Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
; {$ S, d0 ~& D3 a. l/ j# c; Q4 W" L: f; d+ g) f( B& r2 J

! b+ G9 \  q* c. Y我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

7 x" k* d0 f6 p" j6 J0 R; v! q: G' b2 y3 B, l) |: o3 j( R
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
! }7 ]$ K" c* H* ^- E0 |
) E( ?: ]/ {, s5 N2 H( x0 m1 f7 S& y3 p+ U) b: L8 C3 _" r: c( p: ^
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

, ?* A. k6 @" i! g' E( q4 ^, n* g! I/ @7 ?8 h0 l
oh really...( \0 k+ T) l6 {1 W6 j  {
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
# G) t' I4 |+ Mi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
" H. [4 j: S, Z) r6 l. l+ D+ @) f: P
當然這是個假設性問題
7 g3 a8 c( M6 a, u9 e- r# ^; i) v; F但將人數倍大
3 X* A& s8 C+ q6 Q+ z2 s例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個9 \5 R7 ~& R! {" D" _) `
(情況可以換作其他)9 n0 ]- y& Q+ e# S
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...0 a3 p! j& i7 |7 V* N& A: M7 \2 H
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...: |. S8 e8 s5 J9 d2 M; o
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
2 o5 a$ J; K7 _" U  I絕情谷既問題...' `" b" G  P) p* i4 k# B: M
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
) q# X* R9 C4 H$ ?1 ~1 R如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

7 O+ c6 ]( P1 C* q5 f6 m: \% h殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好; N; R) N4 j6 N/ u/ V$ S2 X0 [! r
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生  J8 Q" c: w* r' K
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩2 z9 b; k2 x9 n8 t5 N+ Q
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
2 V  n0 I1 L4 B其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢4 R/ X$ \  B& o$ g% Y. i

) @7 {. R8 ]4 {, C. t7 `- [) @我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
( ]9 [1 `' u/ q* b1 L7 S不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:2 [( j' W# t& q2 z7 ?9 K
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

0 Z% ?3 o3 q3 Y4 Q/ h
. @7 M8 {1 u. u% \, fhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
2 G* d' b- b1 ?1 q+ D你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
5 K/ y, w8 b. b- q# S8 @, x1 I1 f& s
" E% V" K: C6 Z" zp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child+ d! |) u! v4 _  r$ c$ T4 a* |
yes, my reason is helping more1 @* @0 O, m; o0 {) h! z( V
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!0 B; E4 w3 V8 c
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
) L0 M; ]$ I- r+ mbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?& F( V4 h/ |! e
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!4 ^+ n1 [4 G6 \! B) r
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!& i/ A' O  x0 J6 k- Q
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
) A/ r1 Q: R' F: T5 N  {1 _當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~0 b) \; Q; X: o8 g
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~8 @3 z3 Y3 B* o! W
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
0 d, T) b. y# w, ^- Q即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~9 L* M% t/ T% D( J* y
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
. W0 b& S  n) Y; n+ ]6 W但如果o係當時o既情況中~~0 g5 E3 n  C) _7 k
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）