Board logo

標題: 阿仙奴，(My feeling for Arsenal vs Real Madrid) Result in here [打印本頁]
作者: franken    時間: 2006-3-9 05:51 AM     標題: 阿仙奴，(My feeling for Arsenal vs Real Madrid) Result in here

阿仙奴同皇馬互有攻守
雖然零比零，但係好好睇，比琴晚場巴塞對車仔正得多！！
列文演出神勇，加上魯o野唔生性兩次機會都入唔到波
列文比賽中受傷，幾驚傷出換入阿蒙尼亞...

[ Last edited by brightlee on 2006-3-9 at 11:49 AM ]
作者: klun    時間: 2006-3-9 06:10 AM     標題: 激讚

我係曼聯球迷，但都覺得阿仙奴呢兩場打得好好，尤其是係亨利，有大將之風，以前d傲氣冇哂，換上認真的比賽態度。出線功勞佢最大，但勝出後佢冇再扮哂野，激讚﹗﹙希望雲佬學0下人0地﹚
另外雲加為了打低皇馬亦挖空心思，專心部署，所換的球員全部在賽前計劃之中，做哂功課、領軍功力明顯比對面個臨記高不知幾多倍。最抵讚0既係雲加以前扮哂野的口面冇哂，在場邊指手劃腳，態度認真，做番個領隊，實在值得加許……
反觀我0地個費老闆就仲係0甘自以為是﹙自從三冠王之後已經係0甘﹚……曼聯同阿先奴今年都打得唔好，兩個領隊都聞到魷魚香，但雲加0既態度就比費sir好好多，所以本人衷心希望美國佬季尾炒埋碟魷魚佢，做低老費啦唔該。
作者: kakeidevil    時間: 2006-3-9 09:31 AM

阿仙奴好波

不過今界歐聯真名天子唔會係佢地！！！
作者: chanhoyingap    時間: 2006-3-9 10:12 AM

我都有第一位人兄的感覺
見到阿仙奴又再次成長
全隊都打起水準
作者: sonyguy    時間: 2006-3-9 10:14 AM

我又唔覺得阿仙奴對皇馬好睇得過巴塞對車仔喎...
巴塞對車仔好睇好多呀??

阿仙奴係進級...但佢地既實力真係差左好多...
唔好講佢地防守既問題...
剩係講進攻...無少左一份流暢既感覺...
早兩三年佢地既快攻...一氣呵成...
互相走位配合...真係點好既防守球員都好難mark 到佢地...
即使唔係球球入...但幾乎每次都可以做到好到肉既攻勢...
相反今朝場波...
皇馬班後防試過唔知幾多腳在後防交失...
又或者中場比阿仙奴既球員搶到波...
佢想立即轉守為攻時...
無論速度, 流暢度, 走位都差左好多...
唔係交失波...就係帶位個波交唔到出去最後比人搶埋...
佢地之所以進級...
全靠越到一隊比佢地趺得更離譜既皇馬...

[ Last edited by sonyguy on 2006-3-9 at 10:16 AM ]
作者: kitten    時間: 2006-3-9 10:44 AM

阿仙奴呢兩場打得好好，尤其是係亨利，有大將之風，以前d傲氣冇哂，換上認真的比賽態度
good for Henry!
早兩三年佢地既快攻...一氣呵成...
互相走位配合...真係點好既防守球員都好難mark 到佢地>>>
I agree and missed that scene!
作者: vandervaart    時間: 2006-3-9 01:50 PM

I watched the match earlier on and it's certainly one of the most exciting matches i have viewed so far. Although it's a goal-less draw, both teams had excellent chances, together with fast-flowing attacking football played throughout the game. Unlike Barca vs Chelsea, both teams were not afraid to go foward and go for the bite. I think football teams should follow Arsenal's and Real's example by bringing such quality and attacking football rather than defend deep and try to grind out a result, as in the case of Chelsea, they are killing football! We as spectators want to be entertained and not sit through a dull match.

I think Lehmann played exceptionally well in the match, if not his concentration, Arsenal might have thrown the game away. And all respect goes out to the entire Arsenal team, although they are a young side, they showed determination, going in for every tackle to save the team. It certainly isn't easier to keep 2 clean sheets against Real. And after watching Fabergas play, one can't help but think if he is really just 19 yrs old? I foresee a great future for him ahead. Maybe he'll become the next Joseph Guardiola for Spain.

