<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » Sports討論版 » 伍晃榮的一席話在歐聯決賽充分應驗出來...
返回列表 回復 發帖
Originally posted by lizard at 2008-5-23 10:41 PM:
覆#15-#19 。

一個好球員,如果係...
我係曼迷. 不過都好SUPPORT TERRY.

2隊射12碼加埋叭有佢同COLE 係後衛(曼聯: TEVEZ, CARRICK, C7, HARGO, NANI, ANDERSON, GIGGS     車路士: BALLACK, BELLETI, LAMPARD, COLE, TERRY, KALOU, ANELKA )  .    佢以隊長身份 (後衛腳)  做最後一人踢, 我好敬重佢.   失重心下射失, 非戰之罪.

我唔清楚你基於什麼原因會聯想到收錢, 照你甘講, 86' 既薜高, 94' 既巴治奧都收左唔少水了~
Originally posted by tovic at 2008-5-23 11:01 PM:


我係曼迷. 不過都好SUPPORT TERRY...
以前無咁那多人賭波,也不會有現在這種投注金額。現在投注金額之大,就足有能力改變賽果陰謀論產生,所以根本就吾應該將足球跟賭博掛勾。
o dear...i cant believe someone would say John Terry or C.Ronaldo were both bribed...
would someone be that stupid to bribe players who will be playing in a match watching by Billions of people in this world??

guys...Stop watching Shaolin Soccer~~they are not "Golden Right Foot"~~

Sometimes your expected result or mostly predicted scores did not come out, it doesnt mean that's a fixed match~~

cheerss~~
Originally posted by arthur8088 at 2008-5-23 11:18 PM:
o dear...i cant believe someone wou...
C.Ronaldo were both bribed


C.Ronaldo 有無corruption,我無講,也不多講!
不過 Terry 會係無人干擾下,有咁既絕頂低級失誤,我就認為絕大問題!
Originally posted by lizard at 2008-5-23 23:31:

C.Ronaldo were both bribed


C.Ronaldo 有無corruption,我無講,也不多講!
不過 Terry 會係無人干擾下,有咁既絕頂低級失誤,我就認為絕大問題!
you cant compare basketball with soccer in this situation~~it's totally unfair...
after 120 mins hard fight, players are exhausted both phycailly and mentally, Penalty shoot-out is already a big affection to them~~ i dont see how low-class it is for missing a penalty kick...even for a big-named players~~

if you argue with Terry is not mentally world-classed, I would agree~~

絕頂低級失誤??yeh..there's one in the match, it's not Terry, It's Dider Drogba~~
Slapping Vidic during a match is really 絕頂低級失誤

looks like you have not participated into any competitive team-work sports game....agree with #15 said, you would not understand their feeling at that moment~~

in #13, you said 只有用陰謀論,有人收錢,故意自己滑倒啦...

Terry is being paid for around $130,000 GBP per week.(according to rumours and newspaper), how much do you think that you need to pay to him to convince him losing in such an important match, a match that would bring his England captaincy back?? a match that would bring him the championship that he dreams for since being a professional soccer player???

just one more thing, what about you try to slip on the grassy wetty pitch on purpose, but still able to kick the ball...

[ Last edited by arthur8088 on 2008-5-24 at 12:39 AM ]
如果收錢, 點解右要救GIGGS EXTRA TIME 球空門呢?? .........



可能莊家預到有12碼同埋叫佢12碼先好射失.
Originally posted by lizard at 2008-5-23 11:14 PM:




以前無咁那多人賭波,也不會有現在這種投注金額。現在投注金額之大,就足有能力改變賽果陰謀論產生,所以根本就吾應該將足球跟賭博掛勾。
要收幾多錢先可以彌補到果一刻既失落?
一個職業既足球員,有一個機會,可以為自己效力多年既球隊奪得第一個歐聯,可以以隊長身份捧起歐冠杯,可以成為各人心中既英雄
幾多錢可以令佢放棄依個機會?而變成一個令人唾罵既過街老鼠?
況且,佢射唔入只係令佢地要進入突然死亡階段,假如傑斯射失,而安歷卡射入,咁贏既咪又係車仔?

再者,佢捧起依個歐聯之後,阿布分比佢既獎金亦係天文數字
佢入左果球十二碼可以盡覽榮譽,又可以逗獎金
反之,唔入既話雖然有錢收,但係個名要遺臭萬年
比你揀,你揀邊樣?
香港一般朋友, 係完全以自己既世界觀套落好多足球員身上,
佢地普遍認為足球員都收水, 因為佢地自己如果踢波, 都係會收既...

咩彩池大, 注碼多, 人就容易受金錢誘惑...
我係26fun不知同多少朋友研究討論幾多次....

其實大部份人根本唔了解足球博彩如何賺大家既錢,
更聽過有朋友覺得球員自己會造波下注, 真係天真得好笑...

不是恃老賣老, 當睇波球齡有番咁上下長, 咩奇怪比賽都睇過以後,
當然要運用自己既腦袋, 相信大家會發現, 真係有可疑既比賽,
真係10年都無果一場.....
Originally posted by eqhigh at 2008-5-24 01:11 AM:


要收幾多錢先可以彌補到果一刻既...
you're right !!

之前講過好多足球員, 奉獻自己半世甚至成世係足球上,
佢地成世人既理想可能係奉聯賽冠軍, 歐聯冠軍甚至世界杯...

情形等於奧巴馬希拉莉鬥生鬥死想做美國總統,
李小龍想中國武術發揮光大一樣,
佢地唔會因為有人比錢佢地, 就會放棄自己既夢想...

我唔明d友仔咁鐘意話佢地收錢, 10幾萬英鎊一星期,
收水黎食黎你地買果港幣一萬幾千蚊咩, 係咪好唔 logic 先...
Originally posted by lizard at 2008-5-23 10:41 PM:
覆#15-#19 。

一個好球員,如果係...
我真係估唔到, 有人嚴苛到, 大雨跣腳都係因為個人唔小心有問題...
唔係唔比你咁講, 不過真係有點雞蛋裡挑骨頭....

一個200幾磅既高大球員, 走足120分鐘再加上大雨滂沱,
我真係想請教, 做左你講果d所謂 "防範跣腳" 步驟, 就sure唔會跌?
最奇係我都唔見其餘射入波果11個球員有做你講果d野wor...


如果用你呢種思維方式, 世界上基本上無球員會合格 !!

至於贊助商波boot既問題, 唔能夠保護對腳or設計浮誇,
係生產商既問題, 唔係球員問題!!


只要你係好波出名受歡迎, 贊助商就會搵你, 避不了,
要清高如你講既球員, 往足球小將裡找,

不過好似次偉小志強, 都有sponsor...

[ Last edited by amigofans on 2008-5-24 at 01:41 AM ]
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » Sports討論版 » 伍晃榮的一席話在歐聯決賽充分應驗出來...

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。