|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.; W; q6 e( e' Y4 A
' p4 b. A% `2 `) b$ m
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
* e! X! x0 i, u1 d7 i! B1 F7 d3 s9 n& p( b2 T9 p4 i' _
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,, z+ c' F6 V# c
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
5 [) E& ^( l1 ^. y; x# J1 S9 \( P' ?- L) ~/ J2 d* A5 O% g
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
# w: X6 h; l! l) l+ J$ ]$ z E9 N( b( Z
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, 5 F3 W9 f2 ^( u4 P2 Z
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
