Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
) u4 I2 Y' v+ N1 E6 a/ n9 r
. g9 x8 r/ X, k+ ~" |+ X毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動./ R7 h+ J' X' P/ I3 `
% z+ P$ o' t) i+ g& r3 P
對打人者只作出警告了事.7 Q# K; Y/ B: l! x
% b" S2 T7 V+ R
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
. ~  p! F  V  m( K$ h4 D1 k- ?& K2 `2 J
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
$ R4 }% Z( \' G( I9 s
& `6 a  m  v& y  I: `而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
6 D: _5 S# P0 M; J' n8 d% W1 m6 |) {! t, U3 c" R: `2 u
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.* D) J+ |9 `' M- X
7 ~) A9 j" q) W! H& u

* o9 N7 E/ ^1 J- w2 ^0 m9 p1 X
, R2 V9 Q0 [2 ~+ N; H個人認為...... T$ E! @! @1 i' o* O. H+ u% r

9 ]1 j2 s3 g0 n, P4 I* \& ~1 f9 v岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
. O% k. I+ P7 F# W8 {4 l2 y; R+ z: g3 Q" e$ E4 {2 L. b9 Y
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
' H$ Z4 t3 r3 M) O

. _$ u+ P2 w: Q" L  z[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?9 j8 g2 }4 g& D$ b8 L( ?
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?
: R! _  J7 [: c) U, Ware you the witness of the incident?
; Q/ S/ w+ m. L8 z; |if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
) v+ {) {3 b- L) C' w4 H5 iand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
& \+ [8 W- R  \* a0 G9 Rotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:5 @4 q% f; K- g, g8 ^1 T4 e
have u studied law or anything rela...
+ x$ `! u  i$ ~

# X' A) l3 j' i9 g- o黑字 : 係轉貼
1 t$ {3 e( o# d( c0 j: c6 {
- K2 [- W( }% r$ c紅字 : 個人感想
5 p1 ]: a1 f) z' V& q
" u  N' o0 }# _; b( @ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval ; {) U: L2 f, w
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
1 ^% N7 B* x7 T! {btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
) O* E/ z/ r3 k9 ]just becareful even if the words arent your own words..7 `7 ~# W; |/ U1 k
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
! m, Z* K& u7 O% c+ a# P( [該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
4 s$ \' x5 P* ?1 Y1 _7 l* ^0 r唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得0 |" h* {# I4 Y" N( d+ e
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間- c8 \6 f" w* x+ Q4 n
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
6 B2 Q% K% Z+ y/ A6 `我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事) B& Q9 m7 C, P3 O+ N
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
' R( \# Q$ b( l( {9 {請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x" ]/ o, S3 U' h- q. p
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0