Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.# e9 Z$ p! u8 \* r- U( z
+ D: }& h0 A- D  ?7 f
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.& S" w1 g8 [2 n+ q+ }
8 h4 y+ ]4 M; A8 |
對打人者只作出警告了事.' [3 m5 d1 M9 m
) T: k% K9 ]6 m( e- u4 l0 n5 g
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
1 i7 P' S) c& u( ?+ b
. s( y- U. E9 v3 n5 Thttp://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ$ Y% {3 _- }6 ?! E; I5 K
9 O$ @0 Z: Q/ G
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.' ]* H2 g1 X8 e
0 y3 h3 I8 ^% s! D" M" L
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
; U4 h& c9 D. }, W+ [3 A' @  k1 h# L  ^1 i( x

7 |5 Y4 Q- |! @& Z/ Z  }
) K5 U$ B3 o7 h( e  U; _0 T/ o- D個人認為....., @5 f7 @+ ^7 c* V2 J

, R' P: T5 s* _+ U8 t! _3 ~4 a岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
5 y! [# z4 w! O5 |% X  J: M
+ w3 B. c  [' `好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
' t0 a, d% x" `5 o7 i. d+ x$ e& X
" @' l$ i0 @# w& \- B( U
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?$ ~& A" y! L; f
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?6 H8 H7 e- Y9 v& F0 q
are you the witness of the incident?( D6 _! b6 W7 p: L. c
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
# F7 f5 w; C( F4 H2 e0 land better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".4 l) c0 z  M; m* Q- n
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:% }4 ?' q/ r% u; p3 K
have u studied law or anything rela...
! N. T' y/ C" q

4 t  Z) y# j# M% |0 H黑字 : 係轉貼
0 q  X: b! T# L4 c5 w6 g" m
- B- v3 ^  T* p7 h" C- D/ T紅字 : 個人感想
, [  }2 |/ Y* ?; J
5 U4 k- q' R, @' S' E2 q* Rok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval % ^% K$ ]8 O6 S1 b
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
0 R  g. C  T+ X" Kbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
8 j- c: q, v: A+ v( j. v# Fjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..! u+ N' X( R8 m. M0 B( ?# `2 K
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
$ D5 H) u  }5 A3 u. e$ [' q1 P. s該警員明顯地想息事寧人..." \" Q- R7 o9 E( }
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
8 P' U* t1 N7 l  J如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間, `+ |4 _. `: e6 I0 c/ b
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說/ |8 h2 R. P; W% e4 ^* `( V8 s
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事; z7 E7 W' z+ h" S( T* b* x; `+ h
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當1 Y* ^' U% G" [/ b6 s6 d
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
6 ~7 l/ s) p" }+ V由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0