Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無./ ^1 L" n/ a2 ]: W+ i( Y
' A$ x& i" {9 ~
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.- E+ ?1 F5 A' i9 F' f8 D  L$ q5 l

; S5 e' @0 w' G/ K5 ~1 U對打人者只作出警告了事.; \- b1 t! T( T# @0 Y

! m' {( n3 B2 d+ |差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
  m* _8 c, O: n4 u: h9 e+ {/ i& g/ r8 G
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ9 b+ N9 {6 ^4 A. j& n' y9 b
# f; m8 Z; g5 C+ A
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.' i4 w7 C. K/ z) h0 b$ N
& h/ Q8 A- g; Y
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.& Y% t- M% x6 Q  x, t4 J6 t

  ~4 w- p4 {+ H3 k4 H9 z) p0 j  j# f( Q% f

- D8 W) X- f& L5 _: f個人認為.....
+ w8 B9 u# P1 q! q* W3 S9 ^% `, T; x! d
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
" N% m+ w5 Q" s7 `! ~7 K! o# ~6 C. ]! l! r  A0 o
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
1 |: i5 N; C( {3 R# j! X" F
6 ^! Q( j6 x2 B, l( t6 F! H% M
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
3 S4 E3 y3 X2 y, k2 zdo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?
: g9 c+ A+ x  [3 d! mare you the witness of the incident?) k" I4 n: p3 {' d7 D
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
$ u5 ?! a" q9 @2 G; t- p& g. Dand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
9 ^# v" ?/ {; A3 Totherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:; Q1 c) e5 U' _- Z7 r4 \
have u studied law or anything rela...
4 H) p2 E% t0 O# o

- O7 Q2 C0 u% f; w" ^& f黑字 : 係轉貼+ v* Z7 c' r( V, G" Q) P% A# f8 I- @: w
5 c; S$ e+ i; \* s
紅字 : 個人感想% }3 E& x0 N7 w+ _
: V% n! \8 m4 K  H: S2 b
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
# D7 u2 t- `; H5 G) ?" uit's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
' B; {# |8 ?  Z/ |btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. / }' C% B7 B0 {/ V+ E4 v( N- R
just becareful even if the words arent your own words.." }" H3 {- s- h
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
' y/ c! i! F) m8 W- P該警員明顯地想息事寧人...! a9 J. i- ?6 u
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
+ D2 j4 {. y$ ]" I如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
- }* o7 b: u) [5 `& b8 b以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說; P. ^* ~7 L1 V
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
0 t, a! z+ x9 G' v; D) D該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
$ E0 c+ z2 Q, L" I; [" i請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
7 _+ n% T6 O# h2 @( ?由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0