奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:- P* J- e: R+ Z; J( L
+ B/ Z  A- Q1 a( i7 s" y3 q3 ^
agree,
: R. I7 `9 O- `7 k. }0 i我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
$ N2 v# V: ^  n- f$ f% p6 C2 f2 \2 ~但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,+ p+ ^# B* G+ `$ g3 b8 O$ e: q, ?
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

8 @' G7 L: Y+ o& {: Q: Y, H
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html( m, H7 k# s! Z% F: Z& c
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
7 I5 f- Y7 V- M1 |- K搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.7 \+ @- B, s6 \5 O& Y0 F2 F" |7 p
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
1 m/ c8 I+ X- }. ]5 n# k* A有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ # c1 F, G: s0 J4 Q! T) O2 G3 b2 x

) [/ C+ t- }/ W3 J係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
  M5 Z6 V2 R% y+ v2 p- ]0 A0 r8 F5 A
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

0 q7 l& q5 g/ l3 \

- ?  Q: B; k2 @* U絕對支持啦. F' V4 t& @3 }: {) S4 k8 ]

* W) ~6 Z1 w/ ^- ]$ \% `3 ^有錯就認,打就企定2 ^. ^) ]* p1 C
9 R  m; g" ~7 @& k
無錯當然要撐到底
7 K) Q) M# m4 c+ f
( u4 {: n- H' h: }* Q& I! H2 O但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩3 O: ~4 `/ \, W) L% {9 z7 e: ~
9 t8 ?- R9 U; g. [) ~
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
8 H0 m9 ^$ D  p, j. H% Q( }  O1 N+ c6 M" d# T. O
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
! J& I; x# k/ J% R# N! g$ S  o7 Y( K/ [. e. |( B- Q# d
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生/ L  i; m8 G& K( q( v; ?, p+ `

. T6 R* }: s/ ?( @+ e# |) |& ?/ O唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
7 G- a: s' U! }1 X% {
$ {8 ?: I2 c7 N2 U我唔認為lor
! |6 S( B: C& h7 @4 t
5 E0 a! ~& D( `  ]唔係話要整死佢地; d9 d% B" S* i0 V2 T
# v6 k5 C/ s) f( x% {5 O
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
  L# d: ^) h  p4 J; x! q' \9 p7 D$ F5 N+ s7 z
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
9 v2 k1 d% o2 \) D( _2 z
6 K0 x2 ?9 j& [: q) z& h0 J, s7 n有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的. c" m- s6 V1 V5 s( ]( s$ n
$ V9 z& ]4 B6 @: ?, P9 X8 p
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由" z" W, w( E/ }' I

( `8 N0 j8 `1 n) X6 _: p  F, e大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
, ^) C& L  ?. V3 p"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
% i8 ^5 A6 U+ p8 R
: J% C3 z) @7 i5 e5 a我們的大學生
) v& `# Z& l# v7 Y, c# d5 H- ~* U
0 D& o6 R0 D, u
" v& L9 a1 G8 i: F

! u+ \& D7 ^+ ~1 L, w! q

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
5 ^# J  W3 \4 j. [% i0 q% w, H6 U) s  y: T4 B+ i; s

* I5 R  F/ P( d) `, s" J有見地 !!!7 F# ~8 |, S7 k3 O
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html$ H" E, {% ^1 j3 L) o
6 X( m  j3 g3 b4 [3 Q) s8 H$ N
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 2 s9 O; }$ q$ ]1 {- ?
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
$ q. W+ ?. W; w0 B) xI pretty sad that about the University official.
5 u" c3 S5 S: {; KIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la- Z' G+ {' z& h' \4 t: r) t
! t% p% Z( k# t' E- w( d% F: a# f5 p
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:. {7 ?" S2 q+ w7 V" F' ]
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la& W9 m3 x- q2 H' ^6 B9 v* ?

7 Q- q; w5 f/ Y! ^0 Q; c[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

5 q% |' `# _! F  ]  F/ ?

: ~6 e1 n" L9 q3 x兩者有何分別?% B) F0 L( z" Z9 B4 S; G0 q: ]6 N
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?