
Originally posted by fung at 2006-5-9 12:24 AM:
原來係咁....第一頁就係...=0=
Originally posted by fung at 2006-5-8 11:57 PM:3 J% Y' u1 Q% o$ N( B1 s
各位brother) N: O" |$ B3 C% O, c5 y/ k
" |, ~, ~ ?' b
唔知係唔係我太廢......
Originally posted by Azuma at 2006-5-9 06:25 PM:
- t! q9 E& d: W O' U, {. ~
9 U# p$ E+ d" q9 r( o1 u- I
一個市場有幾多個廁格?4 ]( w. s0 f+ y5 @2 `, K0 X+ ^
我諗你...
Originally posted by homan~ at 2006-5-9 06:38 PM:
* z+ l: {, t4 ?
! @8 a& K4 i! P/ g4 ?# A
好認同 !!!+ ~1 x, o- E/ Z# U3 |# L+ B! p
good point !
出得術既都有限料啦![]()
Originally posted by Azuma at 2006-5-9 06:25 PM:- c+ ~7 Z$ D1 }" j# D
一個市場有幾多個廁格?
* z# _% e1 {) h0 i9 I6 d7 H
我諗你...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 12:59 AM:
其實我覺得真係會咁樣出貓既唔會好多, 甚至會係無
. C ]; Y* m7 W- }" M
因為就算有網址比埋, 有無人會知道呢一遍essay會就嚮網頁既第一版?: s7 B4 A0 l5 Y8 q+ w$ k
又有無人會冒呢一個未知知數既險?
以一個正常既學生都唔會諗出貓呢一樣野, 明知係刑事
, T; J. O1 j9 g. s% O, u x
就算真係有人咁樣而出貓, 佢又可以記得到幾多答案呢?
所以, 雖然HKEA就絕對係有疏忽, 但係我唔覺得有d咩既大既影響, 只係CE考生嚮度小題大做, 因為如果真係取消果一part既分數, 通常黎講, 普遍大家既分數都會提升
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 01:23 AM:
1 s2 a, E& s/ T: I) R$ \
出猫并唔係刑事的- s9 l5 }, R+ G3 D, l( z
所以警方冇...
Originally posted by gn00987333 at 2006-5-11 02:25 AM:
講真0 ~4 _- M: j- y- A2 O
你自己考唔到就考唔到啦
點解要出猫呢
出左,又唔一定會合格5 y" O% q _" j
有機會佢d答案錯既
你有可能會唔合格tim
而且係唔係應該嚴謹d呢$ @( y7 ~& C) E; l s$ i
咁都會有個網有d會考資料) S, B( T8 N2 D$ L& N1 ^8 P
咁駛咩讀書啊,溫答案咪得囉=.=
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 02:36 AM:
$ D# b4 P+ p* M R: w/ r7 A ^
/ N3 X# A) r+ A' O) j) g
考題係抄個網的
考評局懶Q到照出
班考生先咁興![]()
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 02:32 AM:
, I) Q! A$ d2 M# s0 @
出猫唔係刑事係無錯, 但係我記得佢地可以用其他刑事既例黎入你罪
正如偷窺一樣, 一樣唔係犯法, 不過警方可以用遊蕩罪黎入你罪0 p& J$ ~8 e% \$ d" E3 M9 ?* f
1 P3 Y: ^4 A4 a+ V4 I
另外, 通常會驚有d咩唔公平既人, 通常都係d邊沿人/低分既人, 佢地就係怕其他人拉高左分之後, 而令到佢地唔合格+ S$ f1 S* ?5 a: G! a0 K
如果係攞A,B,C既人, 怕咩你地出猫, 出猫既通常都係d唔識既人先會咁做, 高分極有限: h# L* W+ ~% I2 k% U: t$ v! ~
* v/ t2 K0 N3 C; ]
所以當局為左避免出result之後有人嘈, 通常都會増加合格率, 變相等如加分
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 03:13 AM:8 Y9 {) I* \( E& ~% U
5 e/ t# S" o. U. Z* l6 e
刑事係要舉證的; t1 W+ N1 Z3 b8 k, X1 D X
仲要有相關的...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 03:27 AM:8 \# d& ]+ ?% ]; }" L- _. B: j) E
. {* I, d7 e) A8 e
4 v& ~& T; k" n6 w2 V
佢地可以用其他刑事既例黎入你罪,...
