Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
& K, D" Q  S: W+ P: O5 I5 |' K; m9 [6 Y& g" Y/ A- D; q
2 p& X' \' L% @$ B/ X/ g
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

0 T- v% J8 p# M! }$ Q; j  d0 ?0 [
9 I; J6 _) r6 q5 m
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
2 j% }/ Z% n8 g" Y+ r
$ n9 G6 D* l* J' K% U# A: R7 D, i3 @9 _; D
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

' V" N( h: |* L9 v6 h
3 M/ b5 L) D  m7 Loh really...
1 j+ u- Q, I* F  O0 N: ihahhaa, thx a lot^^"
; H4 D  y8 Z. m# ^i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題! D+ ^) V% n& q: ]
! E0 W9 Y$ O! Y) t/ _0 z" u
當然這是個假設性問題
9 w/ m/ l: T5 j/ |( h% ^但將人數倍大
- Q4 w% _5 a! n( b5 Q/ n% w) f例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
1 T( U: P* p5 r0 H! H9 b* H' a# T(情況可以換作其他)
2 i7 {  [* ~6 t5 ~9 I始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題..., L4 @8 j/ z; C, N# l7 O5 X
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢..., i# {# d2 C' g) m
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
* C" a7 k+ s0 f絕情谷既問題...
: u: c+ s( H+ W; a* M如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...1 w4 Y- z/ Y2 M4 j$ y
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

! G* t1 S; P2 f+ z8 n. {/ N7 \) a
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
7 J0 h1 n2 ~% R. u3 t於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生3 B% G/ {/ @4 B# z, j/ T, B' L% ]
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
: [. M/ c/ y1 M- x! x5 S9 n4 M好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
2 `& V( H2 `; z* \其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢7 [5 `! S9 j- T  v; ]  _& Q1 X: H

! a* o, E; O$ b( H我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命( ]4 u& C0 n& j: b2 {1 h5 A
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
+ g( w" k8 d. H8 ?其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

0 J) c$ g1 E/ L7 Y- M3 U$ {
3 o& M- q+ n! k! k1 |haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
5 S/ G5 T' [7 h; m# K你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
( s: X; r9 {) z" N) _/ W5 q) n! X0 K$ ?& V. U4 ]
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
( }" ^8 V/ r' R3 k* [, v5 pyes, my reason is helping more
( \5 ^3 u0 a1 ^0 o. Lfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
# d( k) F0 Q/ A+ k; k5 @. [if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
! a" l$ O  b) E( ^0 r, C9 i% P! ^because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
: k7 X' b3 J4 |# i6 t/ h* I, ealso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
- S0 ?, ~) Z0 _3 m4 Q$ l" i, Dmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
  @* B* n; B7 L9 T7 zunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
4 y) N" z* m8 o% G9 o: l: h2 _當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~- c' Z8 f3 f" P7 h/ S( H
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~7 J- J- W0 ~" O1 z; w
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
( P) o. U: i8 A* K即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~7 t+ c: e/ f/ w  J7 p" A
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
$ t6 s+ S. k9 j6 T但如果o係當時o既情況中~~* M# h; K, R) m/ h  l8 ]( C
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）