吳建仁

Originally posted by Charcoal_henry at 2005-6-9 12:18 PM:


同意到極點～

其實克勤既唱功...

如果單以音域計, 克勤應該比學友更廣.
但係克勤唔及學友, 正係因為"感情"問題.
聽一聽佢兩個唱嘅"李香蘭"就知有一種分別.
至於踩鋼線唱歌,
對於克勤黎講,
困難嘅只係"踩鋼線", 唔係"唱歌"
就好似譚校長可以一面跑步一面唱歌而面不改容咁.
因為"唱歌"對佢地呢種級數嘅人黎講, 易過食生菜.

[ Last edited by 吳建仁 on 2005-6-9 at 12:35 PM ]

cwc_tkd

Originally posted by 吳建仁 at 2005-6-9 12:29 PM:

如果單以音域計, 克勤應該比學友更...

同意呀~~佢成日都唔夠投入~
同埋唔夠放.(演唱會就一時時啦~~)

吳建仁

Originally posted by cwc_tkd at 2005-6-9 12:36 PM:


同意呀~~佢成日都唔夠投入~
同埋唔夠放.(演唱會就一時時啦~~)

冇錯.
如果克勤可以放開懷抱, 唔執著於"零瘕疵"嘅話, 可能會更好.

sniper

克勤出哂名唱歌冇感情啦, 剩係識震音, 我一d都唔欣賞佢

justin714

連克勤都未夠學友既水平
咁學友咪好恐怖>.<
有冇佢地唱得好既幾隻歌推介呀??

Charcoal_henry

Originally posted by cwc_tkd at 2005-6-9 12:36 PM:


同意呀~~佢成日都唔夠投入~
同埋唔夠放.(演唱會就一時時啦~~)

Originally posted by sniper at 2005-6-9 12:59 PM:
克勤出哂名唱歌冇感情啦, 剩係識震音, 我一d都唔欣賞佢

我唔係咁同意wor~

係, hacken係好似感情唔夠explicit咁, 我覺得咁樣係因為佢唱歌實在太輕鬆所致, 令人感覺唔到佢好"肉緊", 好有感情咁, 但係我唔覺得佢係唔投入wor~ 其實我覺得感情外露同內斂係唱法既分別jie, 我相信要hacken唱到好似eason同基仔都一定無問題, 相反則不能矣, 但係hacken咁唱會好唔自然..... 不過各有各好~ 其實欣賞hacken既同時, 我都覺得eason同基仔好好架

同埋我覺得有陣時eason同基仔既"感情激蕩", 係因為唱得好辛苦~ 而hacken就好少會好似斷氣咁~

abc123shing

錄音係.....錄左幾十次出黎的效果
如果d 歌手唱live 有cd 咁好聽
d 人就唔會話而家d 歌唔識唱歌la
克勤唱live 唱到cd 既效果先係好波

cwc_tkd

Originally posted by abc123shing at 2005-6-9 02:11 PM:
錄音係.....錄左幾十次出黎的效果
如果d 歌手唱live 有cd 咁好聽
d 人就唔會話而家d 歌唔識唱歌la
克勤唱live 唱到cd 既效果先係好波

係呀,我覺得佢同eason同學友唱現場都好好~
不過佢地ge歌路唔係好同,
舉例:要克勤唱eason ge"阿士匹靈"佢會唱得好核突,
而要eason同學友唱克勤ge"六呎風雲"一定冇佢唱得咁好,
所以分返開黎睇,佢地各有各好,只係風格有差異

但係我就不太欣賞基仔了~

jaykfc110

Originally posted by sniper at 2005-6-9 12:59 PM:
克勤出哂名唱歌冇感情啦, 剩係識震音, 我一d都唔欣賞佢

我都係咁話..冇感情仲要賴有感情咁law.
你地唔發覺仲almost首首歌都係一樣唱法ga咩..真係cd機ar.一部機丫ma
不過我同意克勤係有唱歌同靚聱..只不過係我覺得好悶
我反而覺得eason好全面..佢把聲唱歌唱得好自然都好聽eg. "shall we talk" "時光倒流二十年"
show 唱功,假音又得 e.g "反高潮" , "黑夜不再來"
快歌都得~e.g"打得火熱"(經典la~) or "衝口而出"

你諗下克勤唱"打得火熱"會點...
相反eason唱"我不會唱歌"我覺得都不會太差law

月月鳥

[積極回應者+]