Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:8 e7 i( g6 a" T2 i- p  U* ~' G
' z, b8 G" T* d# c# c- j

& H" c) w' ~  P# d- ?我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

8 G9 ]' I2 \$ }3 d, H' m9 G
" w+ S( D. J6 ^- Z6 l1 P% e" _
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:- f4 B; F9 P" L, I
) B- n, L, _7 q  b  v
  b2 W$ Z; Q7 K: g( ^
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

! ~% y, D+ q+ ?1 t( s% @) A
  r5 P9 f/ x* u' I
oh really...1 q8 z) M0 M  i3 e; X
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
, l2 ^+ s! F' C9 X! |, p9 pi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
- p9 c, X& h/ {+ X2 ]- N% r4 Q  I$ U  i
當然這是個假設性問題$ o3 m0 Y$ x/ W
但將人數倍大
  a3 L( o3 f4 W6 x例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
# |6 {* K0 y. P4 W' R1 f(情況可以換作其他)/ r7 ]2 C! ^6 J  M2 j$ [
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
: g3 Y' a2 b. q& Y如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
9 ^. F4 v- `* s; d7 n6 E如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
. l* Q$ q& y" U( I/ s5 y5 D& B/ z絕情谷既問題...: a4 k0 A# g; H# w% v& {
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢..., |. j3 I6 b& Q2 n1 |7 p, `
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

% q8 v( t' t, s0 s
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
  b% ]  g7 X0 J/ d於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
' V4 g  T% q+ p; A但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
3 g3 h/ W. [! ~* c4 M3 @3 T+ t好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢4 J1 r; Q% L' c0 @4 L
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢* Z' X& D* N0 A

# i9 \, Y6 I: M0 ^' C) I我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命/ \9 Q8 |0 N' ]' V9 N2 u
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:. s3 j  H% v% F
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

+ l, a! w# T3 C1 w. _% s) ^; \
; b* _+ Z* e  S6 h; U; e: {haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣6 |; ?$ {& @, v! i0 p
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....7 ^3 [; ?/ e9 W3 R

, s, X5 p; j( ~; [% N% A4 |2 Jp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child5 b2 G. k* B0 V
yes, my reason is helping more% |7 V/ [% J4 p. t: z
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!" |- p" K- b' @4 r+ x: u
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child! F/ L7 w1 A7 X2 {4 d
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
7 i/ ^+ }! q! K+ ~. malso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
+ O! r) u1 [) S# m. e/ Zmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!6 R- w+ x( Q. h; Y8 ~# V. o; G
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
) l* G! X! v. [- j$ Y9 |+ \, D; u當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
6 J* B# a% z% [# Y8 p1 s我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
! }7 i& K9 r% |' v6 p正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~" p" E; N+ H3 W5 e2 G% b6 V" N8 x- L
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
+ m! ?$ q# y, b  y( P( \; K我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
! @. j& k* z+ D- c7 O2 i7 N9 D3 g但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
  S& O5 e' ]* D* D3 d( |我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）