Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
$ ]' a  o5 }9 f/ C( p. N) z. M& W" F" f7 t; V2 D

6 h; n6 G+ g2 y我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

' v* j* ^3 |2 t% g
1 Q% b- U3 w# l% v1 [) Y$ m! i
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:+ k+ |5 X6 W/ X
/ u1 k) ^7 @4 e7 P
5 Q% C8 H% y9 n7 l4 U7 D4 ?6 I. A
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

1 }( F7 e+ M! t7 p

! B" H" T6 t2 s* p3 e) ~2 {oh really...
& |  B- {$ U$ g% V- a# F0 n6 W- P8 Dhahhaa, thx a lot^^"
+ _! p( v2 K  g# @+ v/ E2 \7 ii didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題5 D$ B8 |* C) V# s0 t$ o

( J2 u! G* \& _7 v* `當然這是個假設性問題
& U. v( I1 z! e& ^3 N; u但將人數倍大, K2 w& Y& D! n% h
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個! p- N! m4 N# Y4 u1 f' X) ?2 A
(情況可以換作其他)
' L9 z1 M2 ~2 |( L2 M始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
. Y2 Y' D: m8 L: Z如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
3 b0 z/ V# X+ A* p" h如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
0 F- l: Q) ^& s3 ^  t  H絕情谷既問題...
" A+ F% b) {+ j- ~) [$ ]2 }' Z如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...' r9 X# l5 J& ^/ X2 b
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

# Z4 D2 i0 Q7 Q8 T+ k# v) f( E殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
. O  p2 X: i: l& R, \- B' v於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
2 \# q. g; L" M3 \但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
& W" h4 Q; ?: S  Z: m% e好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
/ s  I# j/ p, [1 U" M1 ]/ J其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢) w8 ?8 m3 K: M

; p6 h" {; S3 }- z5 V我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
+ R6 P, n' k/ W* K' N  G5 ?不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
* M* q  D' Z7 r# N  U* y+ P其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

  ~5 p/ g4 I" q, [# x
8 g3 k! u. ]; I$ H; f8 m/ U5 ?' \$ Thaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
% ]  k4 l7 f0 Y8 }2 j1 B! [/ F) h你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....# t4 `6 p$ _: x7 I6 F$ y+ E7 R7 f; H6 c

' X# w& f3 ^" v1 p+ @5 \p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
6 ?2 y+ j, v6 W: O, o1 |' D0 r$ eyes, my reason is helping more' l# H" k6 n+ B( w( `2 U
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!8 Y$ s% |( N7 O
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child3 {+ R& `$ U1 A* A: O5 Z. Y
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?% S7 Z4 m7 n2 d3 x- s+ |
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
" A% y/ [6 x; J3 S3 g9 Kmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!! @$ w9 {* x3 M
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
+ X' J) N, H& f  Q4 w6 r* c$ B當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~) ~# j8 N; N* r  ?) m
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
& b) o) j7 c% i( `$ k1 b正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~) ~3 E9 G6 D. a0 @8 {+ K
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~# n4 u; l% O. {* S4 c  t
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
& G# e7 K( f1 H* Y4 n0 K4 j但如果o係當時o既情況中~~+ x7 Q7 F7 w! }" Y
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）