Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
, u5 N  f0 S1 b5 g- g+ x" I6 y4 g. V; m" V
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
3 [. Z$ u1 g% i! M5 l3 U8 t! {+ N. B/ R5 w! ^) a- ^
對打人者只作出警告了事.
* q, J+ t/ n( M" |3 N9 ]
- Y( e2 K0 u8 _差人涉嫌包庇打人者.; o2 K2 {5 ~: z

! M' g, I/ O/ B9 J5 O/ khttp://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
2 i# |1 J, @* j8 t7 `5 _7 J/ h: f3 ^" S% o/ m. A( v
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.% M: v# w' S5 U! z. ]# O: w* H

5 @5 @/ }/ Y; K. |+ W請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
" c& I) ^0 _6 P- a& A6 Q: U7 ]; c% b0 y2 E

! \; N# G9 i) q: A2 Y' V. [! f: K. r2 ]8 ~- H
個人認為.....2 h' n: U/ w& v% D0 h8 u' f5 q
2 m" O; B; z5 _& Y
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
, p0 c$ s: C, c# a
0 H3 i' m4 Z4 P6 b/ H好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

# K2 n% |+ j: }+ d4 w4 `. P5 C/ o& u
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?7 _3 g# L3 Y; v
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?
. M/ T! a$ }3 I$ `+ d0 a0 k0 ]are you the witness of the incident?' @: f* [; N% V2 @5 ~% p
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..8 }2 f& S, P" ~4 Z
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".9 ?0 L- J' p) Z  U! `
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:* g. ?7 p; V* ]  ~* G: n8 @
have u studied law or anything rela...
, d1 O) L* L, y# i, H
9 O7 C$ _- l9 e9 N5 o) {: p
黑字 : 係轉貼! C& w( _; |2 t9 o+ w2 _/ ~

3 {5 B7 W0 m, U5 Q紅字 : 個人感想% p* Q8 r0 o/ a( r$ |5 ]+ @3 a

0 ~- h0 o# r$ T: ]ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
# [0 E1 o1 u+ W) Bit's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
% ?+ ~0 g/ o3 p. i3 T# \btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
" g! `# B6 s4 zjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..) S/ o* |+ `0 h! B8 u
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
0 t. z- f7 \: w. b該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
' x1 j' S2 _! I, h9 B唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
0 t7 n9 C/ t- K$ U. s& b  G如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
' H5 Y% U+ l3 [" u% z0 v0 k以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說4 o1 c- t$ }& ~. U
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
# `0 R1 _" J$ a6 m- A& A( U  V該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
  W! ]/ A6 M2 N$ n" [" \+ ~* I請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
! u* n6 f/ l& z7 l由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0