Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
" R7 g' G+ s' `
. F' K) F0 N3 y% @毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.4 d( x/ A7 @) J
# s% u+ U* H- F# D% L/ a
對打人者只作出警告了事.
: J- X3 R# W2 s, Z1 e( M5 U7 V$ e! B9 x
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.0 G3 x8 u: N( X' B
* n) z( \( @, ~
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
# s, U# t! X) K4 c' s' }( t& p2 U$ f$ A3 X' M
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.  l" l; ?; U; l

6 p" v" N2 m' U1 D. T4 M請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
: i0 ?1 k  Q) t  l8 n$ x6 v2 R9 v0 F3 f' J. f# b7 j
" _# o0 w: J- }1 @

; T. N9 s0 j3 u. X個人認為.....6 j. I0 C9 ?0 b9 j6 L

0 f2 B( S" w" m+ {" L$ m岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
0 ]. o1 a! F& }
; f" [  ~) S" P0 p好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

# c% M6 i! D$ G' H! Z3 h8 a( D- M
) A4 h* G  W) S$ E% h; ?( X5 }[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?1 r) m* Y" ~- m, I" c2 X% m
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?7 Q' D" d8 m$ l! ]& U2 \  ^) \
are you the witness of the incident?+ w* s2 S; I; N9 x+ p# E1 K1 F8 d
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
0 V  O& M! ^  q, g  pand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
! [8 I3 Y- q) g, r# @otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
" ]* Q# d. ^$ }% [  `7 {have u studied law or anything rela...
* g$ T6 i5 A5 v' D
1 v6 W0 p6 m! \. {7 P
黑字 : 係轉貼& j  E4 \$ O4 Y) U4 T* M  ?

+ Y# Y4 ~0 O8 k: U) E紅字 : 個人感想7 P: M, M0 x9 W* A3 O* g* U

" D5 c( y7 n7 u- n& p# ook ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
  F4 E( P  P, `1 n$ H) }& |it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
  j4 g- i2 g8 B% m7 t2 K: A2 D* A( Dbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
$ e2 ^( n" N& a4 f; D# Y- gjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..& y& F& A3 c) p  [" F
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為6 E+ y% q/ i  g4 @
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...5 D3 R8 Q6 a0 q  l% }
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得, I* Y/ P  h4 t0 R4 m: l& c
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
3 U1 m9 L, n0 _以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說/ p/ H6 `2 Y$ x6 O8 d! ~
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
  D( X! s7 N3 H( f, e該警員的處理手法絕對洽當2 u& x$ Y7 i0 P3 ^' P
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
8 r  j" H( G+ k! }/ @; T. ?$ z& q由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0