Originally posted by artta at 2007-5-17 08:18 PM:
10 port
Originally posted by msv at 09:04 PM:3 o* y) ]1 W0 e2 S
點解今時今日先會有投訴??! T: t% @7 u- B7 n& G$ r
本野出左咁耐都冇既??
好唔明
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-17 09:16 PM:. d/ c( ]# X. C& @5 V3 a$ j
6 N& I& u% d: U/ K+ J1 X8 y
公然與教會對抗有如拿屎上身+ z3 i5 G% w- O7 P% U! L& |
所以過去一直都冇人夠膽提出$ u" E8 i) W& h* k' _ ^
現在有人帶頭發起提出
一直對聖經不滿o既人自然會群起支持& H" l9 T) [; c* b" E
一呼百應
Originally posted by msv at 2007-5-17 09:04 PM:/ H1 c) a2 t0 y! S6 |- N
點解今時今日先會有投訴??
本野出左咁耐都冇既??+ _) A1 |0 M5 j% ]& C9 I
好唔明
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-17 09:30 PM:% o* Z$ t5 y1 s% W6 U
% T n+ r& J9 ~8 u2 I1 z
...唔係教徒不看..( Q) X/ r: A9 f
...係教徒的..因己被洗腦..看了也不會出聲...明未...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
6 G+ k# e o P- M# R5 d; N8 ~/ U
+ P% |2 Q9 N' V$ }
同意紅字哥part
! x5 Z9 T1 M1 x5 k- b
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
根本就係邊個疊友邊個話事, 是與非係無準則.
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
; a- v! u" |5 i
* I, w4 I- a& y7 k
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇
Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-18 02:27:
嗯 ... 我覺得樓主好似有少少無謂 ......
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:$ W2 i2 S' K- a' b* a
; `, X3 S- n, H( |& {0 ^! a
同意紅字哥part3 _, Z- ?" |" r, g7 W$ x3 J
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
3 p4 ]- E' P# W, M4 [# e- w `
8 O- A$ h0 k) `5 V" G+ n
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
! g& X& W. J8 M4 F3 K
同意紅字哥part
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:8 g* T. u6 x. l& a$ N
一千幾百人投訴? 是但一間教會都唔止...
Originally posted by magic at 11:46 AM:2 r( d) w" ], `! {5 C1 h+ d
. O+ j$ G) m8 n2 }8 ^( w
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by hubingandtvb at 2007-5-18 11:10 AM:) f4 B3 X# H' @" Y
如果要達成樓主的期望,最好的辦法 請...
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 2007-5-18 08:41 PM:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:! K. L2 n2 F5 X# R
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:5 O+ j+ Z- v; K$ m+ p& C
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-19 06:01 PM:9 d4 ^1 y( k9 c# m; I" ?
1 ]; g8 T% e2 X* l) g! L
5 a# c3 G' K! `: K3 x0 ]
那些教徒會說 神o既想法,人類不能夠理解
Originally posted by karenmoe at 2007-5-20 02:36 AM:1 d& Q# S- `1 J0 D3 S
投訴x經既目的唔係要令聖經變成不雅...
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-19 11:46 AM:
' b! F4 \6 S; E! b* `3 _' Y3 i
, O3 M; L3 ~* @4 A" h
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-22 09:51 AM:
7 c6 `/ I( O) \# ?2 L5 g% k; q6 I
多謝讚賞 haha
$ y$ g7 g( d: f; \1 w3 o( ^' G5 A
聖經係咪不...
Originally posted by vcrcan at 2007-5-23 01:40 AM:
大部分人都係雙重標準的,見怪不怪了
今次事件已令更多港人那些出位耶教組織的面目
歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |