奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
- ]; B2 d6 F, r  y7 D# i; p" ~% s
agree,
# v& t" P8 V2 r9 F3 k我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
* l" b/ ^; W8 X) \! r7 j: X9 `但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
% C3 L8 r* Q9 d2 L0 v期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

/ t# ~) i4 }! B. b" f3 Shttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
9 K& `8 v. S5 H- n: x  e4 Z已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
! h3 h6 Y: A2 R) m! j搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.7 T2 ?% g6 q; x1 l& U* O$ q
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
7 ~) {7 P& c( K% {) a- ~. G有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
; f. x9 t% J  G/ K( W) n& p* \2 H
0 w9 V( R, V0 \! o" r係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
; `. ?3 C- ?( X  q6 C9 l2 g4 y& U( e0 Y- F7 b6 z7 L
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

1 b! }6 I0 a+ _% k0 g

: l% ?. i2 h. o" F2 R: `絕對支持啦5 e  W" h+ r5 L' j) y9 U

. j3 D+ {! ?: E8 m8 Y$ d: a) d8 r有錯就認,打就企定9 U7 |2 u0 O: z, m& N& @7 ~" l" ]
4 }  q* b6 X: ^) K# D$ G$ X. T
無錯當然要撐到底
) `+ d- ^; \1 B& O
, F! G3 @! k7 f2 G  I1 @但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
% F9 A7 X7 v/ v, ]* k& [8 V8 z7 h6 f  `2 \
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
; `. [- ]  E( @, N) k
7 M! I5 p  s6 n8 n% k6 I一份公眾讀物係好有影響力- C1 P2 x/ T$ x" [+ K

7 j+ j" Q+ i+ g# i) J! L2 S/ c我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生+ C# \. L, @" T7 u

5 ~8 @7 Q# g* C唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?% m5 U, Z3 [* J9 V

7 }) Q# h) |3 I4 y我唔認為lor" G& O6 t$ `4 |& t5 d$ [6 _2 }
# I- j1 ~+ u; U
唔係話要整死佢地
* i* I; H5 N2 N0 A( D* h
- R5 _: v" @% y* G, r9 w+ S9 e2 t而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用  u0 A6 j, s4 _# @# w( c
2 O/ R& F! j4 ^; j5 K! u$ Q
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
7 \) O- |; k, \* \6 T3 J& l; K$ {  m6 X- U4 `  Q( F8 z5 n
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的% X2 Z7 b. V. `  x- e6 |

9 k0 q# E9 C. j: ?& z唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由, C! V5 E) z  H7 r. Z9 [3 {6 b1 |

* C" L( w3 B  ^大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句7 j/ p) Q% G6 g' s' {
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非". b9 I2 G9 n: K9 b
1 V+ d4 _7 B+ V, T
我們的大學生
- }9 d1 C. X) I% E; x3 t. @7 I- F+ x8 G6 r% k7 P
0 b5 n, s- k( P- T4 ~9 e- d, B$ `

; j6 e8 L; e& C) c/ x& h( E+ }  V: }9 h4 ]: V

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:: N0 [* ]5 U: \# d* p
& ~* V1 x2 o' |

% g! Q# b$ ^8 t; }有見地 !!!! E9 K9 X2 O6 r! T4 U/ M
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
- T( S: y; b& u% a. r+ C) ^
, u4 U5 y; d' s6 zI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
; ~/ _% B) Q1 X3 c3 [) r3 EI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
+ Z1 c6 n# O) cI pretty sad that about the University official.
5 ?' k! R8 Z" K  `+ E9 {$ C6 f: OIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
/ W) q# O/ J9 @! g4 K, }
; B5 t/ W, [* u[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
% q$ y( h; a4 v* E- u我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la' z- [# C; F5 u4 G' Q9 O* D% u6 w
" d3 }$ _9 v, F1 r: _
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

. L2 x5 b6 R& b+ Y& x3 p5 m& K/ \! w) S- R6 R, l/ m/ z
兩者有何分別?  E+ ~1 j, y8 H# k
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?