Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.3 I# J1 ?+ ]! y1 U- ^: A4 m2 Q

5 X$ s2 R# L! e毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.* d* W$ U- [! @6 b8 U

0 J( J* C' U& e對打人者只作出警告了事.% ?% ]- H7 F: c. k
+ |& S( [# ^0 a# c
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
7 [5 P8 F( ^2 e7 {0 a) v: \, t3 t: u3 E9 C- z& {, C
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
# N4 C9 v" w: e+ Q
+ |2 s; i; ~! v8 A3 D9 _而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
9 N* F! s) X8 x8 m8 c9 R3 B$ |+ i
' l7 q4 K% d6 ]  e1 F0 M5 }請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
' M. Z9 J/ k5 p3 X- _8 Y& s) Z8 o. w! s
9 }# g* O  n' z

; z% u: [2 V0 }$ G: i% \4 J個人認為.....! b. Z' Y3 ^, E% g* J1 C

7 X2 i2 F. U2 u; B& r3 c岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)* h! O3 H, J% q( u, Z; H* B7 A" k

: l4 l  k* m; m- l. @% q好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
# @! U; ?) U. S1 b* o/ h2 H9 U

( p- v; G2 P" \. w& s; e' q[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?% q/ W6 X" m1 b$ M( @
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?
, c1 a8 o' W5 h, h, bare you the witness of the incident?, E. h" V6 y- d& i" b
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..0 }# {) X$ M' q
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
; S) Z  p  ~/ Qotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:$ T" f. i8 Y' K$ r/ S- E5 Y3 u
have u studied law or anything rela...
7 Y3 W' [& p% z( A
" g% A) e1 U+ U6 x
黑字 : 係轉貼
; m! ?5 ]; m& ~& D  B$ [# k
; L4 J' T3 Q* U* x" S5 w, @紅字 : 個人感想
3 g: b7 g$ |6 m+ M
$ s0 ?3 Q1 f2 F5 r' T# T$ pok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
  W# [% H" [" f: I  S% hit's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
$ ?* L& N( w  N9 q& d/ q7 Obtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. 0 W8 }/ _3 p# p( c
just becareful even if the words arent your own words..6 R1 u  x8 S+ e3 A
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為. r) [6 }: N+ K4 B: ]4 t
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
& D' ~& y" S3 n唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
# q" `5 z9 l1 ?2 L如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間9 R1 J( n6 o% S+ V" p! C
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說% @) L8 T  T/ w- ?
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事$ I; ~0 m, W5 s2 U* I
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
4 |8 w% Q: Q# T! D4 K請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x- A$ b% H. x4 A. p; M2 i( n
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0