 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct." u) P) f2 |, ]4 I+ I7 A" [
; R/ v1 e) y7 l5 g- |4 Q5 s5 P9 ]& d; eaccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.) s2 s8 ^" o7 e8 d7 i. S0 f8 {
' t# ~+ X& w; L8 b) J0 {
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,- }8 N- u# L1 g- c$ L/ l
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
p3 w7 i1 }! x5 C* h- [( i# [/ \- U
! [; K( M* S$ z' ?; Rso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險# z4 A' M: H0 w0 z
1 q+ [% A$ h* ^in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, 2 u2 @9 l, L. `6 s& {, @
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|