Rika

由最好排到最壞
1 l. w$ o: j5 J6 K4 E- y7 rF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
/ k. d8 A: k2 \$ G9 DB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
" P5 T& q6 D1 _# _' `2 Q* J) ZS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
  |0 V5 s8 E0 \( {1 G+ XM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
: L5 j& X2 d" T* G& G4 QL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
+ w  T3 ?, D4 f6 X5 F$ @0 W; H& T' H8 f. _- U$ ^
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
5 H! j% @6 Y% F, ]. o* s& L( U
* p& b1 K2 o# g$ e/ ^" }, e! mS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
% i1 V, h7 M- O. W1 W2 @+ x     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!" W8 w: _1 R; A1 H1 t
) f5 V% E. j( b
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
0 M; z4 ]. t9 }' _( a  M. `+ s, l+ z) n9 ]% k8 i
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志- Z# Y: B/ E2 j* T- g. p) `. D6 W. t

: n2 B: F! @# v3 oF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,# y- r  `; c4 f  e6 ~
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好6 x) _7 E7 G0 m8 E5 T- A5 r; b4 L

% U6 d& T/ F0 a6 |* z[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案! G5 V, _; k' z! f% y9 N
而家答多次
8 T& q. Z  U# _, p0 Q" f& @) _f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽/ t8 I# C6 s' ^, b
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
- M; u- U2 e. B" c- t6 V. P( o+ tb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
0 ?* l7 q  x3 n9 c  Js: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.! h4 ]+ l% K/ u! [1 C. I7 e$ [  \
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
& b7 f7 V! ?3 O( U* D4 S! h/ S5 z1 \0 W+ e
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
# l+ X% z% f* p; Y) u8 C2 w$ xF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度- J% h7 U7 J0 i7 {7 j
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒9 R9 g+ E# i& c4 z3 x; b3 Y3 J
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
3 ^( b# g  y( D8 @( N$ bB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
6 X( G2 l. h( E* t( s+ yF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
$ u2 v, a1 D' dS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
% |  |& F8 |) s8 {/ c3 z* ]! LM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
0 Q% i6 ?9 A6 j6 B7 r( o) fL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果/ H, z% v. V; `3 e
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
$ G- S# F* T- ^5 T3 N/ \) K5 l+ ~/ X" T' [
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:. W; E: U0 d7 X* h' P' V
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己* X! Z+ S9 @( c
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘" a$ m/ O3 E( r0 f- T
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
6 b; q5 A4 B9 _6 ~1 `) k, bF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方3 N$ `2 i" M8 x
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

3 V# Q4 ?& i1 ~5 o+ h

" _. I: H0 e/ Z( d* j' C same choices with u , but want to add some comments - X) G) u; [& ^

- k# D9 x7 j, b0 zB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
: N$ X' B: f& b% U: s0 z6 Z* g9 K! `
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 ). k# g0 i& R7 L, X
/ n8 h% L' `+ ?% Q9 u- h
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome # O% i- b$ t6 _$ u

/ C+ z2 j& V) X2 a5 }( r) IM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......* G* ^" `1 D1 i# }; r  n

, r0 o4 K1 m- C. T[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
9 r' S+ U' [- X0 d% ~, _, FM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢( W5 n% j7 o% q  n% t5 _
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點: }- V; d# e# [) d
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma" U" D$ l$ D+ I# N2 o6 e$ l: F

1 f( C5 N. |9 l% Z8 E9 a' R最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
5 v6 a4 u0 f$ I1 N+ {2 i有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，+ B# K% [+ _$ d3 V
由最好開始排起既話，% ^' A- W* V7 h5 {" n3 O
L B M F S 啦，" e+ J  ~' ~" @; y4 _

4 C; q5 r1 w% ?. N; ]5 N其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，- F4 T' N: n. Z+ `$ v6 y& R) [
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？6 @2 b& \7 q2 `) m
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
" d0 ?6 A$ {5 Y( |2 o! g又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。" y' j/ g; K8 L9 z% v4 R/ f' W

# B; h7 R5 e; l  T/ `4 z5 ^而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
9 T+ C5 `9 U1 _1 {( {1 k& `( r所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，% C$ {# F; v0 m
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。" V) t( c+ P% r- o+ D3 E0 j

# S* C2 ~/ m6 r$ H9 ?2 K而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
( ^1 _1 c4 ?5 G2 M6 Z  u M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
3 z% g3 t0 b" X+ A, Z" l( b亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，4 @2 u+ e4 v( R) I6 n
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
/ _" m' e' Q  w+ L: B0 w% z M 都可算壞了。& n& D7 o* T# ~' L$ k
3 s8 u8 Y( X6 D" O% Z" S6 e+ Y
F 呢個人仲掂，& O$ m7 G# p: l0 j5 |
知道既唔等於要講，
" S$ e" ?+ y& E  a# d6 `如果呢件事發生係自己身上，2 m3 |1 S  }5 C) L1 x7 M% o
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。: B# z6 F1 V2 o. ?( v! S, a" `
5 |  F; @, Y/ d& ^) U
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，( q; `2 r; Y% f
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
- N# n" _8 L' v) I
- i8 r6 D* Z" q4 T. _5 u, K, j8 `9 d, S7 {0 B8 H  d8 x

! u' {* I& S3 y- r: w0 s題外話：+ _% n. J3 x& C" R
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，% j' {' k$ W) y* X
睇到 S 呢條友，3 Z' m5 I5 \' ]+ j, e
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L0 z) D8 Z% R: r. C% i3 M
; |4 d! c! b! ~; t
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
+ d; W2 W! w: Q# r6 @* F4 L% zF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
; @2 a6 H7 z4 Z* }1 M5 W% gM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她: s5 n2 X+ Q2 Z; u3 P
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
& U. \* s1 b5 ^L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...