Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.& r; X7 \1 J- l4 u/ z, e

) V" Q* M4 u. `- J1 w$ U毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
) |. Z1 X5 p. Z4 N( H2 o6 p
. g" \  w2 J# `3 p對打人者只作出警告了事.
1 K! f3 W; m( `0 s+ k; [- ?: e, i
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.2 m) O9 Z/ s! e! n* Q

+ V0 X$ |( L2 u" {http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
& p3 g' t- K4 u) `- Q4 m  i+ w* W# U) p
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯./ v5 S5 g! s+ `( {9 u
) J; w; V- |5 L3 h
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.$ }" L9 B: E- Q& D$ M; H

" w, J# ?) n7 G; A( v2 a, U9 D$ G" t3 |8 L
7 ~: A* V( j2 e- u  _1 ~
個人認為.....% @4 p6 v5 V9 c9 C

% Z4 x7 h- O  u2 C4 c岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
; H5 F* N8 @2 H9 ]* {+ b# {
. R& ~; \; B, `" P1 ]6 M+ e好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

  b, T3 D+ \1 y' S( C% r3 }; \
* J6 J" k: P: z. ?: e9 }* \[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
% @! v4 n+ P+ U" c" Q6 f4 ddo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?( p/ L- _, K/ T% }
are you the witness of the incident?
3 Q( V7 R% j9 {( m8 ]0 S. `& t$ aif not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
0 R& ^9 n, T" C' P0 zand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
& k( V$ d9 K4 Y) Kotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
( u4 i" R; G0 x- Xhave u studied law or anything rela...
1 g0 [( g. f! U8 E

" H( W. k' p0 o$ ?4 `黑字 : 係轉貼4 ?# j1 B* u1 E8 Z& r, n4 l
7 A9 z3 l# _) r0 d1 o( |
紅字 : 個人感想
+ V, f, X7 ?; v, i8 R2 Q) T* C5 I1 ]/ x
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
7 E: Y$ p& P! G- `% @6 ?it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.+ v( _& D$ T4 k( I9 T9 N# L
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. ) K" W5 B+ }2 b8 I" D0 C6 V
just becareful even if the words arent your own words..
0 _; `) s+ _5 a- {4 tgood luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
$ n. U2 j* w+ I4 `% Y8 i該警員明顯地想息事寧人...5 ?) M! u% Q9 }
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
: Y7 s9 r! f4 w7 n' F  W+ Y/ R如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間( A7 c$ A9 d) s% h- v
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
7 q) \  D) c( t; X4 \, \5 p# g我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
9 `5 C2 K1 I4 l) q  Y) Z該警員的處理手法絕對洽當0 a- }! F" j( \
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
$ k& O% a& D* f; j9 w由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0