Rika

由最好排到最壞
4 ], b4 f8 }6 @9 F. e) PF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong. W2 [- j1 ~/ a
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount4 R3 j4 X3 I) {4 |
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
. r0 y5 Q0 c. j' d! o8 f9 ]6 U5 mM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
8 n; @8 j0 D) NL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:( w" Y. |1 J2 Y$ I( k5 `8 g

9 q6 o& ]; h7 p! H/ G3 N9 {M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
$ }) r# e" q( W5 C
9 n# ]' [" W5 r: U- c7 O, ?( G; |S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)4 i  n: ?6 ~9 R, {! Z- ~$ N
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
: A6 J5 P1 N8 D# z7 B2 O; X
  F9 V% @7 P$ yB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做1 O1 V/ `: b: k7 f2 ]' w! g/ k
: s  [2 z. G/ V! E' C+ ^  q
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
4 p+ G* c/ ~) f) }" k% E6 q2 j
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
7 E4 v8 r9 V% @/ L3 _5 X! V. `; U     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好; Z/ Z' ~+ {7 T- d4 j. e0 ~

6 p  J. K5 K1 [[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
& ^- ~3 S0 r6 F, l+ m9 {; @: F而家答多次1 }5 C0 s& H+ c4 l
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽) r- T% U2 ?3 x8 _
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架0 j9 ]# L1 g$ L% ?9 a+ x
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
9 K3 S% T! j* F5 c. z: ]s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
8 o. D" d9 r; m( p9 L. \, u8 v5 `m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S  `4 q$ [; G/ s( o+ {
* g4 D' f0 t7 b& p
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
! h5 A, J2 {+ w6 rF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度% y9 ]2 [- L2 o5 E+ D2 p3 X0 t
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
: L; v% l, `$ l* d# n1 @S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢9 I- N, H5 k4 f0 s& W- A: C
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞& q4 S3 `" w" f+ L0 B
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
0 c2 i  r* E# S  w( j; hS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
- F0 H4 U4 d1 p4 n" V  tM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法! T: H$ T' K" b9 g: ^
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
" z; g% d' D# r0 \8 j" `B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情  D. V4 }* F0 V

: P( W, |) e1 c. l9 x世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
& \. e  w/ D2 \, p, u! q( OL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
/ `6 M9 |; o/ q6 d0 B. hB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘, O6 R; A' s) n7 k+ I: ?- Q
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
  y8 L5 }5 X2 J4 K! ?0 \  c  GF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方; j  \8 Q. Z# b/ b2 d
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

: j- g! l6 E0 h4 ]! y; g( C7 c7 p& \
0 j7 W5 R, k3 j! g: [- [7 G
same choices with u , but want to add some comments 7 C4 T* P6 K2 L0 n4 m
: A; y4 |$ k* X$ T$ w
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
2 {" [0 j& _$ w4 Y! L) s+ s. E: ~* c4 f
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
: ~' ?, C, r6 e' [5 U1 s: q, ]4 _; ]- L
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome , C  |; P. Q9 Y6 H7 `: s$ c

1 l, q3 T& w" c/ }M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
; u) }1 c+ ^& c; i  a3 y, h3 {( S6 O% z/ S0 h+ W
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
* h0 w5 j3 B  C+ Q0 t1 [M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
7 D  M8 z7 c" p7 x( {- Q- p$ k2 _L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
/ N! w- r! u0 ^. d  `F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma2 w6 q6 `3 a" ?, o( G
4 N* `! l: U+ J  k7 ^( _" V2 k' c
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
! I/ p3 u# R6 i3 a% \. K  J4 t有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，/ r/ G4 a) _" t  p9 p# O
由最好開始排起既話，- L3 }( [( k: ]
L B M F S 啦，
, s6 y1 _; e9 H4 O( i& t
3 B) m; I$ t4 m/ W1 e其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，9 {6 g1 `6 W$ D0 b( l( A
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？1 o( G& ^. Z$ w+ Z- `) A; q9 J
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
, ?. ^4 {- \( m- v又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。1 `% k0 l7 G- g( r9 q- b

& Y  E/ m7 f1 y; u而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
$ }* i4 i8 B8 P# H* w所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
) l. o- W9 G. [8 b3 F0 B明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。$ D: i8 _0 f7 y- j7 l

) T! c2 M& |$ j而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
- w3 W8 \! m. s M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
1 _5 Z$ V' G/ N( C" s亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，  s" w$ w+ o' i' p3 ^, ^
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，; {2 A) H2 g$ M$ q& J, a9 }) n
M 都可算壞了。+ u4 N3 n0 {0 Y8 H
5 z" e, ?0 ^( O: A- S
F 呢個人仲掂，
9 O: i( v) c" e3 y! Y知道既唔等於要講，( }5 C" {, |% H' k2 @
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
* {0 y3 K1 l- `我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。$ {6 L3 C. q& S; |  |- |' T2 s  U
9 x) P# H! _5 k+ p$ L+ k
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，+ z# d$ Q; l2 W2 Q7 I+ B  g" U
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。! b3 a8 x7 ]3 m- P9 c# E

$ {+ ^3 c# y+ _) \$ r2 m; _8 [( X; y
3 e9 u0 S! w/ I6 W) d
題外話：
9 H; q# F# T+ x+ @, p4 e唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，- f  p' ^6 B- H. t& Q
睇到 S 呢條友，
/ r# j: u) Z4 ?9 G% Q  `+ ?/ \我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
( y; I$ I$ }" }# N, n5 C7 G
/ t, K" R( V% B+ p; ]* H0 NS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
3 Z7 S" c, D! i0 [- y2 dF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係* i" z6 a' J# p
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
- `2 j! E# N  c3 x) P  t4 J( yB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害$ J9 ~* D0 p* t3 Q+ e
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...