|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
; _9 l4 m. h4 j; f) |! q
9 G4 Y9 N2 f4 [; H+ U$ k8 N$ caccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.$ a7 u. V6 b5 U* u
* h2 ]6 ]: u$ Q- W* P1 tIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
7 g3 R2 @9 |/ f @' S! U% mand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
; ]2 k* `# w3 i% f: g, s6 b3 r; Z5 _( M1 ~8 k; e
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
8 x6 F @& R& h: A0 r5 o/ z% ]1 R6 L+ \+ \' x% S( q6 \6 G4 A
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
3 b5 r7 D. C# q0 O- m: q8 p- bat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|