+5

[ Last edited by brightlee on 2006-3-10 at 01:30 PM ]
作者: 43420024    時間: 2006-3-9 01:59 PM

阿仙奴雖然呢場唔系主攻,但係佢地既反擊真係好湊效,經常可以轉守為攻,依一點雲加係做得好好,而我覺得伊保爾進步好大,兩場對皇馬助攻助守,羅倫終有接班人了
作者: kaing    時間: 2006-3-9 03:20 PM

Originally posted by sonyguy at 2006-3-9 10:14 AM:
我又唔覺得阿仙奴對皇馬好睇得過巴塞...
全中.....講中曬要點....
昨日既皇馬....講真要輸幾多真係可以輸幾多都得....
阿仙奴有幾球波都已經可以羅皇馬命...
唔係洗咩尾段防得咁辛苦....重差d 補時輸返球....
作者: alantai    時間: 2006-3-9 04:47 PM

Originally posted by kaing at 2006-3-9 03:20 PM:


全中.....講中曬要點....
昨日既...
係啦, 臨門一腳真係唔掂, 不過防守都進步左唔少.  希望唔好咁快對住AC或者巴塞, 到時就應該係咁先啦
作者: 中華卡樂ｂ    時間: 2006-3-9 05:04 PM

我係阿仙奴ｆａｎ屎，我真係好高興阿仙奴可以進級，睇得出成隊都好有ｈａｒｄ，睇住陣中ｄ球員日漸成熟，真係令人開心，如果係英超一早踢呢ｄ波唔會好似ｅ家咁慘啦，埸波中有２個球員好低讚，１個係希比，１個係伊保爾，２個都踢得好好，以希比水準較高，希望阿仙奴踢得好ｄ，加油呀，阿仙奴～
作者: bigfish    時間: 2006-3-9 05:07 PM

雖然阿記晉級, 但全場波佢地都主守, 呢d 風格真係令觀眾失望, 以前有韋拉助陣o既阿記成日都主攻, d 波都不知幾好睇, 雖然佢地最終都俾曼聯尅住, 但都贏到唔少觀眾o既心丫, 但尋晚佢地打單箭頭, 角球旗戰術, 真係唔抵幫
作者: harvey22    時間: 2006-3-9 06:35 PM

ok man how about i tell you about my feelings towards arsenal look at there line up man

STARTERS
Jens Lehmann, Emmanuel Eboue, Philippe Senderos, Kolo Toure, Gilberto Silva, Francesc Fabregas, Mathieu Flamini, Aleksander Hleb, Fredrik Ljungberg, Jose Antonio Reyes, Thierry Henry.

Bench
Vasiriki Abou Diaby, Manuel Almunia, Dennis Bergkamp, Johan Djourou, Robert Pires, Alexandre Song Billong, Theo Walcott.

man if i am right i believe all but one (walcott) is from england, is such a shame man! i read articles on soccernet saying how arsenal is carrying the england flag, how proud arsene wanker is man is a bunch of bullshit! if you say chelsea spending big money buying players is bad, i believe arsenal is on the same level! at least chelsea have england players!


bad word
penalty
-5

[ Last edited by brightlee on 2006-3-10 at 01:32 PM ]
作者: bigfish    時間: 2006-3-9 06:36 PM

Originally posted by harvey22 at 2006-3-9 06:35 PM:
ok man how about i tell you about m...
我唔鍾意阿記o既其中一個原因就係佢唔用英格蘭球員, so 我寧願捧皇馬好過
作者: kaing    時間: 2006-3-9 06:46 PM

Originally posted by bigfish at 2006-3-9 06:36 PM:

我唔鍾意阿記o既其中一個原因就係佢唔用英格蘭球員, so 我寧願捧皇馬好過
依....其實我唔鐘意阿記既原因都有一個就係享利啦....
不過不得不讚佢地整場既中同後場都做得好好....
不過無計...我唔鐘意亨利所以都唔鐘意阿仙奴....
鬼叫佢法國對巴西世界盃無波入做前鋒都win 3粒巴西...
睇到眼火爆...巴西就係輸施單....
更係捧皇馬啦...雖然皇馬真係踢得唔好...
不過最後都無輸呀...未又係0比0....
入唔到8強ja....
作者: vandervaart    時間: 2006-3-9 11:08 PM

Well. Do you know why most strong teams have a lack of english players? Because they are simply too expensive, especially if they are of an international. Fine, Chelsea might have English players, Terry is a home-grown, Lampard and J.Cole are acquired with a high price tag, then we have Wayne Bridge, who's almost disappeared.

Talk about Man U, Wayne Rooney. Do you know how much he costs? And Man U's own Wes Brown, Kieran Richardson are screw ups anyway. And Rio Ferdinand? Remember that he's the world's most expensive defender. It's all about the money.

