
Originally posted by CHECSS at 2006-1-30 12:38 PM:
ME
Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2006-1-30 13:22:1 i" p5 ?- A2 j% ?6 U( t
姜維真係咁勁?6 K! W( f6 c( U4 i3 p* g9 |
佢輸俾鄧艾鍾會幾次ga bo...........
Originally posted by 托迪仔T at 2006-1-30 06:01 PM:
羊祜![]()
Originally posted by hung414 at 2006-1-30 21:08:$ o. ]6 V L' z1 E
- g9 d K" K2 P$ P4 C
+ Q& R! ^+ s; m& f. {) h; p
yes...he was the great one to unified Chinese
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:22:
司馬懿
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:24:
C1 Q! K5 K3 Q4 o. a0 N
唔計司馬懿呢?
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:25:9 n& }% q5 \# A) P
姜維
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:25:
why?
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:28:. g) Y, c. K) N
# b( a) J" E% l z) J' f J% j
智慧高之餘﹐又打得% C9 B0 O# f9 J2 i2 d. J1 n8 _
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->姜維
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:32:
7 @& u+ \+ G" d. p
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司...
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:39:3 @) ?5 G- D+ R9 _, |5 c7 b2 p4 I
Just I think7 [- M8 N2 ^9 }* u2 F9 l
第一五分,第五一分
: t. H) R6 j8 q. ?4 C, g
諸葛亮:5+5+4+1=15. l8 U" V$ t: c+ d' r
司馬懿:4+4+5+3=165 x3 a" }, i4 L0 d- @, j) _
鄧艾:1+2+3+4=10! u: z6 Z7 p' u F) c }
姜維:2+1+1+5=95 B' S9 k/ o+ v$ u0 }$ t7 L' |
陸遜:3+3+2+2=10
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:41:
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->...
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:42:% m" {" z1 z" k$ R& y) f9 P
but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:44:
0 p# d& c4 W" Y" `* \/ y
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維.

Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:45:4 z7 z* N3 S: e" |/ @+ e
why?9 l( z$ Y+ H2 b4 J. x( ^
其實他們實力差不多,很難比較![]()
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:50: P% }4 e$ j$ ?: D# B
In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him. 姜維's fascination is better the others because he was the only student of 諸葛亮.
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:51:! w" k+ M( N( R; j- c
他比孔明更偉大
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:55:
; S2 R' F* W3 W/ U
Agree. Both of them were extremely loyalty. However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation. He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:58:/ F a4 a, |1 q4 r5 ~& U( w, Y
他支撐了蜀國三十年,雖然孔明也有27年(207-234),但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多,五虎已屈機

Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 22:03:
yes, that's the point.![]()
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 22:20:6 P8 v, d! B9 f
) s! O" X# s5 K; R
陸遜也偉大,但不得善終......
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 22:29:
Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too![]()
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006/1/30 21:32:
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司...
Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:; n& D |) L8 D5 Q+ C: o8 t
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
係咪如此?
Originally posted by benny0105 at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:
0 `3 M& X% b6 x8 A# m" L7 Y2 G3 n+ ^
z! I1 [! H( O, m2 ^: o" w
6 a6 S* J* J6 g1 }! E3 Z
& z, S4 [* A* H2 l1 ?; v
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...% ]; q7 u( W! ?( x& @
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真
Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:& v+ z' x2 Z5 P% _, n e. X, p
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............0 R' Y7 V% R$ G& D- X' C- e
係咪如此?

Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:, e, t8 ?! O) E/ d5 x [
呢個網係講有關三國正史~5 i. p* f1 C2 ^, s7 t& b
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm

Originally posted by step025 at 2006-1-31 07:13: ^) r$ c& o8 |7 Q" V) V" k
你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?
...



Originally posted by 155220 at 2006-1-31 12:56 PM:
P.S 曹魏後期頂住蜀漢姜維主要係teamw...
Originally posted by abcde1918 at 2006-1-31 12:58:
" }" j: R- v. O; F9 o% k
我打機,姜維係最勁
Originally posted by 155220 at 2006-1-31 01:02 PM:. t* Z1 E: Z1 i1 i
6 Q/ H( V. L. v1 p
打機鄧艾都唔錯,但正史中,我認為鄧艾勁d
Originally posted by abcde1918 at 2006-1-31 13:05:* k( z5 {8 Q N0 J5 @1 {% L
點解咁講
[ Last edited by abcde1918 on 2006-1-31 at 01:06 PM ]
Originally posted by 奇 at 2006-1-31 02:05:
歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也& h$ }3 s1 ]' k, U+ ]" C1 M
沒有佔下風![]()
Originally posted by 下......... at 2006-2-13 05:36 PM:
姜維智力夠高, 諸葛亮又將兵法傳左比佢,最勁當然係姜維啦!
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |