- 帖子
- 6683
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 10274
- 魅力
- 5
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
11#
發表於 2005-4-23 03:42 PM
| 只看該作者
You guys are looking at very academic factors/ I# G; {- [ T! ]3 b- x7 }
The ideal Hong Kong can be very simply. 1 N' k4 Z4 m2 D( Z
Just think about the thing around you and you thing you are most interested
% C# b- }) z: |; s }What government, world city are too unreal to me9 W8 y- T; B/ L. n9 o/ W
Everyone got a different ideal Hong Kong in mind+ O2 Q0 x" W {2 W V0 p
I have stayed in Australia for many years and my girlfriend is Japanese
& {* b" s- w/ w' KSo it's hardly to avoid comparing Hong Kong, Japan and Australia9 V5 p' t1 X: b1 m
) j& Q" {- e1 \( UFirst of all, Hong Kong is famous for shopping, becuase the selling is extremely low
8 Q1 o( c6 R) K2 qHowever, the style and quality are must worse than Japan.
4 r& o! s2 B, hMy ideal Hong Kong is keeping low selling price but improve quality and style of the goods and service. This is very very hard to achieve.
- `$ X; W, k) J/ Q* c/ ?But that is ok, we are just talking ideal. Ideal doesn't have to be achievable
, Y( U7 b/ |& A* T) aSecondly, the Salary are very high in Japan. High salary improve stardard of living0 n& m' W/ Y: N
So, people eat better, wear better, and even go for treavel9 U4 L' ?2 |3 P' T
Thridly, Australia has huge area of land, hardly any to see buildings,
, H4 R, U x' }& }) U/ HPeople are living a house. A house is hardly any to see in HK. ) m H( W0 L4 |
My ideal Hong Kong is more land, more house
8 q3 B- i! f4 a) B8 o ]" g7 u* V7 t+ p G- D0 i) X* @
All other thing between people, I respect this is unique Hong Kong cultue
9 m7 J: Q U3 eIn my ideal Hong Kong, the attitude are still the same, such as MK style./ C4 m5 N4 E- }! a/ t
I'm not laughing at MK. Sorry about that J& w1 @6 D9 R. B/ F2 S
. o* S/ ?7 ^* R8 ]: j8 @
Lastly, I don't wanna see too many Chinese in Hong Kong& Z4 t4 o: b5 v
I see all Chinese as foreigner. I know Hong Kong is a Chinese city
* [1 Z9 ~, p2 H: X, E- n& xBut in my ideal Hong Kong, Hong Kong must be the most population
2 x5 q/ d+ U" e! X2 f$ R G& O k1 h+ A
Isn't it very simply!? |
|
)
