|
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
10#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:
: V8 x7 ^. Z3 b X# v) c. {: x2 Q0 u
& a% o3 k7 H% p$ ?, D; r1 l2 Z% S# V$ e: x |
同意.; b$ g3 a& _4 X; z6 m3 @0 |
但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多...
: h$ ~) K3 A4 o* Y
I do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.9 f3 N- X; L+ g, I0 l2 d9 L- a5 g
Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students
& n7 |2 b+ n9 R0 o `; xI dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.
8 y% ?& Z* A2 s I YAs a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.6 ]1 `, X5 J( Z# J" j
" Z* k8 h" Z$ X2 Q a" q1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law
) m( p S; x$ D$ Y. F2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper
6 g# \7 h2 A3 x3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published! n+ A0 q$ \7 _- D: D' O
" A, S- K* s6 A- t" C" JThanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|
