Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
* }2 \5 k2 k8 {; c; K9 [2 Z1 A# c- _; w; V8 {# m) |! L9 Q

4 q! V$ F+ ]/ }! Q6 S* T$ s我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

* T) a. z* `' Y( M6 c
5 P5 d; _% E9 TIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
/ h5 V9 K" D7 y6 ?
. g8 D6 I' V  }" o
0 b. [0 _8 ]7 V6 l5 F/ WIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

: G. a  @. D7 c- Q. f- T1 Y$ N' O
$ n8 i9 s+ \( D. moh really...
4 Y0 N) t. A4 T3 p4 f) Fhahhaa, thx a lot^^"; H4 |3 [1 b3 y- a
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題& \0 C% a! _5 Q$ k9 P
" l1 y9 n: [* a1 j8 e; }, o
當然這是個假設性問題9 k/ ]5 g6 \  p
但將人數倍大1 Z2 B0 d) p2 P
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
+ H) R& @4 f4 o7 n$ F- L(情況可以換作其他)
. Z- b' K3 X2 r始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...0 U+ t: G  U& z4 {9 n  y
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
* P9 E$ E0 p# C7 ~# f6 Q  ]如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:" i8 E5 g9 {. X6 [; S' K! h3 g
絕情谷既問題...
/ j! R0 H' Q- g0 R如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
* i9 E( I- D5 |8 K如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

/ N6 O2 K: R0 S5 ^4 F* j- Z
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好& a) @8 O) s# h( B) D9 b
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生9 n  m$ v, b# ?4 ~
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
9 K1 r: e4 @5 o! W, J5 j好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
; Y* S& t( i0 m/ m0 G其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢6 Z+ e$ \; n; x8 B3 [0 U
* O  Y$ b( Q5 ~1 P' ^% i+ K
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
4 g4 d6 t' X$ {- v! m不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
( j. u! i  J) l其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

0 n% |  h4 _5 H) N$ `" c0 y
7 f! \9 K. a& P2 `$ Q) e  D) z$ fhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
, \# M$ z0 J% Y# b& T你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....$ j. K0 J- b# c" X4 V; s

  I) v: I0 O4 l/ `2 ]' y9 W: i9 ]p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
* X+ j$ x" I8 ]6 m. D2 p$ P3 qyes, my reason is helping more
  i6 d0 y, r/ O* pfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!& K/ d3 W) U$ z5 ^. Y* M
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child9 L9 b- ]% X$ u. S6 D+ G
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
& b, C! J0 [8 q$ C0 Valso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
3 D- D' I# b3 C; `may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!2 M; C: I( N! s% W
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~5 o& l* A) L' g1 R. G
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~  C0 X; B* e1 K- P
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
. j( ~. o9 m% o- p正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
2 Q$ G+ U& m. I1 r3 ^即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~/ [" A; A0 O* r; m+ ]5 t. l" ^
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~" W$ h& o! Z  ?5 m" b
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
7 N: z, o& }- x+ W* m我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）