- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
+ L7 _; [ s: w% v5 o" o' |! X0 D1 l
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.$ C' I6 K* J0 X7 g
1 i6 |0 ]4 M& wIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,* v E/ m( {( ?2 b: b% J- U
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.0 Q. A5 Z3 v0 N% x) I0 z
) H; W2 j0 R0 g' [" b) e9 k0 gso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
- \7 H# R, A1 S0 m5 P' q- P# c: a! g7 m* ]. W4 o! q$ h, M
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, 9 w% i& U$ E1 e5 V2 ?
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|