Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.7 T' i" b4 L  \
  a3 p; X" W9 J! W- N; o1 T
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.& R" w( C  C8 O- X

& R# r: |6 m7 Y# }2 r+ `* h! o對打人者只作出警告了事.
& R; W/ O' k0 h2 k) W
4 y; V; |* ]" g; Q$ H# C; Y1 y差人涉嫌包庇打人者.5 ~# H) g, F- [
4 ~- l' n4 g. x7 l
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ3 g7 Q- y6 f" |

4 T' |% y0 C. _: h而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.$ S& ]. ~2 ?1 E; o6 @3 f

2 O4 G! m$ u9 S- x. m請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事." z& \: q! h# N5 |4 t
4 h! I' r) M2 R2 U# M5 c, G
/ `" r6 Y3 v% U/ J/ r  h

1 K" {0 Q3 ]) g! W& p; C. \個人認為.....
( i' F  l  [: U0 O: u1 N3 W1 I" N; X0 N, k
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)3 D: e$ M) L+ C9 z

; f# d/ `5 J! M- {7 W* K好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

: I& x  `0 t- d2 E' ?2 N3 ]3 `* [7 ^# ^( }2 h6 E8 X: v
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?/ s! f  u4 W' n( g
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?" d( `8 F; ^# h6 Q$ @: k  c, q/ o
are you the witness of the incident?
( p+ z3 @- w6 n6 a  E; `1 }if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
4 H" d, M: e0 M0 b# nand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".  B4 ^9 @5 t8 A  B  G2 O
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
1 p5 H  o. c  }# m  whave u studied law or anything rela...
0 n' V" s1 e/ c9 {6 j, `7 Y+ _- o" `& \. c7 X9 o0 e0 ^
黑字 : 係轉貼
$ b- i0 f8 E( ?/ d5 W$ P% h: J' ^. k3 K8 I
紅字 : 個人感想) ?; F9 U9 @5 U

+ h5 w; m) A: \. U9 hok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
+ }: V2 c8 |9 K- zit's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.' d1 n/ j5 T1 A5 m! L7 w
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. 8 l" z6 a- Q! s7 v& F  k* s
just becareful even if the words arent your own words..
8 Q* F! x1 x" k$ {' p+ Vgood luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
, R* g# A& A# Y- Y該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
* O7 m& n( |0 t+ u* o6 ]* t) I" }唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得6 U( w6 w3 Z% M7 Q% _9 v6 V. D
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間5 h3 Y* i& N" A) C' l) N/ ?0 |
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說# u& N: X% U) M
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事! C; V; b! \$ [7 x$ A
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
% Z6 I' M1 v- P) f# @3 |請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x* o# X. @" P9 \0 O
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0