香港法例有等如無.5 f0 p0 A% T* Q7 y
/ o3 Q+ u/ @" `$ Z2 c
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動., q' q9 y6 w) e: S5 ?, K
3 R: u5 i8 m& {% I( S+ M8 n; u對打人者只作出警告了事. / `1 f. s& V: r- g* E" Y7 _9 Y' N z, Y
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.2 K h# q2 t- h4 a$ b
% \! M9 q2 \$ M3 z http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ ( g. S$ J# }, G * e5 X7 n/ x9 ~/ i, c而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.& j$ x+ d5 O4 m7 j; N/ H
" q; a4 W1 `/ K! e2 {7 A6 r5 L
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事. 3 A+ Q, s4 o# l, d' \7 H & ^; ]9 U& j! _, Z- u3 \. p4 x 7 G. U4 O7 S$ d4 r3 T $ }1 J% N7 B. W5 h9 F+ B o個人認為..... 4 K# z- C. p9 A$ j0 L+ o% f4 V: q' C/ C2 R
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)% T( X, O! \5 D) R$ j7 S5 X# P
( @, S, B, M8 u' }+ f$ O
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野..... ; s' _! Q j! a, w9 \1 v' W* Z ~- w
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM
have u studied law or anything related to legal studies? # N. ?5 V+ e& i! S$ c2 @, s5 _% w* gdo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"? 4 `2 ]2 U; v e- U. v: o$ Ware you the witness of the incident? 6 B4 M, p; n: {if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..3 P! i; f! a" F5 R! i* M, Y% k
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".: u4 _( r- W) ]/ M7 z
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"作者: jen01二世 時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM
Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:7 \! ] V* z( t/ E+ ]3 X3 z3 y7 I% H8 w
have u studied law or anything rela...
* Z0 D: Q7 B9 X+ L3 c0 m0 @' x6 n) o7 e2 n. ~# i6 T/ T8 U0 k
黑字 : 係轉貼 9 s$ I; G" Z: I% D" A; W/ @1 W, z H
紅字 : 個人感想 3 v6 n+ w1 A! k3 C j [% t2 G$ n6 g. i: U% c
ok ??作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM
dont have to ask for my approval u/ Q1 j W* [7 ~$ I
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not. - Z0 t& r( S. C' l' H$ B5 Gbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. 7 A% [0 F" q$ e' K- h7 r" S A
just becareful even if the words arent your own words..* q, R/ s5 N8 J1 b( W
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.作者: lastwing 時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM
我係甘認為 5 `) n: b) _# O. Z- C' q5 [! R/ K該警員明顯地想息事寧人... " V5 i# ]: J/ f5 D! V4 @唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得! m. I9 O& d( {3 | V- v+ _; r
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間( b+ m! y1 H5 b
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說( \% u/ a9 C: J. A/ y
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事' N) |' Y3 S. m4 s
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當 , e, I5 A+ Y1 I* c# \: u請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x 9 f K# y0 D, `: C( K2 b由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道