奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:- E! @# r' o1 b' e* K1 }  v

% R6 T" e1 m/ ]* G% c" Xagree,
' x8 M1 ~# E, A9 x我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,# X3 W8 Q2 v( d5 P) O! ~/ z
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,0 [9 F4 R3 p( ?* c+ Y' k0 n
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

3 ~* A) F3 z7 t2 [  @http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html" p. ?! j, M. i
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地0 _6 L) k9 l/ p9 f9 \. I0 X1 U9 z9 d
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
4 u/ b. p* d& O0 L( @" xJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:, |. h/ ~& b  k4 G, P4 S+ x  O% q8 C
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
# k' n- z) s8 q: M2 j& e! C& @; X
, `5 k6 E% A7 ~, c係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???, I4 }5 ^: a1 i- R0 u

/ B. [$ @; f4 G7 L; |; z( T為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

# c+ w: j: p  \: @4 u3 F4 K/ w7 m. ?' Y' ~+ m2 Y
絕對支持啦
" I& D4 m& A- A( f
2 O* a7 X" D3 ~% G有錯就認,打就企定+ E  H5 k- r2 N$ u

3 T1 Z2 ?. k" ~) F8 H4 n無錯當然要撐到底, i( o6 w" D5 Z. E. @) n( y

+ c  \# T* @) F. O但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
1 b, ]2 {. C% p% C- f) b
1 y# ^, U7 _* j3 H在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得) a$ C7 H' ?. V2 r

1 b. Y' u- A" R% f6 \1 ?一份公眾讀物係好有影響力0 ?% x* ?* p6 G! }4 y% J+ l
. Z% z  S# |. n' J
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生2 V, x4 h) E: J! F5 k+ d3 z
9 l3 v- H% A9 e: O) r
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
; |; a) D! j6 }* \3 n9 t- n8 h# `1 `
我唔認為lor
3 n* h1 R4 m5 R4 S# ~, I$ g4 N" W# t( w' Z  q1 p. {5 }5 D
唔係話要整死佢地& {$ k& q* i4 w

5 C+ }: Y. B! @7 \% [4 ^而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
6 [! s( i  D. F4 {' K9 s# o& y! E" p8 N6 s% w6 |
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
2 G$ p. a& `/ y- H+ M# Q
5 `9 e& l  p4 y6 O有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的& `6 r8 l6 `" V; N

; `' z( c7 ~! s0 l) [8 a# I/ r% o唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
& S) ^) n8 \' ~7 i+ P: s/ `. ?8 }* y% ^3 ]% \9 E$ `& {( |6 `
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
* a9 X7 r! ?  b) ~"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
2 L- A  ^% T4 T9 ?' h/ L
( P9 F% P0 A, ]8 K我們的大學生& o0 X3 ?' ~( m+ `0 X* G! ^
! j7 y: I0 ^% e# o; _
' }# F5 {# m# S6 J9 b, S8 \* u

% w) `; y1 Z/ g# d. e. j6 [2 L  J0 a' X' m/ j' [' s

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
- ]) l" m4 v, t
3 n. R* T- q/ A- `: v$ A# e% i" Q( ]" Y. m6 ^" C* s- A: L
有見地 !!!* R* w# P- j8 O
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html, J  a0 A" J" H+ b9 g3 {" p7 a
/ ]+ k8 q( a" m8 Q
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
$ i. \* S4 c! o! e' bI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
# q5 a" ^0 j: eI pretty sad that about the University official.+ T/ u5 a0 x( I  u8 R4 X
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la5 w, K& g; H( N+ d8 |

5 N+ T% v- e( ]! l2 Z4 ~[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
/ \' R  l! p$ n( [$ t( n我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
1 ]. f/ p: U" v. h! e  n* w5 h" ?& D" u+ m7 I: ^
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

5 ^0 M+ c" c! d3 c$ f' w4 O

  Z! F3 @! f5 P兩者有何分別?! l' c: H- C5 n/ ?" y
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?