Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
; v8 o0 J- H. [2 P( x" ?! a5 o' N# x
7 G  I3 \. s: u9 g* a; w4 V毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.2 q% p& i% n3 ~
* \0 q( w  P/ _3 h/ o
對打人者只作出警告了事.4 b7 x- E6 u: X

- q" k' N) s4 N4 h) V差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
" _& s6 T' W3 x% E# `  g( f) M) p4 v; ^
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
- \; E! v- s+ b, ^" T: D' L* ]  `% j
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.8 x" p- S2 K% c, W# |

# m+ p) T6 [- Z0 g$ M請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
+ w& k8 m  a# x( {( L% ^8 m) h6 U
: N& v, |5 \- k$ l

: d& w1 p$ E" d' c! p個人認為.....& V# ~9 H: K9 X( l5 B) U
; V5 W+ P5 u, Q/ c+ J
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
8 _9 s% r- T+ A) o3 Z5 n9 a2 u( d- q/ F4 l( D1 ?5 F, o2 S
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

! w+ W2 B4 c# |# W; _/ ^/ G9 h% \4 L* y$ ~% \
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
0 u3 }" u& g, s+ Tdo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?
, n4 T6 Z$ U8 y/ k5 {) nare you the witness of the incident?8 P9 H7 P5 A* u# Z
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..9 o1 h; s' G* n% r- O
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
, x% \% }6 l2 M9 a- \8 Z" Kotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
. ~$ i( `, J3 J$ V! }8 Ahave u studied law or anything rela...
3 e% r3 ?0 @: ~0 J9 ?& |. P) C0 _

2 L4 ]/ I, F- B. M: c2 b黑字 : 係轉貼
- h. J4 h4 X( B5 q" \0 `# j. o8 z9 T4 y7 B$ G6 G
紅字 : 個人感想7 L( D# o, u: J& b. A

  I% ~, t0 T& }. \& p! f0 @4 }8 Rok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval / n) s1 W8 E. x" x5 `# B
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
6 b, _& X$ \) L8 ?/ c0 u4 ?btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
: c0 k" u0 x: c. gjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..' J5 t! i: p, W2 I" O' n' k7 I
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為1 j. K$ y2 u3 ~/ P; b  c. C1 W
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...0 Q  Z* v0 x& [, v4 j) Z% j# P
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得$ @8 d5 s9 X# ?2 k
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
/ o' O7 S1 d9 X  n7 u: p以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
6 [  ]% Q: Y/ `6 J6 ]9 F9 s' J4 r我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
6 z+ g7 w" c* v6 X該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
, u0 ?' s6 n7 c0 M請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
/ G- a# f9 k$ N) q2 _由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0