Rika

由最好排到最壞- ?2 g3 A8 Z* |
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong5 _' l  W0 r6 A. G3 u
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
2 e9 t  d- U' a; _: @7 oS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her. n" F. P1 [/ S
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure) K- [4 j8 i7 `7 x8 Q+ Z
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:" k# d9 Z. |. }) V6 ]& H: o+ A
' K- o% w8 J: z$ [
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
5 E. r, [6 k$ _+ u
; L8 W  B% N: e. ^+ P9 eS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
% z6 k6 V: Z. g( b% y. I5 N     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
* C7 N8 ?$ O1 \% E& T9 Z1 \; k% r& @' h$ `, m
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
7 _9 L! W1 [3 U; X
% w2 G, E+ a; k. ^. N! q1 Q; OL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志1 ?7 O6 L, K% P( |

' K" h8 u; @+ t6 h! |( v" xF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
0 S8 f" W2 m/ b     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好$ N+ m1 j, Q5 P4 d! k6 \

0 V& m' k+ a- v$ ~  `3 t. |' N[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案* c* V; K: l; t  a5 O/ F
而家答多次" ]$ ]+ I  S) t
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
  k$ _) [$ ~( ~3 L: kl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
$ |8 w' f( Y" n9 J: |2 vb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢' }2 C: c+ ?3 V5 A9 a2 e0 X! k% [- }
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
7 t0 t+ R, ?4 a4 i$ R0 x; T1 e1 [+ Mm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
, M. h! N' J- y& _8 h; h  g8 A5 m1 p* M& V6 G3 b# @, j. P) [% a
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大+ k. x/ S5 Z7 |' X4 w+ S6 [
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
9 X0 Q1 Z. b: _, p- ?M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
/ l5 ~+ N% k' Z5 iS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
/ {+ u: ]$ F, c' G% q  Q4 XB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
1 z  u' i  x. q2 \  xF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"% e7 N: Z0 D6 p' l
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取6 N4 I) F& @  ]
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
/ }( N9 L# d9 m! {) D* ^L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
3 _8 X3 H5 l: j1 `# O- V5 |* [1 nB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
6 K# V1 }* k* `7 D: P, J& q. x3 i/ F. ?8 M* ^2 h
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
0 q9 i  \; ~/ Z4 V" _+ w# X3 @L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
! s- M) l9 h+ N- k9 ]4 RB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘8 r$ W8 v! I8 m1 x1 r1 {( J7 w
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
" c- l! l. V* W2 tF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
9 K# B, \1 }2 h5 G9 HM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

* T6 e/ y' b. g
+ t$ G1 r$ C) I" {' d
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
4 M- @+ i# `8 X& l, L4 v8 W" x& Z. N
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  & i6 p: H- w6 r3 f9 Y' f9 a

/ N2 h& n( G1 Q: _/ v* w/ dS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )/ ^* M6 c$ w7 j- U* n" l! E

6 s- ?5 b" W) ~( Z  h2 @F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
. C* f* n- Z" c' }, k) R% f: A6 {) a6 A  `: ]  [" T" }: t
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......! R% K2 r5 e! z- w( Q
: n5 o- @$ C$ c
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge  K& M1 a" `+ x6 Z" R/ P
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
. Y+ m  W$ J) D2 ~9 s$ H$ NL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
- D1 P) e  e3 `0 l$ Y! aF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
( D3 J( k& u, m) X! L6 ~( F( A
( d% r5 m( N' {& C7 R1 M# o最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
  ?2 m/ l( X6 n- T$ X9 |有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
3 B5 G7 N1 ?* y9 W% ?7 [/ q) \由最好開始排起既話，
" M" _5 V# P" |. u' z0 G* aL B M F S 啦，
0 y4 O0 U" g8 }- \7 H6 J
6 h# G/ X. e2 _其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
& D& m) b4 B2 l. o但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
! u- H; Z) U1 Z  x2 f6 {3 z0 g如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？$ P) g! i- \! a) l' y9 |* \
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
6 x6 l8 i9 S4 Y* H1 M  j; e% k- d5 R+ u' X2 C/ Y5 S% Z
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
3 p  F$ y; I# l) X5 n所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
& m2 b, \# W0 i$ M* D* y2 E# i0 {明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。/ F, l5 z) u& {- _( j3 p/ }
7 B/ L1 `6 w  W
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
! R7 q$ q) B! m9 F. U0 P M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，! b+ t. Z* Z/ ]4 w8 T, P4 Q! M
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
1 X2 j+ L% n3 ~6 m1 O知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，9 N1 e$ L2 I9 ^6 k
M 都可算壞了。
" `1 Y" A3 K# ~- }
; F0 \# {: b0 n$ ?' ^ F 呢個人仲掂，
) X) ~6 b1 D& S$ v5 M, [; _知道既唔等於要講，( Y* r& z5 i, U  s( z2 ?3 e
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
; e& b1 {0 s- Z( M我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。4 Q; e$ q1 @: E9 J
+ G" f+ y$ c: w. _7 ^5 u9 S3 p
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，( ?! m* L3 d- y0 \. K* W
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
- L# E! k) k/ I
1 k1 T" h/ l  F7 T2 z
" ^" [0 ]. O; K0 F
# g1 T9 y) Z5 `# _; F2 g題外話：
4 Z+ y  m5 Y5 w+ e唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
  k) Z$ i) C' P3 V% t1 R( H睇到 S 呢條友，
! A! T6 I: o. p2 L% g1 L我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
0 x' ?8 d, n5 B0 O' D
& {* |* b5 \3 G. t5 o4 S3 M$ qS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
( j" h( z  i" }. \9 xF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係$ B0 ~  b9 W, I: j. N
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
- @) `5 ~; B5 W9 xB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
6 i$ y: X8 i9 s1 Z. b/ xL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...