香港法例有等如無. 4 I8 l. I6 \8 Z& p5 G 6 k/ Z D, q/ @& _, f; x毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動. ; w/ c9 O3 }" C- U1 [ ( i; P( l2 A8 i: X0 {8 j% V s2 [$ s對打人者只作出警告了事. * k1 g: ?! l5 P/ D) M, _; }1 H/ b8 `4 i' B1 M. a2 X
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.+ q* ?; w" E. ?5 N5 z- y( x
) _4 x& s. Y" [* K, ~5 i) @ _1 z http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ" L/ P; j j8 X& f
% J$ ^8 j3 c% ]而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.% U# `$ \" M& y v
$ a1 ?3 y* O: q# O4 s, o4 G
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事. 5 G" g( h C( j% I4 _, e - Y R$ T( Q* l' O* { ' g# R; J/ Q4 T" x! c4 q 0 W3 W4 _4 s$ e: z7 r/ c) ?個人認為..... 0 [1 s" t4 H8 ]# `# d+ Q% q3 a2 x Z; e3 z5 @/ E. R, z4 S2 i
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番) 3 z! e- q9 u8 w( F / `: A& C6 G" P) x6 J( ?1 f好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野....." K0 K1 u1 e( Z3 Y. Y$ x& U
8 K/ P3 Q" K" @0 X% y6 s' e+ V[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM
have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?, G5 f0 i% t4 ~# s
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?) w4 @- Z b. Q0 x& t. W! F
are you the witness of the incident?. }+ X) d1 y- F8 T, D) K. i! c
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..# d8 e3 E* @& v1 x0 H. |3 t, H' u+ |: ~7 W+ P
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".: o- p" C/ D/ k7 W8 _
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"作者: jen01二世 時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM
Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM: 9 V' J# Z+ s9 s5 I5 ]have u studied law or anything rela...
/ k J8 P1 @* {0 a . u4 f" w0 _! L黑字 : 係轉貼1 _8 P+ V% `: E' m: e
" k5 h% v; T) Z# }
紅字 : 個人感想 * C, C, V! F! G8 Z6 D( Q ! p* m0 P3 j% `: Cok ??作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM
dont have to ask for my approval m% N2 ~3 a% g) ~6 w1 T C, [it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.7 H4 G: j3 X* v9 r+ \
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. ' M/ w+ D% B! Q4 l& S/ Njust becareful even if the words arent your own words..% ]/ N; T& z3 z& _1 E0 c4 x: h* U
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.作者: lastwing 時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM
我係甘認為4 ~" s3 A( H& A w W* x
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...' D; r4 ?+ E9 i1 |/ n
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得 + P' x5 \- u8 k如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間+ s- f& |0 C3 E2 ]
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說% i% }; i2 @& M
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事" Q7 d- M4 W+ V8 Z
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當 4 h3 U6 ?4 w* _# Y% Z請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x / ~7 m1 B/ J' X; v) l; G由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道