Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
/ J& P/ u# q' K/ J, K' B% t( F: E6 f0 p2 |1 ~
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.7 D# K7 K5 X' A) N- _$ c+ ~
, G, k( g& H" R! W3 {5 V' ^7 w
對打人者只作出警告了事.
; u4 @) q/ s& {* g1 q7 O+ g" g# r! Y0 [9 {) [
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
6 K- ?6 o& b# ^- v' [: K) C! b; F4 g8 }! M( E5 e
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ% L. J/ W8 f) c
, k# z/ u* `1 l" [' y# F& f! V
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.7 C6 U7 }5 ^' ~* `

/ h; b6 ]/ s! P0 i6 r9 T請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.( D) h' p9 D8 M
* H/ g# N6 p7 E/ j4 L

5 C4 H8 w$ }% x5 w( ~- J9 o
# O/ @$ E) J1 K& T7 q* _! ?4 `個人認為.....& N# C( X5 T, H9 J% o2 k
6 S7 u; Q+ G" s$ C
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)% n" S2 R  M- O: K9 Q
% K1 L/ p' s6 h  |
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

. y& }4 @: S* U0 I* {& d. O
7 L  f: r1 \0 R; \[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?$ h6 c+ q2 Y. i# s
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?2 ?) r( p/ r% A" Y
are you the witness of the incident?$ P9 [: W0 U8 v. J
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
! R6 h2 R5 N* Tand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".9 |8 Y5 E  c; ~! k6 H6 V  A) O
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:) j: p8 ]8 J2 W) q2 b
have u studied law or anything rela...
2 W. x0 g' S  e/ c% J& c: `

: R. \$ t5 w  Y  W黑字 : 係轉貼! g; t5 R7 }5 x* e  s# v# l
+ H. V" R: S6 A% D8 e; O
紅字 : 個人感想
6 j# J4 k. t( {6 |4 V8 n; q# P/ z6 i2 i2 Y: u: T9 G
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval # |9 w! {; T- u- q: S
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.4 I! H  O# }+ W% G
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
# E% t8 m+ e# C  qjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..0 e: I* U; A$ a" X/ G: w9 Z
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
9 D$ N2 e! U+ S( I" [% q- J該警員明顯地想息事寧人...  Z/ G% c, P0 R/ A
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
7 [8 B* u6 C/ j5 m' A$ ]如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
3 h1 t& n4 k9 J% Z  x& U, y以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說& B/ H) g( c5 t- v" _
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
8 ~- B& c: t4 {* o  t7 V6 s該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
1 {& o- D5 ?- L0 i9 W請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x- x+ G* Z3 M5 n9 Y4 i& _
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0