<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)8 e# I; |& v# i/ g, W8 L
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:8 P$ M+ [' {$ p9 `" ^. ^, @: \
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
- `- U. t6 Z) K+ f) D4 Y* w
I agree you points that it could be illegal- c  y1 i! ^4 E% {/ p8 f$ u  y6 v
but that is still a "gray area"
# P$ l! j+ E3 y. l. awhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
! W; k2 G8 G& ^4 |/ m+ D. x/ d+ g4 c6 Z0 w
anyway, I want to say that is$ S" I' E/ {( u( p- v4 o0 E! Z6 M
who is supposed to be protected by laws1 d0 }' ^# C4 P4 E! A! Y. [! D
creators?3 [+ ]3 `  G6 S
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market9 ~5 G+ _* e. s3 B: N
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
3 m0 h! b3 W: U. A+ F+ ewhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those- ~7 a' T; Y# ?
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:$ s  Y  t1 R& J- P2 Z
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
: _/ _* I; \" p6 K" @4 q$ Z
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
1 m; I) P5 \3 }2 M; ~6 {3 y* a' p
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
: p) Q/ h0 i7 K' t$ n
唔係喎!
2 ~- P  c0 s! M2 F* t古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!: q5 G  i* _. m
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!+ @) ~. M8 F. L9 G
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
" u/ F( H2 K1 o: l4 e, |; x2 a就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事4 T4 j0 A; H7 s7 n9 }
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
- v- S2 C, I  f/ q* P# R2 Hdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......* @( ]7 q8 I; U& ^; a) s
if so bad, dun download la, right?
# m6 O. Q. o7 b, m! R& ui am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^- Z3 Z: Q  y% |: I
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct2 Z5 s0 {  ]& i, N( S% `5 ~
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la+ T5 x& D/ i3 e3 w' H$ u+ }
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society& E) e' `# l3 g: G! w
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
1 p) Q( O' }' k- _5 Jwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
9 N9 M: W5 Q  @so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
" E8 z6 `! i: b+ v佢又唔係殺人放火~~~* K9 u7 G+ n$ }" b3 q* X
政府想比下馬威0的人~~7 ]3 {1 N5 B- u# X$ Q$ U
錢就一定罰
) m/ k  k5 e0 p$ k. {& Q; |) t未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
% R6 Z% U5 p& ^- t5 c) T( e5 ~唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?3 w$ V2 }: g+ e
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?4 n; O1 O7 M/ c- X
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。