Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.& j: e, x" T$ j, C# m4 z
7 t, s5 ~. z9 U1 Q
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.. I! p0 E9 Z# `1 |6 _/ E# s8 k
8 u% x: a7 g% A& }5 I* x
對打人者只作出警告了事.
% @# A. t) u2 e' r) I$ P3 d3 y$ [6 x( g' @6 ], x
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
. @9 C) ~$ O' s' X* O( O
* `! B$ g- v& W6 Bhttp://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ0 b2 n' a3 g0 A: I- G1 P, x/ `- e
( p1 A4 k" e. j. Y( ~3 X2 \
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
7 X# K! \; y& c7 s! A8 \9 J
- u' L( T7 A/ B& k5 g5 |請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.$ L% r# s& H6 D6 l

% u6 b8 h) {6 ?" ?
6 T0 y1 z& ?9 c0 Y
: Y- b5 `! \" K( @) `個人認為.....2 k& }7 M- o& F% ]
7 @9 ]4 l6 Y+ X9 w( Y2 T( ?; T- v3 a
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
8 n& S: q, \9 y" I! Y( |# ^2 q& K2 D$ _
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

# x) z% ~+ p8 c1 y, o( u2 c; M: X. ?7 K+ |1 D
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?6 v! Z; T! O9 J5 \0 Y
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?$ u+ s# @3 V( X# J
are you the witness of the incident?2 k0 L6 C5 [/ s; I. X
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
3 t4 P3 V, P& g. ]/ r2 xand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
0 c4 ]9 U% v) l+ M* @otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:+ R4 l  i) ]7 w
have u studied law or anything rela...
& d  m) c' [$ q
1 H6 M2 e0 ^0 c& @$ z/ q
黑字 : 係轉貼
( E* D4 V, y& x$ W' ~; l9 L, i+ A" ~5 r. J
紅字 : 個人感想3 M  n0 Q1 Q3 ~! [

' A" M: t4 t. @# ^ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval ! n3 t. l5 f; q
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.) d% Y# i2 ?- i! [' x) ?6 R
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
! }- O/ ^( X' ?+ u2 \% }( ]8 Djust becareful even if the words arent your own words..
# L/ i) `# B2 t) O5 w2 f: ?good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為5 v) A  H$ [+ ~8 J  p
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
3 {: p$ c, L9 V& p  ?% t+ z唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得; C8 a1 V9 N; `& Y
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間' ?" S1 u5 J# s3 F, Y6 K
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
& P/ h  e, O& W* h, d3 u我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事; h0 R3 Q# O; G
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當$ I7 Y" T9 L7 `) ]4 @9 P
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
/ E! i; p. Z+ L由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0