Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
+ [( i5 B. |  I' c
- ^- _0 o1 o7 ?* c. c毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
0 y, Z9 A6 p+ x; G5 t: P7 f% c4 i5 {& ?5 v: W
對打人者只作出警告了事.
% M: z4 y1 K' k* y+ E! H
# s* a* c% y( @2 \& r, }& @差人涉嫌包庇打人者., {0 W- k8 h/ E9 y8 h3 u  j7 ~5 K

( W2 j' Q( d7 q0 j: lhttp://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
; C/ F  q6 t0 P  f! ~: F% X6 S/ w9 G# K. ~: h& R) J
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
9 V# f* I- Z% l0 W
* t; I7 |1 Q, d, w  d& D請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.' s$ F9 Z  E; R* {9 E" w

( m) n7 L) @6 N5 M' q+ f( Z7 k" s  |

! S+ b  D2 A% O, q' o' s2 \個人認為.....
5 ]/ N& _5 S6 ^3 I9 k9 ~
0 z9 g. c3 e4 K+ L岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
) e1 u7 e1 H1 K8 |
, \+ u$ e2 l; A* K# J好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

9 c" M: L) Y9 r+ S; z& ~% [9 C6 i* {0 _% V( f! q1 z
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?4 b3 t: L+ P8 H  s* L6 d# W( v
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?8 J: Y5 O1 X. j
are you the witness of the incident?
& _+ f" h% L' M1 G( w( i. Gif not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..: A, e8 ]  {4 A4 G
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
7 H) ^/ E$ B0 n0 b) m. F0 |otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
5 ^5 O0 z) v& x4 g* Phave u studied law or anything rela...
- i/ |) l8 i) x4 m( r! r4 `

- ]$ X+ ~; q8 Z7 N; R) ?黑字 : 係轉貼) g0 k! z- i# Y5 W/ R$ f

: T5 Y" h( n" D+ v9 F紅字 : 個人感想
- T+ [/ P) c6 }: q% [& x) _7 ^7 p2 N9 l% t& `
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
# C; W/ [( b; Y4 ~it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
9 R. c+ W& |+ ?btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. 1 i# n) l, Z, g
just becareful even if the words arent your own words..
3 D4 K/ C5 r: D4 [+ }% \- ~! ugood luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為8 v7 F- K6 B' c0 P4 ]/ q$ X
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
- r; M$ ]$ I  b- M% c1 p唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得5 Q, i: U2 V, ~
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
5 D4 F7 j8 e* d  U3 `) a% B以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
- U+ H/ j9 j# |# h" Q; t- ~我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
( \. P+ `5 N) C該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
) B( c0 N" r1 z: B請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x" v: \6 U% a3 i5 x& b, Q# l8 b
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0