Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
3 }( q( c& \3 [4 u! U- z; r# |5 b0 m
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.. _! S) y3 R2 H
8 N- {5 x9 Q) `( F
對打人者只作出警告了事.: D; N, U! B- q6 m8 m4 ^  Y* N

. c2 c" u1 o& g9 I  `# R) Q3 C差人涉嫌包庇打人者." X0 @5 E; D# r

, y9 q) \" B2 _) }( b5 Shttp://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ+ z$ @  o0 p& }, T+ I' B
7 z. @9 T3 C9 l; d& W
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
5 _/ k- `! E+ G" A0 x- j! B) Z* A; k7 s) N. u5 k$ n) M
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
' h9 O& {* Z9 C$ b+ I/ @9 a
4 _3 z- ^& \) E( b8 f8 }: q" S  }6 {2 e
$ N& z* j7 y* ^
個人認為.....
# q0 D$ U; p- J. ?6 w% @+ R. F1 k9 G% ]  b/ C) G: @: E! _% Q
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
3 \' Y% ~4 m3 M* I
8 o8 H" S9 b$ q7 `6 c好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
* U; i2 x" y) f$ u
6 X* T* ^, ^- A, z5 F$ C
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
; F/ i% |* S- y+ ^do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?' z! z' f$ }1 @
are you the witness of the incident?
! P) b; t) z( R3 L! a. w7 Y, Wif not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..3 ^" L+ [/ Q1 `+ Y$ J
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".5 q# b; Z( v, e8 f
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
9 G+ a- ]% |- `. s: i" G/ }have u studied law or anything rela...
. R- z/ f% S' G5 G' g( S7 [, d8 q( v$ P1 d7 C: s
黑字 : 係轉貼
  c& L; m" p4 `+ a8 C$ L# [/ n: C9 x) Q" K: n; n) U
紅字 : 個人感想$ R5 m1 O" V9 x( U$ m! J

" d/ ]7 u; y! }ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
8 ^7 R% }* t( p8 J/ O& ait's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
2 V4 S! ]/ f( H% xbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
2 G% f4 t' {0 j( C* vjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..; m0 C' E& w. A' \
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為0 o, q% ~' ?- h: \4 ~
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...1 g0 |! J/ H2 f: e' M9 c
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得: k0 h8 E% {9 F
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
, G7 \* T+ b' o; O2 }, c5 Q/ O以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說- q& `9 R9 c$ n2 T1 J
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
! c$ F0 z% {, r- N9 @2 G& v該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
" t/ u* ~5 d( Z" J, p- Z: U0 \請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
2 I) _0 T& b! f由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0