<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 精彩辯論-----信耶穌不合科學
返回列表 回復 發帖
Originally posted by austin666 at 2005-4-5 12:13 AM:. P  z/ h$ d! b" @) H  I5 {
我係一個連自己都吳信的人/ B1 i/ W& X& V7 Q3 h; v* Q. N8 M% \9 f
又點會將自己交付俾上帝呢
. V" J- r  O: c- y: e道理我知道好多只係做吳到6 n  e9 G3 j, n: T8 x+ M# c
呢D就係做人的悲哀
; A* K  L  e; W  S1 Y0 f
; z0 r* Z; q: M. @- s0 o1 y" O
Nobody says you have to do it to win salvation.....the notion of 'giving yourself to God' is the biggest cliche and Christian jargon of all time!
6 B9 {* ]# g2 o% i9 F# r% h( |+ V2 Y8 B- E0 A
Nobody can give himself/herself to God....these are Puritian theologies....
; b# o8 k4 K) k' C0 T2 c6 ^& S" g5 M) U( A4 C
mr. austin 666, our pneumatology is a bit off...but I admire your willingness to dialouge....+ n+ W* z$ q4 |8 ~

/ N  w9 L  S) X' X5 ustruggle with him and try to understand him.... that's my journey....may it be yours one day.
yes, of cos, we are limitation. and we cannot 'trust' or 'save' ourselves.....) K" U; t* d; {2 H$ @6 m
cheer up.... and find the truth in HIM
We are blessed that we can watch sports, to do many things...
so be happy!
估唔到brightlee對足球咁熟識~~~連哲學都咁熟~~~~~~樣樣掂~~~~
我哲學就唔掂啦!: I: P3 Z* X, `  h1 J4 I, u
我只不過微小的基督徒...................) D: g+ [9 i2 S# b, }6 l1 b1 T( a, A
真的!!這不是反話. Z1 C3 }- X" B4 y. ]9 S' b3 e4 e2 }
因為我是情感比理性強的人; A+ ?" W: k' r' Y. n1 ^7 m
所以哲學是不成的
We are blessed that we can watch sports, to do many things...
so be happy!
建立在虚假,謊言上的教派,不信也沒損失,
) B: i( G; r% ]& c# n以一本七拼八“揪”的故事,作為真理有欠理據,3 X3 K" L2 t; H, P
在只有二千年的歷史中,不斷引起戰爭,屠殺,酷刑,權力鬥爭,強奪金錢,奴第...等等罪行,到現在還進行著...$ ^" c% t; H: R* M: b0 t3 [
正是萬惡之源
Originally posted by DXneo at 2005-4-5 11:42 AM:
( m* b8 H/ b' S7 I; B, z' x) v4 H建立在虚假,謊言上的教派,不信也沒損失 ...
" L9 C5 d  X/ ~# Q! E6 i

# ~: k/ O+ H& ^( O/ GWhat a statement we have here?2 T# X4 P7 D, ?
' g" f; V* F2 Y7 U; R
Just wondering, what do you know about the syntax of ancient Greek, Hebrew and the history of the canonization of the bible? : P+ v8 p) n' K9 ~8 `6 K- |: ~

' r0 V- t7 y9 t0 a6 [2 ?I do agree with the bloodshed part....and my respond that this was posted a page ago in this thread.
, I5 y$ c' ?6 i  Y7 |) q, O
; G; P# z! F6 m" `Looking forward to see the support of your thesis. mr/ms Dxneo
# l$ A5 `$ T' T/ o
* K, Z$ j, D5 V; {9 M) \$ X* e:cool:, W5 Y0 W5 @' M+ G* s6 N

