Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.! S* U0 v- ?, u$ a* b' k0 p9 ]$ S

- G. `% |, e1 F( @  Q" X$ ?0 D毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
# q5 X  k' U3 H$ J9 v4 C7 ~$ q" C; R# ?, V
對打人者只作出警告了事.
/ ?4 b2 @' C) B$ C1 p/ u6 y1 |& U( y3 O- I$ R" }8 `
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
$ E9 @8 U0 B! ~, p% G1 h- U0 D% U' A
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
% T8 L: M. c5 H" Z( f. z% h. I" v' m1 ?! Y
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.# N5 S, d, m& c  B5 z

" P  V$ z' E3 f  g4 B% w請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.' X# @9 I3 A$ R* M
" K1 Y: _% Z8 L
- R) s# o$ ~2 n1 @1 i

) S5 i& O$ b$ v& O( c8 b個人認為.....
* ~1 k4 B) {! {3 f7 T0 G9 S8 O' N7 ]) y* Q
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番). C4 p9 {$ a1 d

7 e% z4 X9 {4 x, q8 `( }  r! p- t4 W- n好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

7 Z7 s1 Y1 g7 u, i7 F0 g' m8 j  \1 Y5 a5 r3 A6 \# y
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?0 r3 v3 M7 t* c0 v
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?* D  p3 U( t  @; w* k, r$ K0 e5 U
are you the witness of the incident?) d* I' @+ D* k) X6 t
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
+ _1 d& B2 k5 y& l+ uand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
. R7 M' n  X% F4 q1 P1 M0 X" v  v5 Uotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:6 {; j2 {! w$ S0 D
have u studied law or anything rela...
' o0 A" H4 s8 ^$ Q8 ^& ^$ \$ N0 T' z) T
黑字 : 係轉貼
* {. Y/ {" ?% |
( {7 [% e' R3 K7 y4 w紅字 : 個人感想2 ?$ c! h# S. F, n
; m3 m. M# y" b% W3 X
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval 3 Z6 F1 W9 n) T: z, c: U
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.* X# L2 d" z7 ?
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
; d$ C. H  }# B& b+ Ojust becareful even if the words arent your own words..
/ |, E* P% o+ h6 M; Kgood luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為7 z# G8 ]& H- G/ a0 y- D
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
4 v: W4 P4 E5 g5 B5 H% ?唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
0 E2 D# T0 Z- {! @0 _' N如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
- [4 {& J) `, W' w以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
( ^& J9 O$ j6 O2 \; b我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事1 d: E* Y$ c* G+ e( v4 [6 l- |+ ]
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
6 X6 ?6 E! j3 x5 M* b$ H請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
! a; E$ z: M" m2 m由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0