Rika

由最好排到最壞
' v" e0 ^' f/ N: o+ IF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong9 ], x5 A4 ]: V# {
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
, S$ }& x* A$ G9 o: xS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her) d3 [# k* t, \& g1 K
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
  h) }% w) V+ u$ o& {+ LL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:$ x0 X# o# `0 b$ O9 f" u: ~
2 V4 Y5 t+ j  w/ s/ u
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人$ |/ X/ ]1 ^. O

" x1 w+ q% |( U1 r0 M1 fS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
2 T0 f# @5 }) e  i/ v4 q5 y' i! {# z     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
- n' \  m& ?* M6 @1 s" K" f' [" P3 u% k5 Z1 k2 d+ c
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
0 |/ B6 l. R1 K0 ?/ v0 [9 [+ A; o. d, Q, t
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志. A+ I) X" ~( |, k6 u, ~! v* b4 ~+ K
  }' o+ @1 s: m- I
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
4 ~2 H) l3 Y# l; q     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好: p; n1 _0 N! M8 U2 d
# D* \, F7 S* L0 X0 ?# A5 u
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案$ b: w( h( z) ]" y* w" ^3 m
而家答多次
% J( b  w: ?% z9 N6 C0 Q7 \f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽- |, X7 V5 F4 [! V5 Q- {% t8 {
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架1 s) `, d4 v8 C- R0 {' I( a
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢# [- s% ?+ I& V: |
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
! E9 [/ Y0 \- x9 rm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
9 [/ ?2 L' S' v$ F4 D2 S: r0 p/ {, M% k2 F: @1 d3 R
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大& L5 L( u% m& s: n9 b
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度1 r5 ~1 L! j  l4 S1 ]( t
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
' u+ s$ L% ?. Y4 j8 p$ h, yS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
% z7 f9 j' R( JB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞3 o9 N4 q7 g# o
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
( y4 ?) A0 i) v) q+ aS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
2 q3 D0 n. X4 Y8 o* HM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
+ f4 {, a1 _# J3 R& d, o% Q+ AL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果. d" Y6 v0 E0 t, f" a' v
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情4 C& I2 k/ K0 t5 q& Q1 a

0 ]5 J2 t5 Q2 i- Z世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
. w, i+ T7 c( Z) sL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
8 P9 }: m, X" C* A$ @0 @0 h% K2 ~B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
* @* S3 ?5 H- X* c* m) V+ B: d/ PS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
8 n& K. V8 ^5 `0 z: I3 GF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方; N0 u. N4 ^9 A: E& [
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

2 b( d, h. ]/ F! N5 F

$ Q* O* y  g3 c* m+ X' G same choices with u , but want to add some comments
* W# {3 g* _  V7 ~' n# y
( ?0 l5 v6 M' ~% J' RB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
+ ]* L. C1 X$ ^: H. [9 \6 W
5 U9 P$ e  q; T& ^. [" L2 sS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )7 F  A: M( i! H9 C/ F1 [/ B
. e2 r2 n: x& [* C5 K( m3 V
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
( u3 ^( p+ a9 U" ~' j" W- k. Y9 P" C9 @- J! g
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......8 R* A" i0 x0 J+ U0 g

. N) B# F5 [- b$ A* N( l[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge7 Y2 J: b4 r; x) R: `# ]
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢6 {) J1 K, _  H7 C
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
/ {0 ~* H/ a* eF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
$ J" S% o  O& m) ~7 G, O$ a% H! p/ c" U+ \5 k( u" b; N! l
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....4 }: z6 P4 Y% K+ A# k
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，* F( X1 E- b- N0 T* i
由最好開始排起既話，- W% i, ?' u: G6 v9 p
L B M F S 啦，
, r# l5 _  ~: u) p6 x
. @! J0 m+ q; C2 s) s( R其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，6 ~  j5 o0 \" n+ F' U; w
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？$ P" _& Y+ ~" _3 v: ~& ?$ Y# u$ R
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？& n' N0 K! P& W! F$ Q. \
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
9 R4 C! }0 p# ^9 r1 o0 n7 q3 f( k
$ i$ e( {8 `& @而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
' z" K/ w, L8 `3 |所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
% t9 O# T. b7 T$ {( x明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
9 W- m. g! c5 S$ ?; k8 k9 {/ h3 i2 }! h5 u* O
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，2 i# c! Y; U& d0 ^
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
" g4 s( a3 |6 A( |& {- j" ]8 x( B亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
. ^* {# Y6 L6 B1 y" k. c3 l% B知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，: E/ P) o  L9 N/ F( V. t! F
M 都可算壞了。9 O) W7 u$ ^; i

: \" i' |# P& { F 呢個人仲掂，% `8 {4 g/ X. K# Q7 `% e, G, f+ H/ {
知道既唔等於要講，( [: E) L6 C" D* i
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
. v( I# M' _8 o( |我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
% S, ^* W+ ?3 L& F% u
: L5 b9 p, x* n/ O最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
! p0 m8 \" ]. ?0 r始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。! T8 c7 U9 L) g2 X
- e- I3 j. h: E8 d% {$ ]( p, N
' _# l9 B4 H& T) ^/ W

$ X. m+ `- r$ t( h題外話：
9 W& f# P9 I$ g; C4 d( o" Q唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，7 l! K, F/ K# b. o6 r# k# |3 B
睇到 S 呢條友，# E' q; D% |$ S0 c
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L9 {! o! I7 D, W! s4 Y
  F. L$ p( M0 Y
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
+ H4 I/ |1 u; B6 gF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
' [6 k- g3 F3 t8 l$ ]- rM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
* O. G) q  o% J6 e* U' MB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害& o6 W% L3 Y: ^  g( u- w4 R
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...