|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
* A) e, b# O5 A9 b
+ P) t4 \: Q( @$ I- Vaccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this./ x+ s; S5 j0 b1 l4 |1 n: P" N' k
$ \% C3 l0 w6 I0 A. z0 X6 |( p6 KIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,2 D2 {! x+ R6 k0 r1 ^6 D. T
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
7 n, v5 s! b. Z/ r" V% X
( I9 n# Q: g( o% r% F& \: s5 mso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險" B* W$ m) {+ n$ Q! _, J H
$ @2 G5 ^2 i5 w2 Z) W
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
+ O y8 ?$ F7 Y7 e. S( ], Sat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|