Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
& C6 p( c$ p7 O' i* ^
0 d, M/ i0 b4 z6 {7 J$ u毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
- k& i8 Y7 Z  Q" Z- b* @* d- ]7 c9 {* }
對打人者只作出警告了事./ Z$ h# h5 F3 T+ w6 Q9 \+ @* \
& X: M" j" S( Y
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.) X+ b6 u. `; b" e

6 I( V8 u4 d: C( ]( q0 v" Zhttp://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
* M) Z  v  ?/ u& F% N" o1 C! \. G* D. l7 f! ^7 j
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.( n* S+ X2 h' j/ K& v

9 q+ z. S+ A& N$ }請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
7 d# Q6 {; Y+ e7 i, a0 J! k$ [3 ]) s' B  [6 }  `

8 S! ^: O# F5 \+ K' g5 I$ w$ u0 L7 s. ?; Q
個人認為.....
9 t6 F3 H6 t7 G( p
; b2 p2 c6 U9 d% R  L* ~岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
7 ]6 e4 N2 g% i) f1 N7 S" J- O8 g' ^( p, d( g
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
9 {7 ?2 Q$ S- E* ]& A; I
, @4 G5 w0 j$ e3 Z% h8 I
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
& y1 w9 v  @' w  Xdo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?
, z1 @& i- S# G5 x- Vare you the witness of the incident?3 w' _  f2 D0 j& {
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..4 K$ w( d% D  H+ q5 u; I2 m/ w. |
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
" e& Y' N2 L$ P1 s) H# c) potherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:0 \  M7 R- p  Z+ Y3 G
have u studied law or anything rela...
7 X" e* _: P* `; H
" b* V# ~( R0 D
黑字 : 係轉貼
$ V9 x; f% [! A8 d5 a: Z5 O6 q6 n: B6 v/ g. }0 }4 M2 g
紅字 : 個人感想
3 T% ]2 D* ?3 D" @5 S) C% t& Y0 T8 H/ u
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval " D( p- I2 A4 p; z* V
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
: c2 {. O( H: S2 f: c# z! I8 Dbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. 6 L( J  o' j4 g3 e& T
just becareful even if the words arent your own words..2 Q% K  B' g! @$ t
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為: S. ~$ J4 d* V- C) p7 ^
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...6 |' E8 ~2 a. ]0 A2 o- \5 I
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得. M8 w4 s: Q$ D/ p, a- d
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間0 s2 u. `+ j' v- k7 f) q
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
& C* E3 t2 {1 ~0 Q- F) E  a' H我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
. S& u% c* [1 K. N" b該警員的處理手法絕對洽當! ^* ^- J& i6 f/ P  V" H8 Z$ n
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
9 _/ I, x& ~( S- O7 Q& U% E由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0