Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
6 e, X  K, H5 G6 g, t$ z! f4 j; {( P+ Z7 f6 o: n$ F7 V+ M
1 n/ ]$ O" ~* y; \, d+ ~0 z
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

) U$ e! D) f2 D0 I& `
6 p" ?5 a2 V4 e! v0 O# o
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:6 @3 |* B  y; y- V
# x( C2 M8 n- Z5 ]6 c: A

  t  [9 Z+ f& x- t0 C0 PIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

- o5 K5 I$ v. a2 V8 X  }
( ^2 X, l( Y# d- a# V0 goh really...' s8 h. M( I3 @3 F. ^9 m5 Y
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"# G3 n7 r$ [5 M5 e* ?3 T/ E: r
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題  w+ T9 ?8 x$ E' k; {/ o
6 D' U+ v9 S5 O$ _7 F/ I; M5 i
當然這是個假設性問題
% }( w6 v: b4 f. S5 d$ Y9 [但將人數倍大
* C  ?/ b4 }  m1 ~例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
7 c* r1 H# ^) q# C$ c: _. I(情況可以換作其他)5 f* f' n+ h6 `
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...2 `3 y  l! P: Q! o, j0 y0 [. U
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
, O  ^* h- v# H& b6 F4 _1 D  z如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
' g! Y: U; E' N) g: k絕情谷既問題...
! V4 [9 q) @( y8 G: P如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
/ I9 T  i6 H: F: y如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

9 P9 W5 b- f2 k& X4 P8 t殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好* U/ L3 h+ @5 Q3 t
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生9 K1 x; h& J$ q; O8 w, ~; ?& O
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
; Q( P" s3 h! U, S( S好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
6 G4 K5 C- a- u4 Q" l其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢& K! l& ~! }1 O7 s& Y
! Z& ]- I& \9 s8 d
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命5 D8 W* w* R0 `3 S$ r* U
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:8 E2 J. a9 X! M9 X1 ]9 k$ R2 @
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

( d4 W9 c+ j. k' k9 F

' q' m, v, O2 v, M% lhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣! l: d; M, k1 Y5 c
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了..... V; @8 `+ y9 m

$ M, G8 A, B+ e& l9 \. L9 q0 Cp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child, N- T4 M. x. L3 x6 b: M  |
yes, my reason is helping more: ?8 T9 t, {/ e) q5 \# z
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
% J9 \& B2 \% Vif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
( v) i. j9 k9 kbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?2 i$ _; a& C* E5 _( Q7 t
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!6 p* B0 f1 c+ g. o9 Q; Y2 Q6 J
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!  j2 n! d8 j5 [+ `2 Q5 |+ v7 q
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~3 P7 }: l4 ^' a( X, S, d; g: R
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~9 f$ X- K' A: V. l0 C( K7 l5 |
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~: ^( F7 u! X0 s; e6 V( ~: q
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~0 I/ L( `4 V5 J' T; j) r0 d
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
, a% T' @! H" H8 S2 q0 y我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
# _5 o6 v9 q6 c6 ?( b5 c, R/ ]' s但如果o係當時o既情況中~~+ X% @! l. ^( o0 U  t" U
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）