Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.! j1 U% g1 q& c

# k6 @4 H+ l9 r6 Q0 L: p7 C毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
8 [5 y& @7 X1 |; W% Z# S/ p3 l' j2 j8 \5 t' ~2 k
對打人者只作出警告了事.% R6 E# }/ n* g, |; |

+ M( b/ F/ R% L7 @差人涉嫌包庇打人者.2 Z; f3 t# j! b4 D

! z) m/ t/ g2 o2 `* Y8 }http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ0 g2 E& Q# f* n! c) M4 `: F
3 C2 K. w8 R: s( @& K* {% n- F' q
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
: {) H) n# A5 X5 {1 R6 a. I+ m7 \7 C4 T3 G0 t3 p+ W+ p
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
: q7 k' i3 z1 E# g8 J: f% _1 e) @! `4 ]
# k+ {  Z; w; S: Q% x) H' i
+ T0 {; C3 l- H3 l! M, i& l3 d5 b8 M
個人認為.....% D" d% F8 }6 \  j" O
( `+ a1 J7 s3 @) N) o  D
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)5 O. Z& b5 \0 X  h+ n* s  C% G5 ~1 _
* o# r1 G5 k% ^( c
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

; r* w+ T9 v7 k0 x7 z/ D2 i/ M# I# U  r
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
7 b! C# u# y2 V9 M" I* fdo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?* @+ \' N, A/ |, @( ~
are you the witness of the incident?
6 b+ ]9 \, x" F' x# o+ E9 oif not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..% a: Z. Y. ^7 F4 t
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".) R! L3 Y  H& S- l6 o
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:  n! h: C% R" N2 _. W
have u studied law or anything rela...
: D( j# O( x" ~  }

5 K$ j0 h# c& p0 v$ S黑字 : 係轉貼9 r& E5 k  ~$ c. q
" b2 u1 v( _2 c8 D( C
紅字 : 個人感想
/ d# x2 d# `$ k2 x
: k, ~: [" C+ |( `5 [ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
! X# M3 u, t; kit's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
: M# s4 h5 S$ z  J4 {btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
+ ^3 N$ j7 g7 l7 d; ljust becareful even if the words arent your own words... ^2 d+ f) R$ A/ q
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
. U, z* q; l* y: A) X! l( V) W該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
0 M' r' k. }9 @6 K7 {0 y  {唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
$ B; o1 B3 z$ I1 r如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
' y1 i7 K* x5 C9 ]: @* j) _1 T以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說2 A. t, }# S: k8 j0 S. G
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事( R" K' [: I6 W9 N5 z4 g
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當. `# E9 `6 k: I5 Q9 \% _/ S) r; V
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x, C0 ]* y* ?3 H' R0 O, V; T+ X9 x
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0