Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
: |' n: g5 U; t/ z
& b1 z( G3 ~; V7 s$ ^5 ?0 s/ n毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
  }  r; L  T. _! n  ~5 }( G0 D; O1 r8 h- s
對打人者只作出警告了事.4 P# s/ e7 t  R& Q: {& `9 I
) G6 p( i4 J4 f( d/ \  i
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.% F- G9 |0 Z6 i+ L5 q

! E. y0 c- V" ~7 `1 x# c; a- ahttp://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ" Q! G2 q9 A5 |
( y) M- R* o! |9 k, t
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.3 X% j* H' K* C3 R: X% S1 U/ F

, W2 D! G* s- @1 b" e* d請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事., G+ m# J9 E: ]! V
* p/ w; b0 D4 l0 B

5 @# G4 u* V' P2 J2 A* ^4 d" q; E" P7 L+ T/ t
個人認為.....& }/ V6 Q' |- ~% h

" }7 N9 l& `! e% C- a* _岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)' Y1 Z4 S# S) r2 h

( k0 o4 b+ {/ ~6 H; t好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

, Y+ `* p: R4 ^" S' Z$ f" K6 @1 J5 `' ^# d5 |. x" _
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?: S1 j1 u4 ^; ?7 }, j
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?1 K: T2 i5 _' }) Y& \% J7 y  d7 N
are you the witness of the incident?  n+ d, N# k  ]2 q8 K+ V
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
* Y6 D# n2 X8 u4 b- tand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".; q* o8 e1 X8 F( @
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
: c4 N( }  m4 ~) L- D) c7 xhave u studied law or anything rela...
6 d/ q# e: p2 D+ m# e, I2 Z$ \' K
: p- U+ K5 H) K
黑字 : 係轉貼
/ w/ R1 a- Q% [( P- Q& I1 i8 I9 l" N
紅字 : 個人感想: T/ a8 s% h7 H

, L! H0 q3 }- @6 F( G; \0 lok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
' t% ~3 |  I3 ]0 W$ E2 nit's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
" M! s6 }" @7 W0 J. [4 H3 Jbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
- ?3 @! [# E3 K6 hjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..! d3 q6 `) Y! R1 K* K3 a1 M
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為) U2 p8 q- T, _# _2 [0 D
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...3 c- u. h% V" i! E3 g3 A1 E0 H
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
' G+ T. }5 h+ T8 y如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間$ C7 ?& m: e7 H
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說$ \1 G. Q# m2 j8 {1 t7 x2 g
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事* g. _0 \  u9 ^' w
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
# ~" @& a9 r6 x5 u請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
) M0 A6 D& g( d' m" x  P( b9 a由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0