Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.) S8 D" N% S* O8 S4 T! i/ I8 O

2 w7 _- j8 ^4 j6 Q  @  k毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動./ E0 R- [2 q$ y& v1 u

& v' l9 ]0 [$ S/ f: I1 |對打人者只作出警告了事., P3 }; y  M! E  V

8 F: K" k% s; k差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
) L) }9 z) i4 |* l7 D9 D/ B
2 s$ X  j: L" |6 |: H; Ohttp://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ- ]; f& O- Q: W# n3 Q4 F+ ?2 ~! }: b

( p* B! ]5 E% f; W& b+ e/ z0 _而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
! w' }! H: L! b; a" T9 t$ `
" o' m& F0 b. {2 p, z請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
' u! Z! A. Z# p
0 O$ O  k8 y5 X: Q
1 I0 E/ b6 z9 Z/ ]- M" h
7 I1 R# {- `% \個人認為.....
* B7 C) F$ ^) ~7 _! D' q/ u2 F1 D6 P4 ^$ Q
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)! E- S! I. b' f  h6 M0 d/ F
* Z# [2 U0 V  |' w
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
" L& ?7 L/ h  V

9 R3 q9 [- W( p' t0 o) s: Q: i[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?! W2 y  c, G8 l, F' k4 `
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?
# a/ ?% e, h2 kare you the witness of the incident?( v0 e) y4 h) h
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..6 m$ D  _. j4 f' U# @
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
1 O" O, A9 q2 y3 ~% r) Aotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:' p# O  ~% ?. E
have u studied law or anything rela...
2 G2 R: r# |; V0 s
7 j8 n! w/ t# W  ^% H- S
黑字 : 係轉貼% N; Y& n; ~% ]1 a1 Y* i

: O# m  D6 ^. X5 k3 @6 ~+ H紅字 : 個人感想2 D4 l; ?! a( i& L8 e# }) J) A- [

% t$ J1 Z" m+ I8 d# C4 |ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval 3 q" L. s! ^3 [* X, A
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.$ A0 b2 f: T5 v" r+ `, H" L0 l
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
. F. S+ A( j! g0 g; ]& Z' sjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..
1 B1 ^3 M2 M3 zgood luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
% h4 K1 Z& Y) `, c! ~該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
3 b+ ^/ ~0 C# k2 E; i" ?唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
/ C, ^: j# f) J( K' x$ o( Y) I如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間1 O$ p% |( k9 B, @: D$ Z
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說4 O; M' Q% a" c9 k. l/ b
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
* {! [0 C4 Z3 G& E- D該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
4 S$ a9 M# ^0 ]) R1 j  E6 B3 O# m; z, r請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x% ^5 B# t( g7 m  @+ b* V1 }
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0