奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:& J& B. p* D2 i+ c- W# g& o
; W5 T+ n, H7 L6 q& l. i
agree,9 g: M1 X5 U' i
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主," f0 ?' }4 `. ^# A) ~
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,/ d/ `& B+ T, G. B
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

5 j- O: e' c, k* @+ G& U1 ^7 P  N/ ?http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html5 ^; G' v/ P5 x! {: @$ E3 T
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地" b( n# x: ~8 [& u0 c3 b0 Z( h
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.8 J6 A# `4 W+ P# w1 v+ f+ F" S  E
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
3 t7 X  }( `" V- Y有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 7 R  E0 e8 i8 X: h

& s7 |$ I$ Q8 i! S8 u; O係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???. n/ U6 V3 @4 E* [* s+ y0 g: U
5 I: S. Y: E% v- C
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

2 F4 [! t4 K, I8 \, T7 S( s3 e6 D# J- Z: @: ]
絕對支持啦
$ t/ e" Q  X( s8 y, g3 a* G3 E& M0 ^# \$ n. H  a7 x  o
有錯就認,打就企定
, x/ L" R0 Y1 w" @1 W# N3 ~. h' \% r2 `6 R. v* r
無錯當然要撐到底7 |( t% b: E8 \) l  u6 E1 s

' |- Z; q3 D2 w" N% c但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
1 Y- [  i- V$ d8 f6 S! K3 P2 m+ K% R7 b8 U+ O' ]/ ~6 V% z
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
8 h5 V' f7 s# E( y' Y4 K" o( T* [# ?( D+ @
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力& _  f5 \( F6 K. d9 t' w

( G. v: f6 {% j我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
4 ^/ O9 N9 l% x# H5 Y$ x) a+ h# N1 D% O) A6 d# Q1 I
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
; b! R. c. j9 d, ~' T; C5 G. g
  \/ f3 w+ _, `; H3 p( m我唔認為lor
2 o8 ~6 L6 z  J+ X
6 F  W0 `; n. T( _" E0 w/ ^唔係話要整死佢地
2 e- [9 G9 w2 Q4 _  G' g
$ X4 ?6 P. h  ^( H2 r而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
5 G  L7 m3 h9 i" t$ b. s: S, }7 ~$ g8 H2 R3 Y6 A2 A
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
  @" y0 u% l' X3 s. G3 N
2 h3 T6 @( x' S0 Q2 P; m有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的8 z; X& h; k7 E$ C, H: s( q# C
4 G: A, Y# P% u; {
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
+ L. V/ S, ~, n/ l, e2 V) w
; G1 k9 Z. W% _5 ^大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句) o( i& D+ S9 y3 Y: f* U# n
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"0 q# h7 u( ~: @5 f0 d: Z

' f; i9 j# a9 g$ {我們的大學生
- Z* r' D; D5 i* t8 c: _
% \- m$ P" @6 ^) S9 U; r% y/ w% E2 W8 T3 @
9 a6 p6 k* a( l7 C0 y1 }5 ]/ ?: A6 ~

6 l& a/ @( A! J

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
: F/ K9 O$ G8 x% q& p2 R- t& `) X3 d0 g! z) X& v* i
. R% R" g& p# m
有見地 !!!. b. A2 }" H) }* z1 H
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
# s9 r0 H' `. ]
. `$ R4 Q1 {7 {& n1 tI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 5 s( m6 g, z5 a$ U8 q# t  ?* H
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
1 O/ L, X4 \' h4 K  iI pretty sad that about the University official.( ?, _0 {8 y- Z( N0 J/ M* g$ r
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
# b2 q! U3 M5 f2 x2 r3 o, C4 d; P( V/ I! z
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:1 n9 x, D# q& n% t$ f3 h4 K
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la; U% d8 \) ]! E  x6 W5 G
% ?9 q4 s" e1 \1 I7 R
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

* ^. S. W: J  o
! d0 ^. J/ H6 Z6 O兩者有何分別?& J/ T8 G$ H. f3 G, \5 k
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?