Rika

由最好排到最壞% j# g' e% J, _2 d7 e! x
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong/ Z8 z  z$ O, [2 Y# U2 ^1 f; \' N1 R
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
, Q# z6 P; ?% G' H$ bS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
; L: I: E8 V# L+ a9 a) yM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
( w) X  u! X+ }L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
- c4 N) q* E3 S9 M. p! C; ]
3 B% r# Z- [6 ~* r1 k1 CM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
$ q! j$ u# v4 K# D. v1 k' p/ m: R2 l/ u
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
3 W5 a0 L& a3 V' b     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!) v( R- m0 I7 A8 v
8 [" e' b' Y8 M& G" N: k
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做8 s: }0 I9 `2 W* I/ v% l

! d7 v# {- h1 eL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
  B" ?. p0 q9 C1 f/ K8 U! E4 B$ r1 @9 P& g# c* d& G( J
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,3 D4 S( U0 H8 W$ j9 }# R
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
8 p7 r& l5 P) u5 {, Y/ Z2 H6 _# b9 ^3 t7 d9 k
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案- d% G8 L; t. k, z
而家答多次
1 Q" I+ x! n' Y# Nf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽, N& v0 b+ W: L0 ?! \. _2 W
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
+ [( q+ a# w% xb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢9 d6 P# S7 m0 \+ R! @8 P
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.% t) h4 R' ~, k
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S, m9 T1 K3 V6 K( i
0 [' ]5 s0 t1 H* K
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大+ W0 ]: E! d4 M7 r( r  H
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
) \3 e- E: l. |M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒+ d& l. Z7 I& h, b  g
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
* P0 x: c# _0 M0 JB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
/ @) d& P5 `7 R4 mF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"" X& {% B) l; u2 {# H+ R9 Z
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取; t9 L  i9 T0 m# f4 i8 J' i- V
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法' l6 }- o) C9 b4 b+ h+ e- }
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果, R7 _; w7 B4 S6 V4 l4 H
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情2 n$ b. Q/ g( t5 u8 X+ Y' T. c$ O
4 a/ |$ Z8 x( O; G
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
. }, l1 o; c! G$ ?7 h; X  _: D9 @5 WL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己8 ]( K; w% y; s1 D+ c
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
% S( c1 T6 O3 I- w% t; GS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
( _$ J& }) u4 z8 I# XF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方0 E; V/ j+ M$ P9 ~. \( Z* R+ O( \. X
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

- {' I/ P$ p4 X) y/ y7 \3 U% t8 ^1 G
same choices with u , but want to add some comments * I2 W; e3 Y5 y1 L( t
! @  J6 J& C/ k9 o  a  J$ f' D  `
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
* h, j9 |. k7 \, ~8 M, I6 t) f
$ I/ p8 g1 F* J: r+ b5 Q0 A% b/ RS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )0 x" r  m) J: r& l9 P3 ]
- z5 r( v8 R' _" S& ^; x
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
/ V4 J1 s% O& M0 L6 _3 |6 r8 O$ l0 \7 K4 x! T
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......; q% F% N  f( Z$ g6 Z, a6 [9 p

. A& b! ~- {- F9 I6 g! x* e[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
; g& ]: J1 v& LM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢  m# f# l" |% \5 }. s* a
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
  ]* P# C$ e- K7 K  R% i* AF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma1 I/ [! m- U( H) n

9 e1 X% C! \% _3 [: S最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
. X: l8 W& t* N4 e3 L1 j3 Y有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
% T- ]4 z8 z, V) s7 M9 z& s! S由最好開始排起既話，
. A, L. F. g6 rL B M F S 啦，
# S' o( P& E; N1 ~& ^7 {1 {! [$ R: C0 Y- l6 Q9 H
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，8 L7 w+ B0 T# P6 n  N8 e) v
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？) i+ e4 ?2 C! ~" c% h4 A' e2 F
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？1 D. g4 n8 Q# y9 f7 S
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
' l' E" _* ~& p. s/ J* T1 T% N" B. c" l5 o) h: ?
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
' X$ s. T1 k8 u+ l1 E( I; E& Q8 j所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，+ a% n2 I: }+ z& e( ?
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。5 U" ]- }% r" b- A9 l! p

4 ^: Q  o" T  ]  e5 R/ A4 R而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
8 o# g- @9 {  ?- s0 ^, c6 j+ B M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
. T' _3 U1 R. L  b7 ~' D* E亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
2 N$ a; V4 V, y. ^" M# L知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，  @4 `5 b" L# y2 v7 t% s4 H: |
M 都可算壞了。' y4 X* x. o2 N
, T$ |: `5 T0 X) t) d# m/ h% o
F 呢個人仲掂，
2 ]6 F# [! w5 Y  \( o知道既唔等於要講，7 u1 O& W3 z8 u4 b$ ]* p; J
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
% ^% o7 \0 f, A( Q我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。5 n$ r$ Q2 [7 x; _! A. y
1 a2 h9 R& A# }7 N, y9 x# [* T% @" z
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，# X. V/ L# [4 Q) g' [$ T2 G  _
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。+ x. H( L1 e$ j6 ]% ~8 R2 n

& m  P8 D6 R" I' E; w& a8 z; |0 v) @2 x. a: F* z, M

! _3 |. }: O# K; X1 e題外話：
4 @7 L# [5 _  D5 d2 J" `% X唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，' Y4 P" k; h3 V5 k
睇到 S 呢條友，
( g  w& b- ]2 g- r我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
. ]* V6 K# w1 k# m  f# x# O0 U  `, w! t# e2 e% M8 L
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!* S" ~* n+ k  U6 V  U4 @- Y
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係# I; C/ u; Y# R0 L
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
2 d* j5 ^' F1 j& W) iB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
8 K# L5 r; \" m4 }" O3 E4 H7 vL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...