Rika

由最好排到最壞  b- x1 D! J! L/ x; j) B5 y
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
0 S9 F, }; X. o0 A. v- IB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
0 `5 H) C+ w2 P: F& \S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her& J2 {) z8 j3 Q/ |* ~( f+ T' j1 V
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure6 W- O3 q2 U2 x  q% U! \3 ~+ z
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:* r, g) w, u5 e0 d/ b+ U" W+ @! ^

6 {# c3 b5 w6 QM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人/ p. u" E+ ~' n/ o* X

. n7 z  x8 p( t/ E9 z6 D5 TS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
. a( n7 Y8 }" r" p2 M, U     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
2 q3 l! h) |/ C$ Y  Y+ O7 I
* _6 D- ^" S0 M# NB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做1 T2 g4 ~( a/ c
) i2 D! C4 X# P; I: j0 X
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
! w7 B6 M7 u  p8 X$ c5 a
4 z, j% T9 n2 X5 C5 o1 EF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
1 f2 U6 t$ m0 W. h. j) X     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好; M. |) u" Q/ _8 N! X6 f
$ |5 `% ?6 O: l8 ]" A) {+ |/ w
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
0 C/ @3 e+ q( Z7 R/ ~# C! q而家答多次4 g0 E7 q9 G; E% d6 y* t! T- d. u
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽% M' t) b# C7 T
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
" O4 j  Y  ]. n! db: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
. p# V+ p5 Q# Q) ]s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
3 ~) a' m6 i0 I# vm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S9 y& w+ |6 X3 V

/ j# M' O- c7 j$ w6 F1 ~L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
# }2 Z- @# }* T$ T7 X+ ^, a0 ~' |F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度& J' H8 m( O  V" c. Z, f; @$ ]3 a0 n8 z
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒/ M" ?. k7 z7 f: a( v$ t2 J
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
2 T) Y5 m# d- A( A' @& R3 v3 y1 xB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞9 Y; S7 X/ e" O- u
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"& B. z) k! N! C3 W, R( m1 d
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取! J( M: H: L# ^, h  w5 {# [  X
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
" Y/ v  O- N) I% M6 IL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
) I* A: l; U* z$ {9 oB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
2 r, t0 `$ e$ B, w; u4 f
# {; y7 ]5 i+ F. n' z7 ~! S世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:2 a: ], E% w0 s0 H1 n
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己8 N) P& Y+ ]6 Z9 @3 L) U
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
1 t, y$ j$ F4 h; O8 AS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件$ U+ U" ?' `0 J% T/ [  n
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方0 v" k/ t5 V' M
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

! C' ]% P3 A6 P, ?+ a' ~% R
$ b7 j1 d& T; r9 L" r' P  z3 B same choices with u , but want to add some comments
. a# B  w( R' r0 \
+ z+ p. ^' T/ K- L% _B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  2 @# N1 S! c: ^- J( u

1 a" L* i/ o/ MS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
1 F* e) G+ ^* p+ K3 _2 j+ N$ m6 p+ J0 X5 E
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
$ D- u; u# s; S4 v0 X
: q4 M' W% l+ s5 S' k5 [. p6 `# @M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
+ C$ b; {& E! u/ U* }7 I* a
# m* w. T# t4 L- f, W/ }# b[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
" q1 H2 v0 w5 c# rM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢. ~7 P  a6 @. z+ h
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
! ?+ z, @) ^6 `- g* V3 OF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma  Y. l4 G! \" l) x) h4 o8 E
9 j% U) r/ ~% ?1 b+ r" ^, V" k
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
2 p: d3 |$ a" j有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
# ~7 Q2 B0 x9 y. K; O% E由最好開始排起既話，
2 H! v% l, z3 E% A8 B. \L B M F S 啦，
/ h9 X- X$ U8 u  a$ y# E# u0 s; q1 Z
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
$ a( T( x5 i0 V* g% S* v但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
5 ?' ]' l" Z6 S/ ?6 W5 j4 I如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？3 f2 _8 ~, f$ H+ z( k0 w
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
/ V* q/ h7 X+ s- s7 y; e
& r" x2 O1 s/ W- e3 S& D而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，: \& J5 v9 B( U; o9 S+ u/ |
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，( f0 t2 D/ ^: z. o
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
8 [" {  C) H9 {. U* _. u% r' i' F, w6 K, L6 Z5 G
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
% H$ L5 @7 V9 w' W" X! S M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
! O  {- P. |  t" H  }7 L: e亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
1 r* A; W2 I- R6 ?知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，( S5 }; T2 s0 q; h
M 都可算壞了。8 K- G2 e8 `, n$ s! u( N

9 E) F1 n$ t+ J' W# k# U F 呢個人仲掂，
9 i* {2 B( e# R知道既唔等於要講，
" k& N  h( e+ x  V2 M如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
; @2 t) u" B; s/ p, F我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。" ]6 B% y6 N4 C$ @" V5 l8 m3 S

4 L" a8 B5 D' y) R+ j' q2 u最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
5 _7 L& \5 M, J3 k1 ~& m始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。6 W& ^& q, k$ l' P& Y+ m

: f+ t+ W$ f% k$ s' ]
  @# Z: m2 Y6 e+ a4 T( R- P: v8 ~* l2 t3 c, R$ c
題外話：
8 A9 y- V& o! J/ ^唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
9 ~$ j5 `3 S3 t, }睇到 S 呢條友，0 }! j7 s* Y/ L8 i2 c5 _" w
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L7 k. M) Y5 H' z: B# Y
2 o9 N: C/ A3 f9 |, n' b
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
9 k8 K. H4 O+ H$ _5 [1 y8 ?$ FF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係8 K8 F0 T7 K) c9 t! c7 t/ g4 {
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
+ P9 b7 x3 a. n' b& MB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害) m0 w+ U' K2 W' v7 K' c
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...