Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
5 F+ d2 o8 {5 \% o/ N3 a. y5 }, w4 k( R
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
) U* Q, I+ G$ v. f( {- M& {6 |! D- a) h
對打人者只作出警告了事.$ ]6 U) X3 B* l) j6 E' B
6 _  g- Y# \; X) y
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.4 e7 m2 Q" T  `# f' v/ v
* _# ]/ B1 m* O
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
& V5 f( @) [- c! q0 h
- V& K! J" A  Y( C6 c, s而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.; S6 E# h3 N2 ?* b3 P; e
' [0 q" A  l  {8 }- H. A2 o+ L
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
6 v; r& v* i! m5 H6 E: f: v. l1 x) P+ f% r4 o2 s

& r5 \0 s4 K& Z) Q3 {+ v# f" u( L2 H
個人認為....." U& D) y( a/ G$ T4 `: p

7 @/ g8 q. C8 S- t% e2 z) n" f/ b. A岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)& f0 d& ~  c" y  B4 Q
2 |8 b" _) o- y- g
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
* ]/ Z# ~" [, ?" u" g

& j( c) Z% D/ C; d[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
% ?8 v7 y& U: c6 O$ [do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?
+ j' \0 T" w+ o9 L3 K' Yare you the witness of the incident?
! W8 D% H/ y* i. m  }5 B  k$ X% Bif not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
. J+ O& E5 G, h0 v' h% Band better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
6 g7 W" I5 ?. l& b" C4 f& B, ?otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:. n  C# X3 X5 b. r1 R
have u studied law or anything rela...
, |8 w! Z9 O$ y* S6 ?

* s/ Y- ?& n5 r% {黑字 : 係轉貼0 E  u+ w% ~& A  {6 y  J
, p+ ^: K0 n) e
紅字 : 個人感想  {0 ^2 e4 l6 J2 c3 S5 M0 f+ M

4 |1 b1 z0 @+ Hok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
  D4 F' Y# _: B4 X- E/ Dit's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.& a  R' w( x; s" S0 o% t. S
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
% y( W" {# G& Jjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..7 D2 G4 E8 z& d  e
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
, H5 M1 r& W+ u該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
0 {' `9 l+ W+ L唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得1 P1 l# \5 E, C0 d/ x
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
  y& m( m9 f& u1 P4 l+ B2 y- f以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
- r% s4 G! k7 d& o- n8 p1 C3 A我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事& Z$ I( n2 W- |: S
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當' c. U: V4 b4 k, w1 @( I" r
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
" `# R8 }( C8 @( M* k由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0