Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:' X( U" M: `9 T+ R, h( a* S5 a

, ~' U) X- T9 k' i8 D- S$ s! {# |6 D, Q
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

# |1 }% l0 v3 V) ~' k

5 V2 E) o& }" }8 D) K3 e5 r6 bIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:6 m( u& B. Y7 r$ H7 J9 A- [

! q* p9 G0 r( w! b* J5 h1 }4 F
) c$ O7 D+ S! p' R* U. dIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

( V: ]# t+ b1 Q" K

. T) b/ S" }: @4 ~0 b' v( j$ Uoh really...& c9 E# h4 t  ]7 s- n' K  j+ S
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
9 c# X( H; w- l& Gi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題6 ?" O( C. k. m& C: V$ d& T0 K
) Y  E1 I: t. }0 d& F$ B
當然這是個假設性問題, y* n, a6 F4 r$ X
但將人數倍大; `; p+ S3 T& ~6 e2 H! Q5 s/ i
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個( b) h. p' Z3 G
(情況可以換作其他)0 U! ~& a9 |" n( ?# |6 p
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題.../ y6 P: @1 I0 Y6 @7 f6 z$ Z' K
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
5 c* O* ]4 D5 ]; U5 s0 |如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:& U8 L9 m9 B3 @6 v% ~
絕情谷既問題...
& @6 f7 Q+ j/ Z* _0 }/ G* v如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
3 O- v) K1 ^' C1 `" ^如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

" L8 I# T  C5 }, W4 ~0 U殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
& }0 |; O5 `9 A9 A& B0 s! Z! i於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生" Y9 }& C; Z6 H5 i6 K3 B/ f9 z! P
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩  B9 R  v2 N* d) E0 o
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢! {  }; m) C# J' h1 M# B
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
; v) A+ O* s$ k) X2 Z3 U+ S
3 @' f& A9 V  [0 ^  b! J我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命2 A) d# `* G( \* ?! X6 f
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:+ ~+ w  R) V- w5 M# @
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

. g+ t, m% H# R2 }% Z
: ~7 c; f9 p- P4 V! M. c0 P
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
% ^  F. {* Z2 B; X0 @- w: ], Y你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....4 u8 _' V9 s6 z: O# V' n$ Q9 H7 K
# {7 z' w( p% P  j, e0 ]$ P
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child2 K% I+ _# e( X) k
yes, my reason is helping more
9 J4 d% J7 x' ~. Ifor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!! f  S9 x& B. V/ W
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
) A' b& s) H1 ?0 _: ibecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
) ?2 N1 X3 K( r+ [6 ?, S6 j/ j, Oalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!% d; e! D3 Q6 m9 Q8 i7 }
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
0 ^9 T, @- P+ }7 Runder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~4 y6 k" D9 G0 j
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
( s( j' x% x" ]/ }7 d我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~9 l/ |5 i# M( U8 \0 @
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
+ a7 N4 U+ A* c1 e( i; D即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
/ r) ~" ^7 c8 F7 I4 m) l- j我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
6 {6 R" M# i. n2 K5 B但如果o係當時o既情況中~~2 X. R" a0 m: F* _- T) b
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）