Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
1 b# c) G  ]8 R  G9 S$ C7 p9 A! c$ A* y4 z& T7 V6 l
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
/ g5 e& D- Z; q* w$ T1 V- A- B) Q1 Y& U4 J, J' E
對打人者只作出警告了事.
: \' R# f6 X: {2 O0 Z5 n( x, O) \2 [7 A( l
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
: \+ w+ B* U6 s$ I2 M4 w! D# W# l- G
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
& y/ P  J  o$ Y" b! E5 O( H  g8 M: L2 `: E* n7 K
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
. s5 x% Y6 |3 o. C* }% U4 s0 h0 i/ c6 i
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.4 W" y: K4 }5 e4 W8 C1 P, y0 x
1 C8 @% t( _; h. X' _+ |8 _
/ O1 l: ^# f; n

$ [: k, ]/ F$ |6 s* ^7 _! k5 B個人認為.....
- I( F3 [+ Z9 ?5 r0 J+ [; t
# Q, [; c! {; N9 B0 r) F岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
% W( g3 ~) |! w( ^
9 }; [/ _9 T" `2 G4 _0 ^好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

. T' [4 v) c: x8 x! ]  b  P' C8 Y- B& i3 v$ p& Y
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?* Y  Z! ?) n7 n
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?% u4 `" Z6 c$ k
are you the witness of the incident?
5 u+ C  F4 R- p/ @+ ]if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..$ v- F2 _5 `2 O) l4 V2 N# a
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打"./ [3 b2 j0 b) Y/ N! n+ |
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
+ Y5 P! A* E& D2 B. o* Fhave u studied law or anything rela...
% N$ |# X; b" B! x9 v0 z5 R& y8 Z; e! l4 x; ^5 G, ^
黑字 : 係轉貼2 ]- {  g4 ~+ {8 A* N- ]5 x
& a$ e) K6 K# g
紅字 : 個人感想
, X; W8 m- w, C7 J* j& Q
! R! U" ]# j4 cok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
: f& k) l  Y; b$ ?it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
: K0 g: C* z; m8 |6 pbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
( z) j( h2 h1 f) Njust becareful even if the words arent your own words..
: V& R  K! e1 T* Ngood luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為1 m* f1 n1 T$ d/ E
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
" [: d. {9 h0 U; w, I5 Y9 N唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得# E3 G" V9 }; u7 O! ^: [! `6 o) ~- C
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間; u  a' H) i! K; v3 S# S" H2 U
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
" ^, N" u; u6 H: Q. r  ~我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事+ B- m! ]" x1 S4 E7 ~4 X8 o3 G' t
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
  ?" G% T, a' u+ O. }請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
6 M# l5 Q- m4 {由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0