<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)3 E" R2 n; Q1 _
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
9 A6 g8 k4 ?) j3 X9 ^/ {大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
: `1 N4 k6 m) N5 D! X! U, j1 ?1 ]
I agree you points that it could be illegal$ C3 T* E' P! k
but that is still a "gray area"
/ H& b7 K! T' N8 Q: Vwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
+ s3 b8 f$ l, B7 _  n' a( L  w9 t# u7 z9 s: \0 j
anyway, I want to say that is' O, k5 j/ r1 W8 S/ G( N$ n
who is supposed to be protected by laws
, H2 A9 E4 j7 z" E8 h1 f: w0 L9 acreators?
# {: g6 \' R' W5 Z4 f: b% w9 hbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market" L5 i9 y* m) m4 G/ d
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
, e; P; l# J9 }# mwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those! h* s- n$ q+ ]* O. M1 Z- B
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
& ~( ]( a/ B! ^- ?' l( W. i) w其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
) J7 r# g# C, f我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
, @9 a& ~3 o5 ]9 S
' `8 y" Z1 P  W! p# o6 o" y9 e我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
7 ^" K% ]: D8 m. `) w唔係喎!/ s& J' r% S3 `( Y
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
/ g9 n6 _4 r" I% w# v3 O1 r7 j7 G" y" {我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
* R( m3 r0 B" T, y佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!+ E% X, @9 {& j* z( z
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事# u1 z. u9 q2 Y' n
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
" e, Z" Z( q" L+ s( g# M2 O8 Tdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......6 B. F1 j% b4 N6 P
if so bad, dun download la, right?0 b" y+ V  p5 b5 s- f+ ]0 y
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
7 O! `) y; K: |! rbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
7 C3 K% k5 ~/ @. M- F1 U' |  o& wno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la* K/ c: N0 f' t6 y) N0 d" b
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society3 V  X* i; e+ Q& F  J! _
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
4 Y8 Z+ B- p' j1 D8 Fwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
  x. n/ Z6 t# i9 Fso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!, w' R  I/ x7 |/ z! f  p2 ?
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~4 w1 T6 ^. ~# h7 C, e# _3 H. q
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
% s- b6 @6 x6 _4 {' T錢就一定罰8 V- @' ?' ^  p6 q! u( B8 b
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,  y- r1 z  d8 w7 N
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?5 B* V6 N, j( s( Y
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?/ _, ?9 O  h9 G+ R
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。