Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.  D6 I: w# M, s0 O; y1 D* w% x
% I: e& B3 v, v: O7 f
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
6 O4 n/ `" ]4 i! I. f0 X4 R$ c5 @
$ t/ M2 e- l0 u對打人者只作出警告了事." W, M9 R0 ?6 `% w+ s

7 F5 c2 {( V) l; y9 x$ w1 H差人涉嫌包庇打人者.* o. F2 [( l4 i3 |! ]7 ~8 X$ O

4 j$ |) }" ]4 D! d# F) vhttp://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ: D4 p5 ?( D( |
+ h8 I& D0 E9 D
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.- B, a# l0 b% I+ q$ n
& `0 i1 h5 v* `$ [+ ]& U
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.. _1 c* E6 [0 r7 ~4 T' W

2 Z' Y, Y. g0 @- K' O
( Q1 ]5 q/ U# I7 Y1 z  @! c# L
, c2 ^4 h" Y: K- Z$ v& v* v個人認為.....+ T3 C5 ^. D# J+ ?: H* Z, j  n

  M9 R* S8 j7 \岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番), t, o  h+ j' u, h

% s7 A; A% A2 R' c好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
1 w9 y* K' {9 Q1 r* F8 T
  a* G" x" i1 X* y
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?( _" `3 c7 ]' B! A6 ^
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?
* l, H" u3 @# q, Ware you the witness of the incident?
9 X7 p  _  e3 K; s9 D/ S9 Y, s; hif not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
5 [  s7 E5 j7 F  aand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
, _. _$ Q8 @. B: k! m' I+ Yotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:' w4 w% Y' [# |, c
have u studied law or anything rela...
! E0 A3 D6 @2 z( ]& S9 `& H7 h0 h! {) I$ X" ?' i
黑字 : 係轉貼
2 c0 D+ x3 e6 e/ s: h$ n/ V7 p: F( M  K7 e+ t
紅字 : 個人感想8 S! s4 [/ Z5 O- \1 Q

* o! v& y. q7 U2 C. k( gok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
. j$ u+ m: ^. \, l! nit's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
( A. Q/ w7 M) qbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
0 B2 N) S1 k1 m. C5 mjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..# r' J. g& R# B  ~
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
7 ]7 I3 H! _% ]該警員明顯地想息事寧人...4 l0 Y# L, z. h: Q+ ^- }
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
$ r% P  s% _5 h0 A如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間2 t; g- h' j0 y# o3 C$ p
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說: s7 A% u' L  s
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事, B. R; j3 @, ?- @: |8 ]
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
1 n) q9 n5 C& E- y/ N7 m2 U1 a請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x3 a, F3 O7 F$ I0 {% O
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0