Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.  U7 Q9 z( W, l6 U' Z+ ]

8 u7 V; U1 y4 O" k* B# A# H" ^毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
& ]9 h& d7 K  u! s& U
9 R, R, Z8 s0 d* h* o對打人者只作出警告了事.* z5 S: L, N1 @3 A) x/ x( S

4 c2 ]4 r( w7 ]差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
6 G9 n# v" n- D/ L( x) R- J% {  e- n8 T% @
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
# D7 X1 Y1 v1 T; v' A3 [/ p/ z; c7 w/ h! P: J2 e( }
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
% c/ N. n, K1 ~- g  x' u1 c$ q$ @
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
1 L0 E+ L$ Z$ x; S. M3 E+ h) K7 j+ K6 j8 P1 ~5 Y

) `. P& m: t. E$ A* S( ]$ C' d% v0 b% |' c3 r. Q) e) V5 V* l
個人認為.....( d. f) `2 C" y$ f+ B0 T# ~

" I% p# j/ T2 ~岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番): A/ q4 c. I4 I6 Q4 Z

9 o  R0 ~  A8 ~4 B好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
) `7 t$ m# G) L( w5 ^  M* k$ M
* U; O$ f" N; ^/ f! {0 B
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
6 L) ]$ v0 O/ q1 \  d' y' T! ?9 Cdo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?
: e4 W: [/ i6 ?0 `, q6 dare you the witness of the incident?/ K  C0 b# r9 O( o
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..7 I  q. i; U, S
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
& |$ u7 ?* ?$ @4 v* G9 Iotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:5 p3 y$ b' n9 B& v6 ^
have u studied law or anything rela...
8 R. [- o6 z5 ^. z3 n

2 I( I2 _7 P" |黑字 : 係轉貼5 r& g9 u+ Q- Q% d1 b; N7 Q

3 X! n3 {2 f- ?8 @" }! p紅字 : 個人感想
; ^. h5 ^: K* x, h1 n0 H! S3 `3 v  `9 d
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval ! _& q- Q' {) H2 o4 [0 T
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
9 K9 ?8 m7 i& ebtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. : j' E3 V4 p) [* k/ H
just becareful even if the words arent your own words..0 Y5 h. G1 n$ }  v( c  K' S% d
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為3 q$ N! @+ |* t
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...3 K2 t2 Z7 A  L3 O# q
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
2 N2 _' s6 V/ u) }; p5 A! K/ u3 f3 a如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間0 f: R1 Q1 N* e) ?# `
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
) e0 X0 O: s. e4 F我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事0 ~$ E" o8 F# H9 y
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當! m* R7 o5 e. h% Z$ n3 c
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
* F& d; V" a- n, }  f& Q由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0