Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:# {! b) _/ Z/ `! d$ E8 N1 e* v

% n8 l6 H- _9 M5 }3 P6 R
- {. d+ O! x0 ]% Y5 d! R: Q我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

  R7 ]* m1 ~, j4 P6 z
* ]+ [8 G/ |) B( [! @. v* FIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
( C5 p6 e1 q$ C1 U; N! D
4 Y- k! r: _) }9 j" \' r, t7 h+ M3 H' g7 l6 w
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

$ a/ Z: c% v; o- |2 W: c; Q% D- f8 E/ ?3 ]. q
oh really...
1 ?3 p' h9 y4 p/ ]hahhaa, thx a lot^^"1 l' X, R/ E" v* \3 x  X
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題5 u8 }* v* h! W9 j7 r) V* U
. s& N( R' y  _8 w# t( [
當然這是個假設性問題4 J; U8 }/ t; E( [2 `( O
但將人數倍大
, n. g/ ?3 B& G; {7 C" Z例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個2 t/ r" R5 z" q4 g9 a
(情況可以換作其他)* v' _& q1 c9 }5 i3 G( Y8 q
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題.... c( l5 X( B$ Z) B9 \
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...: X! V# c, _! W& f: }" x* X
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
; N" ^4 _+ b8 ?0 @, u絕情谷既問題..." J7 Y1 K0 q" d8 l# Q' n2 H) ~2 [* w
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...  X- X3 W* g/ G  u, p( d" [
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

6 s# _3 t3 p6 S7 {& k' c
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好! v% N- `3 N# `) U; p
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
2 `, T2 d1 [# w4 R* I- H0 U& M9 i但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩" ~2 q' c' N  |7 L9 K# o/ m
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢6 Y7 m/ e% m. G8 z
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢# ]# G7 B$ D; P1 J
. b& d! _/ g7 ^  k, v8 r2 ]
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命' T" m7 ~. o/ x- r- t) e& j/ J
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:) Q- Y& H# R+ e. J7 N/ D
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

1 E2 Y& O! o& P3 a7 G0 ?

! i! V8 i0 N5 u' u$ }haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
# B: o* y  g* t. y你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....' K! D5 n+ o# H  Y* a
4 n; X/ e' C# G, d/ J6 ^
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
5 f1 H. z  c" Z4 q* _- i6 iyes, my reason is helping more
" Z" I- N3 c5 n- k" Q/ pfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
5 W. l' |. T% @+ ]8 e9 e) K; Dif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
9 ?& {: T" I% G: ~: Gbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?  b: S. u0 d1 D6 N
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!. V8 N1 F: _8 _) }+ m
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!  I- \' C* }( U3 L4 A) D4 }0 W$ r
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~, K# k0 E- H+ g5 R
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
# o+ h% B- U2 `1 o- b: \我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
$ z2 q; o4 i4 Q4 d& H. W3 o, m9 g正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~2 R' b8 M' e& v0 i
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~) T. [% z* l' P" i+ y
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
* e$ X3 Z/ J7 O; V) L但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
/ Q! E! @( J/ b1 A我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）