Rika

由最好排到最壞
1 p5 ^% ?4 E4 d9 @4 tF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
# }1 c* Q& x" R) L. B/ f" `: J: NB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount4 ]; q0 K8 a: Q5 J2 L' q
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her4 q$ t! g7 S4 k
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure  i2 _( y) d1 E2 I9 r/ d
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:4 h' ?+ I3 |  F9 a: J

! ?5 k4 _$ ~8 u, jM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人5 K2 n/ l! v$ s" L" G0 T5 @

& O5 n1 ]. g( V9 F) E: g, nS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)" l8 ?4 U6 x9 o
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
; i* a% P" ^$ w. D' z& e( C4 I; G2 l! p; V) l
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做3 B8 c! v; g3 n
% I0 _9 Q) _$ x; P: z6 U( u
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
1 K3 z0 f! O+ S4 i4 u4 B
1 Y3 }2 [6 i. e" mF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
3 B# r( A- P/ N5 B: C     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
0 q- c1 |: G1 G" P( V% G2 N8 G/ s  ]% o8 x
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案+ n" [; ]& f: w# A) x
而家答多次
6 C& y0 g9 w3 Y' C* Jf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
6 }' f, v% L: W- C5 b( a3 El: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
3 u5 [$ a% T9 j; Lb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
3 C) h0 [) f; zs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
4 b3 Q" P$ @  s" M3 hm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S1 N& _: F9 G0 s2 @6 W

( d  v6 ^) H# r! CL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大5 N" Q: y' ^% V. E5 Z
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
: T0 ^1 u1 i  B$ S. C1 L6 }( XM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
. [2 ^) o& P; P: gS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
, Z" c% y, t" d0 }1 }1 U. G: J) M% I' XB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
% C2 R) i- ^0 B2 T% W* o: eF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
: z! M5 [, {  B& P% X  ?S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取4 y7 C1 q* n6 X9 ~  p/ e3 {8 c* }/ P
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
1 z/ N( u( m6 z/ Y9 N  N. TL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果" q$ A5 v7 @( o: f5 G% [$ n
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情8 ~, W% B5 m+ ]+ i& I# ?/ E7 K( |; f

. ^% D3 k( O, _7 M世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
* f! Y" S/ F! V* L1 CL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己8 b7 R+ Q+ ?7 P, F, s/ H+ q4 u6 @$ H
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘$ e) _; j1 ^1 [  A1 J
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
$ c5 F' E7 G/ }* WF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方0 F5 l  T$ ~3 T. |  J- n
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

6 ?7 h/ _# o) o. V1 h
) S& A' R& @+ R% n
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
% `/ A( R/ {( S9 M8 i8 U5 k- @" X' z) P. \% p3 b+ [
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  * o: K8 d2 Y( e7 v
3 `1 A, G7 u( _% i/ ?, S
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )' e( J; d; X. n6 s. U! k" _
- N: L1 K. Z6 P  i2 S9 T6 t& A& Y
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
( x; \4 `1 D) p6 W9 k
( f& p  J0 p! Z" s* [* cM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so....... T- y# J: R% ^7 b
; ^* y2 _! E' N) ?$ h# u5 X
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
* T( ?* X7 |+ U' TM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢1 Y3 p! I" ]7 D! n* Z
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
! H5 M, k2 l5 u/ L/ K1 \6 t$ o) cF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
$ L1 e' T: E) w" `+ D5 @
- ?& T. M+ @- i% Q* W& V  L# B+ T4 v最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....* r- t# V( I: G0 e
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
. a3 |% }9 F& K4 t5 {% e  `! z由最好開始排起既話，( _% M0 b$ N. N0 {: @! M
L B M F S 啦，
+ \. F% q% o. ^9 [0 r- y( }- z+ ^: E& _* u2 T# u
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，- B( H' \4 D* R5 l( [7 X
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？8 @- P! m# I# C4 \: j7 ?& o
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？1 ^5 V0 N4 ?6 t7 w# D" K
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。/ d, Z* s- v2 W* M4 t

$ l+ n3 Q& T3 @0 w" o" G而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
3 Z; J  O4 m6 P; ^' [, Q; \所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，6 V5 [% M3 T' \
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
8 i8 ?. P7 }/ C
  S1 v) P0 l# N$ D& |而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
% @1 P" U  R5 P M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，3 S! J4 W" D6 c5 ~
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，5 o$ n2 w/ Z# E- {, q8 r' l+ E
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
' N- e. i4 j4 x  v! |3 p! _$ I M 都可算壞了。. j- m0 [4 ?2 \0 X( p

0 M# h! d$ V) C% V F 呢個人仲掂，
. o3 Q6 F/ \. X知道既唔等於要講，( J' C1 a# w; \' t
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，3 w% k: i0 z" \  p" O  D! a
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
) A9 Z  _+ f: J: e
0 ]6 r- U0 |( H4 L- z最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
6 @- R/ p, v* q1 r7 r始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
; I) m' z! u1 e: ]) L  l% C/ K
) d, x6 e3 C/ I$ S0 e4 G3 I) j
8 A4 v, i( Y$ `. h# d# W% v/ s, R. Z3 l) W5 o; M0 J, @
題外話：
  o2 G& L8 _* Y唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，- D0 ~1 v3 x# i
睇到 S 呢條友，. Q: y! A) v; m& u# X
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L& T* E: M5 O- l* P* x+ N, V, v
( j. M  C4 o) L- g  _3 {; T
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!+ @+ G- g3 M" U2 G1 h' T  P" h
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係' @  o3 O1 d) [: I! y" N. `( I
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她! A* I! u; L1 ~: H/ K5 S
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
9 O; |6 i* `# R- w8 O2 g- vL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...