Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
. D* |8 e; J, y& v- a- f+ v1 ~1 f% E' x! I
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
6 d2 G+ a8 w% i+ S' [* m
) ]5 W; A0 C; z+ @* b對打人者只作出警告了事.% \% l9 q7 f( Q

7 k" B7 S4 p) V% P# V. F差人涉嫌包庇打人者.( Q" x; C& E$ y

! C4 k  [/ B+ k/ e4 V/ \http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
4 E$ m% N" Z7 a' X4 r3 p( R0 J! g8 a( {/ W7 X3 ~/ ?
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
  j# Z1 T( U: S) {- Z, c
/ }1 S7 `  S1 m- E請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
& @. D4 b3 C5 Z1 v" F  ~: U! U/ f7 V0 V& @: s

2 U7 k. q# N. u6 V
- s" u8 N& @% A7 z個人認為.....7 Q- @9 h" Z! j; B' N7 C" m
$ D  H. ], d2 K2 y$ ?4 m1 o
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
) j  [# {( Z, E/ Y
% o8 f. p9 Y- Q0 ?* w好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

3 C4 R! K9 s5 i$ V- x' G2 \: `
3 b* z) `6 Y. J& }( Y) s2 Q! c[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?6 L( t: x% |& D2 h
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?
6 R1 U$ G' @' Z5 u# Jare you the witness of the incident?
' A4 u6 D" Z8 U0 bif not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..7 w- ?/ l( {7 M. D: O
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".. P  O) G$ Z( `, H$ B) p( g
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
' F* T3 z2 Q' ?: |have u studied law or anything rela...
( r8 g( ^/ Z/ E4 L' Z

% Z. x6 L3 n% Y$ a5 F黑字 : 係轉貼& g0 r  m; F( E9 a; L
+ G  ]0 T: @: S  R( E
紅字 : 個人感想, e7 f# f9 a/ m

3 l, I& S/ Y1 r; uok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval - N. \+ k4 l6 t9 O) u
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
( A! N, \% l3 T2 X1 }btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. " E$ _+ U+ s, q. m" H" ~5 V
just becareful even if the words arent your own words..
% t. K( p4 y1 P# Wgood luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
# M: S2 e; `* D% ~該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
+ ^& C% g4 ?' S' M# i唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得2 Z4 a$ A% X1 W" U8 b+ M) {6 Q
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
4 m: f5 s2 X- J- ?5 Z0 K以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說: x3 q9 o) q% P, I, M% ]0 x( S9 H
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
9 E( V: a* b0 z1 [6 v該警員的處理手法絕對洽當' i% m& p( j/ p5 [! }. D: i5 B
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x' U8 {" l1 {: E9 T5 \' U. z
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0