香港法例有等如無.4 q" e8 @/ J* c3 v( R2 T* U V" ]6 w
9 m0 {4 P3 h0 x: r1 v* V* v1 _. A
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動. $ y1 E# \6 v: _$ C4 | 5 e7 d/ g( r, K3 E! |: c. i對打人者只作出警告了事. 3 ]% {& Y9 L0 z" D7 k. [/ b2 R: i4 t* V% v+ N6 I
差人涉嫌包庇打人者. " O6 v1 U( L) G7 [/ G) c; N' y- y2 p9 I, l( W3 n. A http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ 4 d. E- l$ C5 V( V7 `; ^. X; s" _/ L" B; x" q3 u# Y
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯. ' v& W. i! V; B' E8 z6 i) z; }: }4 C# M/ W. t
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事. 6 U) \, P' Z2 m" R7 E6 F0 m 8 B" F2 b# A$ Q8 X, Z! [" ~ " {& q3 D( A* U; X( x8 Z) N: i/ l5 b* ]9 w1 c
個人認為..... a R5 r& q! N+ y9 e) Q" J
0 m! n, W0 T' b3 r' G
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番) ' S) M9 Y! }# _" s6 Q2 m: s) h9 G' h. h! a( A: b$ l1 n
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野..... - D) N7 `6 H' Z7 {0 ^+ W* S* @, `' T8 s! Y
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM
have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?! p8 z8 V/ l! V1 T& j
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"? / ?, E- H/ ^9 v0 {- Uare you the witness of the incident?: X# l' A) ^' i$ T
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..6 \( v& e4 T- z0 l3 }0 a
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打". $ w$ J1 ~9 b" W" a- s) dotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"作者: jen01二世 時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM
Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:- F3 s: s F$ [# U9 ~: j* l5 _
have u studied law or anything rela...
; Y# u7 ?, L4 f( U / N |8 C5 y- e8 u7 S) V, Y- q黑字 : 係轉貼 + N* M9 |6 o7 r) r: Y9 ~2 R 2 `2 {/ Z9 t0 J紅字 : 個人感想( I7 ~1 H% @1 I1 g n! Y9 C" \
: }6 m4 @- r. s- ]7 K+ e9 L/ c
ok ??作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM
dont have to ask for my approval 5 a. l3 z3 Q2 P3 }' m5 d
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.* f- u3 C( C: W- C0 r# z' F
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. ; ~& ]0 H. I. qjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..8 V" m- f; F; v2 c
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.作者: lastwing 時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM
我係甘認為5 s; c+ \+ H! j U9 _2 [3 r Y/ @
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...( R& [( V" }: z4 t. f. `9 m6 {$ A, k
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得 * Q* ?2 _8 |5 V7 V如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間4 P$ L2 ?, ^, z( D3 J, q
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說 : R% M" R! j% ~3 ]8 m, y# W8 F我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事 q8 Q; F5 y8 X/ c
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當4 p+ c6 E$ p, C* T$ v$ J
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x ( R5 n6 b' m7 y由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道