Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.1 u) d$ z3 T6 i
% @4 Y( C9 A: V' u8 P4 X6 o( X% U
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
! i4 W8 s1 [9 I/ a' |  z* E8 h- E' }8 z
對打人者只作出警告了事.. i4 U$ E& N+ `, {5 K/ V
9 Z: T% v) J- }; O( i
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.) _  o+ c3 U3 R  \
7 V) n6 H! k  m" F8 _
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
) ^" O. \2 J' q8 ^7 L$ i
; s; f) X# ~6 P: X9 l6 R而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
* {9 a" e$ I6 i) ^# O5 U' O
3 R% ~' s5 ^4 t! f! {請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.7 y6 h0 H. @% O7 c2 u) i

! ], u% |4 N. E3 Y+ A
! \0 i! ]+ b6 a% }* V9 f* @( L1 I* V6 [- ~
個人認為.....; h# x4 {- J5 v  S7 _# C

# O9 C5 b' B  ?* D岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番), e5 \" t8 m' V! U* f# X

- M! O7 n7 U. F; L, n好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
3 |5 z6 E+ u( w7 [* O
# n$ }: p* T& D7 d# c# o9 g
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
: _) e+ M6 `! y% v; S6 [4 hdo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?! O8 d! i7 r) c7 O4 K, a9 A+ E
are you the witness of the incident?% M5 G0 s* O3 Z6 M. l
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..9 X8 v  p) z. L+ a- W' Y. ~7 F
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".$ U' Y! c: V& M9 X) Z
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:$ z$ W1 G4 j& p. H; R1 x% ~
have u studied law or anything rela...
6 {. j: A$ A* m' z& A

( A7 W/ G" N- @  j2 d' F5 G5 X黑字 : 係轉貼
* E; }/ T( J$ J1 i' o1 X
9 @5 F$ U9 X: q3 Q3 E紅字 : 個人感想
7 K  |  c0 B/ |& N) a( X5 a: ^4 l; l/ T: [+ n
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval 9 L* l* S5 r8 j5 e
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
: Y" C2 B- X& c' K2 Wbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
- L- X, i/ p" z) Sjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..6 |& L- k2 U6 ]; B
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為9 o0 Z. s; T0 z8 Y; q: V
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...' t& K* p2 a; T& T, O) z/ X
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得- _; q/ c5 E# U" q7 @
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間+ `/ w/ X; l  B- U$ s6 K
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說+ a2 f4 x, o9 d4 H! o
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事0 \: E9 P* C2 `
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
5 r1 a0 `' Z. Y- \0 l3 |請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
  @( |% [2 u" w! ]8 Q+ l  z5 S由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0