Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.: P2 i7 v7 c6 y) A5 A2 O/ E

4 M+ k, \8 D# J$ `  K毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.) S: v. e% o) s+ F6 `3 H
( \6 P' o* {; g* }) k
對打人者只作出警告了事.
' B4 d9 J: D4 L7 e- w/ d8 S
0 u, i4 N7 A( V' z$ ~  c3 s差人涉嫌包庇打人者.+ `# \4 S3 ~0 O9 S% }( f, m9 r) Y

/ \- ?) x, s  ?7 Ohttp://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ. Y. Q: J  [' `( U

& e3 `5 o$ ]- u/ i) J3 P* ]# V而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.( `4 p2 M( w6 U. ]
' o' |5 h$ `! |4 e
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
4 Z  p/ d9 X. j; }* l8 K. h, H
+ p+ }! e5 e; T0 r0 @+ b
2 X0 s) a% |2 l6 m- X8 {
7 T2 J  [  c8 ]. f個人認為.....
7 P) a& M% ?  _; ^! e2 S; r, A3 y! z
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)& Z8 O7 Y9 L% R5 X+ ]3 K- K2 ?

4 I) [& K9 Q6 T好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

. @7 c' P* e/ E) o
  g0 O$ w$ F9 j; {[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
6 g7 L3 i) j: V2 n7 Y6 C" edo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?; M6 D1 |, `& E4 g2 C
are you the witness of the incident?1 y' P& K( Q5 e: E6 c" B3 c
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
0 J( @& W+ Z7 Land better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".8 K7 K3 ^: Z- h2 y% ], R) w
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:* U, y$ W0 s  U% W7 }2 S
have u studied law or anything rela...
) t% t/ G: \1 \; t) n/ U
9 O5 U# w* I6 E9 |' `
黑字 : 係轉貼
2 E1 M' l, s5 ^8 z
( ^5 z3 |. `1 {9 Y5 m紅字 : 個人感想
8 ~8 M/ P* N8 K6 w) c$ }, i& v7 A) b& h* s% ?2 `: W
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
1 m$ r+ w- T' H. `4 E8 qit's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.# m# r9 f4 p3 a( g4 e
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. ; ~2 N% }& {5 \8 Q
just becareful even if the words arent your own words..5 u5 y7 v5 s1 n# d% @& ~% F
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
& f* D% L% P4 L( ?  J7 ~該警員明顯地想息事寧人...' f# X% `& b! z: o
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得) Q0 P1 [/ C! l- M
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間$ D( b( a) r0 m  }# P3 e
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說9 y2 n" g3 |7 H$ n
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事) L3 B/ V( ?5 @2 |# y1 X
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
8 ?0 R  \' e$ X5 c$ d請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x% Y; o. a( r) w7 _5 [7 F; L3 P/ K
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0