Rika

由最好排到最壞. }& j% _+ c: \0 q
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong. t- d% b) @0 o( I: b. I
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
* L: |; G8 _! _; H3 yS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
3 s0 c8 ], W. z0 e, c1 m5 nM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure8 y7 w, k! T- G; m& i: L
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
; o6 ~; k/ E' f$ }' {/ C) W  y
: e! g- N5 A' P- |5 KM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
: }& o# f! v& u  |  k* v# A$ u( u% l3 w4 ^0 s$ Y2 z
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
& C- J# l) d1 o6 L3 d     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
* p$ B7 A3 p( l0 W+ }! W
; }% U+ f1 v+ }8 n- ^" [$ W8 x* ^% u; RB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做9 \( w. P( Z$ K; y5 B" b) |4 n
/ W* f5 ~# L/ `1 e$ Q7 U4 }, f) i
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
+ O% b( g1 I4 E* u7 j( W+ I. ^( Z+ c2 |
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,. c8 N" p0 u5 [# I; e' L+ X* @
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好1 @' f) k) |7 F% U9 X0 W. y8 m
' y6 A- U" q# _- a' R
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
" X' T( u$ U  {5 i1 E0 t$ R而家答多次
  M6 S5 a2 B, {' |2 y+ sf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
$ R* E* b2 S4 J5 Bl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架0 D9 N$ @- l. i" ^' P
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
5 o0 X" A  `( g+ Hs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.1 g  i! m: `; U$ O. m6 K
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S( j/ Q: Z% f1 s; n

# j/ m7 p+ g' C1 f0 ^7 ^: bL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
/ G! {. H4 e! C- E4 j# bF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度6 _, ?6 ~+ P1 h- Z8 `
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒1 m" X4 J, |+ F1 D% G; f7 [
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
0 ~  L5 k3 Z2 |4 G% jB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
, v& k0 Z! G, UF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
- {' {( |. L) p& `3 g) y: YS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
$ ^- _. i& h" V* aM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
; J* m; g' `5 ^. E# A  u# `: bL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
+ R0 K9 o( p% lB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
4 n# J) r4 @6 Y3 Q$ B4 {! J. s
0 S! w3 i' F, S世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:. @7 W" p7 B. D6 l
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己+ ^; W" N) g/ H0 I3 K
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘- I3 Q3 f7 n. @( G# v. @
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件# x& w6 }8 l& n
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
6 m0 U/ n% u- i, S2 aM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

, N2 _. ]$ q- r6 o8 r( a
9 I6 q' U9 \2 l' T( u same choices with u , but want to add some comments
; ^2 g+ m6 E9 w1 |& M9 b
: l  C3 i" B$ t: \: l" G. ]B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river    p  C% H* G" d- O
7 |, a$ x* V( h1 w
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )4 I7 n- ~% h2 e, _5 ?  k$ x8 l1 d
4 C, H( B" @4 `% n6 [: G
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 0 ^2 X( o7 ^' Z( V. C0 S" I2 ~" A( u
5 R+ X2 |. z# K9 m
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......6 D: R3 o3 h4 S- R
5 f8 a% |& `8 m# g4 n6 @2 G# s4 M
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
( r$ V. w& a) D& i' tM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
3 q5 b+ U) m5 u4 C' FL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點3 \, S1 j0 `; L# |3 y: H
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma: s( R4 ?4 g9 {# P

. t9 j6 {' D' [8 r; w" u, A4 b, R最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
( v2 b5 G6 o) T有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，6 ^# H: t, Z- a" L$ }
由最好開始排起既話，
2 d/ [9 V/ {: m9 Y  ^& B  |0 lL B M F S 啦，4 I' f- t- Q$ |6 b1 Q+ P
% ^0 W+ b' z7 w7 u# L1 r0 _
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
) W; A- T, A3 c/ ?' J! h但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
$ a( s, N* u8 A( f5 B- i1 S+ N* W如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
2 x& @. s1 h0 }又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
  g4 b6 C* l# G5 o5 z
& K8 ~  u1 k) |- `% |  n而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
- q% a+ S7 m3 d# i所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
: J' q$ G. q! c9 i1 k* \明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。9 h. s+ ?2 |" {% G3 C
/ c8 ^) j8 D) Q( U
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，2 G8 P" R3 E6 s( e# P! H
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
3 Q! K1 U0 e/ s, \% \- O, @亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
1 y) \* E" p  r9 \+ U( x知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，" P2 j4 K  x+ a6 k
M 都可算壞了。  G, ?: M  n+ `9 {1 h5 X
6 \* N9 C- A7 T; z! W
F 呢個人仲掂，
6 F/ h  q$ Q6 c) Q% f- u知道既唔等於要講，- j: {/ q8 z" S' M  K: D
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，& a  ]/ B0 [: I" |$ x+ l2 [, Q% y/ _+ ~
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。; y1 @  H! K6 o6 F
( F8 c( F8 b# d4 s% C% X
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，! ^' h2 Y! J5 a0 O, t7 t; R+ C
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。; z7 j' ~' g( [/ i, N
7 @! L7 p3 K. r
8 x2 t' k! m, p# b

% [! J: Z. A( y6 k$ S5 q$ H4 M題外話：
* C; y# v5 y) j2 ]( N; y0 L) s唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
' Y& C/ H$ o1 z6 ?! R睇到 S 呢條友，
/ ]9 v; [  _0 H- Z) L我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
0 X/ v. y# L4 V2 y# a" D, b
# r7 k: D3 q% V7 X  z& LS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
( `: H- K, }$ j2 Q' [3 h3 r' VF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係3 r5 Y2 f$ q! ?- c4 M7 m# G2 Y5 C
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
' U! a+ s& g( z7 e5 OB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
1 }) X" M  J0 R7 f3 r- uL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...