Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.1 _- F+ Z% [- ~8 r3 u

# Y, }$ f2 M7 y! ]2 E毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
; U0 N" d: M6 Y, R
* q6 r. e. }8 V" [) ?對打人者只作出警告了事.3 g; ~# a! U0 a. L

& B2 _  L7 _& @差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
8 t) o& E6 @- K4 m7 g. `8 p5 M& K& b7 z0 W7 A% D7 H: A  z8 k2 @
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ# ^; f  P  V4 g

% s1 \: x9 G0 U3 r2 \" L9 j而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.- r+ D* l  o! v5 S3 W* [, I& B

9 x* J/ J3 m" `6 V請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
2 J: k( y$ t# L1 U8 B' o- r, B+ J; N/ l+ i0 y5 ^

3 d- D& z0 g, p, W- {1 W( R, s
5 t* H, g% R; u- G/ t* i* O5 O個人認為.....: L; z7 B$ `) D6 f
3 u( q7 t+ r" l$ x
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
4 U6 v3 R1 C1 i! ^8 s
: w" T6 |" k3 R2 A+ U" ~# ?好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

" p) x- `6 [! W2 X; d/ c# r
: T- ~7 J! O  t[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
8 d% |4 M8 E0 p0 q' G# `do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?
; t6 p3 r% f9 gare you the witness of the incident?- ?. L$ i" L6 `& I  I
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue.., O% O* W) t; x/ \1 r
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".$ ]+ E# P  H; R' Z. X
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
! j7 N7 Z" e7 z( Ahave u studied law or anything rela...
8 d8 N3 c6 }# e7 j
4 [3 P- j+ M: i* a+ M黑字 : 係轉貼7 ?0 l4 x8 g, C$ y; {4 M
( X  ]- f% d, Z& U' Q  v
紅字 : 個人感想, V) u' j! l5 v9 u1 ?# I
/ z9 ?& f" @9 K# V2 r2 i0 v5 A
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval # _2 z1 i7 b( w' ?
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
; D$ X. U* x: L5 D; L3 n7 R! Dbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
) B/ y/ ~& q( pjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..
- t$ Y* G7 ^+ m6 G( d3 ?% ~' Igood luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為5 O2 d/ y3 i& I
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
# \+ L+ X% e: W9 _唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
$ W$ Z7 d4 O! E& p, ^8 T" h如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
! w8 j% K9 g% s. x# H" F. D以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
, W& W1 a6 g( _) K& W我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事. u$ c" ]. l7 V
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當( w" m& h; X, O( V1 p) x7 |
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x* k5 q) f2 \, Z' T5 ^# m! N
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0