  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.! z8 w# D& d2 w3 b3 a3 G
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,3 P' H' F5 K. _( ~
more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
$ q$ `6 j4 {$ r2 u- dmain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,
- g! q1 G; o/ {4 r( Jin other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.
9 |; [& r' e( R! d1 J0 kAlso, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.
: K$ {7 V! n" S/ w& bsimilar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,
( b) y6 y0 ^ [9 ~7 Jnormally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
* ], ~$ r7 A& {/ V0 reg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
, E) _" h3 P- X. O/ o. E/ ebanks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
) V p& S, a' c" {9 S6 m, [
: u3 A: z& O/ Z6 n1 ?- B0 Rim not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
/ h& E: {" O& Z5 P5 {$ \1 [+ g8 z, Fin stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.1 p0 m w1 }- @2 `) R9 n8 w
For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
* |1 z5 E! ?3 F6 z: XA's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction., J9 Y" a% O. h+ `& T
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. * \* @: ~8 x. ^' [$ M
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
* l! b7 v' _. x$ \0 w4 Q B, s
; w9 \: T; X( O- D" V: k( p[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|