Board logo

標題: 唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎? [打印本頁]

作者: rayyipas    時間: 2007-11-7 11:13 PM     標題: 唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎?

唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎?
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-7 11:17 PM

港台e排發生咩事呀?5 w+ ~3 K' A) x
之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖7 L& `& {! b. N5 k
難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!
作者: foto188    時間: 2007-11-7 11:25 PM

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:17 PM:$ ?" l2 M; t! T$ u/ [6 |
港台e排發生咩事呀?# q& l0 _6 U2 `  \' `2 e# y" G; y: q
之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖/ F8 C9 W1 g% P/ @4 p" I
難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!
# v& w! ?( s" y( ]% R/ B
8 I' x0 L; H4 m, l特首有講過要封港台嗎?
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-7 11:36 PM

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:25 PM:+ S' S# }) S8 s1 z, s
$ [. D# W( V4 v" G
& a; s, q* r; C" k6 \, l
特首有講過要封港台嗎?
$ r/ h) f) q, B8 @$ Z
5 X, r9 L2 o1 i8 ^+ ]6 ?# R
之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題
作者: foto188    時間: 2007-11-7 11:56 PM

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:36 PM:9 Y# x+ r1 I+ Y4 v  w9 F
. @# Q3 y- R5 e4 ~6 H. ^
2 Y# g3 |0 N; e/ l; n" X$ d- s& x
之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題
* e) E8 c0 {' h' H9 a
( _2 f" O, R& B& J7 S; P
=封港台?
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-8 12:06 AM

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:56 PM:
; x- ~1 y/ E5 E' i" |- `% l, q5 ?* B( v) a# v7 F  S2 o4 Y

! P/ ~0 k6 u, o$ i  D. @=封港台?
3 F5 F1 S5 ~0 |! Z+ e如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)
作者: foto188    時間: 2007-11-8 12:08 AM

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-8 12:06 AM:
! p7 g4 \+ j5 z) I7 @. l) p" O7 z
) ?/ R5 ]* ^) ^0 D+ C5 k如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)
' D* W$ {0 N! ?

, j( k; L6 O$ v' h) q3 N9 E"如果"
* m+ ]3 J* a6 G4 h! P8 U5 t4 Q7 K, g' T/ N$ k) c& J
they way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-8 12:44 AM

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-8 12:08 AM:
- a  T" \7 p0 I0 L3 B% n& f4 s) V8 S. ~4 V! S( e9 c1 O

' @1 q/ A) J# H: X( N3 T/ v"如果"% P0 |4 B7 U: g" C( ?
5 ^, w, ~; W9 Q+ L% w3 b
they way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.
% }. ^7 k( h. {1 B2 n+ ^0 n& |' n
想不到一個吹水區變了時事評論區,還要一定100%正確的言論才能發言5 @7 N  n. h( ~/ N
本人英文欠佳,只能用中文回覆,請閣下見諒。
7 r/ i! H/ `. g* x+ @  a4 ?4 @9 [
豈不聞[空穴來風,未必無因],之前[頭條新聞]事件徐四民已點名說此節目不當了,曾特首也評論過[十大中文金曲]是否繼續,而且政府在查核港台時也發現財政賬目有問題,加上近日港台員工貪污醜聞不斷,令人們會想政府會否要再次評審港台牌照問題呢?) L: A/ Q0 b/ E5 s

6 |+ g! \" n' ?! H9 o! G: m( F當然,以上只是個人的想法意見,並不代表任何人立場。4 [3 \! m; [& M

: F  g# N# p/ w# Y[ Last edited by oz2 on 2007-11-8 at 12:46 AM ]




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0