香港法例有等如無. 5 @5 |; ~( G6 G+ E # q6 A$ ~5 Y& J. [毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動. 0 v. N$ A( N% U, s$ S % Z8 N3 h+ y& p5 \( |- m對打人者只作出警告了事. 8 ?0 u- r! w) ^, I3 t/ a5 ` / f8 C+ B6 T: {, c5 A* k差人涉嫌包庇打人者.* T/ ^: Z; f% P
8 I" [& D% X1 ~" y/ a2 e- o# J8 ? http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ 9 M! \( {/ n# P7 C; J0 o" B ) j% t% z; Q. z) l" x而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯. `4 o* I6 b3 r- B; n# }$ r
8 S6 [) |8 p' v7 p
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.: j7 n9 j, w. X3 K/ i
8 n* \ L, L7 h $ m6 G& ~. o0 A+ ^8 W) n3 k# J& F0 P7 x. C, e3 [1 b) l: V
個人認為..... 9 L+ ]1 K l0 @* g8 g , H0 L0 c+ s# }5 {# K* }* m岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)1 z% C5 N8 e. M8 q# V. H7 s/ ? E5 f
6 E j! b7 O! R1 [8 F5 {' S- K
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野..... $ v7 r. a( P5 H1 u ]5 u/ \" {) l* l2 B2 e
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM
have u studied law or anything related to legal studies? % E! `6 r! K5 i& |' m9 a, ido you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?" M' E) m3 U$ l4 r* \2 L. B1 s
are you the witness of the incident? ' g9 q7 H" C2 Iif not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue.. # Q/ O. t; W( d) A ^6 _4 zand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".0 O, C- E& y. ~7 h
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"作者: jen01二世 時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM
Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:2 m0 q, c2 o1 U/ g6 f
have u studied law or anything rela...
& C3 S. [4 l# u# E; z2 i% X* {' S- g I
( t m2 ?" X' v& v, G; w
黑字 : 係轉貼- L W2 y. R# q+ F% E5 _& i" S4 |1 I
5 [$ O5 O# w5 l! c4 F
紅字 : 個人感想, }$ g; ?) i! r3 Q4 o3 M
! D5 `0 H! n; ?8 ?2 n8 y
ok ??作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM
dont have to ask for my approval & G7 P/ a$ B- V, J$ H4 w E$ \9 C% a
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not. 9 p8 ~$ q- M. E |) l! k% Kbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. + X+ y* g8 D2 g; ejust becareful even if the words arent your own words.. 8 `" `5 N& q6 d; A) Z7 l/ f! D1 rgood luck and hope you could last long in this world.作者: lastwing 時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM
我係甘認為 : e6 A0 X" c% G+ h! Q. w該警員明顯地想息事寧人...! w g0 d, G, A9 U* ^
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得 ( Z+ |" q+ e% f2 w0 B如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間( G$ Z5 e" s) _6 e1 n ?- F9 S
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說 2 k; C8 w3 O- w: k3 t我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事8 ?9 i3 H C- R- H% R4 p! A+ l
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當 ' b% o" f, A* `請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x' l+ z X; A0 d+ u! I
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道
& G7 P/ a$ B- V, J$ H4 w E$ \9 C% a