Rika

由最好排到最壞
9 H: D+ V3 |7 d4 }F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong4 p+ |) y% W, `+ g* _- Y# Q
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount1 D' d4 U3 B' f8 H2 O8 ^6 I
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her- {; Y9 @! j9 P. p: w! F1 A
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
) Y. G& Z% k9 E/ C3 I4 Y  F( EL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
6 O# l- }- F: J
, h% D. \$ `( P: w2 {* T6 KM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
+ Y2 V5 r' c6 l% ^: ?3 q( j, _9 }* |8 z
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
" N5 G5 J/ B7 ]     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!/ S/ b# n! R# r3 l+ O1 u
! n) o- n& t" D) ]
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做8 C+ i3 z/ D- G3 s

/ _* t5 t9 l( Z* K8 |0 h. mL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
: e# H/ Q' w2 {; w: M  |# N/ v! {1 a' `1 \: c
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,& a2 d: R8 j2 H& {$ ^
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好; s  p* S) K& a& }, K& }

, _5 F6 O8 V8 r4 U7 C[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
" ?+ v  n2 x- H4 O2 o* I8 ~+ O7 H( j而家答多次" u( V5 S) I3 m' V! m, Y' t
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽/ F* f, b# A8 W
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架" I/ k6 ?; C1 x2 Z
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
$ t2 x4 p2 P7 S. o& {s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.3 X) W( l+ u9 W4 o7 F% u
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
/ {& f0 S7 a9 s: B) x6 [
. f) E) z5 n/ v& d9 L8 L2 G3 _L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
7 c- l6 p8 w  e" r0 w; qF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度: k6 |) O% G) b5 E; u8 S
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
) E3 Y% h$ d+ cS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
9 \' `! ^: D2 X4 W5 mB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞; k3 ~1 Q3 e, `
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"8 ~& _4 x' P/ l+ m. i5 M
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
% |8 ~( u. K1 E7 a1 `M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
: J+ T, T' I, I; w! vL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果* S7 _* g' j& X  n) g
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情) W0 g7 J4 ~* H5 T; t1 V

$ U. j- @; h; `' i9 s世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
2 _1 [- A9 m7 S5 ]$ L- g0 nL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
' ^" V5 _4 V0 {& u% T& BB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘/ K, A, C% ~5 I5 ~
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件8 e* u# S; _& C+ ~
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方; C+ L; h: j+ g) ~8 ]
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

4 a/ u0 e2 a% T9 t9 x$ `1 X9 `. b' k7 Y- e7 Q$ n% f
same choices with u , but want to add some comments 1 |8 f  u" O0 ~+ L9 r

% u# \5 I8 y% w6 n8 }B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
& d2 ^% z" C& M! z9 c. i1 W- g$ y  W# d8 [2 J$ @: t" E
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )" h7 B2 V! u/ J% e/ n& X
6 Y, s, d# f5 L
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
* i. B* t  i3 ?: K: G9 W9 C/ ~! m1 e! H" M) X
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......4 c+ T# q' w9 w! e  y) q
# M$ R' @, ~" k# ?5 i
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
" }+ {1 I  q4 u- \. A% MM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
4 }" g8 S4 R; S, B5 _L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點' T& H  X9 d! `  L1 E
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
5 B; h1 j* o! o2 v- m0 j  [% y+ E  r
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....  t  N" I  Z6 Z
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，5 D& |9 B' }. t
由最好開始排起既話，4 J2 d" O- [+ S. X/ w9 q9 H0 Z! D5 d
L B M F S 啦，
1 l& F1 u' c% R' J7 w" c
: I: b* T* g# d* E- r  c9 X) `$ X& U其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，7 \9 v. h, q3 ^6 c0 F
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？& v) x9 z& H  g
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
5 F; v' [* c- P: p  {8 o7 R又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
7 K  u6 G# R# f6 V  f/ x1 L
8 |3 K* |1 m1 S# C7 o而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
1 B- Q7 z8 Y- _! ~所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
+ }+ [7 D* P0 u& G/ r2 b明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
# H4 h- h+ T; J+ Y: h4 X6 G; A4 w; S7 g% o; C0 R
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，  W$ a3 K6 p1 O/ h
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，1 m" r2 t9 k* t* a
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
9 S5 a/ `6 p& }+ ]知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，- P. }; `$ E+ \5 Z
M 都可算壞了。
$ }- w- h) X4 y+ u; s. m; L8 M$ @& H8 |$ L, ?
F 呢個人仲掂，/ x% R0 o0 p4 {: |. E2 Z5 e
知道既唔等於要講，
) ~7 S0 f2 t6 p5 t如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
8 D1 q/ ^7 I6 e8 D我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
' \* W/ L7 D; Z  I
) I- T+ Q2 b5 m" F$ `最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
7 W/ N  D- [; H6 h始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
+ e, ^) y9 r7 Q. i/ r
& V$ `! N. L2 U7 P
# Y1 C% w# G! z4 k2 y% L, O
, R# v5 w4 a6 v9 j; R" X/ s題外話：1 ~" c/ A- u. a4 G
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
* f, y. ?. k6 O3 w1 F睇到 S 呢條友，
8 y2 I1 e" ?: M' f/ e: r0 [( R我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L( I% f% R: F  g% n0 l

+ l" @5 Q( H: i) I# S# t' j& US: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
$ X$ b( S) W0 G% NF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
. h. W7 ^) Y  qM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她9 O6 b) F! g, k7 e
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害: ~* h! k5 e- K8 T
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...