<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)2 j# J2 r+ ?2 t- e7 c1 Y
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:6 b# Q$ I: D# H7 p0 a4 ]
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
# l' J, r$ f; r  z# X# e) v0 s
I agree you points that it could be illegal7 X! Y+ C5 S# U( n
but that is still a "gray area"& P3 Q2 z1 A; X: m0 r
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
4 ]* z/ i; {; m% q8 G2 E  D- M  h* M* a  p0 x
anyway, I want to say that is
, ]: N; n: H1 ?  r: ewho is supposed to be protected by laws& C) D0 L6 @. n' g0 w( j# u
creators?$ V+ S! d7 U# S6 m) ?" k# m) E
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market5 ]: n7 G4 m- Z, S8 {+ {! B5 V
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.1 |" J! }4 i6 T% a. Z1 `3 k+ t
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
! t+ G9 J3 ?  I* T, s' dWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:8 S" T& a. B: ~; d3 ]! @
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
) J, R, u, J# q; F: C! t
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:/ g, V- m7 H8 m8 G  X- U
1 Z8 P2 p7 J) W& ~( @( H
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
0 Q4 _3 \( O  j5 x( X4 B0 G4 u
唔係喎!  d/ P* G/ H4 A
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
+ o( z) X2 y) p$ J我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
# l8 A. q3 t3 Q7 j& S4 L佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!/ O9 D8 r/ Q/ ^
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事! t2 M* ?. X% a* I' @7 g4 Q7 D
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
  p' l0 D9 w5 `8 Edun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
5 o2 E( P& Y; d# R1 kif so bad, dun download la, right?
- s7 U7 O% Z7 ei am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^5 [( z+ x8 D( p+ W' e
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct) V4 h6 n0 h8 q0 r' I* k# `
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
: s$ r) X! ~1 w- r  O; ^2 tso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
1 f- L' b( H2 kusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
+ U" J: k7 N. H( Nwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!" ]7 L: ?1 N! ~5 {$ M" Q2 j
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!' y. C0 P, T) V! ~! ?6 Q7 {
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
9 m7 f# y# Z7 a政府想比下馬威0的人~~
* j! X+ V5 f7 [- H錢就一定罰
7 D' l+ n8 v1 M3 O! E" U7 H未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
8 i" v) i- f  H" S2 B5 a唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
( B+ @9 c8 X( y+ a/ `佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?( Z' w. N  |4 W; r! F  d
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。