Rika

由最好排到最壞# d& K! t9 P) j0 V
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
2 c9 {- o8 A# g& g8 ]. B. \B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
$ w7 c8 b& J- q" [! d" H; rS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her8 K5 P5 V. _4 s: \5 M9 ~+ ^
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
, K( t3 v# V2 n3 C2 ]5 ]L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
& P: ^3 }" E! G$ h/ N" a' w( Q2 w8 _4 n0 S* M- p1 I
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
3 f6 s& G# N$ Y$ K5 C- ]
$ z- y: C& _/ m& y5 a% z4 X7 ]) WS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)& `6 j: o& G  x
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
4 D' h/ Z6 M9 c" X0 }6 c, b
8 P/ U' E$ y+ uB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
# f: L( T2 ]2 M! ]4 k1 y8 Z3 R& D& s$ P
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
) A4 U8 O% P; H9 ]: R- c/ ^* `: m7 l2 S, e
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,! J5 N2 q0 l4 {3 @8 [, E9 d
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好0 X! l! b3 G2 Q# ?( j
* g0 H  {* Y( S6 Z: ]
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案: c: F" z. m% F8 Q, m0 c) O. F# x
而家答多次3 H1 Z# l7 n( \8 y: k
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽% I4 Z$ k- p* j- I0 E+ q* u
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
; m  @! N0 r+ {8 O$ {  Xb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
2 z$ Y7 ]9 D6 J1 p+ {s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.1 a0 d% Q$ e0 ~) n6 a2 I$ J- t5 p
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
7 U/ W. q" f( G' y$ F9 N% R& y* L. F) Z: p) z# ]; X
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
* S, Z1 a" y% |) \# T5 @0 AF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
) ?# r. d6 W4 E8 E  WM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒& m, ?1 A- G4 t/ Y: |8 M( T
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢5 w, M4 D. p/ }5 O" F  b5 O
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
3 J% j, W/ g9 d6 r2 }F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"7 F: z# x3 C  ~
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
9 i2 Q% T* `7 zM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法5 L0 ?) j+ Q  t, U  ]- x" U
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果3 {- C' [+ ?1 A5 o4 }& v
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情7 e& |1 ~" s. H, x0 K

+ O0 D8 A7 I0 D" p; w. G; a世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:* b( \: {& j  i
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己8 d5 h8 \- M8 N; }0 D
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘( F% h! s- Q- u# T
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件* S# c" O3 Q( B4 P  L
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方/ K) B; t% ^3 z: d, }/ d
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

9 Y& R5 J. d4 b; z
0 l) O, R0 D  `; U8 p- [ same choices with u , but want to add some comments
8 U6 p# P& r# d+ |1 @0 `" t
+ j) d0 v! U( a9 U" ^B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
3 y0 |& {! a" V3 a* A- A; H
+ S) E6 {% B! A( TS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
' Z+ ~7 `, `8 Q- |4 X3 c2 Z0 f4 _4 n( c& u$ @' [/ o( Y+ k
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
9 L1 K: P9 ]6 P$ p& ]; [: i" y: D3 x$ V: _2 Q) U+ G/ \8 U% @2 a" F
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
: w& m" f  J; A" w
  e% J$ G$ E2 W$ }' U[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge0 x+ d1 x: Z8 l- {5 P
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢9 b% ~+ i7 j  w! [3 i6 f$ J
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點/ v. M" O; a$ d: O2 s) c' y: f
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
4 F) j! z+ G1 i1 U# n: m$ E9 u8 V6 I- t8 `) H/ u
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
0 r' \) J' r& [) V! h有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
/ K( r$ i; P- e+ M: k( ?7 D由最好開始排起既話，
; o: k: U# t! h, k9 b: o" pL B M F S 啦，0 X4 P7 z* m' x% A* W3 w

; S1 `0 h* V6 `6 U其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
/ N2 j3 F) O+ `3 y但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？$ C; P0 n) O. U+ ^8 r: p
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
2 n4 U8 p% F) J  C& f, s5 W又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
  V, ]1 K' y! ]) d, n- z1 |! c0 w* V' G$ E
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，# v9 C1 t  M! D% l( e8 Z. A2 c% E' Q
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，. h9 u5 p+ S; U3 z4 F
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。8 I( |' {# V& j, c3 W
1 m7 j! E% Y& r8 x) K* [7 Z
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
+ Q5 ]0 ~* l' O4 [ M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，  a& `! k  H- z$ {' W% U3 F$ t
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
2 Z8 I2 F7 I; Q知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，3 U- k3 S. c  |3 w# ~9 Y/ U
M 都可算壞了。
8 y4 O* f: D6 G4 i' W5 z# j
9 |7 Y4 _1 m6 m  c F 呢個人仲掂，
5 Y1 _! e0 o$ `4 k, q/ I知道既唔等於要講，8 ^" d3 |8 [. k0 x4 i0 t: |
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，1 X+ ?# Z  c% b! ?
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
; |1 ~' B# l7 H3 F" P& U
' T, s+ o$ k' {7 N最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
4 U, Q! U7 {9 t始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
) M9 x' U' X; M! z! h, v, o1 ^" U, A  _8 p
  n& ~+ r0 [, t7 M: ]) x7 `& b
  z, k* @# t% y& Y& }5 z
題外話：
7 ?6 A- F/ r' D1 ~唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
% p4 V& |, ^3 `" u8 K# Q# `/ |睇到 S 呢條友，: Q5 c. x; T& X3 f- N8 }
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L6 e- e) l! C( T0 L" C( a
5 s/ {! `; @; U$ y( N
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!) e& f. S3 @5 c: O  o& X8 `
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係; F9 C; D$ U( [6 o' I) p. R1 r
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她- _# k( o. C; K' J
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害" I* s0 {* N* g( m/ U+ q5 n4 P
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...