Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
' V; U% C* Q7 J. o9 @
0 G! z3 U* a9 B2 L* R毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
# l1 F! @0 X+ p$ l( J6 L5 P6 Q# ~1 y" o  v
對打人者只作出警告了事.
+ j+ x7 L" P0 L1 T# v% t+ l+ T4 A2 x1 g. x
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.; R+ u  s8 U( G# k2 @
6 l+ u& m* C5 _/ V  \
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
% ]5 c1 n: m% B4 D6 b  l. _; o- X) j+ o, x+ g+ j6 ]1 u
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
. B* X! Y" k* c/ Q4 E/ G
6 t. a. A8 C+ B- @. M) i請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.8 S. c: R6 w& f4 k

) z2 j0 h% }) G  p0 F% @, [# o/ a' Y9 F7 e+ y; @  A

% q: S  b7 b. u個人認為.....+ j  b/ C3 F& y* c; \* n
# b6 r2 C. _! [- R# b
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)8 c5 M/ \' m) D4 T* S& ^

) N7 ?, T( B  M' I' c. X( \好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

% B9 t% W$ {, ^7 |/ L5 k! q/ B# q. O# j) C
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?3 X' G% ?) n" O" S9 G- A
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?
2 m$ q1 N) `4 J1 l5 g! sare you the witness of the incident?
" E' X9 j. @& E. N# k) K6 U2 c4 Uif not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
' X5 Y$ w& \7 S( o8 }# }and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
) z: M7 y6 W2 Q" s" U/ @2 i& Lotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:1 D4 C9 f% `# x6 d
have u studied law or anything rela...
1 T2 D5 ?5 T2 h& ^/ X" U) U8 q) _  l- {, p
黑字 : 係轉貼" ~2 d7 l- w- D0 q

1 }8 g: i2 L& P5 D& C! {紅字 : 個人感想! Q1 Z$ v6 U7 k5 j  @
) X' w/ H, e5 ?7 f
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
9 s  W# g& m5 p3 {" c0 \it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
7 g" e( @3 k. Lbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
1 Q# K7 }- c, o' `8 Q9 i" ]4 Cjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..$ U/ l3 X" @5 }' N
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
. f: o' N) p4 m5 ]: B- t) W5 }該警員明顯地想息事寧人...3 L2 s) T- T, n1 F
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得+ k2 X6 T) z- d, N+ e! @6 N0 e
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間( U8 |8 s( F3 _' i/ H
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
# D# e3 V( Y1 t我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
; J% v6 ?$ r% g& P, s# |( [& ]該警員的處理手法絕對洽當: I, W. W$ O& m0 [  ?4 J7 N
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x- o( z- p8 H* k; m! l+ n* t
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0