Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.) o, U( q7 \+ c4 n/ ?

+ M/ k( H) j. h7 ?2 _+ [毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
4 ^1 G& f% X2 S1 u  M$ u
( d# \: @5 B2 o8 ]對打人者只作出警告了事.
& Z' ^1 |: |! H6 _+ `4 f
: T6 P2 c# {+ u2 p" G差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
. A1 ~) b  e  l2 {4 P
. f4 g2 I/ H1 k. q, p' Ihttp://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ5 |6 B* A+ O! H" f! c+ A4 r0 P

+ @3 O  ?# N9 M/ a而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.4 n% Y  L9 A. z2 [0 a4 H% C
  c) _7 j" |7 W: u3 D
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.2 |  `+ t2 V$ ^3 p: m

2 h2 ~1 ]/ K% ~, B
4 v" Q4 S. o/ j; m2 |
4 Q! D4 ]# P9 m, ^' @5 ]0 }5 L- k: t個人認為.....& p  |: E. @6 T$ u- e
& \: F3 T# |) a% Q! k9 c
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)! g& Q6 k7 r+ v7 f8 i
1 y) \- q# L8 e; m, T0 t
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

: h, z& f$ ]! O6 Y- ?5 e5 w8 I' a9 l  Q1 w& N5 q
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?5 ?+ p) a; y  a; N- W
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?
! x' G5 k& j1 G6 z4 iare you the witness of the incident?
( x; B) V8 |9 K$ Zif not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
  g# v$ V+ L- rand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
' ?: }+ P2 ^$ Kotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:! u; `0 o; Y1 a; |5 U2 t
have u studied law or anything rela...
9 J- z: K4 n) z9 E7 S3 C. w6 @% _* S0 C  w- t2 j
黑字 : 係轉貼' k) U/ t: \+ T% u* d* _
! w. l* _/ P3 O: d
紅字 : 個人感想, N/ ]4 J4 T1 Y5 M, G. A4 z
8 K  V2 A" O" l( N4 e; t
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval ( I3 H8 O3 j* w# c: V. I5 i
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.0 g, e( k5 n, f* O
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
4 R+ p: O( s/ x( l  J! {just becareful even if the words arent your own words..
% q# `( _! E( a7 V5 L2 B$ hgood luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為( b. R5 R0 j/ D) b/ E# @9 I
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...# u" `4 B- E; v  N" h
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
; K; S' [' m; o  Q; _如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
- n# R  W( e0 q以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說; c# ], k: a- ?
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事. U" S6 `' V0 j
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當; O8 h& ?1 O. O# c# R: O
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x6 i# b( q4 t& \% e" v2 H2 |1 t
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0