Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:- T2 g! B9 r/ W* K! l# j

0 [6 {& c: k, E  l2 h) s2 M# l) ^4 R) h4 w3 x* [6 y# c
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

" S( c7 H0 Z5 Q. @/ ^/ Y( |
! x+ C# j) R* _! w  T* l. U: f  R: [In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
3 u) D% U4 L8 n) p/ o' X' K% z% Y$ j) q) s
% [4 t& v4 v1 p! `& y* }# n
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

9 e& R  h* {9 U7 a, C  O, m7 X- P( R
oh really...
9 s$ d' r7 o7 v, Q+ P% Fhahhaa, thx a lot^^"
- G/ q, s* B1 v3 q% e$ c9 ]i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題0 T  K; D! V7 O* H

# Q4 o. a/ K2 `當然這是個假設性問題8 u# \* i5 P5 T# \9 s/ m
但將人數倍大( C. H- p( C0 Q- t  i6 |/ f$ f! }
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個7 E6 |9 N8 ]+ h3 x2 e( E
(情況可以換作其他)
: C" ~2 J, W1 J3 ~# {: ?- H始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...& j2 |1 i' }0 G) b2 J
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢.../ J( Z% a# `7 I* F) k3 z5 m
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:- l- _0 `/ N( \7 e$ n- d! X( q
絕情谷既問題...4 r/ A% y' N, m- M: R7 T- J
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
, m7 I2 I' B" h. h6 y3 I如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

0 f9 ~. a: z2 a+ ]" K6 V* E
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
8 P# m  z( W/ S' m( J4 g於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生5 e; X1 F. ]( ^. [( D& a  Z
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩, Z2 ^  u, y" S2 s. N
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
& V9 [4 a) [* w' g# L2 h- F4 V0 C7 R9 I其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
! L9 {' O: z. m' P/ ^2 K/ l+ U4 ]
- z! O/ y: f" t7 j/ n, [我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命; C, J9 g+ d- n# n( _1 M
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
; y" N/ O) q1 Q. I6 P1 I  \( C. z1 Y其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

. `2 M$ \# K+ i/ [# h0 Q# R6 r. V, w. z
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
2 C4 A, D$ Z% }% F3 f$ w你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
5 W  n% u( `. f' M! J  F9 `0 s1 e, _2 X& b
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child# D% h" L8 [1 Q; h3 N3 I
yes, my reason is helping more
1 j  D" g6 ~) U5 I$ n# h. N  \for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
& ?2 Z  U5 g1 [9 R9 ~+ tif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
0 @8 B+ x7 P+ C0 L2 v5 D* Obecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
  r4 n# e7 z2 k# H/ dalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!% u- u3 z* Q( I; F% T8 }  S( {+ \; M! X
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
) p; A" Z+ Y/ e( o7 Wunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~9 K1 [, S2 w2 x6 K* i+ T' ?% U
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~: L0 D& {4 x! w% d  x( I5 z9 `
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
' A1 t: O) n8 z8 S0 s& M$ R7 }正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
* U. @9 w0 d% `# s/ M" }( Z8 e" C即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
6 b# l. D6 O/ w/ k- T我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
( B" @. l; P5 ?- h2 E但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
) ^) |: q8 j7 ]我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）