- 帖子
- 6683
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 10274
- 魅力
- 5
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
11#
發表於 2005-4-23 03:42 PM
| 只看該作者
You guys are looking at very academic factors+ W8 B9 j" m9 K+ T4 h* Y% I
The ideal Hong Kong can be very simply.
( G1 _! e E, @# uJust think about the thing around you and you thing you are most interested
8 \* W# B- W" S* D2 F, CWhat government, world city are too unreal to me
( R; ^# {. ^5 M3 iEveryone got a different ideal Hong Kong in mind
0 u4 q/ w( o' }4 QI have stayed in Australia for many years and my girlfriend is Japanese, v- f0 q- g4 |7 G
So it's hardly to avoid comparing Hong Kong, Japan and Australia% `7 X3 ]8 `* D5 _2 {
/ i" ^6 w) R6 _, D9 S# ~
First of all, Hong Kong is famous for shopping, becuase the selling is extremely low
1 w- M) Q* h8 n8 @% pHowever, the style and quality are must worse than Japan.
8 F5 q% z6 g" ^/ I% T8 iMy ideal Hong Kong is keeping low selling price but improve quality and style of the goods and service. This is very very hard to achieve.1 B+ a* f4 T0 O- R, d7 R
But that is ok, we are just talking ideal. Ideal doesn't have to be achievable+ [* @, f4 ^8 c# l4 T# T3 F# R `0 x
Secondly, the Salary are very high in Japan. High salary improve stardard of living
$ L& u3 f4 r$ v" [$ {3 KSo, people eat better, wear better, and even go for treavel
. b! @$ Y$ E# p7 GThridly, Australia has huge area of land, hardly any to see buildings,0 p3 l" g P$ v m7 Q$ x
People are living a house. A house is hardly any to see in HK.
$ N* t9 Z6 X% p! p+ ]# H7 O: {: JMy ideal Hong Kong is more land, more house
" X/ R* U9 [$ f; D, {
. k! Z" E0 W! D4 q4 SAll other thing between people, I respect this is unique Hong Kong cultue
( B* a. i4 u) H( GIn my ideal Hong Kong, the attitude are still the same, such as MK style.
2 f) e3 h6 h$ e$ wI'm not laughing at MK. Sorry about that' e3 y- _# X+ Q: O: I1 B
/ N+ D: ]# _1 X4 BLastly, I don't wanna see too many Chinese in Hong Kong% ]5 C- e) r1 \4 V
I see all Chinese as foreigner. I know Hong Kong is a Chinese city
, W; M `) ?1 v# OBut in my ideal Hong Kong, Hong Kong must be the most population
- t q+ l8 O3 b5 z. x+ Q% h$ N7 `; l# P
Isn't it very simply!? |
|
)
