<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
0 z) l2 h' ]6 d& W" W) R但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:9 A" E  f4 z! U$ d/ C: e4 K2 i
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
) U8 i, n- }+ L6 @+ M7 [
I agree you points that it could be illegal
5 ?" A+ ], m# B* pbut that is still a "gray area"1 O3 G5 o0 M7 f6 E) J
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair. b- j+ i& r' P, O0 u  M
! }' b! J* u0 D
anyway, I want to say that is2 S2 V2 D& y. d6 e& L2 w' z! C
who is supposed to be protected by laws* `5 N0 ^6 S6 Z" b& }
creators?" ]) r+ |, U8 W- D8 M% U
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
, x4 @( i# ]$ v( M4 |. b: p' h: j8 Vlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
1 T4 W* @& C; W$ B( Ewhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
  f$ j, A; {3 K$ a" }# UWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
: H0 L* y/ }# i7 g! X其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
% C* n* y, f' |! L! q8 v2 r6 d% [
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:' @8 r3 Q" Y' x4 S- q% v
* c% h4 |4 q& o1 W
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
, h" h/ i; {6 |' e
唔係喎!
/ }  I- [7 P. S' [& }) K* F古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!* N+ z% C6 X* }+ `+ N
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!9 W$ [+ \$ l, M, \
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!; R  E* t2 p9 _4 `6 Y
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
) u% y' N* q% p/ d一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
+ S0 k+ n4 m! O2 k5 G* ^% E. Q' x  \dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
9 V/ y& y' `9 @6 H7 F( z; Iif so bad, dun download la, right?. U0 d- K. F0 b
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^. q( r4 q$ K0 A( }$ \4 A6 o
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
4 C' l: M# e1 W) d% Q& _no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la1 u% [& }9 j+ U) T" |% b$ L
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
+ M* M3 `2 |$ F0 [! iusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
8 M- n: y# t( K9 \why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
# Y0 T3 u1 h) tso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!' Y: I* ~( }$ ?9 B# b
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
( ~  u& j9 p6 b8 r5 l政府想比下馬威0的人~~" F; W* ]7 ?5 H" ^$ G& i
錢就一定罰
9 c, n* h  A- m- M未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,0 V" \7 r* ~, h# v( S' e& U
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?9 K6 T. r, W* i9 p3 l( Q: {# n
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
2 i0 f2 `6 @* F0 v到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。