Rika

由最好排到最壞6 b4 H9 E6 o) q
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
" ^$ x0 {- E! v3 pB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount( A$ T# w/ M" i0 Y, h/ l
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her' N  {9 R+ R' J1 A9 u
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure( Z; C9 A. h/ v6 y2 A1 \
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:5 d7 F4 f" J) I" v! g2 a* ]0 o
. W9 E0 x1 m3 j; c1 h/ J
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人6 S7 A; e4 {" s0 ~

9 c8 v' s$ L1 x/ O" I9 @7 y- PS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
* I0 {7 X( i. L$ @" ~" R; Y9 P     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!! ^8 }3 ^# w: w3 \) h. o8 Q

% X* z0 d& ^# Z  DB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做6 i$ P0 Q3 o3 `* v5 s" {0 A2 {
8 e  r' L$ K, j+ {+ E! r, p
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
+ b2 J/ ^% J; f
& ]# Y! M2 r' ^F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
6 e  Q% C/ w' {$ }2 J+ p# R     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好' m- p  b! m, E' U. w/ `" S
' ~  i3 ]) n+ @9 i% `. }
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案" u# L* l& I+ c( H, \0 Y1 z, r
而家答多次) R: _0 U: F6 m. S7 \8 N
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽7 }8 u" A  _- f& |( f0 [
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架8 k. m8 R3 Q( v7 R$ h* v6 q
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
3 g, M4 ?0 T( f$ hs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.4 S5 G' B6 }4 l, L0 d
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S5 g, d' _  C) @% R8 M

+ u: t, N) O1 ~L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
! @$ Q/ L+ y) l* o/ yF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
, j! \( |. v$ e# CM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
! o+ [, Q4 ^5 ?9 l' W- u8 o3 I$ }S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢- ^# h- d3 A9 v, `5 k; ?
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
" ]3 T* e& R; z2 \F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
; H# a3 }9 C8 Z( pS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
7 P/ V6 J% d9 z  @" n4 h0 h8 Z) qM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法/ ^& {% [: s. U; m
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果( Y* s) k4 ?/ \% i7 {9 F! ?( l7 O
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
' N. u2 Q+ W; t% {9 _6 i8 {3 j9 F6 A* l) C" W) Z: M, D
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:0 a/ p) s( _" C& l) f6 ]
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
* S' c+ U5 R5 ~# G* z) B5 EB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘* ~$ w; d( q0 g  B
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件! O5 d. B' {/ |7 _: U
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方& R7 r8 l+ _0 G; K
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

, |1 c3 D/ U5 b) e

  k) O0 ~- \7 A. r same choices with u , but want to add some comments
+ X! c  V% n# b: A. V0 j
% p/ ?8 [" d* D3 c, }' `, qB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  1 [  Y+ m  T8 R6 Y2 N( a0 g1 H
" j. j8 a! F+ V$ q4 v, r
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )  \6 ^! t7 x1 W; S9 U4 |

) k4 w: g8 [7 l* wF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
2 w+ Z6 P9 G! Y' |" s! ^
+ m3 k# c' h, G8 rM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......  s( y) r) b3 K3 g5 r; f9 t

2 n6 C0 _0 j2 T! z- n+ O: O; y[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
& T+ l- ?7 w6 ^# B; U  k$ |M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢. i4 I6 q. {/ S2 w1 g7 ]
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
% h& F2 ^1 W3 i( n$ C; tF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma: I+ t, o/ A+ s7 M

6 V' T7 J. m( A7 u" Y最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....* x& }( S( C+ u- B# d
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
4 S% ~, R+ N; q/ F! A; v1 O由最好開始排起既話，
: e9 b% [6 e7 ]$ {L B M F S 啦，) e# J/ A& o2 L2 p5 r/ k

8 m/ k: \( o/ A6 q* l其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，+ U  b6 Q: q- r+ d7 V) D
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
8 u) c8 b. w9 s4 L" `$ F4 j' X如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
# f0 G  k, I' U( k又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
2 l4 Y+ J4 ?% _! U: q  _% ^6 I: Q; f) x4 [: b' J3 ?4 y
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，( J; }. T- P: Q3 y7 A: V
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
5 x* f: ~! x" ^4 P) |% e) e明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。/ D2 M; X$ s" g( e  a/ J. ~+ X: ?' ~

$ `6 Y7 n& b) [9 t而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，1 z7 t9 C3 [) p/ X7 m! v  _
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
, V. z. Y( t4 Y  B9 W亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
4 f$ u6 N! m% ]4 W- [" C知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，4 l9 |7 c& Y& a* l0 G. _1 z2 [# [" L' D
M 都可算壞了。# a" }, i+ g# x& N$ h' H* r
! q. v( K! T4 w# C2 h% I! ]) n
F 呢個人仲掂，! }/ L- U: e% _. L+ a
知道既唔等於要講，
* N: {% X3 g/ g' u* M如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
, r7 I5 I. ^; r- q我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。. o* I% B% `$ X
% m' N0 ?+ l+ X5 l7 H& U
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
. a7 R0 g& {$ u; C始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
! A  l- o& ~/ G2 S$ H# G6 A0 u: a& D* |+ _6 |/ v
. [+ v+ M- O$ k

* F  h0 @  x7 u. t* s題外話：% E% ]4 }2 c8 j) g3 F) }
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，# u, P+ m6 a# v
睇到 S 呢條友，
* ~3 @; Y+ I# r0 ?我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
$ H: E. a1 w& L5 G- Y# |  k# v- k7 Y" j- i6 W& c1 [. M
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
4 o8 y2 M* P5 b! V' V1 M8 fF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
, R* O4 D) X+ r5 zM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
7 u& x9 K* x+ B( qB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
. I4 x& n/ d- ^. h+ g# v& Y9 F* VL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...