香港法例有等如無.& K# L9 v* O. N- w4 @6 w! K
& M6 U1 b% V4 W. q1 ?2 L
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.$ m" d- O9 p4 K: m3 W' [9 ]
- w2 V, W! i# E& c6 w* T! \對打人者只作出警告了事. 9 q, k1 v M' e0 m2 d) R# _; N' Q1 o+ |! ~. S1 k
差人涉嫌包庇打人者. 4 m6 g4 D: A+ v) r$ }$ O, y$ \5 y* ~* s0 r http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ0 D7 z3 X) U+ [5 v4 m
0 j2 J& G: y( @2 j而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯. 3 W6 y1 E1 E4 t; Q; F 1 E0 D- p o& j: w- ?請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.: k+ q: w$ l$ \) h
% z0 {& v; V4 m, b* l ?. j- d7 i# ] ! L1 j6 \4 U/ |- t6 E$ |2 E0 _* e" d7 f% w9 z. w. b. G4 {; l8 f: t
個人認為.....+ n7 M7 G7 j5 p% A7 k$ @* b
/ m4 N* w" C @/ V3 t/ K
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番) 2 |4 b4 `9 M5 h7 ?" @) h" }4 W$ I, p$ i
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....7 b* Z0 ~6 q( Z' I0 f, U& F5 }
. G' W6 `8 j: ?* O, K[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM
have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?0 _/ O. N2 B. c0 ~9 S
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"? ) ^6 E- j2 q/ S# Lare you the witness of the incident?9 ^' n. e3 c, ?# r0 c1 l! k
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue.. + I1 R+ V( X( O4 f3 Z& o" c4 U, Land better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打". 3 ?# S8 i7 Y9 |' \6 dotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"作者: jen01二世 時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM
Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM: 0 s3 P( V2 @' X+ k' l u& O. xhave u studied law or anything rela...
% n5 }) N6 e4 [6 f
. P8 v! ?/ `, M# p
黑字 : 係轉貼/ k1 [1 X- o) J( p$ q, A& B. G
( ^% k" w Y: ^' H
紅字 : 個人感想 4 d" I& x, y0 M7 E" @+ v8 t: K8 h, h4 o9 u
ok ??作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM
dont have to ask for my approval 8 W3 g6 Y' i* s0 L8 s
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not. h4 G- U/ s, z- _: K: O, j" z; g
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. ! ^ `2 h" a0 F* ]+ Djust becareful even if the words arent your own words.. ; \+ Y/ U3 D* u: D2 N& s' G% Ogood luck and hope you could last long in this world.作者: lastwing 時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM
我係甘認為( [' z' j* F8 z2 d
該警員明顯地想息事寧人... 9 q) `# D5 @, x5 l( S唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得, G& K1 ` L/ N ?' ?0 J. a( Q X
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間2 e. T8 ^, m9 U, Z
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說2 V2 @6 u1 M+ D* S1 X( n
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事. U+ B: b4 ]6 Y9 I7 U& u
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當 6 }) f) b/ Q' _2 p% ?5 Q ]6 O請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x / `: Y: }7 d/ N/ k2 n由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道