Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:2 i" ?4 _1 `' `# u- Q: ?

: n6 p0 ~) _* F
! D. ]8 Z: Q$ @1 I" ?$ [  ]我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

  o: I1 g# I# Q3 o! w  _
" n4 X* {5 [+ r) `- O( K
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
% E# }* r8 }1 P& L2 u$ h3 q2 B7 g% s5 G& s

$ ~, H1 n6 e5 z6 g  d' \5 h2 W& f) _In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

4 _5 \2 N- J- @
- d* }; h- v/ F$ coh really...( b' a% A" C1 k8 g2 v5 d
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"7 f2 P) ?. n# m# f5 j" e7 l' U
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
' C7 b) p) t" g# e: B* F  \" {$ ?  d: |1 q2 s% m
當然這是個假設性問題
9 f- P0 I. k! p! D& D但將人數倍大
/ C* U  a' [8 g  E' x1 N/ E; F例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
9 z) }& |& x4 n8 ?(情況可以換作其他)! B" j6 B% M9 @4 L; J$ C
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
5 o1 f/ V2 C5 S; f: S如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...8 \" }1 M2 _) C, ~2 I+ J% _
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:3 l$ `! h; m0 |' g2 C8 u
絕情谷既問題...
. k& N( s* X( y7 V3 }' R如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...7 G0 Y/ V# X# h( c) V
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

' P1 f! z0 l0 k! O# B1 D
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好# q% [  o/ H2 Y* K" q: Z$ m, w
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生/ w4 ]8 Y+ v: a' m: T
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
& g3 b" |" \/ C8 Y5 o% Z好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
; d8 A" D+ c* s1 a- t, s其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
1 j8 x' N; Y2 B
' i$ W9 k! w6 E2 j) L我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
" s) o$ p" L9 }, `" v不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:% r' i6 q5 k: I/ W3 t. o" m
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

0 B: Y- b1 H( @' @# b" ]( |* t( [: x0 _: c& A) ]" L2 B2 X4 Y  Q
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
' n$ m& h) y; t# S  P2 u你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
* R1 A  @( Y+ Q: M  g9 F9 \1 j. e2 L) a
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
1 l0 P+ D* z" {& D, W- j2 hyes, my reason is helping more
4 v( p; C* ~! e9 L. s) zfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
: @. h/ q$ j0 pif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child8 g8 {: a3 ?, W: M3 H
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?  h3 G; T( s, T8 w5 f* Z
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!4 y! j& h; R7 H
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!8 Z# q/ Q$ L& s& c+ D/ ^
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
# x: G" s/ g4 Q8 i% C- ]當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
5 h$ ^: b2 _7 f# _& z我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~* ?  [6 `6 ~2 X# a" k; N4 B
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
$ _7 Y/ l, O6 A2 U* \3 _0 _9 B! y即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~9 ?- Y& v! T  ]( q8 M
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
" [6 I0 j: ?& \( r但如果o係當時o既情況中~~* T" h  Z1 C0 h) x0 V+ A, K; X
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）