Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
# O$ L. y( F8 @; {1 w8 k! ?7 r' P' E0 t' ]
4 O) ~+ Z! p) w5 d# B. a8 l
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

+ {) B6 V  j0 [6 s2 S1 e

. k4 }  E  d1 W4 f0 X2 TIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:( s* ]8 J1 @! f) i7 e: p
6 Z2 v0 X8 j& |! @# i$ a

9 w! f6 l; I9 G( l* h8 t/ O2 ]! PIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

6 s* d4 f. n' ?  D* r: F. ]! f& R' N5 y" U* o" w
oh really...
7 D( w# x3 e7 shahhaa, thx a lot^^"
" E9 \, ^2 A# d) l! f5 A1 K2 P' Vi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題' ^# Z8 R# l. q3 k3 u* X
# j  R, n; i# N  N$ x+ a
當然這是個假設性問題; ~4 b0 U, \" E& }' q  ]
但將人數倍大
( V$ F/ O: a, e! B8 m7 |例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
; w- w1 c$ h9 |  q) r& _(情況可以換作其他)
* H, {9 m  V4 d6 `8 b' l始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題..., Q6 f0 D$ q( |- c5 A$ v3 k( }
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...: t( f, O; `0 f$ E- D6 e8 |
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
6 S3 z( h" y: k+ u5 Q5 z絕情谷既問題...
! P6 m( K# L# ?如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
; A" S) W& V  _& R9 H如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

' h) X" m- F7 f7 W$ L殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好% Q: r1 C1 c# P
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生4 r* T# |4 F) P3 \! b* |
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
3 w- i' H9 h* U3 c5 Q好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢" r6 D: H6 U+ Y/ r
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
2 X% T( {* q- V6 @
; N3 S$ Y) b* }& g' l. P我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
: s- n/ c' I! ]* X不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
# |1 F6 n9 {3 B: r- I: v: k. z其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

" d, O  N% y* D0 X! |5 Z) h8 Y) u' R/ E
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
5 R+ S1 m) A% Y, o6 Z' ?* ~; J你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....2 n! }1 f* Q+ t) t1 I2 l/ b3 N

3 H/ \& P6 D5 P. ?6 h2 X1 Dp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child0 V* t  U$ d, G  z$ w
yes, my reason is helping more
0 e3 [1 l6 h/ f# c8 u  C8 i8 d* Ofor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!- A8 r. q0 Y9 F# S8 e
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child# }& R7 c) O! r# D
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
% v- m6 u4 i5 U9 dalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!# y$ z4 U- \2 A4 i( J8 ?
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
$ |: l' A* Y# }& W; M* I' S9 W  F2 Wunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
" D/ l  ^5 b0 b% S. j/ {8 p: j當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~* V( Z1 n& }9 d* j3 m
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~7 x6 W6 z4 j  }8 ?( O
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~7 h. q9 |8 _& _/ W8 X5 P# M% S
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~  R0 G7 n6 }" D$ m, O# C6 j+ J
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
7 D/ A" F) l3 @) j5 X但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
/ I9 v, y: p* z0 @我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）