Rika

由最好排到最壞& c5 _1 E: X9 K) T" r4 }' Y
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
5 ^* D$ X$ n7 X/ x  |: ~5 s6 v' ]B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
+ G/ a( e* F% A* XS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
. ~/ A. [) u8 |7 v9 {2 kM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
: f$ U1 `& {0 I6 {6 N/ PL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:6 O& o" q4 H8 E/ q

; M. S! ?0 c* [2 `$ jM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
) C" f. i7 _: g. u" y9 |2 o
2 ?9 `/ |, ~$ q, cS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)( ?; T" J/ q3 d+ i2 C
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!2 K+ ]% |6 o* S0 j" d$ }* s6 z: o
) |1 M& q7 R- r! H  U. M1 S
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做7 L, `9 Y# k! w% J6 d

# j6 E8 s1 X( BL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志8 _2 {+ E9 g+ ]0 L( u4 C/ `

  |8 b$ J& \. _( L7 k  r; L: lF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
" w; M( M0 P+ k7 D( v, d     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
& C  v) J* U  K: o% ]3 p
' F9 H( `9 l. s" @, ~+ O[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
0 H& ]( X& T4 c( p而家答多次  y7 a" t5 H& B
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽, R7 j! R2 k& |; S* N, d0 k
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架; r1 w; q8 X5 v0 U% T5 i" X
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢, P$ Y0 \/ K9 v3 |, S
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
4 B# k; O0 \7 U1 }m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
. k' L' z" k. a3 L* s2 u
4 w# p: q  z6 x, j% zL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大5 K, t5 o/ ^" C# Y1 c
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
( e3 p( o2 Q# s: t) w/ X* p5 pM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
# m) u2 m7 T5 o" o% x% f  HS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢/ ^; w4 R$ s3 E# l' r( f
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
! @& s+ z2 b/ N& V' T% LF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"9 Z0 N: d, q0 G2 D3 o8 w, ^$ U( Q; y
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取1 M- j# A* x# }) n9 W+ p- }5 v  E
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
* F0 Z+ f# D: n' ?0 A5 zL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
% N9 D: s) P& S* ?B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
3 s- c' t8 S, W, a
8 w% P; j3 Y+ E% ]" r. h$ G世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
4 x9 |. n% O! K1 p1 VL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己" W# w7 D! ?% V7 }9 R3 V( o! e; N( Z
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
+ e% s! r: J) ?* aS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件* K6 D; g1 Q7 I! {# t$ d5 x4 R
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方2 I3 |. @: n+ O) x7 Y% m
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

2 {8 Y- |! Q! h: X, F0 ?
# Q: }( O! J+ g2 j+ G9 c
same choices with u , but want to add some comments + J- C" W& C. j% ~

; O2 s4 h# h7 M% K% x, MB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
  [* B& D( L& o: E& Z1 l6 Q8 H8 l% |; G1 E+ B( B
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )' P0 u3 N& h+ X( \7 X/ N
3 f- a* p: n! D7 g% G, P1 h
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
, _2 {" n* M( N: n) u
; ]  ^3 q% o9 T: z6 vM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......5 {( O6 k3 I$ ^# n

" _& |) v) h- I+ `. w$ F( W[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
% @( ?7 I, U1 G( W3 J' Y' iM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢) E9 A/ L- Q' M2 }% i" \
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
6 `$ O$ D& O4 ~" {F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
; _5 w  u- D: ^. V& ]  X
; B. j9 d; ?- Q" z最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....7 c5 o& v0 ]& K! `- Q
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，2 R$ g6 \1 K; s# E% ]& l1 f0 [
由最好開始排起既話，$ ~, _. k* m9 y7 I# Q! a, l0 B6 @
L B M F S 啦，
9 j1 @0 \8 r% r
5 @' r( L3 [, H+ v0 f) p7 }) @其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
0 s* d3 X6 p7 m# u但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
- V0 h, g: W, c0 N8 H如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？- Z! l! k, j7 u% Z/ @
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
  ^. Q; N5 w9 Y3 c6 L
4 t+ A/ s- k$ ^( R7 }$ Q而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，) j  W. g$ B6 ~$ @/ J' _" u
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，% l' L; Z! l. \( s7 W) ^4 z3 H
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。; [4 y6 A' J% ?6 Y
1 p+ H; d+ \  T7 d1 q; w
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
7 H  F% [& g# w6 U" {$ D7 V+ I0 { M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
7 Q; E3 c  b) A6 S( h5 z亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
* Y$ q" _7 @9 Q知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，; s, [8 B7 {: I9 w# r
M 都可算壞了。
; n+ W) N5 m+ U8 |! w; _  e/ |7 J: h' W0 r. [
F 呢個人仲掂，
5 z2 Z  n7 `. k; s知道既唔等於要講，
- \( f: Q8 |( q& k' S如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
# V4 ^9 C6 ]1 O# Z! j5 ~# ~我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。1 }3 M3 r! h% x, D: N( M7 @7 f

5 W9 G. x8 w; i! i最衰個個緊係 S 啦，; y; l  o0 _9 C; F6 Q9 q2 }
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。1 q, p0 _9 c6 Z6 w, \- ~6 I

% O3 V5 s4 j. Q9 S' B. `
- @( Z& ]- y! V* W/ o0 a& K) o# G; ~7 O$ O: [% i4 j/ i" i) @) x
題外話：0 c1 c2 {! G7 M7 V0 B2 _1 o$ {
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
8 i: v- d. L) A! c睇到 S 呢條友，
2 T, G0 ^' g4 y: {; E我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L/ w6 g3 b6 j# q2 a0 h/ }! R5 T, X
6 C; Z; S8 u# x/ G  y& ~2 e/ {5 f
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!2 ]% Z1 h: A. I8 Z+ {
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係; p. o  k$ ]2 H( l: o
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她5 M8 @$ A+ h! h9 p1 ^% Z# g4 A
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
. c4 k& }2 L  c2 u/ ~0 }L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...