 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.2 M% c) f* p; {7 M' u1 X
: z* h2 r6 J- t* R c
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.$ [8 w+ u& s/ L* D8 w; R- k* G( K
" P* f; @% `9 B" y( vIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
0 `# _0 M# S0 H6 Qand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.6 V9 t, J* s7 K5 |3 @, z' K
1 w$ K7 T- w. _8 Y) k/ G' q
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
* Y. y$ F( |& t3 E( c9 e; ]
* \& z; ?% w1 K: G+ ^8 u! `% S& sin 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, , U- g8 q' J7 F& C' H' y7 R
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|