+ U$ {( p% D1 O) T$ A而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.! v* T1 A+ }& P( j; P' ~
; ^5 }( S8 q# L- v; t* x
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事. ; s5 ~3 P3 w- H! v# b1 B( \ ( E* P/ ]' l& X( A) Y 1 I f; P& l- Y' G% ^: {2 D9 L2 _0 l6 p2 `! {. q
個人認為..... " e9 Z* e6 _, l- \, M, y: F ( {" {( b" U. F0 X) v岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)" p5 w9 V7 x+ j2 g. G4 e
$ R. A/ t3 z0 Z y) O+ o
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野..... 3 P6 c' c( u1 M. B x: D$ l$ }0 \" A
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM
have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?- J- N' M; w( E' x
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?0 S1 ^/ _ ^ _" O4 B8 c4 N: Z# b
are you the witness of the incident?% }2 q: p, f q, ?5 v5 \9 Q7 C
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue.. $ A+ V/ d K7 {; T2 Oand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打". / I/ a4 V8 x4 e% c7 yotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"作者: jen01二世 時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM
Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:' T$ T7 J2 I2 \
have u studied law or anything rela...
1 W2 r, ]9 t$ l0 M2 m3 Q6 w
/ K" L3 `1 }4 x; w+ s, F H
黑字 : 係轉貼 / B* c9 e4 a. v0 A, l q) u: E. _- w n& F0 I5 R4 L- f紅字 : 個人感想 3 | g1 \6 F9 b. q2 [" }) Q# C5 I. G5 ]. @* n! M6 x
ok ??作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM
dont have to ask for my approval . A! b' o1 V# f0 T- xit's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not. 8 R K. g( ?! v+ c( ^btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. ; K' l. y" R# \, E+ ]just becareful even if the words arent your own words.. 1 [) c! p# `5 b# X2 sgood luck and hope you could last long in this world.作者: lastwing 時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM
我係甘認為 & A5 z% V: U) k2 ?" s該警員明顯地想息事寧人... : ^, z4 P! o+ K0 e$ R4 ^唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得 ) G- M9 `, u. L# k# W如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間 3 F0 `9 x: W1 t0 D/ o以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說7 k Z p+ K( D+ _) H
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事, s6 I5 Q; K6 T1 r b
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當* \8 Z9 E4 b$ P/ P
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x- G( V$ E1 _/ }, q0 k. R
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道