香港法例有等如無. [$ G# |( J; e7 ?
: M! h1 e q, ?5 X/ D6 r: c: U/ z: `$ S
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.) O) o. c/ d, E& A- N
- f& T$ t/ L& _3 h6 v1 V4 P對打人者只作出警告了事.8 e, v( K% w/ g" }1 I
+ I/ F' N. g: |! o8 y2 z! N1 c差人涉嫌包庇打人者.( d0 b) w: H: ]8 `* B' Q) W
6 F. J# g- h5 p* N4 i' b8 f http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ / h$ T5 H5 v' L j7 n/ ~! A! L H- a# _4 I4 k而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.+ B1 [3 M1 @) l; u: o2 g; w
4 p+ J! ?7 h# L8 l2 e- S' C1 {; }請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.! h8 Y2 o( b. V& ~( Y
1 s @# }3 X7 U6 q( W
h" F# z" d6 I/ d0 _7 f ( F6 B7 \/ W* a個人認為.....: p! a3 w9 u ~( _ U- y
# y1 L* |8 _+ T6 U+ f _& d: \
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番), D8 k: R) X+ G- t3 s
+ q+ e! I5 M" {+ h. J: u6 `好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野..... H8 |4 V) r8 }; k& j( b- c
8 s5 ^% C/ f) J4 I! k3 }: y
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM
have u studied law or anything related to legal studies? , J3 U; z$ e4 o) Ndo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?2 ]* N0 O. _$ ~/ ?% H0 ^
are you the witness of the incident?) i5 ~2 \: F) w R1 k0 k
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue.. + U$ y, _0 F0 e7 s& L5 L$ dand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打". / H8 _9 G6 J6 e# a- E# r8 j9 Qotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"作者: jen01二世 時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM
Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM: 3 C4 `( v G& c5 P. M6 S) jhave u studied law or anything rela...
0 \. i: D9 F% s / T: h) E% p3 X5 h' Q, n: N/ y/ ^" q黑字 : 係轉貼9 |9 {8 l) b/ o
; [ R% E& k/ W% Q0 k0 d1 G
紅字 : 個人感想* w0 C1 T" H. P R
7 l5 v2 j5 L3 i3 yok ??作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM
dont have to ask for my approval ; j' q) z) e, f3 M
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.2 ~, l" W+ z- R1 I7 I) U
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. / R4 K* K$ H& G5 hjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..9 i& ^+ k) i5 K& M
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.作者: lastwing 時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM
我係甘認為/ N6 W: X! [6 V# g) @! r
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...8 a) a) t- Q* l- S
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得 7 f0 e: Z' M; @! i3 i4 a如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間7 d. z# y" t2 @9 }) l1 C. `
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說& A/ h" J3 \' H5 m
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事8 Y+ }6 H' f8 j' x# t9 \+ R
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當 2 z. T$ L/ X. Q8 g+ o5 ]% i# Y請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x- i+ O) z" b$ Z, y' I+ w
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道