Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:# _3 W8 _( V/ Q) b
* X" N8 V4 ?/ r* T7 _

  A" E6 I5 {' o7 U我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

2 q0 t( Z7 K; Y& A2 C* M3 N6 y" O) }, d
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:8 v" x0 W0 o: L) w

0 r0 ~* }/ k( ~5 ^% K( w  p) q5 ]: H9 y2 X: [- E. z
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

1 N! o$ T. f8 F& U
/ ^6 n; O' J5 o* K' [$ R5 Goh really...
" r; [, _6 L. [/ W; ~3 qhahhaa, thx a lot^^"' f+ \) O; R0 w- b2 Y
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
9 D7 S, J" M! }! P# N. I) @
' b; o  }1 r/ y( x當然這是個假設性問題
0 c5 s! L3 p" q% q; P4 I0 Q1 I" v" m但將人數倍大$ M, H/ t8 p) V
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個  l0 P2 x  c! {& {; S8 Q
(情況可以換作其他); v9 `" w# Z6 _/ n$ F
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...) O* D6 u5 Z: A/ p) T, ^
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
' E4 [$ F" \* i- n4 A) E  p# f% B如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:- F5 f. T0 F& T8 I8 d. {
絕情谷既問題...
5 ], r. S9 _2 [2 k+ s0 y如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
  B/ l8 z. E5 ?+ D- }5 z, V如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

0 C' z: s" {5 G: ~' O4 Z' ]# y
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
. [+ l# `0 l1 \. W6 |於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生' X! [& e) |1 |8 g6 x+ u
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
* N1 d' B  l9 y. v7 a好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢0 T: b( @! Z! [& {
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
$ v% c+ x6 S  `) F. M1 y* ?/ O
% K' [+ C2 i/ }! M# E# G0 ]/ d我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命, w0 T# k! s% H3 p7 l6 m
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
$ u+ e) ]# V! ]! s" @6 J0 q( P5 |) u其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

' {4 g1 R+ \4 i! e- a- R3 r
" d0 r3 Q, k7 H; X0 _/ K6 K# w. shaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣3 \( L6 u7 k8 t. p* p& }
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....& m$ \+ Y! Z: O
. v$ u7 X4 a% ]1 H% t' q! v: Y
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
$ j! m, e0 F6 ~yes, my reason is helping more
3 S  S1 D3 O+ Q9 b0 r! H! k* s5 Lfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!" M1 m; Y) L- v/ \, w2 v- Q
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
, a$ w) z2 r. |% P: dbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
6 J+ \# m" y( Y- ualso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
3 [- }! i* i+ U/ {. mmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
2 H, y5 X6 z. V) x! Dunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
. z7 V+ O; Y5 W# x) R' `當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~6 A, }7 v" u1 g+ Y2 A8 L9 w  Z: J" |! v
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
& u3 E) e, x+ t& j) n  a1 j! _正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
) c9 A2 ~! R" C6 Y8 C! A0 X即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
- r; X0 R/ ^, ^我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~) I7 n. K- F; g+ t
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
0 T5 ~( h8 r7 s( W8 t/ E我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）