- 帖子
- 6683
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 10274
- 魅力
- 5
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
11#
發表於 2005-4-23 03:42 PM
| 只看該作者
You guys are looking at very academic factors
5 B* M- H# h5 @* F) A( o7 vThe ideal Hong Kong can be very simply.
6 K# r$ ~6 G, N1 BJust think about the thing around you and you thing you are most interested e* s/ F" J! i" K
What government, world city are too unreal to me, G6 p! F6 k7 [$ k4 Z
Everyone got a different ideal Hong Kong in mind% N e+ x: L" @$ _2 o* ^
I have stayed in Australia for many years and my girlfriend is Japanese
' w8 j' a; A) Q. i" w2 vSo it's hardly to avoid comparing Hong Kong, Japan and Australia
" Q( u" U7 i, F4 B( ?* ] J# N% }) e( |6 Z8 W# U
First of all, Hong Kong is famous for shopping, becuase the selling is extremely low
( J( [4 L# E% G$ ?7 \7 WHowever, the style and quality are must worse than Japan.& r R* c3 p$ _' c
My ideal Hong Kong is keeping low selling price but improve quality and style of the goods and service. This is very very hard to achieve.
5 g/ ?! Z. d/ A+ t) ^But that is ok, we are just talking ideal. Ideal doesn't have to be achievable( [* J; f9 j5 a0 [. d
Secondly, the Salary are very high in Japan. High salary improve stardard of living
! T. z, o7 l9 ~! H) p& a4 ]! t3 _$ kSo, people eat better, wear better, and even go for treavel
8 m, ~+ h+ Q' W# T6 x# sThridly, Australia has huge area of land, hardly any to see buildings,
$ ^" U: e0 ]2 `# SPeople are living a house. A house is hardly any to see in HK.
' p0 J* ~1 q3 |( IMy ideal Hong Kong is more land, more house
2 Y; G' f9 Z: C4 c2 h! i. _% u: C: g; b2 k# G
All other thing between people, I respect this is unique Hong Kong cultue
5 ^ ^' p0 S% y$ lIn my ideal Hong Kong, the attitude are still the same, such as MK style.
$ W' n* U- L2 HI'm not laughing at MK. Sorry about that ?5 d0 l+ o/ ]' g+ T; [
1 O% U7 C' q/ `7 E, hLastly, I don't wanna see too many Chinese in Hong Kong9 b% I, Z, ]" b( J; t6 b6 {
I see all Chinese as foreigner. I know Hong Kong is a Chinese city, r7 B- T- S2 q* ]
But in my ideal Hong Kong, Hong Kong must be the most population
; m$ n6 L- L5 h0 v$ b- O, M3 D% F* R7 h+ C
Isn't it very simply!? |
|