Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
/ N% `  `! d! a2 {' e2 ~! M" ^( j" L2 [# ?" V
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.$ ^5 r4 f3 ~+ L+ E$ j: ~8 z
# L' R' ?7 p% V( G  [
對打人者只作出警告了事.
: b. C: y" \% a! v( l- _  F- E# k1 M- a$ h$ I$ [+ Q
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
, j* l7 b4 Q5 `
8 Y* p( A) ?# p& n: }- _- Ahttp://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ9 }4 O1 q4 Y$ q( k& K8 T

! R9 @! A! |( E. ~而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
. Y2 @+ c7 k! `6 N6 ]) y6 k
; E, I5 ]6 Q% W" y& T% P  D6 o- _$ b4 m請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
- g* c  p' E3 _% G: O; f5 {- b. a2 ^- H

1 I3 g# m+ m; n/ I7 u  i/ h, u5 K% k1 r2 X
個人認為.....
/ b5 T2 T, e* J
$ [" s; u* S* q& p  [% w岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)" [' _2 K; o2 V. _6 d
: @! k1 {1 d+ e" u
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
+ o' y4 M9 k% m; ^+ s  n

; k6 @/ E6 o( v  Y[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
: y7 c" b8 _$ D- H  z3 Z6 }1 p6 n6 S0 Vdo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?
0 w* b4 q# _& u1 W7 \9 Care you the witness of the incident?' I6 X) `. o3 t" T1 |
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
  l( q8 I5 u6 Jand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
( ^4 h, s# C4 Y  z6 J3 Votherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:; C9 H4 y4 C4 B
have u studied law or anything rela...
+ x8 ]5 ^9 s2 T

/ f6 h0 H, Y+ m2 L5 g黑字 : 係轉貼& M7 O* I8 [3 C% z2 d7 `
4 r2 j6 o% d: I8 S! X% j
紅字 : 個人感想1 Z- ~3 E3 T9 m7 h4 j3 C- Q
. ^/ E: b# \! L0 ~9 E
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
. T& k* |( ?0 y! K0 w- P* Cit's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
4 I: Q$ O& r0 J2 {) t5 A) Gbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
" `2 N; u# R2 v; _% Bjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..+ T% g5 M( z( l5 F% N
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
  }$ [# k/ P0 G) c- ?該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
% x6 Q) u3 D8 S# n$ f; k" _# @唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
4 r. F8 }: y3 }: E/ |: J如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間" O% h0 N2 }$ r5 E+ q7 s
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說" u% L% D2 R. c* a8 j: y
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事6 ^+ o9 r2 u7 q" C3 A
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當8 F; x" X0 i- A9 F# X, M
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x* p5 Y: r* d8 K5 |& H
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0