Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
, c& h/ X$ m& Z. q
/ d: }0 m+ U2 \7 \毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
. `4 I5 @, i& U0 z& C4 I+ n7 p1 l" C& o* _8 d$ D" J9 g8 K0 h
對打人者只作出警告了事.
+ s# B. g( r( w% m& e
+ x; m( C. _' O" |8 a' r  b: z9 X1 C6 c差人涉嫌包庇打人者.3 S# t! m3 ^+ c6 v! U

3 J# h1 ~/ N( n/ Z6 ohttp://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ" ]& G. |. }% c5 n$ E& B6 x. n

+ ]5 w* u: J# H( A5 E+ O而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.% K% O9 x3 ~) l$ Z# D- n0 z0 W
- _8 C; _" w6 j  g
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
) @; L7 X* u' g! L- K( i6 e0 C( l* @+ h" _* o$ P+ ]/ S

0 e, z3 l# O/ N6 Q" ~
: h" J% e3 c" [6 x) y2 c個人認為.....9 P4 x! W5 F. l

0 s3 M/ ]/ j3 z; |+ `岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)3 M7 ?' T2 M0 i, N5 ?  a
  d- T* C, C  C/ O* s
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
7 L$ e1 y1 P) @$ _0 k
& Z% k2 P" f" u3 }# r: o
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?( w8 V# d7 d0 P& S
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?5 X7 v0 X1 ?8 A  @1 L
are you the witness of the incident?0 d6 m* N; Q8 k2 S
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue.." W2 w4 G# c9 ]# }2 X1 T
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".) S- X1 E% u1 A8 q' ?' n
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:" p! [; h9 ^! v
have u studied law or anything rela...
& N/ p# W0 J1 W" U" G1 M
) K0 x* j5 D1 F黑字 : 係轉貼
! j! \2 [( M/ Q3 b  J# }  \) K4 G6 u, |" l  ^
紅字 : 個人感想7 B9 Q# d4 c$ r, J- D

6 a* G2 w( u& H. aok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
6 u- u% U: p! `9 P* Bit's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.% e! d9 o5 D" W/ ]( c
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
8 y$ I4 a% `6 O( Sjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..6 T" p4 X3 m4 g, F
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為& F% }4 T5 ^: K5 G& |
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
' P! m9 ]- ]! D8 l% y, i唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
3 N  w8 T$ ~' P; |如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間2 V6 o+ h/ c/ b6 e2 c  [) x
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說. s  i- ]! l! Q4 Y& C3 o( N* u% p
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事& k# Q/ K/ r1 x  m2 V( j+ X
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
- j0 O, w) v, y1 m# ~2 H$ x( o請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
+ M! n) v  u/ N由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0