香港法例有等如無. # D: ~ t0 t$ g4 S% M s; k4 N: H2 o3 o7 V. r, Z# i0 N! o, ?毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.+ ?# z( c$ t9 }# }9 ?, C# `
6 q5 G3 k p3 z- e6 L8 g9 l
對打人者只作出警告了事. $ E6 @ P( |" Q% b; ]) z1 w / o; v3 Q( Y8 D w$ F1 h& q5 l4 z差人涉嫌包庇打人者.9 M# V+ c+ t8 R; `
/ ]6 t, x% Q) R3 D" Y http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ 5 T! _5 R1 M. C ) E% l0 P; R! ?2 d- [# o而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯. 1 U" ?: h/ J ]. F- l: A7 W( v: h( T! u& _, t1 `: n1 g1 W3 C
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.* ]6 G7 K3 O0 ]' i7 ^/ w
5 B/ ?9 s+ X2 {' i: N: A
x( L: c( s: M1 `; K
3 t: M5 n2 z) F
個人認為.....) u1 L' I3 o/ B0 _
8 R6 s; v. j9 A, m7 x0 J N) l/ f
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番) 5 N4 G' L5 p& \) e1 g. c8 V2 {4 \' W! J5 n% w8 Q& ?! R
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....% ~% J; e( e4 _6 M% D$ t* a; S2 Y* C
" I( C% W$ r) R8 V0 z
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM
have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?. F: _ D4 [8 r% h
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?% S$ S. y; J& ~ q
are you the witness of the incident? & k8 ?) ?: ?$ b6 T9 wif not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue.." u- K( J$ l. O5 N5 w9 k
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打". + S% w, Z; Z/ z l. |9 ^otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"作者: jen01二世 時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM
Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:3 B$ V/ [( f1 b- k
have u studied law or anything rela...
: A6 u3 s: {( F " }( h( L5 C, M) u! b; m黑字 : 係轉貼- Q! ?: G; Q6 l9 {% `
" H2 h: O# @% C0 h- t- K
紅字 : 個人感想- }( M2 y: y, ?# T
; P6 W4 S3 i7 `2 I. w
ok ??作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM
dont have to ask for my approval + H' l2 i) M" z; s# {) B" Jit's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.7 W- f7 u2 J. B9 U; e; z
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. 6 Y( {: g8 H( ^just becareful even if the words arent your own words.. ' f9 ~0 G7 {/ E N O" ]! ygood luck and hope you could last long in this world.作者: lastwing 時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM
我係甘認為6 G! H) c6 n! g" W) M
該警員明顯地想息事寧人... 9 ~$ \% K5 O K& @: G唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得 - r* Y! `& s6 a8 [# f+ y如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間% J% K) f4 f% v
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說 . P' w4 O, W6 }( }! A, V$ \2 I我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事. O. X* U2 \" d* a
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當2 J- P9 _& R1 m& N9 V1 _% g
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x, M& `! I' w% X0 r9 q+ [
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道