Rika

由最好排到最壞6 s+ w$ O% K, c# M. Q9 F/ P6 l' j
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
( R& H) L6 C  [: ~1 uB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
% ^( ]/ G( h$ X! h; e6 Q9 o$ ~S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her7 a  U0 V- \, A8 \) n. Q' Y
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure4 v! }# Z- ?- z' j
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:1 M/ `! W0 X+ D" @: N

) P! L0 i+ C/ {  hM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
/ n% A+ c, b( q7 [5 x' y; ]# k# C) U
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
% c4 K! J# B. i5 X+ t" z     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
( B  Z, i* r5 v3 X! D) c
$ U# c7 Q1 x3 C. [+ ZB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
6 j+ A( R5 E. u3 a
/ M8 k; c( ^7 I: S, ZL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志& j; t4 D+ ^  M

* a1 [4 R7 d& `" B) fF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
/ L0 T' x/ O' x3 r/ q     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好9 ]* X5 h0 U5 V& H' v
* |) X3 A. d( ?9 D
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案) g1 ~% t5 Q3 Y
而家答多次  A# w, s, w2 A  B
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
1 `& g8 `' m6 {; T' a; ?  J; q1 Dl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架# f7 D2 H" S3 m5 @1 p" u% [8 H! p
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢" g  P7 f$ q1 t$ H5 q+ S
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.% P9 I- S4 k: v
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S3 o( A/ @8 b$ `* O9 c# Z

+ ]& [5 j8 L9 j6 Z- a1 iL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大: S: S! v$ M6 W# U. \' ~" q$ @: e
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度( n6 H1 O1 ~# O% v8 A: ?
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒6 ^0 |9 c/ c4 X# P
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
/ J8 z. _( Q0 V) ]7 SB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞* P! u/ [: ~2 W/ J5 R8 B. G5 _
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"- G3 f+ q1 |3 p' A! g1 @7 ~
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
: c+ H7 D/ ?: t5 Z2 s/ SM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法% ?4 k- _# f) u6 Z' z* m( [
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
$ J+ j! n% ^. T% W- Q% {- P! HB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情% s& k; A/ |5 G& ~( F

) t% n6 E) o' j& s9 h世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
$ m; u- O, R2 K6 F. ^L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
! F5 q. h$ Z7 @9 k9 ~B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘+ u' S. D! O9 Z9 ?" [
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件( H, E6 b- \0 |6 y3 z% M
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方0 ?0 d5 L+ B! {) G  p" L/ |
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

  V* x" @% H. V# _6 u
. ^) n) }5 b& ?8 ~# V7 L- x' H
same choices with u , but want to add some comments 8 T) n& V& }7 J1 H" |

  x' H# b" B0 O: WB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
8 M. F+ @" P; X. Q7 @9 v* r( l: G, B" ~2 [
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
3 }7 `% V- P; T7 e# f0 Y! G, _) A* l' `
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome * ^8 b1 f! A$ _' p# X# ~

) P. Z  U6 k* YM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......# F5 C& E; e: c3 _

0 D' e7 L; x6 b. d[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge. Y7 Z! T, R- S' @9 H5 X
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢) s5 k, i# Q0 i3 j& t+ Q
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點1 G7 U  f# j9 C. ^4 \) `
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
3 l& |( p" O. v1 i
4 D9 ?" e; a6 P1 G8 y1 Y  o0 @最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....; Q" ?% l. p( V# o- i( r
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，7 [8 P5 Z4 ^5 H
由最好開始排起既話，  C* Q& f, |  `7 f! j
L B M F S 啦，
" i$ _# F, N7 @1 ~- ?# R5 `' o3 R8 A$ [
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
0 a/ d( w, V6 v+ i但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？; O6 |& P" O; l' \8 ^
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？# F- E. H* ?* X# \3 n
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。- }. t& S2 H: A9 l: _

2 ]2 g+ h* v( T$ X而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
% T6 _7 v0 P: j. ^所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，1 l3 I5 e2 r. z& V% q
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。0 |# _* I8 I4 Q4 D
5 k2 G; h+ o; m
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，4 y6 r0 G0 T$ D. L% P& u
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
! K3 T0 Z7 t  r; _; z亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，0 X" }( f9 m( W: @; t
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，- X9 u2 g! }9 e$ l/ N: o9 }
M 都可算壞了。/ I  |( S# \; y, G2 F- \
, c  H% T! f2 X* g' H9 F
F 呢個人仲掂，
6 a7 Z; k/ [$ F* W$ ]; l) |, l知道既唔等於要講，
1 r7 k1 F; X+ ?2 Z) |如果呢件事發生係自己身上，5 S1 c9 \& z1 b* w1 o  @
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
  \, C7 l: S# a7 v
9 @! y$ K2 ~8 n3 C最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
; |( P! N7 @4 R, F6 @% Q7 U始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
  O; n/ J! X' _4 S  V, V! S* m0 c4 h! C9 g. W% P4 L7 |

+ h7 s" D7 ]/ B# b+ A& Y' z4 t4 U
% J8 [% P6 a/ n6 h$ E題外話：
  L2 e6 ?: z0 C4 R1 [3 I. M1 I4 O唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
) U' {4 b/ L1 R  L' T* j* X5 T睇到 S 呢條友，
9 w; {3 f/ H- H6 g8 l我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
! Y/ a" U( R0 S, D) M9 B
4 X0 ~/ e' E9 O# e  `& _S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!4 x- N9 ~+ y- s3 z) ?; p) B
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係: C! J5 G5 ~. Q; I2 W1 }
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她8 K( |; w4 F$ q5 g$ R' E
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害# |$ r: {9 e3 N. V
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...