Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
4 k4 r$ I0 v1 z- l% s
  b8 x' G% n. X) K1 g! Z/ E' y4 l毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.' @: `4 j9 X( p. S5 Z8 `

/ k7 |5 ^: h8 Y5 V, Q對打人者只作出警告了事.
3 o+ g' f0 m* {( I  T" y$ V7 Y- j  T0 c3 Y
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.( ?: X7 A! G2 u. |3 r
5 e0 ^6 T' W: f& F8 M8 `
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ+ o- M9 U2 ~, k( ]* i/ p# ^- K

2 F6 y' z, S% s) Y而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.6 V( ?0 {' M" V
2 }* j) p  X3 N+ @
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.8 ~3 L9 _! u& o5 y: Q1 m
: V4 A! k! F+ b0 P0 Y# j0 T6 y
$ I; b) F: w! m( @. s2 _7 ]3 k

' T2 y0 M1 I, K個人認為.....
4 @, C/ z. V0 F$ [6 Q# y3 ?+ p, F/ s* o& n. J( @
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
; M+ t) W/ k- D. ]8 i+ m9 H: K& Y7 O0 `( `3 C
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

& W  X9 h, N/ V0 K  e
3 i9 P* ]! x' z( }! N7 \) e7 T5 @[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
2 J2 h6 _/ O- n! pdo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?3 \' T, [) J- \
are you the witness of the incident?
6 b6 n: ~, c: X  H2 Sif not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
* Z8 B  F# s, S2 kand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
% P, `( A6 c' E5 ootherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
$ v% ]" z' {% S2 thave u studied law or anything rela...
9 G# ?- b/ y/ `% O/ i' e
/ T7 H" L! i- s- ]4 m9 Z# X
黑字 : 係轉貼! A6 N- j; |/ `3 l8 r
, b+ E: [8 r4 {
紅字 : 個人感想2 w7 w9 k$ }* ?1 l7 e* @

/ N3 h# f3 P/ b% bok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval 9 u3 s* p4 u0 L0 w: o
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
  A& Y  d& U' [, wbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
- b3 r0 S  R  h- w. U0 ~& Ljust becareful even if the words arent your own words..
# J3 V7 R( B1 u) [4 V. Qgood luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為3 L8 P: Q2 ]" O% C
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
) @) K* f, ~* s# q' t6 @" ?  Q唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得/ A! S8 g% x9 j  c
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
) {; J. |6 I" ]3 l* H以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說+ O! }1 F0 A3 Y1 t2 v  J& q+ J  m
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
+ \$ i2 e" J; ^, ]/ U. ]該警員的處理手法絕對洽當. q# s& F3 x* ]% b
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
% q2 {( S) G) Z: m0 k' P由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0