Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
2 k- ]+ z1 X% ^6 y2 X; n  {$ B7 j3 [( ]- c! @
' c# J0 Q3 H$ d" l, {; \
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

, O+ {/ S: D" `9 d1 h* ~; [& z/ _( q6 i$ y/ m
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
4 B1 I2 z8 r* i8 D
3 k9 c1 F3 [  K; O; K7 E
% d8 S2 {4 X7 V+ ?) U  OIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

/ u* x6 {4 q* n$ V! D( z
( B: u. M4 _% ^' M& m& G
oh really...7 c! v4 p( S- g  z
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"9 T6 k5 p: `  }5 @
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題7 b# U) A  s# a$ ^
% ~) a3 G2 o$ d$ d
當然這是個假設性問題/ Y$ I# s6 R' z
但將人數倍大
4 Z8 L" ]( C& L2 v8 G! g- p例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個+ S! n. t5 V) V2 J% o! s
(情況可以換作其他)
& |* K1 E' Z. f' f$ y: ?: \始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
; O$ ^, U, I% D8 m如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢.../ N$ F& m% h" l* l) i( M( _3 A
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:3 F( V$ F4 s  C1 ]6 z7 V
絕情谷既問題...
9 N' u: Y/ S9 E2 v+ s如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
. k  Y, p$ s+ r4 u; s如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

4 M; m" r3 w( J1 `殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好! b& }& M0 x" M2 V# g
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生: ]" c: J* u! i6 d2 c
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
% t6 p& v- k: \3 X( R" q  J好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢+ R% B' Q, m( k' W
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢3 Z# q! B# V7 h# d; O( K
% \8 R+ b6 u  v( ?
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命! M2 y& m$ s2 M: y. t  ~9 o
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:7 y( y* B$ k0 h0 A" g
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

2 d: a" T" C7 Q3 b3 Z
# K8 I8 w/ u' Z) G2 ^haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣& D, o; ?2 I+ W
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
  H. l& }7 |1 t5 M% Z: I/ @9 B8 t8 P! s1 Q/ i, c) A- M# p! a9 n
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
3 T* q- \* K4 W, K3 c3 A! Byes, my reason is helping more& _) e9 `4 U9 ~7 Q
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!! m; s+ n9 h0 @: L
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
" x9 Y4 |/ J1 n  v! Ybecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
* R0 H7 P: o; f, Dalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
$ p$ X! [; D+ \, {7 Mmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
% u$ W+ }2 ?0 u! iunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~$ c$ x' m# D, o; H) _4 l7 j0 ?5 u4 k
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~  Z; y' J. T! `
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
( _/ z( N3 N  O% K* g正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
, B+ M" ~+ W: N即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
0 I3 p8 ]5 ^1 O# I* N! N' H我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~/ k; r2 K# |& S+ J4 R
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~( x2 b. `  I$ h
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）