Originally posted by Triangel at 2008-2-5 01:32 AM:# }. S" ]* C3 w0 @9 J+ F
8 I+ B. t$ H5 K) ~! r, g
oz2, Great Topic) B; _( b3 W2 q7 ^: V. v* r1 o1 {
我幫你張呢個主題: (1)Move 去吹水版? & (2) 轉做加分題好冇?
Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 01:33 AM:
: o& a' Q. }1 }. ?2 J9 Y
那麼方案(2),ok?
Originally posted by Triangel at 2008-2-5 01:37 AM:* x7 ], n" Q6 X# |& C! V! m
, R! E1 C2 A, Y( ]
可以帶出討論氣氛并且有討點的,我都會加分
Ok?
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2008-2-5 01:59 AM:
你係唔係有D搞亂左啊!
上面發表嘅文章[不好]AND[錯]係有連貫性架!2 t V, d/ k! g/ H! j
你嘅舉例根本就亂晒龍
Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 02:11 AM:
- Z8 J: w0 A; G' B4 x9 x
可能我的例子未必是好好,而且每件事... 6 `' a$ f! O, S: V7 q" M
4 q& X9 d8 o9 L
[棺材]多數人認為是[不好]的東西,但它不是一件[錯]的東西; {6 Y/ e/ F, N5 Q( ]
即使把[棺材]被放在一些不恰當地方,也是行為上的[錯],不是[棺材]的[錯]。
Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 02:11:/ K$ z" [9 S- E3 |* \8 `8 F" X
0 \. \" Q- a) j# B+ O6 [
可能我的例子未必是好好,而且每件事...
Originally posted by SWK at 2008-2-5 02:20 AM:
你啲舉例好似有啲"格硬理" 咁唔係你既錯 只係你舉例得不好
Originally posted by Triangel at 2008-2-5 02:27:
! p( U6 A; z3 I; R2 d
應該係:【格硬黎】, 唔係: [格硬理]
Originally posted by SWK at 2008-2-5 02:20 AM:, ~% o+ V# z4 t" _+ L% W+ R
" C1 N' U& V& S) I" e* Q( [2 V) ~$ D
你啲舉例好似有啲"格硬理" 咁唔係你既錯 只係你舉例得不好
Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 02:42 AM:
$ s4 h% e, i; q8 r6 x' Z! ]+ F8 |
多謝你見意,也令到我又有另一見解:
- @' k, z/ s4 T
不希望因為此帖而令到會員之間產生罵戰5 ?* g( [0 w% ~
...
Originally posted by Triangel at 2008-2-5 02:47 AM:
放心,我相信 SWK姐姐唔係敢既意義, right?
Originally posted by s20021601 at 2008-2-5 09:10 AM:
我就覺得「不好」同「錯」呢個關係......
哈哈..講到連我自己都唔係幾明tim...3 r+ C7 h. @$ E$ {+ G5 V
還望大家見諒) }' M+ ~ P. a# c) F" |
Originally posted by yeung hiu he at 2008-2-5 09:47 AM:8 q& R; r% P g' _0 R# N
其實我覺得(不好) 同 (錯), 每次都連...
Originally posted by alanfcw at 2008-2-5 01:35 PM:
不好同錯 2樣野黎 我覺得
w, U9 { x1 [( n6 Z# Z' c
媽媽見我做得唔好既野未必打你,如做功課呀3 z, M% O n2 C) c4 H5 S- H
/ o4 d* w. n, a! L! j r3 s5 c" x
但係錯既野佢一定會打你,如你同人打架
歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |