waterfire

Originally posted by 誠 at 2005-8-26 10:41 PM:; I* B- t2 u) \( a7 @+ L* [
套片都講明係StupidVideos, 唔好怪ALWIN_WONG.
# Y" U$ i1 o# M  m# y不過waterfire咁樣講嘢就顯得無知.
/ }* I" F' T* P& y8 {% P高達兄d photos 真好.

2 U8 H/ y) y& J+ B
# B) ~1 |7 l) O2 V2 w

+ U0 _  Q# b: u4 A在下咁油知又唔發表下理論呢

丹山

Originally posted by waterfire at 2005-8-26 05:39 AM:+ k& |& T' A0 C+ z" p6 x0 B4 h
邊個可以肯定佢冇穿梭機呢6 A- J: T- F+ @0 r% q, }" K8 }
知唔知穿梭機佔支火箭係幾比幾呢
9 }; x. n) o7 X再加上火箭上面有穿梭機一d 都唔出奇

4 e/ _0 L% O# x我諗擺架現具穿梭機上去都得既...

呀俊

穿梭機多數都會有2-3個推進器係入面,跟住大概升到一定高度便會把機身脫離推進器.....好似..........不過我覺得似火箭,我上網睇圖d火箭多數都係係1支野咁既樣,穿梭機通常都唔會..不過多謝俾左一d咁精彩既片出黎