Rika

由最好排到最壞+ J. T9 Q5 M6 p, R, y( K
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
9 r1 z& A3 G) }7 f  O, e* IB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount% R1 H. w) @' K
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
7 Z: ~6 I% K9 H/ BM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure9 j$ p+ s8 w/ f7 W# Z( v
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:, v7 m: a* ]1 I- W. X5 `  s' V

$ G% \# F3 D& [0 nM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人" B" N0 K4 W8 l" A

6 T- F) v/ ]8 ?- M, r" US - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
; u6 w* l1 l0 v8 U2 f0 ~. G     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!5 b- ]. E+ ~# k$ F0 h0 H
4 c  v! N, E/ ?9 A; v* A
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
) z) E! r. E6 A! [
7 A1 F" U9 J# S5 @3 r3 c% e  _9 r8 ?L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
8 d' H1 g# ^: f! ~- _* W& r/ y  B1 r- X3 ~
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
) \! i3 N" F- Q: O3 R5 u. M1 p. f     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
1 m- _) b1 t2 K( k* k3 J5 Z
. A9 A- |8 l0 w) v[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案3 h, P' n7 K  o$ i. f. g/ u
而家答多次; k9 n3 m1 @! Y; u8 G; {
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
2 t0 Z4 y$ M1 U% p* V" A/ hl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
, R1 t* Z  l$ }' f2 Gb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢9 ]1 f5 Y% W; a+ H
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.0 ?- N5 b! T' K9 @- e+ m1 m' W" n
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
- ~3 x5 k+ j* c$ o2 i- q$ h1 ?$ _+ i7 P/ D, o
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
1 i( q1 @+ o6 d1 pF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
% e. P# \- D4 W- rM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
! A( e" G5 s& E' L! u5 }S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
- G: W* B  j! P: M* YB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
, L- W7 c2 H; D/ q+ t  _# tF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默", Z0 s3 ~: m* v. _
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取( c2 R; D: t& b2 c$ ~
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
. {9 E, f( M( `5 G8 ^3 M# mL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果9 d+ [# L2 P) E2 [* W9 ?  e
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
) @0 b- w  i+ u- `. }+ n; {) s4 R1 z% @4 m$ a4 [% v
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
- S* c: M+ [6 h- kL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己, t; I/ v* q! ]8 d+ J& n! L
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘  O# j. u  d) q4 m* C+ r
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
, k2 e8 b" \7 B3 s4 o% r- v' gF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
; H& l& R. s/ A' MM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

/ v* c! c* Y- d2 d5 \
0 I; Q4 P7 y4 L+ ` same choices with u , but want to add some comments $ j" |9 ~& t. n: `% Z6 e

' b  l8 a4 B0 x3 K' Q$ O( i* h; N8 iB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  . T$ `& H# M- V* s2 q) ~
& K. q% t/ f7 e# z+ G6 P6 G1 g! X
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
3 K: r; K$ Q2 \) q8 r$ \3 F; Y
0 L% A- J7 ^3 T1 x; xF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
" I1 H5 t9 p! [( _/ T6 E* I: @
4 F$ k3 w' O! I: `4 eM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......& g4 u) t3 L7 q( b: C: c
3 O& p9 Y( \, f( ?3 K# H& p
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge9 i9 W3 v  ^6 F/ d6 Y6 o" D7 @5 F
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
5 J4 M9 Y( i# g& b; Y7 X  j9 B, @L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點) O5 j& R& l4 a1 A6 y" s
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma% j( j$ ], _, E* x
2 j0 c! y& w7 u2 K0 t2 |, P
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....$ }% K8 X- G! L
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
" C' E/ j) ^5 B+ z* R( L" |( A, g9 \+ N由最好開始排起既話，) i3 S$ W# E  J
L B M F S 啦，+ J( R: y* C! L% A/ e7 ^3 k  D
+ B% z6 K7 X  g0 [
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
0 v# C2 u: N) y0 g: e但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
* R9 e, y$ s1 y" m% s7 t4 N) G6 i如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
  n+ o$ s0 F+ u. p# g7 [! i$ G又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。& y, ~3 ^1 G3 k: Z# {

$ t( u8 B% h. x8 a而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，6 R9 A; S! j; j. y$ `- W) u
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
+ J1 Y- L' [/ P6 g1 _" w* o7 }( \明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
% P8 O2 l6 P# ?& ]3 q; ^0 c% r+ Z6 I- U5 p! \. c, W
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
5 `9 x. d! K" v+ a3 E M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
) e1 ?! Z% c( @8 d5 e" d. I2 p亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，( s) s3 m5 g: `
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
/ N+ j# y, `2 j9 S! T M 都可算壞了。
- u# ^0 M- s# l3 d* Q' G! f( u: r
F 呢個人仲掂，% V3 l. L6 t; e( U8 k5 S+ V* M- e
知道既唔等於要講，& H3 M4 `* X/ \* `  |: F
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
3 T0 K$ r; O( J: p6 p1 Z. S我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
& V1 x$ `' Y( S0 G) X+ E4 \8 o% a
. j7 b! S# L" }+ F6 @* [& M- K$ A最衰個個緊係 S 啦，4 p" H# a" O: `
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。* u1 {8 \7 I5 u1 u
' C4 i4 ]; B: j
. T/ S" M& h4 `, t/ x. P$ |5 S
% k/ _5 S' e+ R0 u; b
題外話：
4 ~# z9 s) o' F% C4 ^# d唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，0 w- ]5 y# ~3 r8 ?* u+ Y9 }% F
睇到 S 呢條友，
* X7 V& l8 |9 u. ~# o( `9 p我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
: D; G' j1 X) k: T& g& |" s3 D5 C7 ], d
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!; v; D2 u) M# P: |7 E/ D! u
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係/ X, y- |3 K' m2 N' J: w
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
* \3 i& a/ ]2 v% L( u3 NB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
, T/ }' `8 U; M+ K7 ~L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...