
Originally posted by artta at 2007-5-17 08:18 PM:
10 port
Originally posted by msv at 09:04 PM:
點解今時今日先會有投訴??
本野出左咁耐都冇既??
好唔明
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-17 09:16 PM:
0 k( v+ v4 [1 Y/ s- O ~
公然與教會對抗有如拿屎上身1 |. {5 ? O* @& M: m
所以過去一直都冇人夠膽提出+ y4 B$ o6 h, y( }/ p+ v
現在有人帶頭發起提出: |% W* @4 x' B5 v. R# o
一直對聖經不滿o既人自然會群起支持7 T2 b9 n8 W5 r
一呼百應
Originally posted by msv at 2007-5-17 09:04 PM:
點解今時今日先會有投訴??
本野出左咁耐都冇既??7 Q8 X v L/ H. Z$ [! d ]7 b7 @
好唔明
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-17 09:30 PM:
...唔係教徒不看..5 ?2 H% i& D9 T* D K
...係教徒的..因己被洗腦..看了也不會出聲...明未...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:2 f* X3 Y5 d& Z0 ?3 F) Y
同意紅字哥part
9 G( A% {* A2 K
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
根本就係邊個疊友邊個話事, 是與非係無準則.
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-18 02:27:* H' ^2 x. ~5 L
嗯 ... 我覺得樓主好似有少少無謂 ......
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:2 U# V5 l" d: D/ n; f2 G
0 M# _% h% f2 v
同意紅字哥part
3 _) }+ ^3 @2 Z/ `
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:9 M$ z8 Q9 ~8 N* j1 g! F/ G
4 R& I3 ^2 s6 T# y
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:5 d) W4 E, r; ?2 o) C* {+ ~! ]+ Q& I+ h
9 ^; U! X5 t1 O- B1 @" X3 ^; Q5 T
同意紅字哥part
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
一千幾百人投訴? 是但一間教會都唔止...
Originally posted by magic at 11:46 AM:0 q" e! B7 R0 J$ f5 y
# W6 o5 {( @" N+ V' O! o
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:& F7 I i/ j( ?# ]2 q6 P+ q3 D$ L
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
~~~Originally posted by hubingandtvb at 2007-5-18 11:10 AM:
如果要達成樓主的期望,最好的辦法 請...
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 2007-5-18 08:41 PM:* L3 E, H0 o9 N, U, C9 i) ?
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:/ ]' ]: b' v1 J6 S
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:" z) c T7 n8 ^$ M% N8 l5 ?' g
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
7 ?8 ]5 a* s) |! W
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。8 {# q; g7 j' w9 r2 y
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-19 06:01 PM:/ A! y4 a, n9 F3 x: K- d: R
那些教徒會說 神o既想法,人類不能夠理解
Originally posted by karenmoe at 2007-5-20 02:36 AM:
投訴x經既目的唔係要令聖經變成不雅...
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-19 11:46 AM:
$ e5 A1 F% w! c/ I
; j$ H4 X+ E- X5 I
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-22 09:51 AM:
+ t8 k! X- f8 ?. c1 L6 E
多謝讚賞 haha
' M0 K6 S0 z+ y! p! g
聖經係咪不...
Originally posted by vcrcan at 2007-5-23 01:40 AM:3 @: H8 c2 K! Z5 F
大部分人都係雙重標準的,見怪不怪了
今次事件已令更多港人那些出位耶教組織的面目
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |