Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
! S5 b- V( j9 J4 O
6 `2 S$ L! E1 S  F6 }- H( I毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動./ u/ i3 W* U. ]5 }/ z9 n  S

3 u! ^1 I% [5 m2 z) z% g對打人者只作出警告了事.7 D2 C& u- d3 q
6 P1 |0 {- @3 G7 {. K: L
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.3 o" u( p  R+ {# P3 ^: g

$ G# t7 c* A  B1 p+ Khttp://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
( D' L( R5 ]: S3 l  N% o" R# x! F. V! @8 z, o; T' w) y9 ?2 K3 U
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.( i! r: y" S( p1 w, ?2 L- y

) t9 z2 g8 Z( t' i+ t" b/ b- B請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.5 s4 T. i. v8 e% e3 x$ y

' c% ?% F& b) g4 J2 W! M
1 N+ ?$ H; k3 m6 y* k* w
- F9 }5 L: P6 b, p個人認為.....& N  q5 P6 Z" ~# Z! p% x0 H% C
" [$ F) \1 f) b( D6 p
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)7 J+ X$ V7 M  O9 Y8 M) ^3 U  F
) v8 u1 U) y1 l( s
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

# \! g8 o% ]) ^: e% q5 {, [% s( v3 {
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
2 X: f/ B. t6 F2 k& u* vdo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?! r+ L4 {2 L4 E- h; e
are you the witness of the incident?
7 F# R3 v- r9 `! ]if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
2 Z; D7 T8 T: w5 xand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".5 h' P& ~- i5 D1 y% z
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
# q( ^9 N( E# D: R2 R! y2 X3 \have u studied law or anything rela...
% K# D, J, j) ^# O
$ i. A, y/ j, E9 L黑字 : 係轉貼( D1 ?) l) J1 G( M

. y- z- T1 |, x4 i5 f紅字 : 個人感想
* W" L/ v: Y+ _% Y. V
5 T* ]4 v( u9 h& {" l0 U9 hok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
! n$ M) e" D# L4 Z# oit's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.! M5 J& W6 Q7 x3 R
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
4 p1 V' u6 A3 y7 Qjust becareful even if the words arent your own words.." G. J1 d: G3 X' T+ }# e
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
3 F8 L# ?# H$ ^4 P/ J" c- F$ h, E該警員明顯地想息事寧人..., N, P( z( O4 Y
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得! L$ [( n, \/ x; o
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
. f& z. R* f2 r3 K; P" h以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說" D# T& B0 d# x/ \
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事' e) ?% e5 d2 L
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當' w  U0 P8 i, q9 |
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
# E! Q4 V% ~0 b由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0