6 D k( Y0 Y9 [2 M. Z版友如要討論事件請到其他post, 多謝認真投票. # ?1 e& f' m" Y# E x 9 y& a. ?% N8 G, r8 }" x樓主不鼓勵發佈,傳閱有問題圖片及一切違法行為.作者: ckyckk 時間: 2008-2-1 11:32 PM
完全沒看過 作者: malecoke 時間: 2008-2-2 12:43 AM
if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ 2 `' W1 f% ?) }7 A$ K . R* H3 I) U9 u5 s! Z只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟( x, y1 T0 G I
不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 6 t: y8 C0 m2 K2 V- @7 Y/ u7 w: L
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！; l B3 B1 r4 k
3 P/ F( N* F E% Y9 Q" [% a[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? ) M5 \8 W0 z$ R+ m1 [8 K% G( f
; q6 B% w8 |& z5 M% Z* P( @. V: z h( `
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片, 5 a( ~* W% q# j0 y3 c9 oand "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD"....$ W. h, M# `* b
) D* G+ i- ]4 N0 u HI can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. B, Q: b$ E! j P* b
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want.5 N" \ j( f5 I9 y7 j
Well, just my personal comments. : c" k6 v- N3 y0 W4 U' j- D) w: C8 x- f7 Q+ W
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
) M5 \8 W0 z$ R+ m1 [8 K% G( f
