# K ]! Y7 Y+ t差人涉嫌包庇打人者. + r) Y }! [3 s2 \ C/ [3 s+ D) w- K% ] http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ5 [; i, O3 |7 b1 g- n9 R
8 }9 S L: x, Y$ d
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯. & h6 v9 N0 I- V M1 f) G) J3 F/ Q; Y( i% v: {& I# }
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.2 i) P0 D, m* e
- c1 B, H5 u+ o; D$ g# b
0 P* q- @. k" W2 M1 l8 i
7 Z: G) i2 \' ^) c7 f. \個人認為.....) x9 p1 \- V- q' `, a, s5 T
8 H4 j9 \& w, U7 f! L* b0 R/ E! ]
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番) 7 g! \; h( n3 \9 K. O$ p/ o8 v- K# }! e
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....) e$ n( \/ V7 i4 A# F
: p8 Q; ^ w7 s( x# c
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM
have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?9 o' `* j3 S) D- f3 n ~
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"? , @7 C- ~3 W: N" }' Q" s( \! jare you the witness of the incident?4 f& N. U( ?% `
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue.. # U, c$ X/ }+ v/ Aand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打". / h8 K3 W6 p# \6 G* b. d; Q Rotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"作者: jen01二世 時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM
Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:5 p- }, t: p. v1 h: {0 ^( e
have u studied law or anything rela...
dont have to ask for my approval . c" m8 M" R7 A% d! kit's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.# |6 v) b k, l, O
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. 3 m5 N7 Q6 t \! p7 Ijust becareful even if the words arent your own words..' U9 r+ P. O4 Q) P+ Y
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.作者: lastwing 時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM
我係甘認為 - f; F4 I4 N- J. `- x2 a該警員明顯地想息事寧人...* T O* r6 N6 m/ a* z6 h: D- d
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得4 `0 ]: Q7 B/ e2 h) C" R
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間; F! E8 l9 c' A. O' B' x7 D
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說2 ]$ P( E+ F& j1 D: c% K: p+ m% U$ K
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事 9 _/ o/ i' k) O j該警員的處理手法絕對洽當 F' D6 _, \# Z* s7 z$ E# ~' K請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x3 Q' u6 N9 g1 y' u4 j5 k. _
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道