Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
3 f! |: R' R: E% Y: Q: G( Z9 J- ]( G1 R1 f" D  N, R4 A
* q6 k5 ?( E/ ~
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

! p3 ^# W8 F! a) Z7 }
$ Q  [% k! J* ]% _& u3 o1 f
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:0 P' \* R+ E4 Z! u
0 h$ }- C$ o# [" d, N

) N% c: r- R: [2 zIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

7 F2 H4 n; W1 W' |! O. T. x# t/ e
$ o/ S9 Z, C( Q( b: y/ @
oh really...
8 e! J4 I4 c2 B. Q; Mhahhaa, thx a lot^^"
( t* ]2 g+ N: b. b6 ki didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題$ S3 ?4 d# X2 a3 \
+ j. ~2 f: g. M3 |
當然這是個假設性問題
3 t9 ~! n. P, e. [2 r但將人數倍大/ {+ i8 \! q. y& a
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個5 i. a5 u4 V1 @& [( U4 p+ P
(情況可以換作其他)
, T+ }1 k* i8 K0 n, X始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
! k. y& Q- K- j, r4 o如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
8 O9 _+ k. T1 l如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:! b9 x* H9 U& V$ N0 Q5 e5 T
絕情谷既問題..." m9 M2 B) L! t' R+ h, U
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...7 a8 V/ s, O( c8 x( J" [
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

1 Z( X& h9 a" W: l+ d殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
( H# T! M: A0 N; ^4 t0 N6 a9 H於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生& ?' N2 ^! r7 Y+ \
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩* D/ v9 U# d, [
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
; k# N; Y1 @1 f# K# ?8 [其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢' _: ~) v9 F# ?4 K- Z1 s
. c' C: [3 r2 q! [
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命# H" P) S8 u( R
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:$ C& ~1 B, p' x! P0 A5 B5 {
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

. ?$ m0 b& ?  e% g( {4 r
6 c3 \/ g5 ]7 u/ ]haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣* m0 l" o7 m- A0 y6 c
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
* G0 [' J* U( i' X
- E0 ~# Y" h. Gp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
3 ]: M5 Z5 b1 x. Q& X" fyes, my reason is helping more6 b" i! Q) R! [" Z& D. g
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!8 ^4 t3 ^' w' S" y% M7 a- E  F2 \
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
0 C- p  f2 E9 Q) X, rbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
6 \$ f8 Z6 e( u. C  i5 n; a1 }8 k  Q7 Ualso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
6 s, a+ X/ ^; {# Q+ emay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
- x. U: I: C8 x8 B' {under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~: T8 `: |0 ^3 X% x
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
0 [+ y! f. B4 C3 N( ^- Y我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
- u6 ]2 c  P6 [) g/ C: d) R- N$ g$ o正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
5 s; y% o# I9 a即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~5 K/ ~5 c2 s0 w. O$ v+ U  q5 B7 F
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
6 T9 R3 j5 d# u1 o但如果o係當時o既情況中~~1 M( ~2 i# i( k- O  X
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）