Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.8 [. I1 b$ I. b

0 W+ u4 g2 T4 c! |( K. D毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動./ g( f* M6 C( y: ^

2 M, V7 e" t  N" f  N  ]) s對打人者只作出警告了事.
5 w! n! P; A/ y6 H) E5 o8 y( e* h& A9 K
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.) P5 r8 Z2 d5 w* b( o8 y  Y

: ?5 t' ]1 A) f1 o3 j* H% [http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ. q6 t0 m* k7 N; g. w: d" |
# x& }; v/ x9 ^# h4 ]
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
6 A( y7 W0 l3 L8 R) D# ?) t. G2 _5 c9 J8 z
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.( I( u0 x" T) l

% X/ s9 L7 z1 z+ D) y$ y" s0 O1 B3 n2 |# E. @
) ?. y* u( T1 T& f2 {$ v1 ^' O
個人認為.....
6 `, S: B. g0 Y
; M2 a( R0 A( K& r岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番), u  k0 F4 o* K; |  M/ z. m
5 @$ o7 v) M! `; ^
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
: [7 Z/ D4 ]7 d0 h9 C+ K

8 y, Q: B3 F6 k# {7 H[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?- r+ I2 M# s. y: {) O3 [1 s
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?
- e' f$ x% h, b$ ^( `are you the witness of the incident?" G+ k% j+ K7 r. g
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..7 v, k* v' Q* G7 F
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".; ~# G& C" O, b$ W
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:' w! f7 c5 B; @$ T6 `6 q- A
have u studied law or anything rela...
8 \2 f4 M6 X, J6 a
, v3 g: C) c) y/ ?
黑字 : 係轉貼5 U  t+ K& Q( w7 x
: O' |7 W" h! |, l
紅字 : 個人感想
  o% b9 n1 V( c: [  p. w
2 w) F$ a& n" q2 n# M8 Wok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval ( r8 b# G1 H- p3 L* v: Q8 D& T  |
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
2 N' w8 l- a. k# ]* wbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
- q6 f0 O* W' Pjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..
- H' M* B. b+ G3 i9 m5 [# Vgood luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
: T% l1 [% v: \: ~1 t該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
$ B. a' w6 s" A" _0 H1 j4 |6 H唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得7 F' ]: }: @% E! l1 A
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間: k1 d- I- N% e+ L% e$ |% ]
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
) A5 G1 B& g. E我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事: M' I7 O* a8 T. I- a
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
7 R- D0 `0 X- s6 x( ~  \請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
7 C$ ]* ?% ^- R5 g由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0