香港法例有等如無. ) X+ _. O/ {3 a* R/ n + }* x f4 L7 R) Z毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動. 6 j- |, N# M6 Z8 o6 G 3 e4 j# o. y1 D( i2 \4 ^; \* Z對打人者只作出警告了事.# u- J) G6 u- F- T
( o; k, c/ l# O" U0 i( X
差人涉嫌包庇打人者. 7 i l9 o; g f+ _/ q8 C7 d: r/ @' L9 b- Y; S) y3 N1 | http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ 2 X' C( p- ~& _5 {; y2 O; u8 L. N, @% e- q+ }' z- r; n
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯. 0 M% \3 ^& ^( h: @& G, I1 C2 y1 \9 Q- O, t
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事. / G ~9 w! ~ R6 I) A1 U6 f5 f3 U* W" }/ g7 J$ K
9 U- Y* n+ n3 w8 D
2 B+ V2 R; Z9 e% h* X# l2 O個人認為..... . P! k' m q& W0 d - v9 o2 F) m2 }5 M3 b. h: k5 e) f岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番) ; N. ^( ]1 M' R. R) X7 f' \# V/ g6 H4 S% t9 P( S& c; C8 r$ B( g! e$ O0 o
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野..... " Q6 H9 f! ^9 S" j/ V% G' \& h3 h4 e$ c# S
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM
have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?- Y3 ^* i% ~' O' I# Z4 t
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"? 0 L6 L: k: V, [ j9 A$ Iare you the witness of the incident?/ ~1 `( V: ?% A( ~% N& q" [
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..' r: ?& R% e: h$ k5 A6 W( M
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打". $ b6 `1 ]0 T1 J) O1 aotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"作者: jen01二世 時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM
Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:' S) m9 R: }6 u
have u studied law or anything rela...
4 A$ g* Q8 ~4 V$ }, q! ]% Q1 c% g0 k8 \8 k8 E
黑字 : 係轉貼2 z- e" {1 T0 J2 q5 ^* \% f1 a
: ^. D3 R _5 {- l* o紅字 : 個人感想 5 `. [& _4 x! m/ V: n! _# U, t6 J3 l6 U# e* K
ok ??作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM
dont have to ask for my approval ; P2 m( P% O$ V9 O! \. m1 e
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not. + c0 U5 r: E) |# |' Nbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. / | w) ?, f. v, D, z4 djust becareful even if the words arent your own words..& u R v$ ?- M' i# R5 A
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.作者: lastwing 時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM
我係甘認為 4 d) X! q# B+ z" Z3 T+ |4 b該警員明顯地想息事寧人... 0 [7 y6 B2 f S8 z唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得0 i0 a k9 J9 h5 L& k! N
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間 i: \1 u! _! n以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說 0 G1 Q/ g7 o0 {" o2 h. p9 b- g" I: w我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事6 c/ O. j1 |+ Q+ ?6 b1 B h
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當; g6 t- l' c& D8 @
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x/ y3 a6 O6 \6 e# ]9 B! `1 C
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道