Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
& a" T! @/ }% Q4 s0 |3 j9 ]" i7 q- E8 O) i4 N
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
/ e( c% S5 `7 S/ f7 I4 }) x! C; }% M. B
對打人者只作出警告了事.
- N" j% _8 i% a
- u3 Q  R- g1 s% e差人涉嫌包庇打人者.$ _6 Z& ^% ~+ I5 x9 z  s2 f& L

7 X# j7 _" X8 p9 |% Hhttp://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ7 d/ p4 I# b  v3 P2 O6 o7 k
( r: g+ }/ o' l* v% u# l
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.1 ]" U+ i& l. P0 t2 t, b1 r8 |
# Z% @! g& y$ |2 e
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事., Q2 ^, A2 P* A, n3 Q

! A6 V+ W7 o2 ~& H* P. a* r$ G% Y. U
6 U) u3 m4 g$ B0 X* V6 J* W$ Z: x
# B3 G- {  y  K) c個人認為.....
% |' T2 W) _( W6 v, h1 p  Z, N8 ^
1 o" M; e3 d5 j. u) F, H岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)  P9 h7 e; w7 K0 k2 s
4 A( a' B3 b7 m" G* X5 y2 \: X
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

# @! Y1 m  H3 e9 o3 y  g$ Z& @& o! O) v( O! T! Q, y
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
$ I: ?8 X: m6 y* n# e4 p8 }3 ^do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?6 y- o6 V6 U- \% A
are you the witness of the incident?
# Z; @7 N' b& [% uif not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..; t' O0 Y3 }* N- ]  H( X2 ?8 Y+ J
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".. \0 s7 g; @: y4 z
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:: T; M9 p3 T+ U" g7 x# u
have u studied law or anything rela...
! v' @4 B$ G/ ?/ Z
# D5 n! i9 ?3 u
黑字 : 係轉貼2 f- l% s% b+ ?0 W0 E

" C2 m2 r, J2 v6 J5 c3 R紅字 : 個人感想
! x2 E- \& C6 m5 f: \) o- t
) R/ K9 B) P4 Vok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval 7 _. W$ z4 P" W! g
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.' \5 O. x4 U5 u+ o. |
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
0 e) t. K3 a8 E  sjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..# ^6 [/ Q( i0 D' a
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
1 e5 {, b" M) y該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
- X, C6 h+ ?! E6 [+ f唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
2 m9 \; f, m7 D, J& u如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間* x2 z+ o4 u- t4 e% @, W0 q
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
8 y- X9 F! j$ t我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
& }. c# e" m+ u# u該警員的處理手法絕對洽當: C, x& o/ v$ I2 A1 ~3 l' P
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
( e3 c9 V9 v2 p; }由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0