Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:4 d) `, n7 f8 B
& Z, E4 e! T+ s$ L" S- K

! f3 }- X' U; {5 A* d! b我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

+ B/ K# T" ]: g) T: B7 J
! e. L, j( A# O. {3 [, f& iIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:* P* u6 T8 C; k) |2 H' w! f# ^) i
8 ^4 n% U5 m1 ~& q* J3 M

$ B7 {" H5 Q6 o& i) u6 _In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

$ G( o! A* _6 R' M' `
8 Q! ]6 L! \' c7 l3 [! ^
oh really...7 m' G, b* J3 o# L. V
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
8 ^7 o- x" R7 d  K' g0 q" G) U7 b7 Zi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
' \  m0 D* @: ?" u$ }$ Y, ^
; ?; t  q+ {9 g當然這是個假設性問題
9 V3 b& r/ T. Q  W, n) Z- N2 E但將人數倍大
  B: }, k/ I* o例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
+ {- a8 I9 d/ v; ?5 v' I8 m(情況可以換作其他)
2 {: s. I& @. b始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...5 }6 ^8 v) l- @( H3 W* Q0 k5 o9 N
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...9 \9 e) H( y9 B/ N* ~9 j
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
( @" l3 d( V; z8 `: G絕情谷既問題.../ b* A; U0 o- b/ J
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
6 {6 L; C1 D6 n" G% H& \: c如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

( ^' S2 |! N$ i- }8 b8 o
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
$ h& A5 r; L" y5 h# @7 m於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生9 l8 f/ U1 Q9 k2 W! f
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩" N  m9 |2 c8 M; F
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢% h6 s7 b% v  W" I2 U9 L4 D; V7 x( T
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢, u# P3 k* w, A0 K  A

* c7 P' x. q, u; J1 w我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
9 `1 v( b( z6 _% Z7 Q& r不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
1 R, b  L& s" p3 O. Q5 {) N* [5 M7 V其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

6 r& d- i6 P6 z" f7 R$ n% Z- V4 p. u: J' z; T/ r# b- f5 z3 M; M: S
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
( H$ d) }, B2 V  L7 u( l6 \- u你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....7 R9 h" n0 O! \6 q% C% P- U5 G  Y
# B2 I1 M( a2 L
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
3 _1 r6 Q1 b6 S2 {. p/ h0 Syes, my reason is helping more
6 u+ M+ U! ~+ Lfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
, l1 b6 c7 b1 t7 L- n+ Pif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child- A  k9 k# ?  A# B  r) e& {7 a
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
0 y; _( Y. ?/ }$ w. calso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
1 M& c$ ^/ M- ~8 r0 Cmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!+ a" s2 [2 Y3 t$ r- y
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
& G! q( u1 w' O) C7 n+ @0 N1 \$ }, q當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~1 K2 G  u1 V3 }1 a) m* s4 \
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~( d* n4 ~4 G  G: \' M' x7 f. P
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
# ?* V- \3 E+ V即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~4 Z& O; `' n9 o2 |8 _( ^
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~6 j+ T5 {) [+ t
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
/ W9 L$ E- ?9 m6 m9 T我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）