娛樂滿紛 26FUN - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世 時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM 標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
4 N+ x% I/ O: |+ N, v2 b7 H
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.( C4 e5 Q/ J( {) a
+ D5 Y; z3 T8 ~9 H: d$ I1 z
對打人者只作出警告了事.3 X7 \. d! m/ V1 ^$ }

差人涉嫌包庇打人者.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ5 d7 A/ y7 n0 n5 a( ?# V
+ z0 I9 |7 y+ G$ U4 `. ~8 I
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.3 I# Q' ^; R& D' @3 A
0 z# a3 i# s* g/ c u, z2 q, I
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
4 w& F. g$ J; [, i; Z5 K

9 N$ U7 g" Q) ]6 x
個人認為.....

岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)

好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....1 r! F1 f" E) m* c; Q

[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]

作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?. _2 x, p. r( U0 c& W( t
are you the witness of the incident?# d g9 a4 b! X |; l8 L. b" i0 }
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打"." X4 H2 `, ^$ T) `# s
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"

作者: jen01二世 時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
) J+ q$ m+ f" J6 u" yhave u studied law or anything rela...

$ ]3 t0 q) K m$ I% z& u, b
黑字 : 係轉貼

紅字 : 個人感想
# |( J& q$ }2 i+ h- x# O: o
ok ??

作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval

it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not. q$ l- B, C" O
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
just becareful even if the words arent your own words... k9 k6 m+ W( @$ u5 y: j
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.

作者: lastwing 時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得+ B4 h$ r0 D+ x4 v6 J) J% F
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事: H1 s8 A( I! ~& Q- f Y
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當8 b( F; m, o0 B0 r% ]) n
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道

歡迎光臨娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/)