Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
6 b% d! I$ {9 H: L' U" [/ x
' k( V' G4 E+ p" w: b毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
) a( a8 |) i" C- M1 `6 r! x3 L7 j/ p$ E8 U" c9 q% v
對打人者只作出警告了事.
8 D# z, t5 ?* Y! c3 l
$ y) s' F8 u2 S差人涉嫌包庇打人者.2 r- u. i  R/ h. u! F( |
2 {, P# ^2 ]. [) S
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
9 }9 w3 g7 P9 ^; o0 ~( Y8 p! W; A6 n1 h; \5 i0 W
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
: j  B6 z0 @% q- i. P) N: J5 {  f0 _5 `7 Z4 k$ [# y! u
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.: z$ X, Y& J6 T5 M
. }$ o6 `5 t" Z( h
, U! t& T, _2 w4 ~
- G$ W$ V. T+ Z2 m/ t% ^$ K2 u
個人認為.....
8 y/ ~- ^5 m3 F8 r. X; s- o4 |- g, i% E4 g( `
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
% k  |$ F1 U" \
% _/ J8 \0 C* p" f$ x好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
' c. `# J4 ~) B4 [* D; Y. c5 v
# C6 _* h  k4 j4 E' Z
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
7 ^& C% E7 v$ W% O  u: p4 W: G$ O' Udo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?
" I& a/ [6 s& s. F; b# Iare you the witness of the incident?' H% Q  C! ?7 `& F! W+ `9 D; M4 h
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
& f* \: p$ v% `  rand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".! @& P$ O( o" v1 M
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:; |9 r7 b& J' S; P& x" D, M
have u studied law or anything rela...
0 t6 V2 j) q7 v) T6 K; g

( i, l, E  N- G5 y. W黑字 : 係轉貼, ]2 |/ B* _. ~4 V

1 f4 t9 S3 ]- ~/ ?紅字 : 個人感想
1 B4 k. z8 D$ Q$ y0 w- K) j  X( T$ j3 Z
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
+ K! I+ u* K! [it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.8 Z: K: s/ i+ B7 s
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
: M) f+ w. {: n% u0 A4 Gjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..
2 O9 C' G% A$ ^1 Y/ H! X" u$ ogood luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為' C2 k* W" ^) {) L' n/ z
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...6 @8 g0 W* N0 }0 M% n* h
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
! m0 d' \9 x# G; z' l2 s( a如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間# l" {% M+ x; v' z: {/ |
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說- E' I  {4 {8 x; ?. r& f
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
: Y( L' u7 o: R! |8 T該警員的處理手法絕對洽當+ h, ?1 n5 k: t  X, T
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x! l$ O3 |4 E) r; R4 a  k! @$ s* T; E
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0