Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.! z0 A  M' o/ o  j( m

8 O% F& y) V! N4 S4 Y毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
6 R- I4 L: q5 l1 o8 i4 l  l1 [! o: I
; P/ {" _+ u) W( z6 i5 s對打人者只作出警告了事.. R5 t5 D6 ~7 N. t0 Q

! v+ K8 R! S- ~6 B7 n差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
) x+ l( B6 K/ d) r7 d& y, f5 ^7 h) e. j) A7 Y" b" @) n' W
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
; p- ~% D! V9 [% g9 [& d
# ~; ]* s. r) D3 s2 ]: J而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.3 a- C. h6 M4 }$ s- k% O. e

5 F. g& A# b$ {0 L6 g6 a請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
7 ?- \' l1 I. d( p* u0 w/ `( W5 h7 Q, o

' M* K, o9 l2 k1 S0 ^9 b% p! T- [$ X: \/ e) G: M3 Z
個人認為.....
" O% E6 I6 Q: W8 b. ]" F
0 V+ e& N2 g8 _% c7 k2 c7 K岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)9 l! L! X3 ]7 a) w

3 {5 T+ o8 \* F7 u好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
- `- q! U1 q0 M* _  m
; f' k) S" G5 Q
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?# N. m+ V7 d. d0 M: c4 @
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?
& F1 s4 Y8 c  j7 `are you the witness of the incident?( z- g6 L# `2 f
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
7 ^& {5 l7 d' ^1 O2 G- U' m: M+ _( Rand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
* v! s/ a. ~: botherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
- D& L5 R  F3 _have u studied law or anything rela...
& q9 i: H. d- C5 b' C/ P* q# D" d* D' {$ x+ S, t& E
黑字 : 係轉貼
: o8 Q% Z2 `' l/ W
) W3 e5 Y6 p( Q. H. A紅字 : 個人感想0 P* q0 r+ X4 x! b) t

+ D) i6 h8 @+ m- X4 pok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
& @. v% c7 F5 \& fit's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
( M3 W! u& k) F* t! Vbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
2 B, }4 T1 D8 ^/ E. r+ sjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..2 J) ^" Q1 q' R( K3 `0 M% H/ Z
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為9 X) i) Z& d% J/ I3 t6 O9 i7 u
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
8 w: Q( f) Z# {, c0 H唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
1 i; E/ o# T! [9 n/ i: F3 f. l, f如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
: b# H" K5 g- _) b2 G/ Q以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說+ v2 B8 a/ B0 D9 X
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
$ s$ o% X; ~% k該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
, j" J; ?: J+ r! ^1 D  [" X" p4 r9 @請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x7 [3 N6 ^2 I) l5 J' O; r) p
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0