Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.: y+ k) k9 F. X1 Q; J9 ]

" r- X5 I  Q) [" G毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
3 H1 V& ^( c$ j, w# H2 }  \3 v3 n% }5 N
對打人者只作出警告了事.
9 K3 y: y9 q4 J
% p! t& A+ u6 D2 G差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
# [; k/ s- u* L, t+ \, u; X2 A3 c; A# U% _" z- Q4 L) w6 b
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
7 H' T/ v/ J+ }" p( |  ~" o/ @6 R
7 q; S- U0 w% u) u而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
' B" K& t8 m9 ?8 y* I
# S6 i7 [4 p; D1 u" ^! u4 g3 D3 m請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.+ F6 T3 x8 D: h8 d2 x
: ]+ X! n: I* X
6 d1 u, E0 O/ p) x: Y

* A( @4 I0 U; q6 P個人認為.....
' f4 g5 s4 X8 F" ~& E) Y! X9 F! k8 L
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
& [; @2 W% j: J
5 c5 ^! y7 n& F1 ]好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

7 F5 z! i7 ?2 c% h. g4 B! D! C# D8 _5 i1 J
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
1 n+ f6 `9 I7 v* r! t4 `do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?
) ]. x5 h( z& M* X' o' p) q% kare you the witness of the incident?2 i4 l) I. |9 k
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
' l4 N3 Q. a* ~and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
8 \, F' {" M' _3 ?otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:  Y! Y0 \' h. S& [* W3 r
have u studied law or anything rela...
1 O5 i" D! a4 k8 h2 [: z
3 C# |& l; G: h4 u- Q' a
黑字 : 係轉貼9 o1 H$ J& A8 i$ X# `7 o
7 M1 y* m$ y) p$ f5 V
紅字 : 個人感想
' b& E1 F+ k7 N8 M3 P+ v" n' U1 o* _$ X! x" j& ?( b0 y3 O) K
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval + N! @/ Z8 ^! {/ e# f0 Q+ w0 r8 v
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.6 i  @5 c! ^% q/ N' h$ R* I
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
% }2 O  q* u; Y6 T/ c( S' Z" gjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..
0 p  L- i# G4 C( s$ d+ egood luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
7 C' n5 T5 |( Q! j+ D該警員明顯地想息事寧人...4 h( q. E+ ]; V9 v8 n: ~" j; Z
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得8 v1 i, F6 u' a+ U1 g! `; k* K
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
+ }/ z4 o% p% L5 L" D以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說% Y) ^9 Z0 K; n$ u
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
) B5 }3 o# j, K5 J+ ?: ~" Q7 k該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
- X% C7 _  l" C. |8 [! o: j$ I2 Q+ t請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x$ \8 i& l8 l( X
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0