|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.6 W0 G1 y& }( {/ x) `
) h0 J, W+ k- u8 b' M* Z
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.- [/ Q+ C8 e) K8 Q2 A8 w9 u* [. Y( P
( U* _& S: [4 TIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
+ X: i: _) F, uand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.9 Y9 O* q( x; I
+ v' B+ u5 @6 \4 U+ b7 f/ z+ j, O* Gso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
( P7 M# {. G0 h" f) H$ k7 }
! q0 _) Y( [+ w$ @; A- Fin 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
3 d2 P% I" |' [# s8 Nat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
