Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:& A( O& d+ x+ r4 a( Y$ Z) j
+ i. D' D  N& `/ Y& R. Z3 F

. x6 F4 D0 j# b  Y% N# m我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

+ p& s! P, d2 {2 o& y' k) e4 r  A
) D/ x+ G; |3 F  h" ~) `. N$ f
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:8 u: s% j1 T% D
* y* r. c5 q9 n0 Z$ {- v

: |, N& t! j5 F- [0 e% uIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

/ g+ K) V5 T  ^4 g1 v) ^# E2 p& |# H' W% @) \+ p7 [
oh really...( g" ^1 ?8 v; I
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
* W% ]1 s) Q3 Ui didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
8 [7 z- T/ Y6 G8 ^
* q0 c  g# m4 ?* y當然這是個假設性問題2 J# p7 A6 S8 o' Z% Y" L
但將人數倍大
% M( o# t1 L& w4 w8 S例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
& x" |& X( [9 Q; e  A; o(情況可以換作其他)
9 F0 H8 V: i; F8 ^, P: m. E始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
$ w/ X* X0 {- C  U" t% X如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
& ]$ }0 r) K2 l如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:# q+ b; T9 Z  ^* N
絕情谷既問題...3 J/ t* m9 }2 u* Z6 w  |
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
, Q2 Y) w' U3 q% G( T如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

$ t7 T0 S2 J4 H6 s. @: K* U殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
; b+ Q9 Q$ d: Z/ s於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
! T/ R- [6 t: k  h8 M1 A6 C0 ^但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩& f6 p. p: P0 ]0 I, }% X# h( c* n
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
) B& F, s7 B/ L. u其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢9 V( P  G, n; ^/ H/ F' E
5 d) P- @) s- z. X4 Y
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
  ~" b: U% [" ^不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
3 I& L: E1 ?: W  g% `1 H其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

- ^0 B& \( d; n! Z6 H3 |9 E4 s1 Q2 ?0 t* k* Y* B! d5 X
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣8 p6 y% z9 E1 P& Z$ e9 }
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....- J) Q" ]4 }0 ]- Z
) k+ k+ {% F+ x
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
1 V" S6 E2 {- R) i. iyes, my reason is helping more
9 s5 Y& |6 W0 x& ?$ k, pfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!3 W5 K) X; T5 V; l0 ^0 z% `
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
3 S3 h6 P: @$ M: n- i' Z; K4 jbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?% k9 f0 |- A$ [
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!6 U/ `# v# M$ _: v3 N0 {
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
* ?+ d& e9 R" ~: O' s7 |8 Cunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~* N. _0 U# P9 v2 T) ?' U; X4 r
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~; h* J4 R5 f- l' m9 v1 u2 Q
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
1 }4 w5 W8 c* ~) k' D正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
; E+ X3 H0 [$ O3 P3 ^! V" v! S即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
# R& X, k; ~. G2 v8 [& D5 e4 Y3 |我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~( U: o& B' [4 `: j5 G
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~( J) o0 e/ k7 ^- h  B/ ?
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）