Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
* {5 [- E+ J# F' `% w/ i) V
: G, E; u- b& z+ ~0 D. g, O! S毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
4 ^0 u# v9 r9 S3 @& k
! Q2 R5 X( z! ~( [4 w4 E0 w$ Q對打人者只作出警告了事.0 F) m8 V! N4 }7 r' M
! Y, E- @, V* ?. v$ s/ Q. d
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
9 `5 N/ w) ?7 {5 q0 }' [; h/ o; Q+ |% s) v- c, m: B0 V
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ! f0 z* \1 W3 z
  Z( U) D6 P% o
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.& M( Y/ Y6 r. h; A  h& ]

0 i3 l9 h* M  i! m( f請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事./ }5 k( I0 Z: u  I

/ O6 \" @$ `) M+ {7 S; W
8 {/ J9 v% v8 S$ ]
0 Y" C" X1 i: y* J+ I0 E個人認為.....
+ K# V( c" ?6 U+ Y% y
7 m& a% ?/ u, N4 i. a岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
. Y% J5 \% E7 z
- M2 W# I) d0 B) h" {; \好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
! A. [3 O2 q  o% z& F" h/ E

/ E% X. I  @: g[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
5 x' Z7 E2 }! L1 z% x2 edo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?! ^4 Y4 B, K& P$ c
are you the witness of the incident?
) q* W) Y# ~( qif not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
4 S$ Z: ~, ^9 r6 H% ]8 r* l' zand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".' j4 U; x; s4 `( s1 T) x
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
6 T  z  g$ I0 t8 Dhave u studied law or anything rela...
" l* g& Z' C7 _) O4 l+ a5 h* j; x
黑字 : 係轉貼
; C- \) v9 z+ {. j( t1 |; t! C: s8 I- `( w& b5 D
紅字 : 個人感想
" b" M" j# i7 i3 l3 G% g, u+ J; T5 P2 z! K; P+ h% q
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
5 v5 A0 E& b$ I8 kit's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
9 j9 H" f0 N4 z, w! v4 Wbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. 8 [" C; \! d- p; F( m
just becareful even if the words arent your own words../ p  U2 z7 A1 u6 m/ g
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
2 ^; U& w' T2 D, h該警員明顯地想息事寧人...; x  o8 I, R6 D# T
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得# r( |. G( c7 x  Z
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間- C7 B: r9 m# H8 {! T
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
( H) H. k" t# W. _2 h& n/ C我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
5 m2 ~& F6 |1 S* T該警員的處理手法絕對洽當9 M) T& t0 s! p# B" i
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x: p1 s/ b- _6 U- @  y+ Z
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0