Rika

由最好排到最壞
! g# O  A8 n% ]% m5 lF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong8 u* O: e' w$ B# B1 G
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount! O+ i$ g3 J& H' K. l" I
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
1 j/ s. x8 G- S% X- CM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure$ {0 T1 b# A# g1 Z5 _5 @
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
& r# L2 O+ E  O- ^% E1 l/ A
0 c% p5 J$ c- I) k) e: Q/ I% h) |M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人: {  [  i4 G2 w$ T3 T  U9 g+ _- g

3 d0 @- C8 w) d* u$ GS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事); g$ w+ @' C& Q8 W, [/ c
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!% m9 Y6 b, U+ p3 C! E( ?) e# Q

4 Y) A+ D  B5 c% @* w$ C4 hB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
" W$ d$ K+ v0 ?- B- x: O' m9 ?
: r& V: Y, n/ rL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
1 ]1 t! `  q; r7 m0 g
" C. z7 P) y, @- N! qF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
' k# G$ V; C& S2 b7 H; \) i     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
, |, N9 A+ B# }- e- \' O( c* D- Z  u- Y) l/ i5 W4 R
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案1 L/ ]6 O4 {7 z& H4 U9 [
而家答多次4 B4 I7 f  S2 t# X+ y
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
' {$ d: [* `, }l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
/ z6 f3 j/ D# G& l, ]. Q5 fb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢) V- y& v/ |7 [  n* ?8 B7 a
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願." L& J3 S' |. Y3 ?
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S* M  u% u. C& E$ w3 ^/ x/ |

; E. O9 A: z$ Z; s/ }  K1 H' A! P6 YL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
+ |5 g' b8 Q7 aF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
4 e4 t2 S; n$ p3 K5 XM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒' a# u! b' {; E# L% j; {% {
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
- B7 Z7 n5 O/ |  ]: a4 _B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
8 Q: ?* C% N. i4 n+ g/ v+ m8 M: YF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
; _- T0 S; m# \2 l# H% m* G6 {* ~S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
* e) @: @, }9 F) lM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
% y5 q: e* }9 I$ |6 UL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
$ d+ g+ L. o) |2 m1 J4 @B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情. n' \0 d, R2 b
4 o4 y; q  Q  ^
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
" z5 K  i3 n3 |' W8 Z; P$ EL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己- {' Q. M  u3 e6 U
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘3 }0 }* ]( [: E8 ]1 L. C2 A) ~
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
. P) O; N# R5 X! e2 Z3 K8 e% SF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
" C; t4 p9 w! w1 Y+ xM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

, E' D. T4 X: O2 H) [; R$ n! Y

! @$ v' _, f9 W+ M: P same choices with u , but want to add some comments
2 R6 |- a5 i' L8 x
+ [6 w9 j9 M, F6 d' a; Q  Z2 WB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
* `5 @8 ^# x* @0 |- ~8 w6 ]/ D& G! ^7 Q3 @7 l1 I/ q, p7 X
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
4 }' o: K, m3 A% ]& ^+ E0 h0 ^( Z# x% _& D  d8 e3 f! Q  k
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
2 {+ |5 X1 U6 q% v: d  r
1 K) `6 Q- R" O5 X- g: m" oM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
7 `  U8 e2 t- V, P+ S
0 G0 |+ L6 o" A% f$ B* z[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge2 l! J- r7 |  m6 N  H& f
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
$ `8 H3 d, u9 {" ]8 S: TL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
" _; O/ R( E; ~6 c$ |F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
, K, ]* w/ K" _3 f
% ]4 n7 o/ g9 \5 N- g  l3 J最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....% K, k7 W' {0 b' f, t3 y
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，4 o1 Q3 [' v; Z$ F5 P
由最好開始排起既話，
$ p. v5 C( s5 m$ }% PL B M F S 啦，
3 V) v  h6 y/ u9 s) P$ _  S. X7 T+ o- c$ e: i* K2 v
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
6 s; h; M+ G1 o0 g但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
2 O2 G- Z2 z1 x9 F如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
0 |" \) ]. O$ z1 r0 E' @又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
7 O+ g" [. K1 l% f1 V- O; H' h6 J+ k" J7 }! f/ d- W# t/ k' ^
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
% s8 D6 m+ i8 R9 e所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，& i# A4 X9 \% m$ N" k/ H* U) T
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。9 x- ~' X, j9 M+ o. L6 o
- Y9 T. U, H$ V3 N' f& x
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，, k$ o& Q( T* b5 e* z0 Y- w
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，. ~9 l7 C2 t0 A2 ]% A0 d
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，/ s1 Q& A+ }% R/ T% X6 y
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，2 R2 {6 o# T! i* y; P  Z7 k
M 都可算壞了。" \6 N' G* L- m) {3 @% j4 M
7 J! h9 ^4 T; ^, A
F 呢個人仲掂，% B9 t/ }( ]8 b) j- u& H1 _3 J
知道既唔等於要講，
& e( j5 S8 E+ X如果呢件事發生係自己身上，, [$ l: I; W$ n4 `7 b6 z
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
5 w, [" l% x  ?0 [4 {* p3 S) o# p' j' C* ?
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
$ z! n( @& I: e始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
: S- w% [6 _8 z% \+ v# @% K
8 _1 b; h4 j" F2 E# D: n* Z% G9 ^. l" O* ]. x9 q4 y3 R: @

+ o2 b* E! _; x2 f. I  T6 L! \5 c/ I題外話：# d% {, U+ Y6 A! c7 a9 N
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
' I* C- Z- p# @6 }% Z睇到 S 呢條友，- n2 Q4 U( [( M8 b& y* b1 L6 I
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L2 J( w9 `! j% u* C) u4 q. C
% e1 {6 @# e% f  n; F; E
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!! Z7 @+ x, C& `9 ?7 P+ {
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係1 ?7 a) K: G' \- @5 o
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她* a* z! a+ \8 D# Q) v; |* a
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
+ J( g9 {( y, fL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...