Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.  `+ ~' o# i) x& V, E7 d: J

* R" m) o, b% v) u0 ?毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.7 V0 R5 W5 ], J) p
* }( c1 J7 T0 ?5 y
對打人者只作出警告了事.
& L& u: d- ^- \  Q7 ?" d/ p7 C9 m$ U, K$ _
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.# ^7 Z- `) D. A! y! c. P+ v; a6 J' _
5 A5 h' ^+ ~; [* k% s, \6 T
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ, e" ]* p% |1 A+ ^6 U

& E. ]4 d* k+ C1 d9 z8 k# r而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
+ n, L7 V5 w- X! Z& E* |
0 f% e5 e$ C# [: V請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
9 a* `* C' l/ q8 e7 n7 m" V
" b: C; Q9 C! A- H, ?, p" u8 r
4 ]+ j' e+ f7 w
3 R/ q8 X5 Q# K個人認為.....+ B$ C1 ^2 g% E' b

& e/ ?+ t0 B" [, r岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
; t: D, f& @3 r; F2 f) U9 }% a( W2 z1 Q$ O2 B7 L% S4 H8 b
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

1 d/ n! r% r6 u# i. u; m: r: ^. n- z, `# ^* |) I/ i
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
* Z' A% F; o4 J# Xdo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?8 x4 ?) i+ {! p& L
are you the witness of the incident?
1 h) {- f0 i0 X# X2 k# Q4 Bif not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..! r. j/ V( e0 O, C
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
# X8 ^$ E! v# A7 Rotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
8 O. z, a9 i" J8 p( [3 z/ hhave u studied law or anything rela...
. F; y% Y7 E0 Z% j
  m5 l$ r: @& G1 @* }6 a
黑字 : 係轉貼. I9 U% ~4 d+ R8 D# B4 l: u
- P& y: O( `% b5 k: V; k
紅字 : 個人感想
. \; B, `( y, j/ p. w
- x  C8 s0 M6 h, ~ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
: P% b. m8 k0 `it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.. N2 }5 `9 ^: `
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
/ w3 r! ^; J. d. Q& q- b, |5 B  i: Njust becareful even if the words arent your own words..
$ v% L4 T3 O- `! ugood luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為7 ~3 U9 e: A5 l& Z
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...% q1 G# c* I* T7 W
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得$ Z8 E- P/ H# U/ c( ^! L
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
* p6 Q4 Z; l2 _' T. ~; W& O以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說) |9 }. z/ o! r% x( n1 ~
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
- ~( _# [1 }/ K7 q5 j" }該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
; h: f9 [6 F+ P請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
& Z2 Q' Q, D6 [+ F由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0