奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
! |" j' Y& B3 A0 E* t3 v) Y
5 S- W; m0 d4 v; Gagree," J! B3 K+ |3 h9 ^- ]
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,2 q6 a( P1 P5 c9 V$ L
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,1 K8 M5 r; n* i0 u" c7 [# i
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

0 W( z* |3 X6 k& o7 ^
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
8 I7 u9 m) R3 i& p已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地+ m! U4 c& m3 `0 j' [5 O+ J
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
! f5 Q5 ^( I# }  M- i  D* mJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:  R: o. t# q' n, D* v( Y% Q0 N
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ ( Q, }, a6 H: ~1 l
6 M, x8 D% ~6 }3 r9 r0 U/ b% A
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???5 R; I2 M3 Z, K- [

! `4 o! n! S' P+ u: u5 a為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

1 h$ X' A2 a! l2 D2 @! f

1 E& y1 F& x* Z0 e, Y' K5 R( N絕對支持啦
( S4 e- j: t: k8 T8 q3 `3 L( y/ L8 q: X. J2 d6 ]/ s
有錯就認,打就企定
$ N9 J% {' `. C" [, p0 v+ _2 d8 @2 R# S9 t+ j( i% w
無錯當然要撐到底
. V( E" R* [& O
9 `$ w9 x" n4 \- U1 J( D但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
6 I' B0 e$ d# p* u$ P5 N' m' V. Z5 T4 O& S8 ]
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得3 ?0 g; y1 [" V/ h
( _) _# V$ q+ o7 A
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
$ w% r9 C$ @1 c% M' S) P5 ?  {9 v7 U; O1 {; b- I# x! Q
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
3 b8 Z3 P" E+ @) m+ z$ p$ t# g( Y1 m3 b! e* l
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
% Y, M9 @7 A/ G- j) C# `  V  d) e) ]* X6 c4 |
我唔認為lor
! p  P$ o- D6 b+ r/ W( r0 q( `; c/ `7 U0 \5 j$ O
唔係話要整死佢地
# [; L) y$ j$ [% y/ p7 `4 ~4 q' x4 J# w
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
$ z: h$ [1 P& x, g7 N: m' f( Y8 Z( X+ k7 N% V
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大& M- L8 H" g4 T
0 B$ K. E0 }% k; j2 w
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的% F+ |9 G) V& P) ^/ _3 T! g

0 S- y0 x7 T) Z. l1 e/ l& p唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
" W6 t$ [0 Y. O( t+ f, H' k' O8 v3 t& Z4 U" g
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句2 u. H) P4 k" _; P9 b
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"1 ?1 e+ |* s  b: C

9 v: z6 w: ^, E7 N3 J我們的大學生
( Z* f1 s$ ]; e0 v1 ]) X3 ^6 X: w2 ~9 v' E
2 @( ~+ z2 t* @$ j$ v  y
; l3 Y: \' E' r: N' m8 j1 Q/ V

/ }" A7 m4 i4 l0 b

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
& J0 ?( W( e  c6 w
7 W/ z0 [) v5 v' S
0 [" {4 y4 z. t  I有見地 !!!
/ O0 |) g) h& _* Z9 }現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html" Q8 n$ k; b8 X  z& A; B
; _: N7 J6 K$ F2 A) y! R; p
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. * }5 }  k, S, N6 D# l1 d# M
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. & `& i! R9 S& s% P+ R4 P
I pretty sad that about the University official.+ a; @2 h" i! d; y* e# N2 e7 C$ G
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
% \- }9 B% q8 s, N# u" Y% S  O% O- U/ e
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
& |3 S2 [/ i6 [: [. Y9 `我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
+ Z$ a( N( w! H6 b: G9 Z$ ~, J6 @
( W( u" ]/ `" x  h2 a. o[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

2 X0 Z: g, L7 k8 R- m6 N7 Y6 `2 U

# I1 y# A# ~7 w* _! Q$ o# T兩者有何分別?
  l' |  p9 C2 K, y/ n. [- r中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?