Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
' W( ^& P, u4 E$ y1 m2 n* q% L. t) s9 q1 I# p0 R+ L  T; n
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
( |* v2 o: j- w+ `1 X1 z2 @5 L7 S2 u! D' ]* t8 n0 w
對打人者只作出警告了事.
( y  I2 h. a5 T/ f! \2 w* e4 a" d% v& O5 c3 O
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
& |; y7 o: n! ~: u2 ?
  m% {# I8 l- ]http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
! P& g* D4 c& l: k0 i; R& n2 s0 \: b) B
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
0 j7 o5 j8 ]& t% H; A5 [, a8 a/ D* }. s% ]4 d- k
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
- s: T$ P1 e; {9 [* ~3 M3 ^
: M3 s9 ]; s8 Y$ O: Z$ Z; z- c% T" C( n; R7 A" ?
5 f0 G( c! n7 D* {
個人認為.....
/ z7 J: J6 j8 \7 e$ D5 m9 N! z: b, y" y
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
* a) C4 U1 M: T% c5 L7 x  c+ }4 @1 r+ r
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
3 z( M. W6 p5 Q/ y0 N

7 s: n, u7 A5 h& G6 t/ z" `" Y- `' l[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
; V( h2 ^5 p" o( [do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?1 c2 \7 `6 s8 f2 T! c
are you the witness of the incident?! V2 a5 O. |& l6 {0 G( x
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
0 r% I# D& H0 Land better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".  w* @. s) w5 [7 R: o; B6 v
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
3 t$ A8 D9 P. G3 b: Ehave u studied law or anything rela...
0 ]! }. H, k( B' R
, a6 C& e' z  [4 M5 y! x黑字 : 係轉貼
) j' f) r5 V3 a$ `3 v0 `4 Z) o/ V& K
紅字 : 個人感想# W0 d+ q3 t+ ~6 }
3 s; L  R6 P: k2 J
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval $ g2 U( G! {0 b" f/ ]9 ]0 \
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.! L/ I( H3 N3 N0 [& T
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. " E3 i# M/ A* k7 L& r
just becareful even if the words arent your own words..
, u) q1 P' ]7 j( d" Q/ g) I( {good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
( W7 X% x: p4 H該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
, F9 F! @  E' ]4 B- u唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
1 h  e% O9 Y: J9 C; O# u1 I如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
/ N. }: a7 _* \  ^% Q/ t2 y8 z1 r/ d以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說: k6 n/ D1 \+ I! D! {
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
' t' o# `+ N6 e8 ]9 W  J% v該警員的處理手法絕對洽當8 ^5 y+ _6 F; _5 I1 a' c, p
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
0 i- J5 r! ^% n& y由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0