if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！1 w- a- ^. c; \7 ?
1 M# {5 Y9 o1 Z( ?! ]( z只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 ; V5 ?6 ~1 x0 Y c2 d& U6 Q& ]不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照* u. {; L T# Z9 w0 \1 Z$ M- B
4 u0 p- k0 h3 _2 I9 [
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ , x3 O6 w2 C" D6 h* p; I" O% q0 W$ L0 D- d4 r
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? ( K; W1 c" b8 b7 h) A5 E5 N# z' j2 t" q' d
- `$ W0 c7 i- o( j/ @! Q% s3 `$ D( ]I have watched only several "疑似" 相片, l9 J" n7 b+ ]- B& iand "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... & u1 x; h) F- e4 k8 p$ [; S/ t/ r) K5 J4 x$ K4 R; x
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. 7 m9 C% G* M! M) }7 F0 H5 W2 NOn the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want.* s' h5 _: d) A
Well, just my personal comments. ! _* n9 K" q! P: z0 W9 E ) Y2 [$ a* ?5 VHv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
