Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
  }, K$ ?- v+ A, a% e" o
* l0 Q$ ]0 W) G% T; W2 M
$ f  M" {- p9 p6 e我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

; U2 t+ Y5 {6 q/ Q3 J; V$ ^+ X! {# P2 n
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:- X  i4 |! b! a9 ?5 K2 l
; Y/ U" Y1 g% W1 r; G; ~$ L
- M, \! Z: z! f1 E' _" c& a
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

: R* [0 N4 ]+ ~& ]4 t) T
, m1 L- m7 b( o/ X
oh really...
( I% u( R4 J; D$ s+ dhahhaa, thx a lot^^"; U+ k" v) j4 n# o
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
" j; k; ~3 P" f! `4 K
9 V( {4 v" H+ q% y0 y1 v當然這是個假設性問題9 a' V. n3 S) \! P* e& U
但將人數倍大) N% V& g8 v$ b
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
9 J4 \4 s2 H; x; v, Z(情況可以換作其他)
' i3 G( [7 H6 V, g5 x' L$ @& M  T始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
0 L5 Z# P; J# |, J0 c如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
, n- \3 g9 {" U; l如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:( k/ J4 ^5 _: L2 B4 s6 ^
絕情谷既問題...& k# G2 t  F' O- V
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
0 b/ S) A: ?( o2 \+ o4 }; o& z: C如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

" K# l3 K  V) T; Z2 h. |殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
. L6 R+ y% }/ J5 k& C於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生+ r3 b1 C& l3 ]5 p( C/ X9 Q# q( F
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩" Z' f9 B$ h- R9 m$ W% m# r& H% z
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢, i+ D; x& y, P: g5 J' V
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
- o/ D/ h( H+ h! k6 ^) r
; e" t( I, v! X1 [; H我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命$ C0 [! t! g/ v6 Z
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
) l9 P0 K  B, \6 |6 b/ T& u' [7 L7 X其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

7 h% }7 o5 `! x( O" u, \2 _! ]
5 ^/ f+ @( v- B2 t. F4 M5 B  T
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
" r* A  Y( V1 P1 k3 C1 V, q$ l你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....# L0 e" P, _! W; O

. s" ]5 R) K$ [! ]7 A4 \0 zp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child& a. j) n% z/ N2 s9 B5 e6 K; `
yes, my reason is helping more
; w, M5 @9 ?; i# z+ Y; _for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
- N( B1 k/ C" A! E% `if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
* U2 B. L+ {( l4 d1 \because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
7 k; Q9 X) k0 Q: g8 nalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!& V; v: z, T/ V8 J+ m" c
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
8 c' ?  q+ S) N. i2 {$ @8 Yunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
( A' [) G; g& H4 g當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
' Z0 i5 ~9 h2 t/ d! ?/ M我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~0 V* u4 w2 o' p! S$ |  P! o$ e
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
: x8 Y. \) N" Q- \; b1 G即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
# R, g" O  g6 M我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~4 g2 D0 ]4 n. R
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~6 e3 P* J8 U* b% _4 d
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）