Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.; X2 p( P4 {! b4 f8 d8 d, Z! s& B

6 ]3 x: u# ?( q5 J; I- D3 ?毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
* _% r$ D* g& F  }6 }$ D* I& |4 @
對打人者只作出警告了事.
; |* ^: [. Y, n( m. m. @. y- K; K- {, L) o5 W0 D
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
, ]  L' }) q/ _; k, W$ F0 o
* S' s; K" k: C" S8 ehttp://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
3 m' U6 _# N7 d3 ^$ h
# w* p# Y. v" v9 M而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.+ e' o% O+ j1 n# Q. T
7 w% I$ d) e. A8 {' M* c
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.4 }5 B( F( t8 k
5 X) F$ C4 }  w2 B* H

* ?( H" n6 [, ~8 d6 {% p
% I8 x1 p/ z+ j; ~$ o: }* C- }個人認為.....# Y) C! P* i" Y8 M

$ G- L+ P& {! P2 R* n岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
& {2 h  s' O2 Z( ~0 l. `/ T* `2 J! z% l7 _+ U
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
6 ]6 d% t  u+ Z3 b5 U
" @% C: R" q! M; s' [( B& ~. `0 ~9 [
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?* E4 k4 M+ s5 e% c
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?5 {& u; P6 M* J
are you the witness of the incident?
7 d- p' {% e9 Uif not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..4 Q% h$ L8 J! l/ I9 @
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
( f6 D8 j+ {! |, Y0 H! `otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:, O; d5 ?8 Z4 g& B* k+ Z& K
have u studied law or anything rela...
' J4 O9 w% G8 n8 w2 L% v% t
, k) U% [: K) O# F
黑字 : 係轉貼
$ E. p; Z* ?# R" z2 ]8 m# @3 N2 q6 Z+ A# d# |4 h8 L. p6 S/ P
紅字 : 個人感想
4 ?# D- y, P& _7 N( \% H
9 \5 B5 `6 Q9 N7 n1 Z2 Vok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval , N3 \6 C, Y- j9 s$ z7 m' ^
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
2 m: d% s5 [/ Nbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
: G0 t# n% z  I7 F6 x' Ujust becareful even if the words arent your own words..
9 |& r1 U# e2 ~good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
3 F0 b  P: T" j該警員明顯地想息事寧人...2 L+ }3 Y8 R0 Q" a
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
. |$ G( S4 y  V& p  d5 q& b如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間3 x0 L5 m: u5 p4 T* I: l
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
1 [6 ?0 e3 g' x$ Z- s7 _我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事5 [4 H  G, P7 m# i5 m
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當1 ?. u" i6 `" w$ {
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
, a2 f/ S. c4 a  R由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0