Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
+ _) Z) \, ]6 y4 P
2 e  b/ A  s5 a0 x9 X毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
! j0 y+ P) K" u  G, \! e- N; M) K4 Z* U2 L+ O) g0 K4 o9 g# ]
對打人者只作出警告了事.; }; A1 x! z4 e$ i  `3 H
9 `: I! q8 n  s$ b
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.0 p" y% d  T2 ]
& v( h& w2 A% t
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ2 ^7 G6 t7 Q" H  `7 D: I7 k
/ H* D4 b& C. r. m+ W
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
" _$ s7 h, g# [0 o8 M* Q' H) A. F$ g
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
4 n! F9 ^% q2 J# R( M3 m/ N
) M4 X8 J# l7 Z: |, _+ Q
9 J; [; ~3 L/ u8 b$ P' b/ u8 k
6 l4 q' q- v7 m% G) V- i8 V& ^個人認為.....
; I+ o* r1 z5 ]6 k0 _+ y$ N4 Z$ d6 x( f- X8 U9 U# z
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番), ?' ?# ~/ r$ {+ m% D; a

- d" E& _- O  V. M# O! G好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
& U( ~8 y$ W3 w. ]1 c8 M2 ~, w

' Y. r4 Z7 @! K4 E" w[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
; Y* m2 C2 V* ~1 v% P. {( Rdo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?7 G- e8 m; h; Q5 v9 @
are you the witness of the incident?! X: O* @/ Y: G2 R
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
+ g  j6 F7 Z* ]0 y5 n2 sand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
: B. @6 V6 n( _7 ]% xotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:: n1 y$ b/ _0 r. w* S
have u studied law or anything rela...
& g/ g  m* d2 e! J
# y0 r, ]8 w8 G
黑字 : 係轉貼6 ]. p% c4 {' ~" E0 u7 A
6 ^8 k& ^% c5 `# p, |
紅字 : 個人感想
- e* S  J- l* \
! u0 \6 S4 @+ b$ j0 p/ J+ [ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval 6 d$ i0 \) b3 }3 _* F1 Y, W, @% c
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
, q- a6 g1 r1 m" pbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
5 U0 N: F. r1 ujust becareful even if the words arent your own words..' N5 F* ~7 _. u! D+ P
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為# o  Q4 M, u6 x! V
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...: X  o' r" y  _- [
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
4 v. G+ o) D3 _' G# I如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間! G: ]' \0 a! f
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
) a; M( Y8 i( z' `$ D$ H3 A+ Z6 @2 B+ h我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事  v9 Z* f( G  J! Q
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
4 C1 F1 I% X$ E" F- j請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
0 [7 C. L; p8 g$ c) X  A# g由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0