Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.5 w( o4 I2 K7 X6 P: X

1 }% {& m& W/ f# @7 n# l毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
, w9 ]( U7 Q: n# T8 {  s% W- p8 h
對打人者只作出警告了事.
5 \- {/ I2 \1 \5 s7 g: r& `- s' X
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.4 m$ P5 C# e$ Z0 p) \# X3 e* E7 M* u

/ h; i  n4 ^3 C( a2 V* }8 Yhttp://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
  N& g; g2 g/ b; }: ^  K  X9 b+ C% W$ N2 I$ ^, ^& l" ^
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
9 g  w9 W( c5 K% N" a) W% x5 i
; q  I; Z8 t$ R4 t請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.; J' p9 [% Y8 }$ z' u

' Z) ]  v: j* c2 i: ?3 F9 m$ M0 R* J" _6 w$ X0 ?$ W% s& R* Q

0 I- Q3 F3 o7 |個人認為.....% o6 H5 k! p, E% M
; S8 [+ p# F4 \8 ^1 M
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
1 _% _% e' S  f, s5 |- u$ b: O; W* v2 K# z
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
! J" Q$ T% ]5 V* b
+ c; G+ Q) ~& P
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
8 k( u! D6 k6 l1 c0 `2 Ndo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?8 _) D, n- Y& J" d
are you the witness of the incident?. g" B& G& n, z2 \$ ]
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
- O6 v3 j  `1 N% d: v2 Yand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".; n4 v" s$ T  d1 [1 n4 G
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:% l( D, k/ b" b$ V
have u studied law or anything rela...
( v2 K  e8 G( i" d: x, z3 @; M  B, O
' E( }+ a4 x- Q  H4 O  w黑字 : 係轉貼
+ ]. w) ~$ r+ f3 n/ m( A- X7 R4 b+ r$ |7 X
紅字 : 個人感想9 S" c$ `9 Y* p# [; b! f+ B& [
3 O& j$ G% f( c8 Y" ?8 s
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval ( I, `* M7 g9 g' q9 [, N
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
0 f% A" c6 c; A( v9 Rbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
' Q- l# w8 o4 m: {* n! `8 gjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..9 q4 b! p% u- I7 l
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為5 {! }1 M! Z2 `& D* l
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
4 N1 u& j$ K+ }唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得6 V4 A( b3 Y3 w6 S; [$ k
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
2 ?& s* K, _/ c8 g* u8 n0 g% @以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說4 z; p' _$ j9 p+ s( X: L9 l
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
) x% P& I) u8 z- c* J( q該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
) f& z% L  e( h+ u% l4 K' R請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
% |" \( X6 k" _" n5 c由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0