Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.' k- w/ X% f# ~+ j! r

2 g" v* B7 P; _9 b毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
, ?/ {4 `" m! ?5 Z
: `  s. i; l* D8 ?4 {3 m1 G7 B對打人者只作出警告了事.
* v* ?7 s9 `5 v  o& `* i7 e8 ~( A3 r+ V  u
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.0 T! Y; U. U. o# u/ z! X
- ]$ E! @' s+ H9 S! }) z2 j
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ0 |7 _3 o1 O: t! X

0 E4 {: y/ E6 Y' |6 B$ B而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.( R; w4 \- [. P6 q- h: }
' j! J$ ^; S3 m4 ~$ F& m8 P
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
/ V- I0 m3 M* y& z( Y; H7 D* Y% W# E, h0 O  C1 ?5 d

4 ^% N6 |0 {+ }' O
1 Q+ E; X/ S0 q  R0 d個人認為.....
6 r+ p  ~4 l  S% z; Q
6 t- t8 }1 p7 }岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)& d% R, v7 j9 c' @6 D3 m. b& [2 z

% M3 }: ^, w8 f: w6 ~$ Z2 k好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
7 ?: I5 C- {: k4 J- q) ~; c

4 s4 B) f% k8 y1 P, W- l: [$ O) a[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?# Q4 W) B/ {5 K' T, `0 C
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?+ V: C" v* b, j
are you the witness of the incident?5 {- a4 n2 J! P) F3 K, y
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..% [1 o1 U& y2 l1 X
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
, k4 B6 q! e0 T$ Gotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
0 l) G$ V- _; ~* Hhave u studied law or anything rela...
. C; j: V# X4 Q! V( `2 p7 g; e. Y% v2 X" j# Z
黑字 : 係轉貼3 O+ b$ G) k  _) {0 I$ g  \4 w

  m% I* L1 G+ ]紅字 : 個人感想
/ ?# K0 c' p- M! z( L
% `3 [5 f. B' L9 l% O3 xok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval % a% I. k& p- F
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.: ~) f& |/ K7 J/ O2 Z
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. $ D  D' V; `4 M$ h& c
just becareful even if the words arent your own words..* }% E% D7 w- G" ~
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
4 u9 X* R# ]/ o% R' {) U該警員明顯地想息事寧人...' b$ o+ Q- U$ b6 s) b' V: U
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得5 E$ L2 v# E5 m& [- E
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
6 @% @+ G1 B5 y7 A6 P以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
- r7 e- G) w5 v4 A% W我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事4 s! y# w0 h) k4 R2 o; @
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
7 E4 q- w$ C; H" q請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
) C7 H, H& C) e6 q- [  [5 N. [由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0