Rika

由最好排到最壞6 f; C9 Y4 K8 L
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
, j0 |. q, p( V$ qB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount3 G3 R- N0 g+ v+ X1 m3 D) Y# ?, }+ G
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her# W' ]% h9 \  \4 Q# w5 I
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
' ]8 H. j' C" v- i$ i9 d# L" JL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
1 w+ Q3 I3 T) ?5 T  U
0 V( M8 M8 G3 zM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
- D* ^' G4 u. s7 a# l' T
9 F+ h( g( @" m7 u( ^+ ^# T" iS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
. {9 n7 \; v5 r' f     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
% q8 A! h  Y6 {! c! ~; \  w
+ _6 v  T4 M8 c- q. vB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
2 v* P; x$ d% @0 t0 |5 ]
/ Y2 i+ t) \# L. ^9 L1 M* OL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
& B9 `5 i5 Q% t! @) {
5 n+ P$ O+ a- N  S% ^  Y' A4 xF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
9 R- h" K9 l$ ^. F( m$ P     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好( c- l9 c" f4 x0 H: a2 r; ^

  \- ?+ K) i( [$ v* ^5 P[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案; D. _& j3 A2 T: [* v' j
而家答多次8 C  ]6 c; y' E/ U7 i
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽: L! N' F& j* [. j& z7 y
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
6 M. k8 f$ w: y% Y/ k; m: |$ Pb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢" k# S  a2 e0 ~! I
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.' [# c" b% ]6 u$ W
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S- u  g- P0 O- g, @) w# h! S9 W* f
" A( A, F& o: Y% f0 A1 K% z
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大$ D0 K) u/ h7 {3 M. }3 X# |
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度# |% @8 V1 U3 ~2 P9 H' E  i
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒6 E# A0 C; Q/ V
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢6 b2 Q  u3 q. Q/ D  ?) [: T
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
' m3 D! q2 S# X0 x/ [F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"2 x% Y1 E6 C& t, t% [
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
$ r" l  ]5 N; Z' S1 }M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法' {( N3 ?3 ^& I# o3 v5 g4 j
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
( w" i# w; i* ?! vB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情" W. d- I; r; d
9 b' m0 I$ p1 \' Z
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
2 y2 D( R4 U. M: p# B7 O2 ZL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
8 ~7 ]$ u6 `4 ^' Y  \+ D  b' PB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘0 E/ Z$ ~! Z, X# ]! R
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件5 d1 U6 \& X( Y0 U/ e7 H
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
$ s  N: T; ~. ]/ E' uM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

2 [4 Y6 s9 ]1 u' Q! Q: q
4 R) k$ x6 _8 } same choices with u , but want to add some comments
/ R, Y! K$ S3 Y5 W9 b! L# r  P! [9 i" @; E( G$ O
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
8 U- e& D. P4 W, S& ^6 T4 n
9 }; V( K) @; NS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
7 U' G6 Y- d9 m0 M/ |' s) d1 O0 j$ L2 H
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome # P; x2 O4 D6 i9 d; G
5 B* g7 ]+ ?$ K' v
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
2 n+ U  b4 }' k% P9 m- s
( N& A( y$ j2 t  N+ v# ][ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
+ r- ~2 G! b8 S; y2 ?7 a$ vM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
8 h) T! |( h& ~5 [9 HL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點1 x# G  `& ^8 Y8 A1 {
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
) \$ ~5 V# k% l5 e
2 h: g" g3 E9 L# |最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
+ ^. G% K: |, [7 s; ?有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
( u' ?! Z1 O! ?' F8 @$ T3 Z由最好開始排起既話，
1 N4 P5 a* a% |: oL B M F S 啦，
2 {. @" I6 e- ^; g+ {
0 Y. P$ @. D1 V& g) M/ t其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
; E! w4 T2 N4 w: o但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
4 D3 F3 [& d- v( l0 G; Q如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？- y7 Y! D  P, P
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。" E# S* m* ]6 s8 P. p7 _

% M3 ?  S6 e* {6 l而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
7 p9 P9 T; r3 Q+ R所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
6 m* f  i* N$ i, Q明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
+ ^# d2 ]& O  q
8 ?0 q9 G; G' z$ u$ f$ J& C而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，: Q' x) g& i2 ]$ m
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，8 K" J0 h7 \/ I: K  i0 h2 o6 H  C0 U
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，, B1 Y! |" v1 t+ J' |( F2 o
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，( F) W1 @9 A/ _1 j$ z6 ]  x
M 都可算壞了。
3 t" U0 P! ~/ f5 h, G
: M' Q2 o0 R: w7 F* g F 呢個人仲掂，0 P; |+ j: F, [3 ?: o
知道既唔等於要講，6 r; ?2 J  E" w. T% D3 T
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
- Q" F( T$ L. W# F3 Z7 T我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
& |. K2 a1 ^( D; f
; ]! S7 V5 H  f7 q" M7 ~) w最衰個個緊係 S 啦，* E' @) ~' B, ^" Y' R2 R/ R" L6 j
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
1 y/ K, l; q, L) d3 p* i, U
/ b# f6 _7 D# z( h: `8 X! }9 `& C" @) g

4 \. a# ^2 V# V7 N& K( P! z題外話：' T! f: F2 m+ ^3 n$ M
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，; P5 r1 q4 M$ R
睇到 S 呢條友，
! M" ~0 s: K& n( Z; _4 |+ S我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L$ u  Q- x, i5 f/ E+ T) x
9 I5 L+ S& d" q; \
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
4 D0 N) E8 x0 ?# t# j4 fF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係. Y5 H1 F1 v. @3 c- c. G+ a
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她% I3 s5 C. r5 D5 }
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害5 V. v2 S8 _1 _: O6 [( T# L8 t0 e
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...