香港法例有等如無. 5 ~2 A6 c3 k6 q2 f2 p4 u9 ` ( z" R: y+ W$ V' ^ K) ^2 X" M毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動. 7 p# C; ]% x+ V- x: c& q. V3 F& c# M+ ^5 {1 t
對打人者只作出警告了事. 0 I' I4 c( e4 q" w* x5 o! r7 r6 U, x0 m: b1 M
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.& U- l- P4 Y* }5 S
; U& n% i. S* U. L u' y# h( L6 G http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ5 {8 ~* X- C4 e4 W3 W3 ` R: P
& i0 w, N1 l) J5 j1 e7 Z" q1 A! n% ?而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯. * y+ y7 I, `' a$ V% z- ~( e6 j, o R- `1 X
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.8 {5 J% L1 p& m0 g+ m* t9 R, ~4 T
% T+ l8 i* S T1 K. K3 e0 ?
$ ^ f' d8 x7 K
% `3 X1 W* i, N" F4 g! a1 j個人認為....., X* [4 V* J8 r3 f: M
. ^7 _( f7 C6 V
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番) " @1 l6 y- w2 g4 ]" G/ _0 A; h7 X6 ?! U; M6 @8 P* C4 u ~
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....7 @% p4 j a5 d3 T
% l: O) k; U) }7 p7 V; h- t* ^
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM
have u studied law or anything related to legal studies? ( p! S1 m" r$ I4 xdo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?0 W+ \$ H% B# a7 w, \6 \2 W
are you the witness of the incident? # A$ B) F% [6 Z. A, Yif not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..5 P5 X: f0 W1 x* U
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打". ( ^8 J6 i9 W* N P* e+ t3 f* eotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"作者: jen01二世 時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM
Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM: 6 [8 o& H, ]0 ~- ~have u studied law or anything rela...
- z! p$ @' s( q4 ?
* t8 d1 `7 V4 O+ z2 K黑字 : 係轉貼# k6 B3 L( ^9 G
: Y" u M5 C M8 ?紅字 : 個人感想 4 C6 r- n2 i: z) n* D5 s% ~3 M& T) W/ a+ ^9 W
ok ??作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM
dont have to ask for my approval ; B9 n* s, _: z2 q* s6 vit's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.! C( L. ^9 N$ n8 Y2 M
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. 1 t& d) n. V! W) ljust becareful even if the words arent your own words../ v1 G) ^+ d% O) m6 U# n
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.作者: lastwing 時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM
我係甘認為% z J$ ~% Y* a4 K# E0 a0 t
該警員明顯地想息事寧人... 9 u. p( P R; s d/ }1 @, E唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得 Y/ B% V' [1 g* M
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間 5 ]& Y8 G. w! d( J以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說 2 R: \; p1 D$ ^; ^; j4 X5 k我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事" F$ t% W1 v) n
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當 8 a& P ^5 w- G9 T4 x1 A& J% n6 Z請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x ' ~( u: c! I! ~5 |& s由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道