Rika

由最好排到最壞8 }6 q# {/ c* _1 ]3 V. E
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong9 O  W  Y4 Z, g8 `" P
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
" I! N! I9 K2 H2 f+ ]; \( n+ wS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
5 _$ i  ~$ w8 R( n" B$ }$ MM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure: f+ X( q9 Y  L  s
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:9 Z+ {( q/ O( X
6 B) J/ h  {% S( ?2 u/ l, `
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人1 i% R& f5 g4 K6 m
! n9 A" N/ T( _' I- K8 k; F7 i
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
! a4 b5 }. [' J, R; j  j     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
4 ^5 K6 a9 `6 L) O0 u1 s* B: I
  w! S( j# y; B" Q  hB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
* H& K8 Z. p$ E7 U% d: v5 ^* O+ ?$ p- d
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志8 }' p, p( a: L  ?0 p
" x2 F  e; S/ x# h5 c0 m
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,& U& h: E. m) f7 l2 o$ ?
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好1 X2 K% _8 O; R, D( d" B

5 z3 I: P- F% |8 H) H* F' {1 ~- K[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
9 a1 i, D- x3 N而家答多次4 q9 x1 C& `2 M2 B, N$ z
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
4 [% |/ ]! R  M( v0 Y+ `4 X, Hl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架* Q9 g* H2 `. M
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢2 F& m! u8 L- I8 Q0 b2 n
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
9 U7 O5 }  X/ c: P" q: Um: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S$ B* z- c/ Y6 l

6 }% U, _% R8 e$ `& M8 H( m9 w$ T( g5 [L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
# B% ^" }9 S% S- V! L; @F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
' M/ @  C- X6 @0 T7 _M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
2 S% V8 Z9 t" vS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢7 f9 ^; o6 h- u: B3 Y- Q
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞* O6 K' i, ?, a$ r$ b( ?- |; s- m
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
- }" `/ O# k4 YS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
! p* V1 S# \$ M+ b0 ^M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
0 C" _" F3 \: [; T0 d7 TL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果/ n9 B: j# w1 V
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
8 {  F6 D$ U6 d; K! |6 o
/ ^/ E# k2 w1 i. g世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
3 t! y' U  m# l) ]! _( HL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己" {1 J3 e  z$ J0 O% L& ^1 Q9 o
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘( t: }6 j6 y8 K7 B0 x
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
3 y4 G! K; y! o0 y; l: _2 ]+ gF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
9 L0 d2 F6 }5 |: y1 `+ H! }M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

/ z% t; {; v5 M' W" C7 ?5 V5 d& w, C

# v* Y" Z3 u5 R% c$ B same choices with u , but want to add some comments
; `: e' J6 F5 ]9 T$ Q+ f: W8 y" {. |& }' h" Z; e& m
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  9 V: [7 {. g) ^0 h; L% r

5 ^' F! A. c8 G3 `* p: u  d3 ^S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
% D& ?5 \5 p8 f- K4 |% X. @3 Y: X
  \, w3 a/ I$ }3 ^! R& VF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 4 _+ [3 ?2 _; p2 ?. D
  b2 I+ e0 I7 ]: G4 m
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......8 Z& g* L* k; S, v
' R* M4 x' J3 `' g% }0 V
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge6 L, g* P3 h4 _# l
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
* d6 w& u. @7 ~7 PL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點! R) v# m4 Z. t' d) I2 k" B* G
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
* a8 Q+ O6 p/ j$ l$ x. I9 J
  e* x. T( t3 M: C: S最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
9 ^  U5 e+ p/ Z1 i7 x有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，, u, I. [2 F7 ~
由最好開始排起既話，
# c0 O* t  o/ L1 R7 Q5 I, dL B M F S 啦，1 b: o6 C! O3 n2 l( V$ K5 J) V: Q

% R9 }, E7 O1 u8 F( q, ^! C6 Y其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，" D: j. Z7 R1 `7 A1 ]
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？9 ^4 S# W6 k1 k# W4 w. l2 V2 G. ]
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？# g+ \" S" f: z" j
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。( A# @2 _/ B! q; Z

$ x2 z( q% n1 m5 s) V# u. ?而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
2 O! F! O. u) p6 H8 U所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，: {% t) U8 u( Z
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
1 i1 l6 Y, l* h* a, f% F& @/ W/ _0 t& _1 H
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，( a) c# A' S" E; B
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
* Q. y  ]0 b/ N亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
: u% U1 G6 h3 ]0 J: }知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，: _; }$ S1 n6 }) @
M 都可算壞了。$ z1 C6 X) u0 P& n, s: ~' L

+ J' K6 G6 M1 Y# s6 g: D3 `7 r F 呢個人仲掂，
' {, n& k( ^0 i1 y知道既唔等於要講，7 K, O# _  b; z" Y7 U9 d- }
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
' [5 ~* E/ [1 @5 y! l% l3 S; @9 t$ n! T0 Z我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
# v* `1 U' [. z8 I) ?0 u. S4 w0 z
0 Z! ^( `( v4 D4 R! d最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
8 _, i: L; P  p$ p$ Z始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
2 h. J0 g/ u0 c: W# c0 G
% V. t  z6 F3 R3 N
% q/ _& l' d4 r$ A5 ~& ]6 O, ^1 _7 x( l, d! }( k) e  W# }9 C
題外話：
5 p8 ~# l9 Y# k/ |, i$ M唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
9 A7 s6 e, {/ y- q4 b睇到 S 呢條友，% ~1 z- i# B% N9 D% Y! A  _! K; H0 t
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L, u4 Z, d5 x& w. H
4 s; e  ~5 N6 ^- e
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!) e/ y9 L1 I  N- k
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
7 P& h, D8 X$ n; Q2 s( r- YM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
% `/ A# Z- k* E8 Z' YB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害- m# p; P' z- i; o3 X& e
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...