Rika

由最好排到最壞& c$ s/ v  e, k& _
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
& {1 {# B% }* UB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount3 F, P1 l. I# v- J. a4 V6 h/ G
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her! ~* X& X0 U8 [' U0 y( a' ]) E* \
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure! K# T1 t& N, o. `$ \" N9 e
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:) P' r4 b9 D, e

' `/ V8 X' O' M4 kM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
- M/ C1 _4 e$ h7 Y: _+ B# ?3 ]  Y
" [5 Q9 y) C# h* \# c& U/ w' NS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
; ]$ l5 F. m% W- \& D4 [6 L7 O' K# l     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
7 e4 M# R; _3 m
6 G& h; l+ B- O4 _5 IB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
+ R+ Q5 A$ w$ G: @$ N2 I8 Z8 e
5 @2 Y* O4 ~+ ?9 \# u" k/ GL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志3 X+ B( y6 D& p" K4 ?
* W/ v2 J: p" ]) [' n/ |& {
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
/ S& u8 a  Y9 ?7 M7 @     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
+ B- @! l6 z+ \" o# e- i5 m5 ?* i' z9 x& f8 @
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案$ I( _; D: {( d/ I0 a% g
而家答多次
: g  u6 N% Q8 s% ^' uf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
3 H% b5 [- P8 d( e7 c( H# L$ T* Xl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
7 L* q6 v4 v' Hb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
* A( }8 z6 k/ K5 {+ P# |" R  f1 [s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願./ u0 N; {& s% L. ^
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S. ~% W! K  T2 J: _/ D& v

- Y* a* h# [$ O3 l" `0 x  XL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
2 ^, ^3 Z7 F3 i$ ~0 N6 M& J7 JF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
* C5 }9 l$ D' [6 p; q1 \, vM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
7 Z$ X% L) ~3 l% \) J, FS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢! @2 A+ ^6 B! g& J8 E3 X! ?
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
3 ?7 G4 H# `7 h7 O. F$ l- h& qF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"3 j# c- |% h0 f
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取7 q9 c6 ~( v3 ^/ O! I5 e& K" }
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
5 R0 F/ }0 G6 w' d2 |L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果6 [8 Z) N9 K( C! K" S
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
4 B6 Q6 t3 K, e: U2 w* b# l
4 ~& W5 P# u7 k7 M# e世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:  l8 w* ~* I' ]% N* X( y: y! l
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
2 _0 h. W0 A- Q4 CB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
$ O2 r: a! ~9 C: ^+ oS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
- ^- e  c6 s7 O+ i7 c2 A. {) uF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
' p# X# `+ b: b( jM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

) o7 q, L, E7 e3 |2 R  D7 p
+ W: Z- f; c+ Z* J- S  ]# y9 [ same choices with u , but want to add some comments
& Z7 I5 X% u/ @: L) n5 E0 q2 A* Q0 C4 |7 P
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
* J2 ^- Z) ?) ?# b, K/ o  A/ t1 M; l8 g. p4 f) U5 h
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )' J9 a/ G( ~$ _# k0 ~* E
# g2 A. d$ d0 P% v# p  d+ L
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome & V5 _- c. i1 ]  M
6 _6 Z: P) P+ U7 ?
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......" _! a) W& R3 Q7 B- b

: {# {/ L7 {  C1 g8 c! M  k" W[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge: [5 V, e; X0 `4 n% x- y5 u
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
% v2 n% p7 [& [1 N" B( Y7 O- L' N1 QL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點" z# V" X6 H9 O
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma$ G: n/ n! H: O0 n) ?$ r
5 _/ ~0 A5 v7 Q/ I1 f4 Z2 ]: {
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
. p0 W' J: Q+ r" B% M有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
) {( l" z! l9 Q& x' W由最好開始排起既話，
& H* V" X8 d( W$ k4 c8 U+ b' R, ?; vL B M F S 啦，+ q* T4 y3 {- B5 f! o
, d! U% \! f! I; M' [1 r6 ~
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
7 f8 F# D1 s$ P" `但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
4 N  n' l; ^2 D9 X如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
% b" f; I8 L& b, `3 q/ ]又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
2 ?! ^2 v& {$ X: x" b
3 A! u4 b0 r6 G  r而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
  H! S- `" T2 o5 T5 l9 G6 p% s所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，! s  G2 m, o5 y$ w- Y/ n
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。+ f. `- \& F  y* s; J. ?
' C6 l: t9 y& L( ^8 O
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
9 L( j# x9 C; }" y. J. s; [3 Y M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
9 W) B% B' P+ h, D4 n1 L6 x( O亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，: j3 W6 W: O% N! P' d
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，) P# T7 i4 o' K) G6 j3 ?
M 都可算壞了。
! s: W! w, ~% X% x4 o' l7 m$ }& w- G4 {. v: |
F 呢個人仲掂，
' F$ @4 g; N5 K, a知道既唔等於要講，
' y8 X  m5 b% k如果呢件事發生係自己身上，9 z: o7 Z3 G$ P- [+ ^6 I
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。3 {- n: s. k, \+ F; Z

# S, m" U9 {& o) L3 u: [8 C最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
5 @5 \  W; s; N- p5 \; U1 N+ Y始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
4 l  d) k% Q# B, H- y3 U  w" v
1 e7 S- a) N. m0 p
/ _0 W- s' J! C+ H( P1 h. m
: K7 |; f9 g# l8 R題外話：
4 i4 n$ A* w8 p6 K6 l唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，8 R0 W) d+ ~  O- z, v
睇到 S 呢條友，1 u7 C, Z; T# V. f$ E  A4 m5 N8 X
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
7 b" F: }' O" R
0 l. h" k/ d) [S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!4 p- _; Y  m" A2 Z, x9 l( v
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
; g) ~7 `: p1 c! O3 ~5 b7 [- xM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她2 D* A+ }( @0 B8 s% M. W1 d  |8 u
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
" K* k$ G4 M8 W9 U& g8 |+ tL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...