香港法例有等如無. $ ~/ H: d& h p' x$ T- H $ U- w$ V' [. \' R0 b毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.: j4 N" w+ {5 f8 U) E
- b. Q Q$ V, w! @5 |! N% G! Z
對打人者只作出警告了事. 7 e/ E k- V; ?! W 5 _( G, @0 d$ Z- E: r2 C3 }差人涉嫌包庇打人者. ( ^ N) F5 D7 y; w/ t$ [; }1 p) N3 k4 U R+ \4 c4 { http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ1 G9 }4 S2 |( @# |" }9 n
; _" h" z$ R+ _' v5 }
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯. * m; F/ l+ l4 Q8 Q `6 v) V: Y: V, ~請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事. ; B/ t. Z! S! ]& W% T0 ]* L5 V" ?8 ~2 ?- V; V6 N+ j" v
2 @4 v( Q7 ?# |( F& j9 r8 I8 a9 I' ~
個人認為..... , B8 m; C/ ]5 G, b1 a) [) F 0 k/ L) O$ X- C* G/ \岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番) " z7 L; {% m9 K3 F3 j ; u$ _1 G8 p8 L5 K. U( z& l好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野..... ; \" ~' ~5 O9 c7 j' w5 m$ s+ z8 o1 ]/ E* C+ v- z) D( |. x
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM
have u studied law or anything related to legal studies? 6 Z l/ u1 A5 J- f! Vdo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"? $ ~0 G) N3 m! ]4 O. P: c4 o, ^6 rare you the witness of the incident?- s; W- T$ ], R# b, H4 B7 R1 e
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue.. . A; @/ q' v0 U9 [% fand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打". 6 E/ ]! Z5 p s; W, v2 Fotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"作者: jen01二世 時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM
Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:, e/ |- }- E7 x, t' h f5 Q
have u studied law or anything rela...
) i8 I8 U3 i- P
/ d8 @4 {7 g/ ^6 O ]黑字 : 係轉貼 ) i. m5 v; E( o% O/ {) F7 [3 o6 P! @" W" q
紅字 : 個人感想1 p9 u+ ~% v _' A$ N r
4 d2 K; }4 L" h* k$ e0 B: O& n' \: i
ok ??作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM
dont have to ask for my approval 8 T5 U) w0 J6 f; a6 a: f) H3 W
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.. H, ]+ K% [8 j1 a# Y% a, t r
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. ) o7 D. H0 g: [3 `just becareful even if the words arent your own words../ P8 }) q! t3 R' h9 z0 K2 ^& N: [. x
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.作者: lastwing 時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM
我係甘認為 " E9 a' U, ^+ H3 f, ]0 d9 |: U" Z該警員明顯地想息事寧人... ' |: k) P5 F H$ o1 @唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得: r! R, I7 f: W* Y9 R0 V
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間 ' ]7 L- @; M. x4 g" ~4 j5 x以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說 # S! g4 t1 b0 W+ D" W1 g我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事5 z. Z; a" K$ e
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當 ) ]9 {5 I, Y2 V. |6 s. [請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x9 [* ]; |& W& J
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道
8 T5 U) w0 J6 f; a6 a: f) H3 W