奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:0 ^. i" z1 G% P* m5 \2 G
4 [5 l! t1 _5 D6 w& G* C7 A& P
agree,
2 [- {1 c$ Q" v/ c4 m& R# X我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
0 \! X: w9 K8 O; z但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,7 I$ R* G" }. `6 ?
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

0 Q2 r' E8 @7 J2 Q% U, Z2 E
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html! k# z5 k! R( @6 j
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地! G! P+ Z$ u! V' R6 ~2 u; `
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.5 a( `3 R6 M, X
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:) Q* R* h& y& k0 y
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
  {# R( J. z! X" H  l2 e$ T& \1 X- @3 c" J4 x/ w/ r; l& j
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
3 ^( @, p$ j5 @* m# ?2 `. w) x2 T9 C& n; V! \. X1 K
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

3 P7 [/ }' `; N$ ?" h/ L* p6 \$ o& |, N5 H  Y4 x" X+ E9 m, M
絕對支持啦- \1 ]7 W$ M0 N! J* \7 n: M

6 }: z% G0 f4 ?: R3 L' A& {0 \0 p有錯就認,打就企定* j8 ]3 q3 w: k' b# W5 l

8 A( M" H- V) ]/ j/ U; S無錯當然要撐到底6 W3 d, D9 S+ z$ e

! y7 R# [' J: A1 e# i8 G- f但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
1 u- F: \: p; c5 G; L  D2 e+ X! |. K5 M+ a0 n2 _! D' @1 x
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
# J6 D! B; D3 H7 p6 x- s; |& Z( C5 c: y
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
8 r, Y8 H1 d: ]6 p8 M6 _; S
. h. l. M" P- z. v我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
! \: W* {- ?+ a" {; _0 B) @3 X( M
/ a* w# Q/ s8 Q/ X唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?) D7 c$ }* Z2 m7 c

) |: b) _* ~6 F6 h我唔認為lor" h  I) o0 X! h# w1 s/ e; a' F% X4 e

) k$ L. ^( q! l6 H唔係話要整死佢地# x2 G$ M: v" ?, I* n
8 ^: H# ?- \! E7 ~  m
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
/ b5 K) v* z- s" |4 ]$ T
5 `9 \  y! c& D1 r! b: D7 |/ G我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大$ b' q: a# \* j+ j/ `7 R7 R

; c, J; b1 S: b; s$ o有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的, Q9 }* F+ q, u- M) @: P
7 i( m3 [% ]' O6 }; O
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由! x& Z# q/ I0 |; w: C' M

/ D! p( d6 P3 i4 a4 Q! u大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
$ p. ^: J5 Z8 e8 {"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"" M) @7 A) `0 d1 c, b' c

  g- T% R, O! `" o我們的大學生
" Y2 {$ I9 s# k" Q. E6 p
7 _) P( a/ L, s* J) ]
" o& X" J. h7 ~* ^  M
/ \  U$ {+ [) {# K
" }; Y+ ]! s' ^1 \

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:/ E1 {& {  @: O2 X
% o7 y1 ~6 {5 ?4 S( w
/ u2 f3 X8 |0 S( a8 e' N! w
有見地 !!!( F: K' c0 m$ ~4 b
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html2 H3 N3 J2 c7 X4 x" A8 ]# M

) X" }# n8 L  P4 b% I7 W$ T# c8 @I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
9 w0 j5 S) h) o5 Z0 L6 u1 UI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
9 C0 [* \! }& |8 T" I5 LI pretty sad that about the University official.
4 }% \- w# p  `& l. I7 |It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
4 n% s- U$ ?" F: }* c
4 R5 P8 b) [& i; d# n: {: ?! w[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
% q0 c7 I, x! `/ G我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la' ]2 X3 [6 _& m+ E+ R! D  |
+ U- I* Q: a+ h+ N5 X9 |0 B- L6 F
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

1 B1 ]2 C% r' ^" k( e  D# _
: T% e0 v+ ~4 `9 u$ a兩者有何分別?5 I2 t* S  w& G# u
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?