Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
5 R, Y$ l$ o- w" i: T! N# v" P4 n$ b3 ?

. [2 ]; n# |$ E3 Z/ J我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

; W' G8 S1 X4 o( g% `- t% P: R

' E1 o0 S; F! g' RIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:, p; S6 f. X- C
8 K1 l9 }  ]6 ^# R& G
! ?3 g. F2 a0 \* d7 F6 a1 Y. P
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

5 k3 q$ q0 L7 {7 `5 a6 ^4 r# Q8 G* H# f' Z/ U; h0 J9 V' X
oh really.../ l8 D( \; i) a& ~# m0 O
hahhaa, thx a lot^^": @, |2 r6 O: a- V! P8 V/ W
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
7 S  o9 d- ?$ D
" p  }/ x% i+ n! B" U當然這是個假設性問題  E: e' E) M% e( S4 r) S
但將人數倍大, s9 p' ~. q9 x# u; \$ N) e/ s
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個* j  A7 }  C9 h9 {" B/ i8 x
(情況可以換作其他)
/ p2 ]9 |+ o# G始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
0 e5 v8 g! q! b6 p  r9 t2 y2 S如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...4 `  ?6 D5 L. D) ]' [* g% N
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
8 V- U0 o+ x  M, A: E- B( C絕情谷既問題...( l4 x( s4 q* Y5 q; Q& m
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...  n& ]3 k# b, I/ c
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

1 W' U* h9 a2 V" @. R2 M% Y
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
; i" n" w+ s* \; p" d' Y% B於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
: m" Z  M1 i  b5 q4 m# k: S( t. o但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
* v9 x/ e2 G2 @! M0 o好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢9 Q$ R0 r( M; T  S, ^' O2 _
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
( |9 ?9 G2 V9 {4 I
9 [# p: E3 K. ^+ K0 q! [5 E我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命; P$ E! {% |, a* `+ z
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:: V4 m- Y9 K9 i) q& Z- \( ^
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

$ \( `/ Z- Z% H. M( C! e, S

  ]* H. V* U# r! ?7 u, xhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
  v% B  \1 ?1 {4 ]/ f8 s9 O你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
; B$ N* Q) U1 E0 b1 K" G  p3 i5 T
% f/ U/ g  ]. v2 l8 \p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
2 }4 `3 s2 @# m" v0 V( c" m; O: M1 K4 dyes, my reason is helping more% d  l. J  D( }5 [/ b
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
0 \, b- S/ ~% a% I6 P1 a! mif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
7 H# d2 [. F: y! \1 ?9 |; e; Gbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
) u1 O+ J# k4 q0 T  I% b% [also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!8 S$ d- X9 R; V3 y9 C- p% T' [. k1 V
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!$ q, J! b3 h% ]2 p3 [0 {2 B
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
2 Q. p* E& E: {& u) X當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
- o3 {3 O7 ~( O$ \) U; K8 V我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
: b  H6 P+ a! c3 N正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~2 {! @0 O( Z" p3 F5 l4 }
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
; e. ?( r3 c% n9 }+ N我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~/ K0 H/ P- }  V0 }. s8 {) G6 P
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
/ w( w' N5 y, b9 P我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）