Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
$ |+ ~  s+ r' s- U; L* D4 U* I/ f
5 _( Z! u+ o2 _, x: E% |
3 w: ^' y6 _6 h3 ~, o+ G: K2 B) |% @我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

* Z: Q% _; W% [+ V- ^4 S/ i! ^

* Z0 n; ]" @+ F' {* vIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
3 e$ }3 Y7 L8 O5 B: S9 [7 C4 f4 x7 M6 R5 c3 g, R

; ?- c+ P4 s1 s5 FIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

( Y& H5 }; X0 v8 Z

( e/ J* Q: R# U: C- m5 X! v6 W4 ~oh really...8 |% U. c# i  F' F3 o# J
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
, B4 r  |4 o  n3 K+ S8 t+ Si didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
7 v1 S/ U5 {9 M! _( {; v. D* ^* j
7 _8 N' W: }: R1 N9 t8 r& Y當然這是個假設性問題/ @% L5 _- ^( o
但將人數倍大
6 `' P8 |/ |) T例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個: P/ \/ v3 R% L. J! _9 a! L1 B
(情況可以換作其他)- R2 g  |! r$ i: L& [1 \* J- f0 P
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...+ X3 V  J! Y1 e
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...) i, U! Z( F9 }& ]& t* j
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:$ N% i: a2 l% n# \" u  h& m9 H% T: n
絕情谷既問題...
8 {! o6 a# D! T- @. `8 Z如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
: O2 G7 C6 G% f8 P. q如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

7 u' a1 L- h( c6 m殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好9 S3 V9 o, N# c, j! B) O( N
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
# O& M3 n' V) |  C  R; {2 ~# o, f; ?但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩9 f9 R! j# z0 o9 j+ w
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢& B& `" e* K+ [: Y% G! x% O. J
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢) Z4 J3 u: {7 N! c* V

/ r( j% V8 Q0 ]5 ?& b# ]& V; j$ r我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
4 K% g7 b2 p0 U( [6 F  H" f3 h不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:- K$ `) H  \5 `, r. n) c: [
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

; G4 {! n; k! _; }" o
. H9 w- @1 k  j$ X1 @: O" shaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
* q1 P& e* n/ b" E8 a+ G你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
. z4 O; W& o& @  B- C+ ~. i7 H, @. Q8 B
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
, R8 Q2 e  y9 x  h* Myes, my reason is helping more/ r5 Z+ l+ P. {9 W, N+ ]1 [& Y
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!6 r+ I- r" O* j4 i/ C# ]; D
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child0 E, ^% [" n% k# K+ E: b
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?/ }  N" \7 c8 T/ q$ j
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!) @( X8 \5 f0 y. R% P- Z2 t
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
1 ^8 p; J3 z& z! W- qunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
  S9 L; \, S4 B* S8 T當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~) @+ b3 I# c2 ]. N- U
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~0 p. x! A9 {' f# H
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
3 Z, [' r2 c3 R! Y9 Z/ E即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~& i( E, a: K/ @
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
& J' ?2 Z& z! [但如果o係當時o既情況中~~! _* l0 l  E7 ]" u  ~* ^1 \
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）