Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
1 J9 l& t  U* E7 k" s- |+ |1 ^. y9 P- C# R( M
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.1 d# `4 {9 f8 c& y- Q: _
' k6 e2 E6 S2 }( l9 u
對打人者只作出警告了事.  T. G7 A2 w$ r; L

& q2 d; |6 L- N8 H差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
* `+ c& v* {1 t9 N! w* ?; x' h9 y8 r
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ* i- ?$ ^  M5 @& n; m
2 j5 N# c  P3 N8 d
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
9 Y# o4 N- s+ L$ {7 i1 F8 e$ v( {6 H; I- @
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
2 V" i9 K/ [% Y/ \
+ [  {0 D9 x/ U+ l; r& f5 O6 _; Z* G0 }- N. g* }! [
3 G7 c0 X. D+ p; \8 Z" U9 E/ f
個人認為.....% @) k# \. ^3 M8 @  i1 J3 {

& Y. ?% \0 i# T" l- `岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)) u( x) t( H1 k7 \" ]- S1 o3 N

" P+ T% C7 }0 |# P' [6 M* D好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

6 n5 E4 i) L( \; P/ d
' B5 t! z: Q2 n[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?$ F2 o0 P; f8 Z
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?- r. p; \9 M2 @0 B
are you the witness of the incident?
! X3 v. Y3 a6 ]. ]& wif not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..6 S8 s$ Q6 n! y  L, \
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
9 ~- {7 G9 M0 q, m7 |otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:! ]9 @3 \& a9 y4 N8 i  R. Q" T8 I
have u studied law or anything rela...
6 \. m( ]6 Y) P/ ?+ m4 |

3 |9 \6 }1 {( q2 ]黑字 : 係轉貼0 h# f1 x9 L; I, B# Q  N. B9 r
  l8 O: `! |% @7 ]
紅字 : 個人感想' @& P$ B3 ~6 v2 C
# x: a! [- L. _) e( _( D/ t3 F0 ^
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval 4 i5 X% H* L) |3 W' @
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.+ e0 ?. a, V/ _* A8 `5 }' n
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. 9 W& r; e3 j" W$ y3 J
just becareful even if the words arent your own words..6 w4 ~$ c# Y% }( W. K, A
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
. C1 A3 `  r% R- q- D/ M0 T3 i該警員明顯地想息事寧人...5 ?# I) d1 n( ?3 x8 |! ]
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得: d( f5 \8 n" S% l
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
; f# k  }1 a$ j6 j! |5 O以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說, W# t+ G$ P$ e) [( x
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事# O  B4 ^7 I7 b+ X  m* b
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當  W( ~7 G1 p5 c" j- u
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
* U6 f4 _  m2 j+ @, B5 N由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0