Rika

由最好排到最壞$ T5 O6 D, z! ~# ~4 P$ f5 O
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong1 H6 }$ X/ q4 A% ?: z' [1 M
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount3 G8 E0 x9 F& p* ~
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her9 o! @6 h  y) L4 C: P
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure! T; A+ Y6 K+ K" j# Z) k
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:) f8 a" `' r6 c& N

; _5 O8 ?: W9 s8 x2 i4 l* |M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人1 }1 ~3 p4 Y+ e) b5 H
7 V8 P0 e. e3 r0 d3 [: q7 ~
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
+ l' m' h% c; P: N+ X8 B     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
- R  y7 s9 F; \, k: i8 x$ {4 V9 N/ }+ _! Q4 [
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做3 Z# }9 C' `9 H) x

- ^" U$ H. _  B1 k/ i3 YL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志8 o# G& z: w0 g4 B3 s
" x) }0 ?2 f3 b
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,( r' N& g7 b* t4 V: W0 q2 b
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
8 v" l1 i5 D5 A7 s" o5 H
8 f: h" y1 N4 u% K/ [[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案6 {# Z! ]- ?, E* C# ]) B  ?8 X
而家答多次
) {. [) ~6 i1 m6 q' Mf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
. F6 O* l) X4 il: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架* K9 X! ]' t; M  [4 y
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
6 P/ A3 R1 l! zs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.5 V% D1 q6 F9 Y& ]1 k
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S9 C, p7 b* q" _0 \, E6 s; {# O8 y

( M0 E  b/ Z2 G: Z* ?L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
# H4 K* v7 J5 x6 f+ A# H" pF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
0 q' v6 w- V. A0 JM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒0 ^7 f( v2 [' c3 B
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢' O3 ]' ^* t( G7 V" n5 A4 @. S6 E
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞: Z0 `9 {" Q1 K1 }
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
/ \: @- _" S8 J8 M8 j  uS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
) n2 D- |8 L5 UM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
8 h$ U/ ?4 n: R1 g" {4 ML: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果9 O/ H. {& Y6 j7 Q8 O1 k
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
6 U# a, m" S( ~5 p, Z0 E0 t) x" h
2 u4 [7 M& U9 b- B5 D; I0 x8 u世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
$ f5 [  ~- @: _$ t2 s+ ?L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己% @2 z. b! i: b* o
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘, i* o' I) \- K! s- U
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件! m' D) T8 Y3 p$ s
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
" ?" L, ?% T( ?7 D0 S. I# M4 b( _( mM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

# p' J. q$ s7 c% s3 O4 j. x8 Z* G3 p8 |  A9 n7 [0 ]
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
9 {" U& s+ T& l
; |+ C/ J2 b2 `B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  2 Z7 C& C( y8 F5 D
; p( J4 V8 \; o4 _9 i2 h! `
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )% F3 f5 B! T  Z2 t8 M

( B, `% W4 y4 V% E5 v, eF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 3 C7 t- v  k% ?% x& g; z+ f

  K8 M. s$ L; ^. S7 @' K9 PM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
; O1 J* K9 k6 X. N2 b
6 b/ R" D  R) m[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
* E" |$ f' m1 U- f) \" a& P& Z$ CM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
3 m% V- F" r7 U$ ?3 B" C1 aL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點, V9 _" b3 }! k& K
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma3 i3 w2 n/ R( i
# G: j6 f" b: C2 Z9 P& a5 u1 [2 u, W
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....; W' Q5 H* P9 w/ w2 f" l$ x% A
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，8 U2 ]2 C5 ^0 p% U
由最好開始排起既話，9 V, i: d" |+ g% ^  O9 G) z: E
L B M F S 啦，: Q% }2 j& [4 t+ _) Y( u/ O8 B
+ q3 e$ w. a3 J, c+ |7 T+ c5 A4 ?
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，  G: S, T, C* ?$ U
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
$ T- I* \; p. I8 U* Q: ~如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
% Y% v% ?; ~. N4 A又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。" p& E6 O$ F( S! W

% S9 r( q. c& \9 o7 @5 @而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
( ~3 _. L  J' P1 [2 B' u所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，$ o/ i4 l1 E2 v$ R
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
5 q, ~" m& R6 A2 {5 z* n$ r+ A) d5 n) w/ s
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
7 M) u+ m; u% K. g  O M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，4 p  D1 Z& g3 E3 ^, n/ g3 G
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，4 |" w" G: f& ^* b& O; K
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
1 ?2 c' q6 Y! o0 v! a9 B; y/ a M 都可算壞了。- x7 A- |4 }" ~9 x
' k! I. S& n# h# Q; K/ T4 X) {
F 呢個人仲掂，) f9 n: F3 b2 [
知道既唔等於要講，' m2 J0 K9 V, ^% C3 L5 ~8 U
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，& ]0 w% }' M4 Z8 L% z5 N0 }4 L
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
- b9 |9 ~: ]! e9 r6 p4 t8 j! O) E1 {. ?+ s: h
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，0 Q+ }" Q) e; J! }9 d6 ]3 {
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
6 h1 y5 H/ V! r: b, _" K
- I' I! v0 \6 |, u4 n% m1 Z* p' @9 q" |' _; O. x7 ]/ O( K
; `! A* |2 _  n
題外話：- q- z! n# q5 C9 }% _
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，$ h' I$ x1 t: N( v3 S) t
睇到 S 呢條友，0 L* \* V1 }6 O! S: I# w  P
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L( a3 }5 X  \6 ^5 _' w0 U, C

- n7 S4 k7 j- i' xS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!4 N% H. P; W! O0 D+ o' Z
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
5 s3 @$ I: {  C% JM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
" U& S* E8 o, \3 U4 a& oB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害* D! _5 ]* W% Y
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...