Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.# ^8 j1 w. r8 q; b; G# R/ j6 }

9 Z% p' s; N% w! X毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
( I* p2 q5 E  p% a$ G$ p- X1 }
對打人者只作出警告了事.# Y$ i: ]6 Q7 K3 q& F6 b

9 q3 p, z. m! v/ Z差人涉嫌包庇打人者.& e: R# |7 B$ a+ P9 k; c8 K
8 w2 I$ f: H4 S* i  b, i
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ4 _3 X, c4 }- B
$ I6 w! C4 P7 h. a& W
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
. N& t+ Q/ |: v, A% e
/ E( {! {4 K" D# R請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
- d- F8 I, z4 b  q6 D) D& B3 s( {' E. u
' e: u; Y# o9 y

6 ~. j- H2 k% e& `7 `4 N% M個人認為.....6 H" w. L) h3 O# n; F1 ]2 F
0 L# f# Z/ M* Q) ^  ^9 c8 P
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
1 c+ @' o, z$ A7 Q8 B" u3 Y& _5 W4 _$ G
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
+ u! r! \2 A5 b! L2 i7 e0 a) ]. I

2 j& |( r/ W. ~8 X4 r' J[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?" B2 `% w* g; a1 ~7 j
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?
6 X& h' r! Y4 K# v( j5 d/ Vare you the witness of the incident?
2 ?+ B1 }2 i: X' a; M( [; [if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..' o3 g( R- w$ \/ l+ u5 m$ e
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
3 y- ^& x: n: Xotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
3 S4 a, _( V0 L# khave u studied law or anything rela...
' P  a) ^! {4 G( t6 G1 {7 T0 k4 N) M$ `1 y: R7 Y
黑字 : 係轉貼
( J; [; z+ j2 H' ]* _- i, Q8 T% M; ~+ i; O/ h
紅字 : 個人感想: n, V2 x! \$ a* H

# t' W8 ?5 c# o# J: y3 G1 |$ x  {2 Uok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval ! H# q+ U5 S2 ^0 q; Z, H' |, {9 t
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
) U1 Z0 k* c& i- vbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
# {' [+ h8 i, n- ]just becareful even if the words arent your own words..) s# Z0 j% E7 S& A7 M' {+ k( |
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為3 ]/ F- `  r! L
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...- t/ V4 C/ V3 d% h4 E+ a
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得4 k0 d, I9 H. B+ Q
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
/ V# F1 ^! w& @# Y" B$ |, f. B( K以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
5 d. n6 A$ a6 B( s我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事* z- ]% F* M+ s
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
; d. D0 Z0 w$ w) r4 w* B6 \請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
1 p9 _/ y" ?* j5 ?由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0