Rika

由最好排到最壞# r. j. |* Y+ m' F* t9 L
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
4 g! T% B; F- d/ J/ y: }/ yB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
, a# E# F: Q! O/ QS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her2 m" ~7 A* }- y
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
& q+ w0 j# Q' u9 X# V5 {3 q2 i. RL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
! y% A9 W- G1 v, z6 F
- y" i3 Z+ s8 q- NM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人% S' _# Y% F) ~5 Q  N# a

$ L4 C) d; W8 W6 @9 U+ _& V. M5 H2 iS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
# L. h& g$ G$ H* P+ n! c% l; \     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
3 Q8 q9 D- }1 p' D0 k
! R& `3 c7 Y8 x* S3 w9 K1 Z  Q! ]8 uB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
7 V3 m' u3 s+ H8 u8 D6 F8 d+ q1 ~9 f6 x' b" a
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志# h' A& g( A2 A$ G0 h& C
* p: X0 t+ z: ^% }, m9 {
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,7 n* h$ m" J2 g$ X( ]
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
! e8 j3 t- S& M* R" Z
) h, [7 V6 s7 ^# r[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
* i4 g6 c' |( S2 i9 `而家答多次) R$ f' h2 B9 w' ?
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽$ j( A( L8 ]; r$ |0 D* ?9 j
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架# D: P) O( G+ |, `
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
3 H- @# _3 X+ _" y% ds: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.7 w7 r, T8 j; \" A# ?
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S, |& x, t' W( L- Y( J+ ^0 G" c
7 M% Y' |2 A% N  U, N" ^
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
0 h- A( E% p& Y/ y& [F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度, M) O3 U6 b- g9 F
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒# J6 f; m1 Q5 U* x/ N5 x( _
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢& B5 `4 G4 J' n( a9 I! \" C
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
; [% [8 k% d. ^  E  CF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"$ v' W! \8 ^& H7 J
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取. g9 S/ E. z* d* i8 u7 w
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
! J# k! w- k* A$ N$ I; ^6 aL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果& M% Z1 Q" l0 _+ G. N) `$ N
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
8 P2 [0 q8 i% }4 e' B% |7 o5 \" n! Q  [9 ^, H1 V9 C% O4 F
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:* ~2 z6 e/ \, \" W
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
+ L. m" W8 i6 }4 Y; WB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘* t6 B' t+ w2 _
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
7 b2 _& x; N4 s" S( S; m$ |$ S) lF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
3 f9 s1 j0 q' G' Y* GM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

# f0 ]5 `1 E  J5 Y: B

4 W+ k- p, i: @. A3 g* L same choices with u , but want to add some comments
6 X! y) V+ k( w! y$ P
# {! s# T1 z. a0 E9 ?- uB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
1 v' M, Q, V5 Y5 c( ~( L
  [3 ^: X  y9 ~( n& W2 qS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )# c" M6 H& \% a0 {) E7 [; w9 c0 i
) y" d- p" v/ z
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome & F% I/ u2 I2 ?( o+ ?1 ?3 ^1 H2 {) u
/ g- Y0 D0 d* F5 L2 p) T
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......' U$ S4 k* {9 g. a7 Y: M
0 F( S& y( J. S5 W
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge9 E& N/ L4 ^; ]% ?2 B4 H, k7 |9 |0 F
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢1 l) W  O' T  p0 G4 U( @
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
: S8 d1 ]6 {4 xF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
: m: B- {1 E; Z6 C" g( d
$ K. s, M' x* i9 D+ a  G+ W, A最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....; U2 W3 R/ b7 T
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
% w8 h: j  {  @& ]由最好開始排起既話，
& D# I5 D- c. }+ q! t! `  D3 iL B M F S 啦，' B6 `3 }3 T! N4 s+ s6 k
, T" s  w7 b4 `2 ]6 @
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
7 D( M; p; f: j( }& B1 }5 Z但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
8 x& B1 E  x3 ]. ]3 n. q如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？, X! _$ o$ _! @4 X
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。3 n# O  l4 U% O( Q7 T

, k" q5 g- j7 n' ?; W而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，$ Q, m. P1 T& k) C# Z
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
# y3 r/ ^! M2 [4 b; r- x+ d) z明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
4 J! z. M- s% d8 c
0 C5 \+ w" n3 j) p而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
& o/ n# t9 Y8 `  k M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
9 W% s4 S& z0 z2 A8 }亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
9 ?$ k( N' c+ i$ f; M知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，9 p9 L$ e, k* Z1 r, x
M 都可算壞了。7 V" b  F% f; k$ ]. i: W
! P! U4 W  M5 ]! G6 v
F 呢個人仲掂，
, M. p' s- V% a  U% d1 ?" a知道既唔等於要講，& N* ?; S: _8 Y; D3 P2 C. ^0 {
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，9 t% b+ E, y$ q- A8 e( [$ A
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。5 F2 L8 L+ d! F' [7 C* {; ~' f# ~; g
9 }$ K# o1 J  T4 |2 }. }
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，6 q7 k# S) Z# u1 L/ F3 H1 M9 Y
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
8 ]# _2 ]' q! A3 X) {7 b! l9 _
6 a' t4 a; A8 h" E
& i5 d1 x2 o: H7 h
% M$ E  G, H; T9 N) l題外話：7 T  x' A( Y: a3 e9 E- ^* ~
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，/ y! i" j, j0 K2 K" s4 s
睇到 S 呢條友，
' e8 u) [8 x" o% {3 v# x+ o我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
3 [7 a7 F7 @# z8 e% M" |/ S) C
. N; D7 h7 r( X; U- cS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
$ \* k! d4 |& v+ G3 V4 y" K9 dF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係9 N8 G2 e/ t$ M6 t) `
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她! J. s: B9 O2 S$ j5 W
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害4 ]' e  F7 G( l+ _/ W8 J* p
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...