Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
6 H, J+ S: P- o! t/ A2 m( T
& R6 T; i5 M0 \; p1 B毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.7 C5 P( v/ q" L, a- ~* w
1 W+ j$ x! `  W0 \0 I
對打人者只作出警告了事.7 }1 e0 \8 i' H' L  I# B

0 g: ~: d# B% j% b8 ?) n) I差人涉嫌包庇打人者.! k) E6 q: E4 x. }; j7 h" O
/ g1 y; y, Z# O
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
2 b4 y# Z+ E+ x0 f/ \$ q, p3 o
$ u  b0 l  |7 a! r而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
/ B% [' o: R. x/ Z
2 }0 ]) k# [8 g5 V0 }請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事., |& d. ^( ~; w9 e/ D0 k! K

- T0 S; H( [8 g
% K* O. U# W2 p9 Z1 U6 }+ ~
; C7 x6 v1 h0 Z個人認為.....) w2 y- T, H' O1 N
: d1 `: g( o) P% l( `+ u
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)+ `; D& o- O0 T- @1 E
2 D' S5 l4 b- H% d5 `
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

4 ~  U3 x) O( l( f1 l+ ^; r+ r+ T, \& w+ m
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?: S/ Q3 j2 p- R8 i( N4 O- \$ I
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?" L" d$ L" Y/ M- X- v1 k% y. r
are you the witness of the incident?5 o* y2 s9 }+ n9 a
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..9 F1 G  a- z0 B' U9 k; i4 l
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".8 P9 N+ C3 }+ t) H( ]" l
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:  H3 b- e+ f7 J* ^9 W* n
have u studied law or anything rela...
! C8 u/ w' w4 u/ y1 ^& `2 x9 D9 D8 y9 A
黑字 : 係轉貼0 o* `6 ~0 g* I

. x( J8 F) G4 T$ k$ ^: y紅字 : 個人感想
9 F, S  ~5 g9 G7 ~- ~, w0 m9 s/ y4 k. {9 w- _
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval ; `0 M( Y. c, R8 `" q0 z
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
7 z$ h; N- B. }btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
3 t, }  J# c3 \# ~just becareful even if the words arent your own words..
) A$ F7 `: A0 j' m# ?" H7 z% p: kgood luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
1 a8 F& f, x% k7 o& B該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
& H- z$ |* [7 s/ ?# o/ D8 s唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
; m* K; _0 l8 C7 n如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間! W* l' F7 E1 i" H( y
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說" z" F0 v- J/ y' Y, t7 O
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
1 G$ Z% l2 Y2 M! i; J* W該警員的處理手法絕對洽當% T3 Q( Q7 L8 a, x1 Q! q
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
4 h! y" e/ {3 [! R, ^由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0