Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.8 @/ N1 `* |% K

( d$ B# Q0 O4 ~( w; f5 N毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.3 F0 n& T- @# J0 u! Q
, M' }. Y6 Y# B  G2 h7 @
對打人者只作出警告了事.2 ?) _6 m3 T3 M& v
  f$ H( d3 e* P; V
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
: _' @) x/ n( s1 y* v" g% G! j8 v6 U& p; I
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ" r( w% U" y# d  q' L  z& I9 X
% ~# x& o5 G( F  x/ E
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.% e( C1 |- E  U3 x
7 M2 S9 m0 ?( H. }1 X& Q
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
- F" p; r- n) M0 f: Z1 A
* a# m. w  U" W# {
0 X# [$ [" y5 t
. w0 K' n% |* C7 x9 g個人認為.....: M( W) c1 L1 ]" u( ?. C

* \4 i& s0 S  e/ h- |岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
1 J. u% Y* t6 f" N+ B
% s1 F: e4 X/ I/ H. D好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

9 l* J5 U; v7 e- C/ \% v6 \0 t
" g2 u& ?* S% e% q3 J* M[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?8 _' ~* e# L) l: F
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?& q" ?4 {" P( ?' X4 I$ r4 F
are you the witness of the incident?( b) Z+ l4 D8 I
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..5 `8 i/ x4 M5 q3 ^8 {
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
/ t& P! N) K: fotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
5 i# T5 |' l6 k  t: G8 x. khave u studied law or anything rela...
) T5 k1 w! G& m% L! d" C- I8 R

( i7 o) O' e5 K9 k8 T$ i黑字 : 係轉貼
; t; u5 e, N; S2 T0 c3 b0 W7 B% L& q
8 |0 w' N& G4 I+ S$ O紅字 : 個人感想7 z0 P. y$ \2 Z3 `+ P# n

( {% O% E: [& L' Dok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval " x& ~1 V3 \* i6 P+ U
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.6 C$ L. c; E9 s- i- c7 H( y; I
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
/ K. O# c8 \$ f5 ?just becareful even if the words arent your own words..
% d9 y1 P3 e+ z& @good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為! Q. Z/ t) z4 ~  p# W! g, u
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...2 f+ B! V. p* ?. U
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得0 R  V' {' H* i+ D( m/ \) l
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
5 S3 C6 S- D! W2 h: M) k以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說* U& K8 d2 a5 k- N+ Q4 |
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
9 s% p  e9 s6 B- [% f' Z該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
# q' \) W# h5 B6 f9 K. `% N請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x+ W: x* _! `5 L+ v
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0