Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.4 _! z: h5 N3 Q& @

$ G+ i! g' B, H! [) w毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
% g1 U& H7 i4 w
' i* K) d$ @! w8 b& X& d# ?3 e8 \對打人者只作出警告了事.
/ {+ r/ Z# T9 Q; N# y! j- z' x5 a
6 r2 I! T/ a9 l- t) r差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
5 [! V# W4 r, O( ?' f
& _5 M9 S1 W- k# fhttp://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
' p! i$ u$ T7 p  o. C, _! J+ B2 ^
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
) Y; L3 I7 w* T% P1 r- _
, d0 y$ N) [+ V% ^8 W, N請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.: I5 \9 h$ t/ }+ j4 ^$ \6 v

5 A& y5 c2 W( H  r( p& s4 U( {) G6 |' }$ I7 {2 c

5 y, h7 @/ A/ \% }% C7 e( ]個人認為.....
0 _3 b( V! ~. T% _( S6 s9 L/ u* T* ~: m) ^# {
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
$ k# `* d8 G1 M7 [3 q6 N  b' F, i2 b0 Y
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

) J! _) r& y1 N! z9 W$ u# M; q' ]6 ~4 \* D: `. W1 }  A* @
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?9 n$ G* D9 d+ t! k9 U9 }% Q
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?3 w$ M  }2 a* g5 y
are you the witness of the incident?; K2 I* m; C  R, I+ T
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
3 M% i; m/ y, l( [and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".( V3 i3 T& N( M+ Z( w: ?8 V
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:# F7 e( @! p# ~' |/ U
have u studied law or anything rela...
" G8 x, T$ R2 b% w* J- l' j0 v  u4 m! m. f1 q: e' h, X; z8 k
黑字 : 係轉貼
0 V4 k0 P1 G- `( Y
6 O# k6 X  {' k! }1 x紅字 : 個人感想
; u- H# k! a0 U
0 l& m, V" K1 _* Y+ qok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval / a# @8 K* L1 v* i
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
3 W8 h* \- h7 M; s- Hbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. / M4 S' D3 W, y$ W# g; O
just becareful even if the words arent your own words..* n& n+ E9 i2 I5 V5 n
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為  J. e1 }, n2 ~9 \& \4 `% _
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...& E% i& [1 r6 d% G% p
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得$ ~. a. X" v) v; P
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間$ F2 N7 p4 k- k3 R0 Z
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說2 k. G0 a& M3 k, O" }: M
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
5 W4 z, ?' `. [4 w該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
9 G$ W3 c# j: K+ h. J' r  b6 B" X請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
1 h( C! h3 f. {& u0 l% L# S由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0