1 X0 b! p/ u+ J, E3 z* S. r9 M3 g3 u6 H[ Last edited by Gretzky on 2005-4-5 at 02:15 PM ]
Originally posted by DXneo at 2005-4-6 09:42:3 S, ?7 i5 ~2 Q+ A: s2 K& g& H
建立在虚假,謊言上的教派,不信也沒損失 ...
- M/ t' a4 P& X, m* p" \2 b* e1 \. F, X2 P, g) C
"不信也沒損失", J1 x& N2 S' c* s1 _4 g
Yes, we can't "control" the religions from others.....6 R; r+ M- ^; Q* M& ~+ b) A0 w6 O# r
but if we look positively, we should find out the truth.. of GOD.......
* @4 K% n( Y6 F0 j8 P3 e* m% ~  Q' i2 U1 p& e
it's starting because we have sins......
: L2 K8 o6 c7 b+ V( F$ H) E9 }satan dislike the creation from GOD..... (men) so .... attack us + f- z* ?: I( L: a9 E( {7 j6 w) t
our jealous, our selfish.. etc... to let us unlike charatertists GOD
We are blessed that we can watch sports, to do many things...
so be happy!
"他們都見證了一個人生命的轉變,就是一位年青人的心智從謊言和教條轉向對真相樸實的追求"+ L& O6 C2 |1 W! c( v$ _0 @
只要把神和基督之名及不要問只要信的思想放在一邊,( `# C* z" s. }1 l7 h
用一些“腦”來看一看書中人的所說所作所為,2 j" u' ]! v: K! c$ {8 H$ P
這些只可說是故事,古猶太神話大全
. D( A9 \" L$ N3 ]* }0 x如果把神和基督之名代入中國神話,更加神乎其神啦,( w5 X* R& g/ \3 ?; Z( z* k+ ^
而中國五千年歷史也沒有大洪水浸沒全國,書要多看一點其他的~~
( J/ V; [" W1 s8 X' T. K9 M7 s
# ~+ D- E' I2 L7 }4 J- c/ S導人向善的道理可多多學習,無理的要求或信條不肖一看,
2 P& J: f4 n+ x; ]6 l/ Q9 z好的宗教不必強迫人說認同,
% `9 a8 w5 S1 I. P6 p( S3 F! |4 p8 F4 s1 z! u% e' ^* ^! ]( [1 m' h
一直以宗教作“尋”略的西方國家,
  N% p; ?4 W2 U) _7 {% m# A/ N改了方式但還離不開強列排他及非教友即罪(歒)人的作法. m9 f! e  {8 m- U  g
美國的“布樹”更以救世信徒的姿態宣傳,開戰...
2 V, y' C+ `7 J) o
6 |, a/ u% d: I: R1 P宗教只是西方歷史上權力的道具
# X0 \  T, u  [  A1 B/ L. J' X& u9 j8 Q8 F- m
吹水吹太多了,我看不必要花時間找理據了,
$ B6 E  w& \) p5 b信是你的事,不信是我的事,我既有言論宗教自由,與你何干7 N& h- l( @, ]* ~2 O! E( H

4 |' b" @7 ^( Y3 s5 x5 w6 L0 C( o以下是其他人的見解,
; W4 x2 f; K. g" i7 a! r看一下神的先知門徒在記錄他們偉大信仰的錯誤
$ q% l" b, v5 W/ J( ?+ G) i; Q  \; Rhttp://hk.geocities.com/hpkong98/buybo.htm5 N! W0 V$ i" @0 n+ P$ F9 r" Z
2 e2 ^/ y$ B2 o% h; x/ Q- _
[ Last edited by DXneo on 2005-4-6 at 02:17 PM ]
.............信耶穌..............只係心靈上既寄託............
. ]0 {3 s- ]4 @1 Y5 k5 q( E/ V5 {5 y
) z9 e6 W$ ^, Y) o1 V信左,如果開心d,積極d,咪信囉! 0每個人有自己選擇!; u+ ~  r/ |( W7 o

. T4 F$ @5 E# W不過唔好吹噓到真係甘"神"!!!+ A( T1 }; W6 [: N3 f3 O
9 |4 ~: b# J) r( _6 A; H
我信"耶穌"真係出現過係世上...不過係1個自以為係"神之子"既宗教狂熱分子!!!
9 S. J9 Y- q; y0 |. I( n0 R
: L  Z. i9 [7 f2 C6 e同埋希牲左自己,成就左天主教成為地球最多人信既宗教!
Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-5 07:06 PM:( e3 _" t" s! J  D+ R% P2 e( {
.............信耶穌... ...
' Y! f4 _- e- D7 c* URegarding the resurrection....- W1 o/ i9 W/ Z2 k

- u6 Q; J) v$ a! DActually even the Roman government had refereces of the resurrection account of Jesus. The great historian Josephus did some sociological and religious studies in the 1st Century..../ M7 D' i) S2 Z; w4 D& F7 z7 D

8 H9 E/ b* a/ u. `. _5 B9 LYou don't have to believe...but take a look at the historical documents before putting some horrendous claims, please.
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 精彩辯論-----信耶穌不合科學

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。