- 帖子
- 328
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 40
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
8#
發表於 2005-5-19 07:45 AM
| 只看該作者
Quote:
, E L, c3 V1 E3 b4 b8 LOriginally posted by 老鬼X at 2005-5-19 12:11 AM:
$ A8 F' j; }4 I$ r% |! ]佢自己唔問清楚
$ ^0 B% D1 ?/ m9 n$ e個伙記寫價單係19+10
; c! K& D) Y1 |* Z檔野就一定有問題
% ~* X! o% M2 c; w# j4 S但係自己都要有少少責任
* Y( Y7 B- _' R% c0 l
2 k1 e& O% ~0 W5 P
' N: O1 s, C" A- n9 r1 R2 ]8 o( x9 f# cOriginally posted by Christy~呀華 at 2005-5-19 12:36 AM:
, R4 W0 h+ _) \( B, [
& E$ |9 o3 D }! I, H+ b大家都有責任既,
/ K3 r$ L' ]6 o餐廳一定有問題架啦,
, i1 C! @, ?6 B而食野都係要睇清楚好D! 5 G! r1 L0 x$ k& v0 Y+ A
4 M; E" l9 W* Z- [$ r: F: Q" B" y
+ I& B E( F( IThe above are typical irresponsible uneducated comments and destructive attitude which mislead everybody. The key problem here is the dishonest act of the shop which it has purposely set up a trap by using a misleading ad to mislead customers in order to make extra profit. Is the case straight forward and simple. This act is sinful, unlawful, and disguesting. Sometimes it is amazing to see how people will think that the complainant has to share responsibility. By applying this distorted theory, it is the same rediculous way that people think those women who got raped should bear certain degree of responsibility because they are sexy or something. Because "I am" sexy or stupid, it DOES NOT WARRANT anybody to take advantage of me. This pathetic theory is totally absurd, laughable, ludicrous, nonsensical, uncivilised, irresponsible, . . . X% J, ^) E6 k* c7 {" a3 V ^# V/ m& b
. g+ V) N2 g' |+ e( b6 F
P.S. Regarding yelling at someone with abusive language, it is of course against the law as a charge of "2nd or 3rd degree verbal assault" or "disturbing the puble peace". The policeman should work a little bit harder in that regard. Because of their ignorance in law, our society is less peaceful, but what can we say when they only have six months training before dispatching out to patrol. |
|