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 03:56 AM:9 m3 g$ d( ^& x' M) i% S2 k" S
& h" y# |4 W. \% X8 S0 {
9 U0 M9 E6 d+ ?8 A
你當香港冇王管咩
唔係刑事8 ?4 C6 p" p) D( A
你點申請法庭手令呀+ _. m1 |' ~. O9 H
責任係考評局度
要查IP呢D野& d5 w& A& U- M, B4 m; S
ISP要有當事人許可\手令先可以做野的
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 03:27 AM:& O& v5 f# G% |: F* R
0 D3 [ V) \! A# m; G
另外, 取消果一part唔等於直接加果一part既全部分數, 只會將其他既部份再拉curve,
所以, 高分既唔會受影響, 只有低分既著數左
; Q4 A# T6 {" T- ?1 C
所以, 取消果一part對於高分既絕對係唔會唔公平
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:06 AM:
1 e( o3 N4 G9 q _4 R
% C I# t8 Q1 F
取消得一係就+曬
一係就減曬...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:01 AM:
0 z7 }8 [0 B7 D- i/ z$ h4 Y. s- Z$ Y
出猫唔係刑事係無錯, 但係我記得佢地可以用其他刑事既例等同出猫既例黎入你罪* u, n/ t6 y+ Z" {; K
正如偷窺一樣, 一樣唔係犯法, 不過警方可以用遊蕩罪黎入你罪
# O+ }9 K0 V( z+ ?! P9 J0 M1 h) U
只不過係無直接既例, 而用第二d相關既例, 唔代表無例可管
9 i x. j" K6 ]8 w
唔通你話偷窺入唔到佢罪??
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:11 AM:. Q8 H+ A, e1 S6 l3 |* ?; ~
/ g! g. K' M; x0 a/ _ ^( K3 X! n+ B
語文考試唔同其他科目, 你話讀佢果d就只係識果d, 語文科正常係唔會突然之間有一part半part特別高分8 r$ W; V; U, \; { f( r3 p! k6 H9 }
所以減晒果一part既分, 嚮語文科係唔會唔公平
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:13 AM:
" T3 h. D, a9 m' A6 l0 q. V
7 E* W3 x! n6 V! i5 s2 T j d
用其他刑事既例等同出猫既例黎入你罪! K" L$ s+ `0 b# ]1 _0 X* Z6 _
如果有使乜仲要提議要求立法' i/ l! j* [2 g) E2 |
就係冇相關的
佢地乜都做唔到先要提案
偷窺同呢單野有咩關係?
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:15 AM:2 t) j" C# t$ D' b4 c
% n* d6 [1 i' P
考過會考未?
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:16 AM:$ p' ?5 e& ^- t W* u
" b! R6 j7 {8 X
* M$ T# v- J# A( e
偷窺只係作為例) Y5 U( g( ^6 O7 A* Q" y) |, L5 B; b
偷窺一樣係無直接既例, 而只係用第二d相關既例6 V" ~9 ]8 @4 T# O+ p
所以, 亦都曾經要提議要求立法
出猫亦都一樣
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:18 AM: H# N: b6 f; e; d1 @9 l
& Q5 b2 o# o; }7 o8 b* w3 N" Q
) ^4 d/ h7 G: [& S9 x: S
我反而問下你考過會考未?
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:21 AM:1 l6 \2 E" A5 }
# W, u, p0 _! _( w5 R0 w0 o% x1 M
我反反問
我(上)面唔係講左咩![]()
Originally posted by pangpang2066 at 2006-5-11 04:36 PM:2 ?! `' v* {* v" [
其實都難唔難捉到人? 就算捉到,佢死口...
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 05:57 PM:& o# |9 z1 ^2 h. ]0 {
重唔重考唔重要' w: d5 {0 r. o( r$ _
最緊要收到成績單之後
唔好又走出黎話. {) a7 D5 C- Q8 q! \8 g, \
唔公平要重考
呢d就最無謂
Originally posted by wangjacky at 2006-5-11 06:47 PM:3 v/ ]4 E( c; `; G3 G# Z
不過而家佢地好似有辦法喇
有左對策, Q1 n$ h3 |% a& y# u; }
各位brother睇睇9 |. o# W/ ~9 j9 H) V, t1 {" x7 }" _
http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/doc/isd/LetterToCandidates.pdf
Originally posted by wangjacky at 2006-5-11 06:47 PM:$ w8 J& _$ I3 W' _+ E
不過而家佢地好似有辦法喇& U& t+ o% ~$ i( O8 L
有左對策! q3 o S. A1 t" w1 {
各位brother睇睇
http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/doc/isd/LetterToCandidates.pdf
Originally posted by s20021601 at 2006-5-12 01:31 AM:* {- r4 e1 ^+ x3 n1 z
普通苛尿先係~1min....但係爆石的話可...
Originally posted by s20021601 at 2006-5-12 01:31:
普通苛尿先係~1min....但係爆石的話可...
Originally posted by 155220 at 12-5-2006 09:18 PM:
入場前先搜身,然後再令他們將手提放進locker,唔知得唔得呢...........
Originally posted by xylitol25 at 2006-5-14 12:28 AM:
咁煩,不如學外國同大陸啦,裝個手機干擾器仲好啦,包唔怕有人上網or講電話問答案![]()
Originally posted by xylitol25 at 2006-5-14 12:28 AM:$ j8 f5 U; O6 }5 p
咁煩,不如學外國同大陸啦,裝個手機干擾器仲好啦,包唔怕有人上網or講電話問答案![]()
Originally posted by 155220 at 2006-5-12 09:18 PM:
2 i o _" |; }: v0 D2 R+ X! W
入場前先搜身,然後再令他們將手提放進locker,唔知得唔得呢...........
Originally posted by zz1988 at 2006-5-16 09:06 PM:
i retake this year . P/ e8 i3 ] j$ l
2 N* Z# M: J7 [& d8 n1 F
i really dun...
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |