Rika

由最好排到最壞
+ U8 T% F8 F+ A$ qF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong, a- K# b" Y9 a- y" r9 J( p
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
. F+ L, i% P0 w4 K: Z. IS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her& t  h; j6 \7 W6 X4 v4 K! h8 y0 j* G
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure$ u. Q3 }$ D! m% a6 ~
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
* ~9 p" m! i# s8 d# r
2 W/ S, G$ J$ `M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人6 K5 E9 r! ?( N3 R; z9 t. z/ R
' z1 X; X+ }5 g6 W
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事); f2 R$ Y5 |7 B1 L+ _" s8 T& K: L
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
  v: N/ s: s% a, A. N& U8 Y& v7 a# i" a3 y) M7 F& y/ Q) x' X
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做" ]( f# R! ?( Z/ `9 Y
3 z8 s6 G$ I* E) c* Y9 b' K2 t& P  X
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志+ a' T$ S2 f1 Z2 b) d9 M4 Z& ^
+ S+ m( Q6 R: ]7 y2 Z3 C6 i+ u
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,# ^3 F. c1 j; t% Z# O
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好) Q" d$ m0 L, o8 G9 {3 y: R1 m

/ l& P7 [0 j- ^; d3 e[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
6 X1 r) K+ W3 ^2 B+ @! q而家答多次6 g6 T% A' R5 }. j9 D6 H/ S
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽$ S1 M+ T9 ^" \6 p1 h1 @3 J
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
" j" ?( Q% ^, T& Bb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
0 I6 _" R/ n% u. P/ X: Ns: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.# L  {* L6 n* H+ ~6 U4 _
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
! V/ g) I- F% k. V; G, d) |/ U  c# J9 i) y0 k. r. o6 [
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大* l6 O: f2 z9 S# U/ k
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度; B; ]/ P: h4 W0 b+ a5 W0 i
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒; s. L1 `& W& V6 }- a( k: @
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
( c, K) M& X3 w& QB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
2 F$ m' i1 L3 ~( a- F' `F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
& u- J0 R9 m7 b  E% iS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
. N: X5 [; o& C" F2 v" SM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法; x* j% \% s& e
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果. `: @5 u+ w- S
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
* _; C8 r# i$ x, i9 x" ~/ ~% N8 w. @* e9 c
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
9 S2 Q# @9 R" a/ `, bL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己4 o8 o: ?" y5 w6 H; D/ K) E
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
- k% ~+ r- f: tS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
( m: h0 g) ~  l1 dF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方: ]4 u" J" F7 a4 O8 x$ L) u. j
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

& c7 Q; G; J5 i4 ^) M! `
4 i; Q4 k+ g% \ same choices with u , but want to add some comments + Y9 v; g. [5 m5 f2 E$ A& K
  o' e$ g1 r! W, A' {; P
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  - b- @$ \% E0 f9 [' p
6 C/ a/ D. d" k
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
' x, L1 s0 y+ O& u. o3 S5 U4 U9 A
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
3 p9 h$ m' R3 K2 D
* O0 ]  K; W2 l! _+ k6 p' u* ]M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
: v) s) k/ v+ m8 r% `5 `# P8 e: V
2 ?# ?+ p! \0 J1 ^$ e3 q[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge, `% N* h2 v0 {( o  e! c) V! g
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢/ |4 B3 W( y. I0 w8 q
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點$ Y) x0 [* U, K7 X3 \! M" ~
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
+ y0 g$ m; r! n* s
5 M- l/ D7 `8 J/ v% G6 h7 q3 U最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
6 a0 S0 \5 V6 j7 A9 O) z' y  L$ V有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，; q) `% t2 V( ?- r6 j
由最好開始排起既話，
9 N: _( N7 @3 P7 _+ Z$ S) zL B M F S 啦，6 v# q9 W% K: X# y4 W

8 I1 {1 l/ s: I4 T& x+ g其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
8 u; o( w( l7 P6 M: ?7 o但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
' }  W2 @0 U) c4 A/ Z% Q/ n如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？9 x% R* D2 @3 V0 K5 H
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
2 A8 t& H2 W1 v! j. m- W. D. U" R- |( V8 C$ {8 D: v) E
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，$ [: `' }2 U6 c, ^8 h5 r2 j- K
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
& s8 Y' ^$ H2 B6 }0 V明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。$ D5 F2 [# y$ M! |5 d8 @* e! m8 E
/ u! O8 F7 z, W! J( E" M5 T: a7 L7 T
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
2 e2 u5 J# p( u+ ]8 c M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
# G3 K/ _" v% E' \7 G亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，3 Z+ L4 L$ \$ ]( R
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
+ g; u. Z' \, n M 都可算壞了。/ {+ z% d$ A* W

% [0 }* Q& H; P2 h F 呢個人仲掂，/ B3 H% ~" d6 O# ?8 B
知道既唔等於要講，/ A! s9 U* g6 k5 F
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
# Z- k: v' }( q. C# ?' |我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
# R; T- h/ B% {1 V+ V- s# b2 ~, O' v
- X0 x; N$ z. ?! H' `( o0 X最衰個個緊係 S 啦，/ l9 y& F5 m$ J1 |
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。8 ]3 r2 B, x' i& O( P
7 @5 A7 F: r% P+ H0 ^( F
# q4 @# w6 o& j! k

- p' q2 }$ z4 D  x題外話：
; `# A9 \, R, ]; t& B! T" x唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，( D& y" x+ S, Z; s. G% q7 Y
睇到 S 呢條友，) G9 F- f4 I$ S/ A. R9 \! [
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L6 ~# k& J! j  C# R$ R& G+ P
+ v( h. H# W4 t: Y0 L
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
2 ~  |0 z/ q+ L$ w) Z5 BF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
0 L& ?: Q1 G0 vM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她/ Q8 I) F7 b- w$ q
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
' k5 K- i0 c: f, dL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...