Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
. p+ C% d- s1 H) \. R/ ~8 ?( c
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.# x+ G7 Q+ j$ d+ B% J  R8 U4 j

* g, n8 E! u& @$ o3 |對打人者只作出警告了事.5 t- u& w( U% y/ q" ^2 z

, w) K" i' J1 c& M' c' `差人涉嫌包庇打人者.% U) a# n# V# _8 U1 c( u% X
4 f  N; u1 X& C% K
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
; [- N! R5 f2 R; d# H7 K$ E: ^2 {; j; d
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
, z4 N6 X7 m) L  o: l( g/ m# j3 {0 T
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
3 B3 B, }% s9 a& O8 B  _) p  k" G4 ?  Q) S$ l; g& l
5 o4 J2 ~# g: d: `

: J7 G5 p: M! G" ^9 t: N1 x個人認為.....
) d, ^: C& m. i1 i4 H' A( G  k' s0 ~$ N3 s; x- e) W' n4 P
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番). g! h% J; a' s4 I% V* S, M

7 U5 I6 b1 Q$ M9 D1 _好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

9 u# a9 H/ I! J! v. C; d) F1 m& u& A: j  M2 q1 G
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
% M$ b- c9 X& K' j8 p9 |. sdo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?! N8 L% p8 q, ?
are you the witness of the incident?
0 G+ ?; B$ g& n8 }if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..: S5 |, f5 l! q3 f) K1 M6 N
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".$ D7 _! ]7 X# X0 ?9 y$ O
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:5 g$ \) `+ b3 N( u4 C1 ^" U
have u studied law or anything rela...
  u( \. V: O" t4 \6 d# l
4 \" t7 O* M: R* @
黑字 : 係轉貼  `& Y) y3 X0 A
, e! i3 _% ?- P5 p
紅字 : 個人感想
7 u5 y% \. t! n# e0 A3 I, q
  W: l/ G! m! }1 J  xok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
2 ]: U9 c+ Q& _! Wit's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
! F4 ?& M% x8 ]4 g4 Bbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
# B2 n/ Q; J3 r& Z% P0 R* Rjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..' y! R4 q! s' S% B; `
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
* `5 x' h4 K! F該警員明顯地想息事寧人...' x, o* ]/ F$ z% t/ N
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
: S9 |2 X; u9 M如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間5 o% O* T' O* ~: v& S. ?1 Q# ~# [
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
0 f3 o0 G- h3 A$ j我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事* U- y% ]1 Y. Q, ]% p) \
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
3 G% |% V# V  ~請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
5 B+ ~+ F, L$ u/ \* U- r9 r由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0