|
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
10#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:
6 h! l4 {) ]* ]4 G5 z- k# D- b8 L
" _# J4 ]2 D X) l
, \/ e) g, X# [同意.- E5 G6 F" h8 I: H7 H$ [( R- ?
但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多...
% f5 y0 P( S" w6 K5 j' XI do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.0 A7 h) |. q- F" z% B" h5 O5 y1 s
Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students3 s) l T8 W: l3 q$ P$ e p
I dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.5 T4 M. S9 T I# [. }/ B
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.
# d5 q8 C' A2 e0 d
) X) @; V4 e: [- C T6 X1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law* f% T. K7 s, t! G7 `- O; u. }: @
2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper
) M, n/ f0 d$ @2 H* u3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published
" @; W- w1 i5 z% O2 _ M8 j+ v+ R( ~- ^/ T
Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|
