法興500幾億單野似搵人食死貓

admin

法興500幾億單野似搵人食死貓
有冇人有同感

BOYDWAN

Originally posted by admin at 2008-1-28 19:50:
法興500幾億單野似搵人食死貓
有冇人有同感

小弟個人覺得絕對係咯~
有咁好機會點解唔借個漏洞去益自己荷包先？
有咁利害可以動用龐大資金點解會職位都係咁低微？
有咁嘅頭腦同心思點解會有個咁嘅投資錯誤？
陰謀論d 去睇，無理由無幕後黑手喎~

qulapo

i don't think so

by putting the blame on a rogue trader the bank is opening itself up for public scrutiny and a thorough investigation by the authorities

if the bank is trying to hide something it is much simpler to lump it into a subprime related writedown and face less questions

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB ... d=hps_us_whats_news

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/ne ... sp1Q&refer=home

kuru

法興自己公司根本投資有問題, 兼將責任卸落職員到,
有乜理由一個初級職員可以動用到咁大資金呢?

tk83

今日同同事傾開都有呢個感覺.
一個小職員點可能控制咁大筆資金.
就算係控制到, 不停補倉, t+2 結算個陣冇左咁大筆資金,佢上司冇可能唔知.
而且宜家講到好似唔駛埋數咁, 突然發現...真係好有問題!

bunce2806

We still don't know much about the details of what he was supposed to have done.  But apparently a lot of this related to exchange traded futures.  These trades are recorded in the stock / futures exchange's computers and monitored by exchange officials - latest news is that exchange officials have warned SG something is wrong many weeks ago (so SG did not just suddenly find out about a big loss 10 days ago).

As tk83 says, other staff (SG's treasury dept) must have sent him lots of money to finance his trades over a long period of time.  It's just unbelievable to say the guy acted alone.