香港法例有等如無. 1 D) i3 A* M* A8 n 4 H: Q# U) K! L毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.4 @8 Z+ e0 E+ a- h ]) n$ L
( p' T g, L L( R. ^
對打人者只作出警告了事. ! e$ G. }9 M" p% [6 X1 O7 h6 X5 |' g% P$ y/ r6 N) F4 L( S
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.7 V; }! O. h, Q& z8 s% N4 n
- K, T5 f/ ~5 A7 ] http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ+ W( N! x1 l0 N% e1 N; n3 e6 {
3 |( T6 x4 h3 P. X0 l而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯. 7 c5 d2 R6 t, |" E! J - s; ]: H5 p: p請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.5 }5 ~* S9 Z, Y. F4 o/ ?3 t1 d0 y, P9 x
$ c1 p% W; \' n! ?/ F
9 X- C0 G- O9 `. D: H' n2 a
9 B- I+ D0 I# j2 N6 T
個人認為..... $ m" ~9 y3 [& C$ m/ j - w. n3 H C+ w$ u+ n6 n岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)9 ?6 r5 {3 x/ q) u% A
4 l7 @5 Q9 w3 O; L: e0 J; c好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....$ p3 c7 D |* q9 \$ \4 s/ d
6 [- y6 i' ^+ w2 Y1 [1 F
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM
have u studied law or anything related to legal studies? & d( f& F" V% o$ @1 |- kdo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"? & I& g4 l2 k0 p& ?# Vare you the witness of the incident? 9 k2 _' l- a1 \! ]2 e# Sif not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..' q7 l7 e8 G- S: e2 I, [5 G8 o
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打"., l% Q! x8 S* ~) ]3 t% T% n
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"作者: jen01二世 時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM
Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM: 7 y/ Q! G% |) `( Z' \have u studied law or anything rela...
2 L' M5 C8 C% o/ r* B/ | - j0 H w7 l8 ?! B/ b# \1 W黑字 : 係轉貼* `7 ]$ A( m5 T
! f. f. h$ f5 f. b u, d紅字 : 個人感想 * P# f' X$ s7 V6 H H7 [& a+ ]$ O8 j0 V; kok ??作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM
dont have to ask for my approval + A- z$ R. b C7 |9 W# Y$ j; [
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not. : s3 H9 o4 B" [/ }% a# nbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. : D( Q% f+ h# rjust becareful even if the words arent your own words.. 3 n4 E9 f7 c8 ]1 G3 u1 J B0 u7 Ugood luck and hope you could last long in this world.作者: lastwing 時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM
我係甘認為 & J9 H, P) h4 S( F# i該警員明顯地想息事寧人...' e6 q# v5 n, p+ v% O/ W
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得 5 t! C' i, E3 A6 d如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間 2 M* n' k$ R1 h/ n: g" s4 h) G以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說 . C- n" t9 n0 L我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事 e' ?/ ]1 J0 g2 m7 ~! N
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當5 I: ?: e+ H0 U, A. v) ]
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x$ A) \& n S% ?2 i1 a2 e, e @6 D0 L
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道