
Originally posted by CHECSS at 2006-1-30 12:38 PM:
ME
Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2006-1-30 13:22:/ H! C% P- r' x1 Q( v( r
姜維真係咁勁? J" | Q m/ Q4 o
佢輸俾鄧艾鍾會幾次ga bo...........
Originally posted by 托迪仔T at 2006-1-30 06:01 PM:4 S. z8 ^# y. P: v1 K3 B
羊祜![]()
Originally posted by hung414 at 2006-1-30 21:08:
8 g& V A+ @4 H! V) ?
yes...he was the great one to unified Chinese
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:22:
司馬懿
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:24:" z- R" c( t h$ v7 G6 d
唔計司馬懿呢?
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:25:
* |: X. Q! J/ m4 J! B
姜維
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:25:
5 H* L% Y1 t0 b9 b# O
why?
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:28:
5 @* Z& H- w3 E' J. B7 T1 U
智慧高之餘﹐又打得
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->姜維
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:32:
- `5 c2 [5 S4 |8 [9 q9 }
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司...
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:39:
Just I think
第一五分,第五一分; |9 c3 a; V2 N& F2 P4 N7 ~
4 c y' X! H1 m/ z1 m% x
諸葛亮:5+5+4+1=15
司馬懿:4+4+5+3=169 d) b# `( U, l7 k
鄧艾:1+2+3+4=109 H) E$ F# v/ k# k: `: C
姜維:2+1+1+5=9
陸遜:3+3+2+2=10
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:41:! S: Y9 `4 k4 V. R7 M; h
% ]0 c% @7 S& S2 ]& E7 o
3 W2 y8 x! x& A
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->...
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:42:, ?8 l- g& y9 c5 t' V
but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:44:
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維.

Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:45:
+ k0 h9 ?0 u5 x$ }1 y5 P' z
why?3 b5 n$ d- b* ~5 O1 }
) S) `6 M2 \7 F/ _1 L
其實他們實力差不多,很難比較![]()
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:50:
In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him. 姜維's fascination is better the others because he was the only student of 諸葛亮.
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:51:
, s0 t6 h1 h# K$ m
他比孔明更偉大
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:55:
Agree. Both of them were extremely loyalty. However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation. He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:58:
$ e1 X! \3 S2 L5 l$ x+ H' u. i" g
f9 J! Q* ?, d5 }0 |! A8 V
他支撐了蜀國三十年,雖然孔明也有27年(207-234),但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多,五虎已屈機

Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 22:03:2 B8 y+ _% e$ H H8 _& y
yes, that's the point.![]()
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 22:20:
- t; W6 ^) ]) h Q# I
陸遜也偉大,但不得善終......
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 22:29:
+ \2 z2 h% t8 ?8 q. A' w' d, I
Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too![]()
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006/1/30 21:32:; ~, p% Y8 B: {5 g0 M1 H
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司...
Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
係咪如此?
Originally posted by benny0105 at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:
! [) Q8 Z7 o9 n3 J" S7 Y. E7 J& i& i
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真
Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:, J3 o8 p7 n/ Y; T; G+ f( U" i
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........) P# d1 Q, n. \! W3 [: y+ o/ C( s
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
係咪如此?

Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:
呢個網係講有關三國正史~
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~. S/ V( Y7 @, o1 _, q" c
http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm

Originally posted by step025 at 2006-1-31 07:13:
你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?5 v4 Q, o. P- g; B- `" G8 y& L
...



Originally posted by 155220 at 2006-1-31 12:56 PM:, E% i7 k: s+ l: }. ?
P.S 曹魏後期頂住蜀漢姜維主要係teamw...
Originally posted by abcde1918 at 2006-1-31 12:58:
我打機,姜維係最勁
Originally posted by 155220 at 2006-1-31 01:02 PM:
7 }$ L1 C- ^1 A: I v
打機鄧艾都唔錯,但正史中,我認為鄧艾勁d
Originally posted by abcde1918 at 2006-1-31 13:05:
點解咁講
[ Last edited by abcde1918 on 2006-1-31 at 01:06 PM ]
Originally posted by 奇 at 2006-1-31 02:05:
# W Y( g5 V# H
歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也! F) [: g8 E" s) k" I4 O
沒有佔下風![]()
Originally posted by 下......... at 2006-2-13 05:36 PM:
姜維智力夠高, 諸葛亮又將兵法傳左比佢,最勁當然係姜維啦!
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |