|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
5 A6 e \+ X6 F/ q v0 N- h8 I5 X4 b) d5 \/ D4 a
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.6 ^% L" \( `% a
1 u0 L0 B3 ^1 c( Z5 r+ ~0 F( T- gIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
" u* C5 X# l# h% x8 E* }) j7 Jand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
' Z$ d6 Z/ R" ]% @: ]* h* d
1 r1 v6 W' c6 Lso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
+ x9 i( x" y; e& {7 D/ Y4 T
8 ~- X6 s! D8 min 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
! Z4 S9 k g! x" g& hat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|