- 帖子
- 768
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 193
- 魅力
- 488
- 讚好
- 0
|
2#
發表於 2009-2-26 01:49 AM
| 只看該作者
haha....good point! [0 P( a( H9 r& i& F& d# ?& x- i
but soon, i m sure this status will be gone for a specific reason+ x7 J3 S. _0 j2 {8 J0 y4 K, A7 B% c
* O6 G% r8 s$ w+ V
honestly these status r nothing special in my perspective
; _4 d. r2 T% I
. T; w9 C8 d D( }1) they r recent creations, how many years is that? 150-200?
5 J& W; Z, ~( F" X2) since they r recent creations, i don't see much valuable skills or knowledge applied on these creations" F0 E. i, a7 z# x9 A
3) again, as 2) mentioned, it seems like a mixture of Chinese and Western art which doesn't really represent Chinese arts
8 h6 d7 D+ w1 ]8 c4) they r just copper from recent periods; ]3 O! m$ D/ {: r! d- A8 l
4 U4 g& a/ I! c- @0 @9 ^
just like the porkchops we dont like, however, they do like them very much, otherwise who will take Yan Yee as gf) `# u' t! R; U* a% ~3 X
i wouldn't spend so much money to get them back which is definitely falling into their traps of making money as they know u wanna get them back for dignity- X& h K5 \$ \( V$ b& Q& V z
- Y, W% V0 T, o, Y, [
law is always so stupid
1 V! s! T: u1 y6 u- B$ Tapparently there r lots of evidences suggesting it's property of Chinese even though they r not strong proofs" ~: m* B% [; F* Y8 b) z. L
however, the current owner also can't even claim they r the legal owner n acquired them in a legal way either, which is just same as the Chinese cannot submit the same documents as well, how can they have the right to sell the status to public in the auction
" V: ~' R6 z4 m" j/ l$ o
! x7 R$ {- {3 ?law never protects the right parties in any way6 {0 o5 k$ b" H5 D( D
sigh...; _3 p, _! D8 Q3 q
4 s, t/ H- S( ]' Z3 X& C/ H3 _[ 本帖最後由 dawander3r 於 2009-2-26 02:05 AM 編輯 ] |
|
/ `. E! Z3 A8 ?5 \, ^. e
w6 h: l P9 t
金山銀礦都搞唔掂1 `2 O1 e1 ^3 O, [
% }; C" H& e' A* K% x h$ Q
