Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
; _1 y2 a0 m  D6 d
3 K  l" Y( A( ]( l6 G2 w毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
8 ~, J- j8 j9 F; F6 y4 a) [4 J8 L" j6 n' E* t/ b$ L. Z1 m
對打人者只作出警告了事.
& L+ F6 M- q, t1 `% \
. u; H# L4 \. G4 s7 o3 n差人涉嫌包庇打人者.2 {" S. S- T/ w$ O

" R3 I6 S1 f) R  F1 i- ihttp://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ& W( r9 N* M2 E" ?7 l
5 r6 p6 d' \; ~) A
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.0 s3 y6 J( B& G+ \/ }: P0 r

: ~' l; `" f3 f  C6 s7 N* m請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
9 Y# Y! x- H3 J- W5 Y% E
+ y6 w" Z. O  ^/ W/ A& b3 W; [/ j
/ N1 Y8 m9 K2 r4 e# b. j: C) l/ O
個人認為.....3 v4 ~' c/ v* p+ |

  D3 v# P5 \* e6 }2 ?岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)* s' ~, @: F! v" R
7 [# n0 J5 b7 N/ w+ B/ `! Y! j
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

, e3 J, w- ]# Z7 x: h& V  F& @
( @! A9 {( C9 N: T" w) {8 O. L[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?5 }  C( H% `. ~& m( R
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?( F+ z1 ?6 b5 u4 s
are you the witness of the incident?+ S/ y3 ?6 ]& k* o
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
0 B2 F8 g1 ?, u7 X1 R. |and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打"./ Q5 T2 ^: a+ S* H7 c6 C" G' q
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
' k3 ~$ N3 d3 x7 g& o' ^have u studied law or anything rela...
" d( _, X* f% m- a

! c3 q" U2 `( _9 B黑字 : 係轉貼
# F1 `" f% U6 n7 e( Z. S; }9 G7 P! R, \6 n
紅字 : 個人感想' @4 R9 ?+ y7 }6 }0 r  F6 J6 z
7 u* }8 l* C. q5 B/ y* w
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval * Z( q( W9 W2 J0 s7 S
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not." [# I1 g' l1 R& v1 I
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
4 v, h# W8 b$ I# hjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..7 w6 l- Q- m. i
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為" v! L: E( d( Z. C( v! ~
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
( U) z. K' ]+ g4 J5 F8 J唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
" `( u- ~% J4 B7 Z( n/ m" B0 f. b如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
% O  Q/ M/ z3 u( `6 Z; }以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
# W- b, c7 E* e: ^1 ^) k, {9 u/ r我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
% D  i! A4 V. ~" u; m該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
* U5 C: v" b0 ?請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
. B& v0 B& ]8 q6 _4 f, a" t由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0