Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
, ?" x& M2 v7 _: \% R
% o8 V! O  M9 g6 o
) \2 w: B) i. g3 H6 A我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

5 j1 L3 v/ Y" `8 v  }
( T0 C( X' Y# K! |8 {+ b; M0 LIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
5 V+ ~9 x9 W% x+ B$ Z0 B; q0 P
2 I- B! S  X' j. ]. r& E# F* ^! E- P1 z( J# [3 @. _
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

* \$ j8 Y: E* ?0 a. v' s
- `1 \# o& U$ d$ R6 N1 Y
oh really...
% {5 A3 Z$ V5 S+ k: I5 }" fhahhaa, thx a lot^^"7 I, ?" g7 \0 D) V* K, ?
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
" w9 b5 O$ [0 {/ D' y
9 ^, w: I" y& D) i8 T當然這是個假設性問題
; `, K. f% s( a- U, b但將人數倍大
: H3 T/ q- Z( k例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
9 T# E! o" Z' B+ n; H1 V(情況可以換作其他)
% c9 t0 X  U+ Z/ b3 `始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...+ M% ~$ O4 b) E. J+ H- e1 k3 i8 o/ X" R
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...  I2 _4 o! m2 D8 d' r9 Z( `% p. X
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
( B& v  s  l% B' f絕情谷既問題...
* t8 N; R! V( F8 ^, Y5 d% |. d如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢.... |7 N1 T" M" g$ d
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

& R  @/ U- P8 b0 K殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
1 {* d* b$ l( n1 v& ^/ {. L於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
1 T; ?1 c1 v+ p% m; @, ~但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩: R$ R& K8 l+ E; v; w9 p
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
( c0 h$ L+ l! b- i# D. Z其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢0 [- _$ O# H. h( m4 w& z
, ~4 c7 Z. U' n! x7 u" |
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
2 O5 ?# y, d: Y0 X8 ]不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:' b! y3 q3 l# K$ W
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

) w% Y" Q$ ?* n9 H. I4 {4 v- y
4 q' Y' W' ?3 @* }haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣: q* p/ c# X$ s# p! e$ v
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
8 v6 M" _1 h" }, u) t0 a4 v8 O' {' z* o# \# ]$ V
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
4 b2 D# c& m! ]) D  V: k6 }& Yyes, my reason is helping more
8 Y4 P  m$ u0 o( w6 M# k0 }for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!. M% q9 ~4 ?8 \
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
2 a- `- l- I$ G- Ibecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?9 T9 W) N  b: ]4 s5 g
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
: \0 c' z+ g. a+ Ymay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!: H/ z; P% `3 D5 o
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~; }5 K$ s8 y: r4 f) q
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
! v  h% {& n' k* V( T我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
( K+ H3 F$ m2 w; ?6 p. F0 N正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~+ q8 u, ]4 v" \3 U5 z
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~. T! n; a6 h8 h0 L5 I% P
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
8 D1 v; M2 D) P+ Y& M但如果o係當時o既情況中~~/ |0 \4 s9 O0 @4 M
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）