slwong3

Originally posted by alan1984 at 2008-5-25 10:10 AM:
雖然成日話佢唔夠摩連奴好,但佢能夠帶領僅8個月既車仔入歐聯決賽,而0係決賽上既表現亦有目共睹,只能講句佢唔夠名氣,所以要炒佢,有d可惜

而0係決賽上既表現亦有目共睹

all I saw is he put Anelka to play winger and put him on at the last minute...
if he just put him on for shooting penalty, I'd rather he put Shevchenko, at least he has played a lot of big matches....

0000001

Frank Rijkaard may be worse than Grant...

車仔應該俾番技術總監(助教)格蘭做
畢竟...

[ Last edited by 0000001 on 2008-5-25 at 01:04 PM ]

HansChan

其實我覺得格蘭唔係甘差!
好多人話係班球員本身既鬥心所以季尾打得好!
但係唔係真係呢??
鬥心可以助發揮......但整體打法.....最後歐聯嗰場.....車路士有幾時踼過甘好既一場??
摩連奴教嗰時返而我睇唔到甘悅目既足球,係各人打自己波(好似波歷克甘,記憶之中係近期先有甘高水準打到出黎!)
當然,從球會角度.....打法唔鮮明但贏一比零係緊要啲!
不過,的確係未見過格蘭有乜神來之筆既換人就真......

HansChan

Originally posted by slwong3 at 2008-5-25 12:49 PM:



all I saw is he put Anelka to play winger and put him on at the last minute...
if he just put him on for shooting penalty, I'd rather he put Shevchenko, at least he has played a lot of big matches....

佢換人係差啲...但佢嗰時換係換啲人射十二碼同响中前場拖住個波
相比之下...用舒夫真高就唔係甘明智!
第一,舒夫真高係放响最前做一把尖刀,嗰時放佢落去,目的唔岩!
第二,對上一次响歐聯要射十二碼分勝負,舒夫真高响利記捧盃嗰年射失十二碼......唔係個領隊可以唔諗埋哩個數據落去!

[ Last edited by HansChan on 2008-5-25 at 02:40 PM ]

alan1984

Originally posted by slwong3 at 2008-5-25 12:49 PM:



而0係決賽上既表現...

整隊車仔既表現係好過曼聯,自下半場開始差不多壓住曼聯黎踢,杜奧巴射中柱,之後加時又中楣

小妖

車路士炒領隊格蘭，意料中事，都唔係乜野新聞！

Shaqleung

格蘭係未夠班去教一隊諗著贏冠軍既球隊...淨係調動能力我諗大家都心中有數....車仔要炒佢都無可厚非...不過佢又真係幾慘...話哂都叫教到成績出唻....好似有d過橋抽板既感覺~

amigofans

首先我唔覺得佢慘, 佢應該預左有今日,
因為佢上任第一日, 應該已經知道呢份可能係世上最難做既領隊...
佢亦應該好清楚, 無聯賽或歐聯冠軍係手係難逃一炒...

第二, 我覺得佢並不是如此垃圾, 至於一d爭議性既調動,
其實好多領隊也有出現, 包括被車迷神化既摩連奴, (例如上半場發火換晒3個後備)
不過格蘭樣衰兼低調, 天生不受歡迎, 自然唔可以有摩生, 放臭屁也清新的能力....

我覺得佢最大既問題, 係佢個人, 因為無名氣, 也無輝煌戰績在手,
要駕馭車仔一班天皇巨星, 佢根本做唔到,

泰利, 杜奧巴, 安歷卡等等當佢無到已經可見一班,
佢完全等於04/05教皇馬既基羅斯, case 完全一樣....

[ Last edited by amigofans on 2008-5-25 at 07:30 PM ]

iknow

Originally posted by filter-052fans at 2008-5-25 07:28 PM:
首先我唔覺得佢慘, 佢應該預左有今日,...

唔係03/04嗎??

佢上任果時, 應該一早預料自己唔會教得耐...
佢都有自知知明, 最遲季尾就走...
佢教到入歐聯決賽, 佢都應該感到幸運...
佢唔係太衰...但如樓上各人所說...佢係冇能力教一級球隊, 手握大牌球星ge教練...

bunce2806

Originally posted by filter-052fans at 2008-5-25 07:28 PM:
首先我唔覺得佢慘, 佢應該預左有今日,...

Agree completely.  One major reason for his sacking is that he doesn't have a high profile like Hiddink, Rikjaard, etc - a lot of people felt he's only keeping the manager's seat warm until Abramovich hires the manager that he really wants.  But another is finishing 2nd in the Carling Cup, Premier League and then Champions League (big difference between winning and not winning a trophy, especially in one of the Big 4 clubs).

Except for the above though, he's done a pretty good job considering he didn't expect to be the manager at the start of the season and had to take over so suddenly.  He should easily get a job at a club that wants a 實而不華 style.