- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
10#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:$ Q# ^& F8 i+ ^4 Y* J7 p
( f+ @: I" I; f
5 s5 b# s; {- N3 r8 J, U6 j! K
同意.
5 Q6 z4 \. R, f$ F$ t, l1 d但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... 9 f2 q0 c9 W) X# S. @
6 y( _! ?. j& T; V/ w$ B
I do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.
; B( Z1 V1 K% ^: y# t2 PYour analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students
`4 a# ~& N/ B6 [+ b. w, VI dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.
6 @" C; E- \. l( oAs a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.
6 F( B4 P* U0 O" \3 ~' q" T; m, r+ |- b5 e0 \
1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law
: Q# J, E6 N( ]" L* ^6 G$ ?2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper5 E7 }. o+ j4 ^1 Z
3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published! f; m& ]& E" I% M% f) n
5 ^* t" x6 Y8 k" V1 e: SThanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|