Not every club have the money and luck to produce successful home-grown talents. Players like Terry in Chelsea, Carragher and Gerrard in Liverpool, the past era of Beckham, Scholes, Neville brothers in Man U, how many can you get without actually have to pay for them?

So, teams like Arsenal, whom you people criticise have no English players, did not buy players with ridiculous prices. Remember, Ashley Cole and Sol Campbell were injured that day. So i think it's not really fair to Arsenal with such comments.
作者: 28083003    時間: 2006-3-10 07:04 AM

阿仙奴其實係英超隊中少數唔踢英式波嘅球隊,主要踢番小組推進,快攻,地面戰嘅,其實係幾西甲踢法嘅,所以佢地係英超踢唔起(以前得係因為以前班球員當打,家下D人太後生,唔夠經驗,一對保頓,布力般li D隊踢唔番自己嘅風格).講番琴晚場波,雲格一直都比人話佢現場指揮差,只係識買人,太保守等,但li場佢嘅部處確係唔錯.之前我一直講話叫雲格比希比踢番中間,因為好名顯左中唔啱佢踢,li場終於見番史特加嘅希比,由左右開始推入中間,交倒波又搏倒foul, 如果唔係雲格一早叫希比li場踢free role,佢點會敢帶咁多???列文今季演出神勇,今場先後救出朗拿度頭槌同魯爾球必入波,成為進級英雄(從來一場波贏左前鋒都係主角,輸波龍門就係罪人,今朝英國嘅報紙大標題係''Lehmann is the hero!'',可知列文嘅表現係幾咁令人振奮呢!!後防線今場交足貨,li條平均唔過23歲嘅防線令施丹,碧咸失準,臨尾辛達洛斯差D烏龍,但全場表現唔錯.中間龍格堡確係比希比比下去,但佢飛身硬食卡路士罰球確係功不可抹.法比加斯越黎越成熟,交波防守顯功價.亨利有多腳差少少入,証明佢有心踢係勁好多(但我都係想佢走),雷恩斯中楣差D變罪人,表現同基拔圖都係一般.
皇馬輸係因為佢地排錯陣,唔應覺比朗拿度打正選,卡斯辛奴,巴迪斯達是但一個都好啦
我覺得li場波好睇過巴車戰,巴車戰一開始而經唔係55波,車仔缺少左艾辛,林伯特無態種下出局嘅惡果,相反中場球員林立嘅巴塞對沙維缺陣顯得毫無影響.加上巴塞上場作客贏緊2:1,一隊唔洗全攻,一隊唔夠人攻,個氣氛確係唔夠阿皇戰咁緊凑.阿皇戰一隊一定要入,一隊要死頂但一向擅於反擊,雙隊唔留力強攻作為球迷當然鐘意睇啦~~~~

[ Last edited by 28083003 on 2006-3-10 at 07:06 AM ]
作者: harvey22    時間: 2006-3-10 10:05 PM

Originally posted by harvey22 bad word
penalty
-5

[ Last edited by brightlee on 2006-3-10 at 01:32 PM ]
hey man can you give me a reasonable answer?? i was juz trying to filter-004 how i feel about arsenal the only bad word maybe is "BullShxx" but come on man at least you can give me a warning or something! i honestly think -5 is a bit too much especially when i am juz trying to filter-004 the topic! is not like i am telling someone off or starting a fight here!
作者: brightlee    時間: 2006-3-10 11:07 PM

this is not your first time to do it
NO CHOICE!
Sorry,
PLEASE BEHAVE YOURSELF!

Bright
作者: klun    時間: 2006-3-11 01:20 AM

Originally posted by bigfish at 2006-3-9 05:07 PM:
雖然阿記晉級, 但全場波佢地都主守, ...
不同意，阿仙奴呢場主守是因為知道自己技不如對手，所以話佢地戰術成功……曼聯同佢鬥功咪比皇馬數law。早幾年阿先奴有一次對住唔知巴塞定邊隊﹙總之是好勁的﹚，都係用同一戰術，攪店對手，所以說雲加是知道呢招有用先照板煮糊。如果佢地對住較他們差的球隊，應該唔會主守卦。
作者: harvey22    時間: 2006-3-11 01:41 AM

Originally posted by brightlee at 2006-3-10 11:07 PM:
this is not your first time to do it
NO CHOICE!
Sorry,
PLEASE BEHAVE YOURSELF!

Bright
aright, ljungberg, i see, no wonder so harsh..
so disappoint about all this man..



歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0