香港法例有等如無. % @# B; S" ]2 @* y6 w" O# n' p3 W: O
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.) ?5 T6 p$ {- A0 W% I/ B+ K
! F$ {/ ]. @( m- G: ~對打人者只作出警告了事.% q+ Q! k# w: P4 L& z: c' L
& o7 R3 |+ u/ o' F4 E' C差人涉嫌包庇打人者. ) M" |0 E( A K$ A I# H# B / D- \* P0 n* u/ phttp://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ2 z; u+ y! ]0 S7 i& Z
+ g+ x- E0 \/ v2 l
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯. , e! s: A/ O3 j# s) K0 R/ t 3 V' W9 }- P" F; l7 l; Z請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.) y m( O0 N9 f8 [6 }; ?" s
& p$ J( N8 [% J. O 2 A5 @6 c+ i8 Q- n 9 r- m( D: l- `$ Y個人認為..... ' E7 q& C% X5 x" Y! I9 I" F6 D) n! ~+ k* g; o# o; k5 t* I
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)' J: h) F) J( g
' v2 o# N |0 U好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野..... % H t, o2 @6 H) \# ?4 u9 q3 ?* q' c$ y: y* Q
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM
have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?3 e. I8 }4 j: I) b
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"? : d( o* I- ]! `5 G& d1 _are you the witness of the incident?; W3 ^8 T6 i4 \5 h7 o* f5 V! f
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..% G4 X$ ^. O2 s; H' R( a8 h
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".% H3 D- `- U# W g: U' p% G$ C
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"作者: jen01二世 時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM
Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM: . V" N+ U" j0 j3 s+ Thave u studied law or anything rela...
: b- E7 @" w- P9 [( n( f- o
6 i- ?2 K9 q5 R& i4 Z* h, L% M& K
黑字 : 係轉貼 $ k H1 Y O9 C1 O8 w/ ]6 y 9 o$ W8 d6 l$ y' A. v8 d# H* \% g紅字 : 個人感想9 x2 x* r( M/ f; L% f" w2 d- H9 X
) {4 j. N$ w3 u' b- j+ W1 Z
ok ??作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM
dont have to ask for my approval : X2 n, W( K/ o% M4 j+ K
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not. , _) t( F* ]$ s4 @( S* |( Xbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. # A4 W, Z4 b$ e R4 Q
just becareful even if the words arent your own words..: x- H1 w( j3 a$ j
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.作者: lastwing 時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM
我係甘認為/ ]5 p9 T! r- ~9 l' l& x; W
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...1 p9 a$ y, d9 ?. d" k9 c# e
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得 & N/ W1 p; y/ O* L6 v如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間 8 Y! X. z3 N. `2 F以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說" N2 R9 ~, r' G8 S: ?
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事: f3 [. M; W+ y, ]+ z( A
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當' Z g# G% Y. x! Z" S
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x 4 g# k% w7 Z, p4 a3 {9 `9 t6 c由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道