Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
0 H+ w+ I; R' E4 G3 _
! @6 A/ W; b! {' }毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.1 Y* Q7 ]1 A: ]6 O/ H8 z( |

- ^4 _7 f5 m5 k8 Q! _% S5 N7 |; x對打人者只作出警告了事.0 E7 ~+ {7 Y& G" G

# K  ]! Y7 Y+ t差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
+ r) Y  }! [3 s2 \  C/ [3 s+ D) w- K% ]
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ5 [; i, O3 |7 b1 g- n9 R
8 }9 S  L: x, Y$ d
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
& h6 v9 N0 I- V  M1 f) G) J3 F/ Q; Y( i% v: {& I# }
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.2 i) P0 D, m* e
- c1 B, H5 u+ o; D$ g# b
0 P* q- @. k" W2 M1 l8 i

7 Z: G) i2 \' ^) c7 f. \個人認為.....) x9 p1 \- V- q' `, a, s5 T
8 H4 j9 \& w, U7 f! L* b0 R/ E! ]
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
7 g! \; h( n3 \9 K. O$ p/ o8 v- K# }! e
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
) e$ n( \/ V7 i4 A# F
: p8 Q; ^  w7 s( x# c
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?9 o' `* j3 S) D- f3 n  ~
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?
, @7 C- ~3 W: N" }' Q" s( \! jare you the witness of the incident?4 f& N. U( ?% `
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
# U, c$ X/ }+ v/ Aand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
/ h8 K3 W6 p# \6 G* b. d; Q  Rotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:5 p- }, t: p. v1 h: {0 ^( e
have u studied law or anything rela...
! @& y5 f0 X0 s( r% B6 T8 A+ z9 X6 p1 m  y/ X1 N( m1 E" f
黑字 : 係轉貼
; W5 U0 \: @/ T, v2 e
4 k$ n" G6 C3 C紅字 : 個人感想
8 b! V* w$ b; Q6 {$ O1 ~$ o9 V9 Q1 @! ?/ \* N
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
. c" m8 M" R7 A% d! kit's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.# |6 v) b  k, l, O
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
3 m5 N7 Q6 t  \! p7 Ijust becareful even if the words arent your own words..' U9 r+ P. O4 Q) P+ Y
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
- f; F4 I4 N- J. `- x2 a該警員明顯地想息事寧人...* T  O* r6 N6 m/ a* z6 h: D- d
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得4 `0 ]: Q7 B/ e2 h) C" R
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間; F! E8 l9 c' A. O' B' x7 D
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說2 ]$ P( E+ F& j1 D: c% K: p+ m% U$ K
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
9 _/ o/ i' k) O  j該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
  F' D6 _, \# Z* s7 z$ E# ~' K請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x3 Q' u6 N9 g1 y' u4 j5 k. _
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0