Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
  X$ f; S' V, Z: n2 d1 ^# m
" [# S: G) z) W7 `' g毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
) @! ]) Z5 f. k, o/ E1 {+ ^/ o  B# Q% }* j  M. c
對打人者只作出警告了事.
, a/ N. O& D; R- M- N/ t" P% }2 v
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.4 z; |5 h8 a: A; }  n! d
3 e" Y: z1 m  ~3 G7 d
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ3 W' o& |! e; \) f) g

; {, c) x0 A9 j8 N/ P; l而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.5 s/ d( b  g/ {/ f$ G
% k. a4 N6 H; S) O* c* J) A0 M
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
) s, K4 x9 H8 e+ S( S' N4 E" y' M7 b

1 W4 f8 Y- e0 n; G4 c/ I' |" H
' H) x! ]' ^' ^/ b: @( h  L: {% h個人認為.....
% H6 R. L6 m2 |- J6 H* d
: g1 u- z% h4 ?4 O岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番). ~1 A( m; q$ d  v+ O. I3 ?" v1 }( |
, p  L- D- [# L, W4 q. @( ?4 x' l
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
7 e: y, k- B, Y  t4 N0 b

# D$ ^( S$ A4 N[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?; U0 M. q# m. U, V% d# ]
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?2 ?6 N+ X, n: V9 k8 }* k' N
are you the witness of the incident?. l1 S3 m* y4 q; t+ v
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue../ s" L8 b4 f* Z; i
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
; r" t$ C0 t8 {9 ~3 Zotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
( W$ ~$ `  y# K# Zhave u studied law or anything rela...
8 C4 M; B' {" j8 D6 r4 A/ {* d2 P' F6 D& n# O
黑字 : 係轉貼
& P* J; ~  h8 a0 D. z( i( C: l
8 E# u2 t/ g6 R& `紅字 : 個人感想
0 k9 l' y/ S7 k$ b# s- e
, A/ J$ b  u6 S1 uok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval 9 r+ L/ `% n  x1 V
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not." O4 m5 y' ~; }6 B
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. . b* @9 [8 D6 `+ P+ M
just becareful even if the words arent your own words.., x& s9 j8 Q8 y/ E
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為" \/ y  V; y1 f  l! L
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...5 [. T- ?# k9 R. Z, x; ~
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
( L( f% o7 ~7 u% N8 W如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
$ s; [: i  _8 B0 o2 t& b3 Q以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說- X# u' _0 v2 H% Q7 K6 i) i
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
6 Q  r6 J6 E8 Y1 k+ G7 [) s& y該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
5 M3 t! s2 e6 q* q5 ]請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
$ p# |( f9 J8 N$ m1 J9 c+ Z. g由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0