|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.' [. z/ d2 C1 `# G9 q
* s" \/ e: i; \3 }
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
4 z0 a% \, o: t" X( [. z3 q$ i: F6 }4 L
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
3 J: O. B. a4 X* ?9 U0 zand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.& P. v% R5 u6 J' g
+ z9 c- A7 q( y U
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
! O8 j" K$ L$ g9 A# }3 K
0 T: N! G* n) O0 f. t& uin 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
) k! F9 x( B p( ^7 T# z$ b) ^at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|