 呢個人仲掂，
; x$ U& k4 [0 s  s/ v2 J: v知道既唔等於要講，
" ^. ]# E8 B; V# W如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
& V$ m! \7 t9 |2 B我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。- y2 x+ X8 l( k- S4 y* t

. g( d5 ^1 f; q最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
" `7 i, y, h8 o4 @始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。  D  |8 u1 W2 o# m$ ]6 Q
6 V/ f2 H+ g( r: i3 d. r& w5 D

+ W' b: m# S4 c/ h  S8 c; _
+ j% T, y7 y/ w# ~# {( s* {題外話：: r" S& H% N: [" Z
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
6 ^+ y! w* X) j6 Q- N* V睇到 S 呢條友，" [2 T; z8 Z9 q: }, @" b
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
9 ~. w( W6 c1 }  D+ A1 n& j. C9 A% R" u- _% q
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
8 Y2 M2 \0 F, R+ Q" ~# AF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係2 g( f4 P* j5 h( Y0 {
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她9 ?3 s- t. q$ |! [
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害& z: E" f, ~3 i) N- r' e
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...