Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
# V" y" P! W. `
9 a( s7 i& m5 x  C8 l0 B# V" Y毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動." C4 Y/ D( L! ?4 Q* m

3 |7 W. l* s* ~/ s對打人者只作出警告了事.
0 R# ~0 W* Z. U4 z
5 Y# F. ~, a4 L) \0 `) F) l. n差人涉嫌包庇打人者.; ]4 Y- Y2 o$ N; J$ I$ [1 u
5 h8 W' A( m. _1 X& S
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
" l1 h1 t/ y1 u. @. R6 ~
' E3 ]8 f9 ?/ _2 M9 q而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
3 ?7 R' U+ K) b9 P* ~1 u1 b7 P: [. Y' [6 _/ H
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.$ [4 D9 `8 X* j

5 P% B5 r6 N! Q1 Y. u# ]$ h7 q+ i" Q7 r& _1 d* P) m3 y; \2 \

* r1 t0 ]0 O7 C" |個人認為...../ Z2 s+ }; X8 b4 j9 m

: E' P1 G8 S' J9 j7 r1 a岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
, [0 }+ h7 N1 N
; C8 t2 B- u& r+ E好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

+ N7 z; g5 g7 Z8 L( S
5 ~9 e3 a* W* ~5 t& b[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
, H) m# `  E  Ydo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?5 d  g6 }2 z, E
are you the witness of the incident?
. ~% X7 \4 D3 }& Rif not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
( F" n3 e3 j- [and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
3 R% M; W+ p0 P7 `7 d9 F$ K0 o+ Rotherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:- c) Z; O9 i9 \0 i9 |
have u studied law or anything rela...
/ k- X5 f6 X) ^' U" _  z
/ f0 [( D) D" D( n2 n2 X3 l5 R% h黑字 : 係轉貼8 l5 y" [9 O8 C* c. w9 C1 P
2 [# ~. y5 a& O4 ~
紅字 : 個人感想5 j9 a, g/ _8 T+ H, c. v
! B$ \; R" n  ?! X$ w
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval / z8 b1 x6 g6 ?" S: j6 F
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
5 v- Z& Y5 {5 U7 @btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. : f' a7 f" B. k6 x0 r) m
just becareful even if the words arent your own words../ E+ r: O* R9 t% C# B& t8 [, G
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為. p. k+ n" M' r$ ]5 }& [; @
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
  r7 F( n5 E5 U3 p唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
# J; |  C8 H- ^  w% ~0 T如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
$ B+ U5 u7 \8 v. Y& ]- i以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說* t8 m+ m6 z5 v
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事* g1 C1 ^* J; N. V6 P
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
( U" z# V; W9 x7 ?請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x+ ?2 l- ?8 M+ _8 \. p. C+ N
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0