Rika

由最好排到最壞4 k4 w. k' n- s2 }2 Z+ Q- Y( P
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
0 Z8 [, a. T+ wB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount: J5 z$ Y. T% ~$ ?+ m- e; e
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
6 s+ v( d8 m% y! LM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
$ B9 a( C7 ^# ]' i4 v9 h& r* sL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
) J. [7 n; }+ `# @3 D- X4 P
8 S5 y4 V2 t" C& x# |: ~; z) Z7 @  ]. MM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人/ I* V$ R% s5 Y0 B3 j

' A5 P. M0 H2 J, D9 AS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
' r: I; P* i# @! |9 D" w     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
2 s' E4 k5 F1 v- R8 q* E3 [
. M; Z/ D* j2 j/ U4 O, p' c/ D8 ZB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做. A# i* Q7 U. y) @5 n, a/ _
, F9 x4 Y) |4 i' e- r, V7 ~
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志, j8 H8 K2 ?% O6 P, u

0 l3 t" x: n1 G% b" ^5 dF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
$ Z7 U$ I5 R3 f) h, m9 l; g" x! ^     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
2 E5 z3 F6 r7 T2 U4 ?* |
" i1 C" |+ ~4 B6 H; ^! w[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
( P* X8 T6 ], G% I/ ?* U0 i  \8 `而家答多次) N& x0 `# I% v7 G
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽! d+ @! H- o1 |) m$ z" W) @, O
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
% m, A( U  x/ V2 s% tb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢1 U" d+ @# i9 L
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.' ^( \' g+ X4 l1 f  u
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
, ~# W+ Z8 T8 F
' W  L5 P) w5 @6 CL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
" H9 g6 I* t0 {5 q' b- M: a# ^F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度) U9 {6 d. y, a& z% r8 g
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
5 A6 z: H/ `$ J( wS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
" i) [: i% C# E/ `. o0 KB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
' }3 u: @+ l* w3 g2 {& N' xF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"+ w1 O' Y8 K" W
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
$ @- `  H& K# e9 @. t9 f% @M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
2 R+ _! j6 K" U) V4 E- X. UL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
: |" u- f0 Y$ cB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
) z& c) ~4 x! `1 G' f8 M( e; o$ x* h0 u  @0 S# R
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:9 m; Z3 i" T' e0 ?5 `: D% Q! |( p
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己8 I! X/ I2 P5 v" s# r% s
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
1 L; `& a' a, }' Y+ ^4 b+ _S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件8 }0 ~- [1 ^8 F4 a" m/ x: [
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方/ y; F1 J" m- l! C0 x8 \
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

- l: r$ i3 \, \$ O

" |6 [, O0 U1 n7 f/ N8 f+ D same choices with u , but want to add some comments
3 [4 \, U* G+ F( F% q9 c! T
/ d: R) A- [, i2 cB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
2 Y) n5 t% [1 O) |8 G- o0 D) f. }' p. F3 I# O
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )/ K! E' |) g4 s9 J: L: G4 L
' C4 ~* d) N% F2 [0 j
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
. ?" }, C7 N! q
6 }1 {% K0 G! e2 ^; o: y: C' zM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......9 f! M9 H/ E" g6 z) ^$ `' A$ I1 F- m  Q
7 M* j, r( F  ^, l% h7 i
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge5 V1 H% _& Q0 v9 z, f  ]
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
% U5 h( |3 F, J3 V( YL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點! [; d8 f* |  O+ k: F8 H( ~
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
4 w6 N9 F4 N6 Y9 t& y+ `( a
0 m/ T  q3 D. C& b最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....' S/ `7 h& K% _+ g1 Y5 {! P! ]
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，; w; ?9 t1 B! B6 m
由最好開始排起既話，
" Q0 F+ y7 X) o9 H& yL B M F S 啦，
/ I5 M& f. O5 _2 J. v8 b: Q- P' h, [' o
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，' o0 G: K  G5 G
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？/ J6 E- ?& F% [2 ?7 a1 V
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？5 L  t7 [! [. A3 X, d
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。! O3 L+ |0 T$ ^
% V2 c/ O. _5 F
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
4 `9 Q  s& p" Q7 c- c所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
8 L6 E4 o" c0 Q% q  u明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。. v0 p  T5 D, n$ C+ N8 i5 R0 }

* ~6 O3 H0 ^; c) q6 V1 Z而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，( ]6 T/ U7 g1 S( G2 C
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
9 N. z1 Y) \' B4 i4 S亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
0 \4 U( c9 }9 U& b知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，7 s# b3 t8 @- ?: A
M 都可算壞了。
* `9 R6 k6 O: s7 X( J& Z' {" A) ~. G" |: s% y
F 呢個人仲掂，
! {5 ]4 y, a& L知道既唔等於要講，. i- A- \, S6 o4 e9 l2 _6 Y
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，5 |9 f# F0 L  n$ I8 ~
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。/ {" [1 k$ s; F

/ d$ s$ k8 u8 q4 [5 X. D" R最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
& b; D" Y# C7 m' G& G- y始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。$ ?) l- [2 G1 w  d* Z2 j
4 M) Z) q6 X/ e& a' k
# N1 O" M) v- v

5 p: q6 Q! j% x/ A7 v' m4 K' D5 d  K0 ^) N題外話：
: {- u0 ?$ s# g唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
7 z/ C/ u1 J$ r/ ^+ c$ C1 L睇到 S 呢條友，' B. B5 |: y+ A+ E/ W2 z* E& `
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L' X8 N1 y  d- e

( i& ]3 Y0 T7 a5 |3 e  HS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!; }! y+ ]! U  S7 [- |
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係/ a. |, y, E8 T+ k5 J  r( X+ Z
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她* d9 N4 Z' Z4 R3 D
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害4 K  H8 r( P% j+ L
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...