- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
10#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:9 W: F$ M. @, a! M8 p- Y% x. {
: j( z2 C* ^( |6 {
( d9 o) M0 ^% o4 A9 P2 C2 Q( [同意.
# l# s, \1 H$ X* c* c& t但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... 8 I5 O; O ~; z4 S
8 ?+ J/ e8 n5 ?( UI do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.# Z: @5 s8 W( }% n0 L; Y! M' l
Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students/ N5 r/ C% a/ \8 q# x
I dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.
3 Q/ }- q4 ], M# D! fAs a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.2 d1 [4 @$ I9 W; Q
+ a9 [. ]6 w z9 S* ^
1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law
7 L# L7 r6 W: j' M2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper: J2 a( u9 K, o3 U$ t7 J$ s
3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published
$ \; e- b8 c, `9 A9 V9 _" ~2 V! A- m& s7 z$ A/ Y; f) i5 _& a
Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|