- 帖子
- 6683
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 10274
- 魅力
- 5
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
11#
發表於 2005-4-23 03:42 PM
| 只看該作者
You guys are looking at very academic factors4 J/ a1 T: h3 K' n$ T0 m
The ideal Hong Kong can be very simply.
" \+ [& p2 y d& rJust think about the thing around you and you thing you are most interested
0 {8 U* c Q UWhat government, world city are too unreal to me" _6 S& Q* _7 s1 j6 E- i
Everyone got a different ideal Hong Kong in mind' Y* b! T; `+ f. v+ t9 S$ u+ w' y% v
I have stayed in Australia for many years and my girlfriend is Japanese
5 d( y6 ~8 i! ~: n/ zSo it's hardly to avoid comparing Hong Kong, Japan and Australia9 U ] D& Q2 W. N$ v
" `2 U3 A* Q) d# Y0 f0 fFirst of all, Hong Kong is famous for shopping, becuase the selling is extremely low2 s' n) x1 b8 W
However, the style and quality are must worse than Japan.8 L) }( Y+ r4 [ I! \ s; |
My ideal Hong Kong is keeping low selling price but improve quality and style of the goods and service. This is very very hard to achieve.
2 q6 q z8 u! A- ~5 Z& g/ _But that is ok, we are just talking ideal. Ideal doesn't have to be achievable7 d7 {, D$ J3 {4 q$ v& ]
Secondly, the Salary are very high in Japan. High salary improve stardard of living( {) X, A: Q. h
So, people eat better, wear better, and even go for treavel
) @4 s, _1 j; J gThridly, Australia has huge area of land, hardly any to see buildings,( W: G% A( K% i
People are living a house. A house is hardly any to see in HK.
5 q! w; m3 f* d2 QMy ideal Hong Kong is more land, more house
' Z3 ^& A4 a& q0 Y6 M8 F p( k9 b7 {" A/ i) W
All other thing between people, I respect this is unique Hong Kong cultue
0 S. _; A5 \7 ^& R1 _In my ideal Hong Kong, the attitude are still the same, such as MK style., a0 F6 _7 u# j r) G; c
I'm not laughing at MK. Sorry about that
7 N+ J( R4 `$ |0 ^4 v) m/ t* i# `, F* c# g5 k8 W7 u% T! ?
Lastly, I don't wanna see too many Chinese in Hong Kong
, L9 J0 o/ a# ~8 o( E# R# U/ YI see all Chinese as foreigner. I know Hong Kong is a Chinese city
& z- h4 A. l2 {But in my ideal Hong Kong, Hong Kong must be the most population
+ e7 h! [9 I y% [$ y; K, t! @6 v9 Z) M* j3 V3 p$ r' v
Isn't it very simply!? |
|
)
