Board logo

標題: 最強C+SG組合? [打印本頁]

作者: 甘國武    時間: 2004-11-12 11:18 PM     標題: 最強C+SG組合?

現時成績:
馬刺(鄧肯+贊勞比利)45.3p+20.8r+5.8ast
熱火(奧尼爾+維迪)43.2p+14.4r+8.4ast
火箭(姚明+麥基迪)38.1p+14.3r+6.4ast
作者: Lap Hui    時間: 2004-11-13 02:05 AM

你講緊 PG 定 SG 呀 :?:  :?:
作者: FRANCISE    時間: 2004-11-13 10:22 AM

YAO MING + T-MaC (C + SG)
SHAQ + WADE (C + PG)
作者: FRANCISE    時間: 2004-11-13 10:25 AM

Tim Duncan is PF , not a Center!!
作者: 科    時間: 2004-11-13 10:44 AM

唔好太在意啦pg,sg啦 :roll:
作者: Anonymous    時間: 2004-11-13 11:32 AM

點解冇 Finley + Notwizki??
有既我會投佢地....
作者: 大冬瓜    時間: 2004-11-14 12:06 AM

duncan 係pf-0-唔係c...
作者: 甘國武    時間: 2004-11-14 09:14 AM

鄧肯叫PF o既唯一原因,係馬刺己經將XXX他域條友擺落中鋒位!~
作者: blblblbl    時間: 2004-11-14 07:55 PM

"c pf sf sg pg" is not always a good way to categorize players.

Most of the time the coach will categorize his players as "point", "wing", "base line", "high post", "low post", etc. But a player can be of different categories in different offensive sets.

The public's perception of C/PF is a low-post player, but I think one definition of C is the player who do the jumpball.

Nesterovic and Duncan are both high-low post players, so it's hard to label them as C/PF.

"Point" should be the player who calls the play and setup the offense. TMac is not a point guard because he is already the offense.
作者: kakueeken    時間: 2004-11-21 01:41 PM

我建議加埋 LeBron James & Ilgauskas, 他們0既個人統計唔差過yao & t-mac
作者: pillgreen    時間: 2004-11-22 01:21 PM

Duncan既位置無指明係SF定PF,而係FC,
即係話佢可以打埋中鋒。
作者: 足球王    時間: 2004-11-25 11:33 PM

奧尼爾+維迪勁
作者: zxcvbnm1980    時間: 2004-11-27 04:42 PM

The 2 Heats r wud gay this year
作者: Anonymous    時間: 2004-11-27 04:58 PM     標題: Re: 最強C+SG組合?

[quotefrom="甘國武"]現時成績:
馬刺(鄧肯+贊勞比利)45.3p+20.8r+5.8ast
熱火(奧尼爾+維迪)43.2p+14.4r+8.4ast
火箭(姚明+麥基迪)38.1p+14.3r+6.4ast
你老母最撚勁
俾人扑足十晚仲可以羅個西餵你條
仆街仔食西毛




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0