香港法例有等如無. 4 F: o) E( x+ o6 S+ m5 K3 X, Q7 o - } r6 l% L x; W0 t毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動. 5 X. y7 o$ S' E; w3 f; { f& l1 S- N 4 t# C; C7 z. ^' q4 G對打人者只作出警告了事., n( Y: Z' I+ I2 J6 O4 e" J; r* Y
& P8 Y9 w, }) x1 _' D0 _6 [0 G, s差人涉嫌包庇打人者. & P7 C# A. B7 r7 ~- W" q- C3 z b5 e0 a5 e3 O, T/ E) f) A http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ5 S' H+ l% J9 R1 s+ e0 y
& i& j* `% y& V- ^而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.) X: @1 }/ f Y) _- I& j
2 O3 G. b3 k, D) X! s' q
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事. # _! h- f, v5 x' b/ X: O 9 T0 V3 Y" ^1 c( a. h& k; ^! u: [! q6 v; Z
1 I2 ~2 \+ p ?% Y; y+ v, u7 |" H
個人認為..... ! X0 K2 Q* K; W, v6 B4 F9 ^- G & s8 v- E/ S" ^岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)8 y2 }6 j, i" L' Z* O+ u- `
. z" u- w7 o' k+ f* C好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野..... 3 J# {' k x9 }+ `; W: g% V7 |# ~" | 4 `) w8 V; D2 z6 I# S" i* o[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM
have u studied law or anything related to legal studies? 1 F) {0 g" I+ G( H1 f: R3 @( Ldo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?9 h4 \1 [# b( N, L
are you the witness of the incident?* Q6 F* j3 j% Y( i
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue... ~; q; ~' b3 D8 l6 R- r1 Q: \
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打"./ ?& q9 ^1 e, O( @9 _4 t0 a
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"作者: jen01二世 時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM
Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:, M8 K7 p6 W6 F' D, ~
have u studied law or anything rela...
4 {3 Q$ {- C; m3 O' v
$ y* k6 {( o) \$ g& j7 v) ]黑字 : 係轉貼 0 U, x- [: f' a- q# z ' b- Q3 k" j" h5 Y M! |紅字 : 個人感想 + e6 I; }* P9 _2 z: k $ { P" I1 I) |ok ??作者: Kev 時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM
dont have to ask for my approval ! Y9 P! b' \5 J8 ]6 C6 K
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not. ' W4 I- ]' f. u! r/ cbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. 0 Q# I8 g9 ]4 i) T
just becareful even if the words arent your own words..- [+ t0 O4 o; [1 q- f; m
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.作者: lastwing 時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM
我係甘認為8 ?. [5 r( }/ W: {* e
該警員明顯地想息事寧人... : ]1 v4 h1 O5 [# q- }唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得0 \6 O+ }' o5 z8 G
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間 + X7 X/ A D0 u. N3 j3 Z以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說2 |7 d$ A2 l) l5 L Z
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事 8 o9 D& V/ t1 ], x- l! G, E$ Y該警員的處理手法絕對洽當1 }+ h3 T& N6 h0 a
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x% V, C7 e5 M/ O# b- v8 ]2 U" z7 c
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道