: S1 j: z7 G! u7 n5 b對打人者只作出警告了事.* X! I" i6 Q: `4 ?
% j+ Z! Q; r% Y8 U
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.5 n6 |$ s+ ?# e) h
( ~) M! l, ~6 ], ~2 m+ w% I http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ- V ?9 @% j6 e* S
5 p8 r X7 h X# A
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯. 0 S/ J/ P$ l& H9 w* a1 ?) Y ' N8 e! r& |5 e, V R H: E& s請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.- r- M s# T L) Q# ^
& i1 N0 }" y' d, _8 s; ?) R h% }
6 q& ~9 b# B! U
個人認為..... . p2 Y3 z Q6 Z& Y/ v) Z5 E - z* F( w' v6 a岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)4 J" ?3 @/ e2 J
# A/ ?& L3 M) `, B
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野..... 2 B( G& n+ G. U/ u( Q" Y/ y, a* k4 O+ _* A& H0 c: L
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM
have u studied law or anything related to legal studies? ) [' p9 f; Q" w5 Pdo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"? % e6 Z- ?6 B, f, \) }8 B {are you the witness of the incident?# h0 C$ m4 v; r0 N& X
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..7 X; y. p# S% I. M0 }
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打". & K0 n) B& Q/ A8 Cotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"作者: jen01二世 時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM
Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM: / c! C0 Z; W1 O6 U( Whave u studied law or anything rela...
dont have to ask for my approval 2 r1 q' D. o1 I( T" m/ x
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.& Q$ e5 _( B/ n" \( s) h% R
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. 3 W, K3 d+ w/ I1 V0 z; z$ r3 E
just becareful even if the words arent your own words.. % j9 i+ ~) h) j" l- y+ @0 b" cgood luck and hope you could last long in this world.作者: lastwing 時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM
我係甘認為9 M7 L' e2 E: M) Q# k
該警員明顯地想息事寧人... - |9 _/ k; h% l* ?' r& ]唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得 ; P' F# F7 m: g- L* \( k; n如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間1 M1 m m2 R+ i- ~& P
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說9 X* r( t- B! @6 D m3 R- @
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事& m' |& s; p0 k6 M
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當% K& K" t' X3 \: J$ Z% ? V
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x 6 z: n$ j! m3 j t% g' _5 ~由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道