Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
& \! A9 ^; e% c* X  S1 S6 C% e6 c( z: I! L( M: b" _
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.+ T0 x9 V& }! [" Y
7 B  i. Q* Y8 e5 L" {! @
對打人者只作出警告了事.7 R* _2 E" P" v
( q4 K# A$ M! A
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
$ f3 n7 o* }+ z5 g1 l+ M7 o, Y8 {" }) f9 Z8 I0 Y+ M/ }+ d
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ- H( k) y9 g: R3 j' v

# l0 o6 z7 a9 I6 q: ^" S, ^而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
" O8 r8 M9 q. D: B) B5 t3 i' i% R! W/ v
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
# |8 g1 y: j, G# H) _2 Y5 K, g  I' a' D$ R: \
6 i7 N5 M% D* W0 p* A

% t; D( a5 P* ?, P' I" i個人認為.....
* C- t3 j& |4 T0 r9 t' C# N% j/ V' q3 V8 I9 ^
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
& C' Q# U& Q( m, U& p5 V; Y3 x1 [8 S  G
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
0 R$ Q# R% p( K/ Z% h
/ x6 u, M+ Q1 f* y
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?: \7 F9 V! H6 h( m' v! B0 O
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?8 {* x3 P$ C! G8 u
are you the witness of the incident?
& t! u2 ?2 C3 N; ?4 l, `" ]5 Tif not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
- T$ G* }, a% u9 O9 w$ {+ eand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".- N. G3 ]2 B) z8 D$ A! G2 G
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
$ h  Z; O. f/ s6 }have u studied law or anything rela...
/ d: M3 _$ b" ?. n9 q3 C4 S  {
- o4 }# `! }1 h* D
黑字 : 係轉貼
/ T0 ]+ c. i2 E
, e; N. b) K# v: M' u紅字 : 個人感想
3 i9 |4 {' f* }+ |6 _" q
2 l7 s; z/ C% g* ?' c1 x6 m8 Yok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
. M. v6 t9 {/ Uit's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
' ?2 B' y1 e+ `7 ]9 }$ g, tbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. . H; f# N) M; e8 G9 a1 ^
just becareful even if the words arent your own words..
2 o% p/ O+ I4 [0 _1 n8 @good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
# i: X9 ?& F3 K8 {該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
- }$ Q( f; h1 W' i唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得! A% X/ p+ |0 n+ O  S+ B2 w
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
. [5 ?! |4 ]* w$ C, Q- w; I以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說1 p- ?# \# X9 w4 ?1 o% N
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
* Q2 {4 x) M, j該警員的處理手法絕對洽當% ~' y2 q, v- Q) I
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
2 ?3 j0 g8 ~. v% v! ~3 r由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0