Rika

由最好排到最壞
# |4 {6 E7 k9 ?4 L. V  \F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
' `% Q8 k5 ]2 E% @3 [B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
4 S  D* x3 ~& s$ BS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
( j7 b  H( X5 A4 b8 |( l1 E' l5 |M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure" H( h* F" t0 x
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
1 X9 c0 e- Q1 I- E- _& r& e1 ]! n$ e; O" D& U- i, M
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
  s- O2 i7 Z  U
+ `. n: g' ?8 W- j' PS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
9 g& s0 P% |! Z2 w5 u; V* ~. `     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!1 f- _( A$ Y0 e7 S9 g

- j* P: ~2 p4 S+ ~3 @8 AB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做9 u# o& F) D/ m8 s- j

  P, b% ^: V+ t7 e  u7 ML - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
7 l! x- A: y0 ~6 J( G/ \2 }% R
0 l" a: [! `( |% ZF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
/ L6 n2 t, Z" O$ e* A: x     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
5 j5 G3 D, ^: s) e, N8 u, _3 V: V/ `. p3 W8 T8 k/ ^! @$ \8 G
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
' v/ J% H. w8 b4 g$ }而家答多次
0 v& r0 l: c' lf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
  l$ ?9 m4 w- d. P( A' v7 [, ul: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架& }: J8 t% A; d9 g) n  S- m
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢& d+ m$ b5 \8 p6 i3 n
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
6 x( L; V6 U, Mm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S$ q3 m- Z/ z" Y- K/ Q& h

' E) u8 L* y! @, |- }& }/ }L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
3 v9 {; R$ Z, m1 F8 k7 YF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度. u7 Y  E! \# m- U! ]
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
2 Y/ M/ X+ G  }S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢: `# c- y3 R. k; M; B% c- K5 Y
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
8 }# _0 n6 D: E9 nF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
0 S" W( W' N: Y  Q/ L. IS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取( S& w# _7 r$ |1 {
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
2 b; u  y" W9 PL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果; B: D: y5 I" _" R* s
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情& z  [  R/ c& P5 R: Z, v& E4 _
- j5 W% [6 \" q' _* G
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:: j4 c$ f' V% I4 c( c+ h" H" H
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
: p: Q5 r; |0 rB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
0 B9 r+ n7 E# e* E: w7 K" S2 ~S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
& v& m. N6 I8 CF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方# H; N) z% y1 h5 R/ Y) p4 o: i* @& p
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

8 p; x9 ?5 r: a! B* M- p
! }+ H7 o! k5 N# j& N1 W1 s same choices with u , but want to add some comments 4 M, O7 n- a* o) d/ ^
/ o  H9 t7 d$ ]: `5 G
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river    p3 D, P. `' m
: d' r" _; |! C# l/ h
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
/ d4 b6 e0 u! t1 E, b" x3 W0 d! m, z0 D8 a9 o6 U
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome $ f+ H. L7 Q) s9 Q, a5 W
  m1 I% {' F8 [2 g$ r' \# `
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......3 Q. j5 s" `1 Z9 }  I

9 L4 W  i9 V1 i; e& r0 \[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge! r$ F4 Q- N% e0 [1 F' j
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢2 u: X- n. X. M( E1 ~3 R
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點! E6 o6 W4 i) T& C
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
$ b0 q9 D9 {' c$ |- E5 o4 }
  ?! z' c4 H: o3 G- {+ d最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....3 [; l; J$ o' ~1 q) N
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，2 u7 S* f! l: L' ?- Y6 b
由最好開始排起既話，
1 o- y$ z5 a; t: o6 qL B M F S 啦，
) `" K; B7 t; V  m1 B% F. f( l9 ]
8 y( Z; Q9 w- E+ ^2 O7 B其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，5 s' n$ i1 |1 X6 n, v/ s
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
8 D, G1 u0 k0 ~+ X3 ^4 Q6 F. R如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？/ T- E# W/ p4 }9 o1 K/ p
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。0 Y1 w* j& g* U6 q; ~  e4 K

+ R2 l- d# B9 E& ^4 l) G+ Z8 p而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，% B* ^7 K0 M, {- I  ?
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，8 {5 J0 T. S" h4 M( n) n3 x! ]0 a, O
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
3 f8 f; X6 j3 q- ?- R  T+ V$ `: y) W+ N: d8 v% C
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，1 c" G4 n* h* ]
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，4 _" v: C1 m1 b0 ?
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，" \: @  {5 d- a* B5 ^
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
2 `4 t5 S( l* L* F; E M 都可算壞了。
2 t( X7 E' V7 l+ C2 v1 s! z+ {
2 K( _* M+ `7 _5 X1 R F 呢個人仲掂，  E+ Z; [1 |# i  Q. g9 M
知道既唔等於要講，5 u- r* B- V5 ?7 F, E
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，* v6 s0 G% s' d2 U# P: O
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
3 b4 C; A& f6 i3 w
  O& _7 r5 o4 F2 V3 O最衰個個緊係 S 啦，" v0 C. T9 V) F2 t) ~0 c
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。; u& r7 R+ I- I9 l1 [$ E

5 n1 F0 ^0 O* f; R
' ?: O4 `0 }4 T% ]' L& }0 U! S- r6 v6 @* b3 M
題外話：
$ @# r' x; B: I唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
( J7 P/ M. E! X- H8 w+ `$ B睇到 S 呢條友，
/ p; @* m9 G8 ~/ O3 L0 v$ U' }) Q我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L- c+ o5 B8 }- P# }

* g  }0 A" @, E$ ?1 p" W& `S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!: v, l* g+ _0 X" M9 w
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係/ P: @1 S6 v. y( H7 `3 R2 D
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她) b& m0 |7 a- ~
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
$ o: w% \7 z+ D1 Z5 jL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...