Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
* s9 m: Z! l4 u1 f& s( ~0 h5 C; s5 x8 b2 I  Q

/ Q9 s- [# ], V3 {: j我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

) U* {$ h1 @& _: b; \
3 _# T+ p+ \! i' Z  ~6 m4 H
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
" K' H( W1 z+ v7 F& K' ~
- u  j( \, ^& L. Z8 n  _/ {: p# f# d/ s( W" D$ F3 Z& J
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

( O- {/ _' ]: X
" `5 L6 W9 e4 g5 S4 w
oh really...
2 W4 h4 t- L) ~# L1 }hahhaa, thx a lot^^"/ t9 I7 e" F; Z0 A+ u
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題# F* p/ k! W% c, ?, X

+ X- o9 n$ g& R9 f! Q# N3 X) ?當然這是個假設性問題  e2 g8 P6 `! A
但將人數倍大
, b& P  B7 j- d例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
5 y! f. ?# z1 i% w# j2 Z(情況可以換作其他)8 `+ B  N$ V: |  \/ r7 o% A. G
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
% a" L$ H0 p/ Q1 P5 S$ j如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
: D# O+ b3 j4 h+ M* `0 w( M如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
' V1 W8 {7 `! h( u8 [* |( C( f絕情谷既問題...
1 r' B! Y  N& l" e1 N' S如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...- V" ]* g5 K" z. _$ j( }0 t
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

2 I7 L1 `% J& a* R& I2 ?殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好* Q' D( J; ?' w- c& f
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生8 y" c# m" I7 H9 j+ t5 I
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
1 O2 N& X& D. W( c5 _( r% O好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢) u0 T/ s9 N( L  V+ T. p; ~  q
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
! T5 p3 E, v! {: M; X
5 `) [7 b& Z5 k% i- W2 U* w我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命& ~% g; O1 V0 L$ v+ n, x. _
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
6 L3 r/ N# J1 ]  t其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

1 `$ |$ X, ~  T& T5 y* y, d$ r) b
, C, W% b( v8 i/ lhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
4 O, A' Q; r6 m) ^4 J: n! L你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
) `8 a" Z( N5 k0 Y( {/ K
6 t5 F& a/ w# K' _' [6 v; up.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
3 p5 Y: R  `! Q) Q! kyes, my reason is helping more
/ m: a" C6 s  R9 j+ bfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!5 w9 R5 d+ v. {. l/ c
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child" X3 ]; T+ Q: B. _8 B$ w
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
5 m$ N) \( W# ^also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!+ v# ^: V5 I: R+ T$ q
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!  f: w' l! d& _. Z! E. Y5 B1 t
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
' t6 a. [% _/ ^$ ?/ W. z3 J當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
' |/ N* V  \1 Y5 J' z我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
& r, I  a" E8 Y" A! y- i4 r正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~* ~9 |: S5 B. p7 X: N
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~/ ?, ?: H) v+ Q
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~$ {7 H% Y" F. s% ^2 C
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
8 Z3 ]; b1 b1 v' ]6 H2 Z  {我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）