Board logo

標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5] [打印本頁]
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 09:52 PM     標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

我希望佢冇事!2 r* Z" g" n% d7 b6 Z& J" E
佢都係方便各網友啫!
  r# Y& @: ]3 H; n之前我都有好多套戲響佢度download.
1 y! S8 h, k' i" y, Y- N$ h1 j告得入就俾班仆街開到先例!  `( ]( K. }; c2 f* ?+ E
我覺得bt係一個灰色地帶, 唔可能好definite話係侵權或犯法!/ z9 N; d+ i' E; Y6 [
班友甘大回嚮甘狼都係感情因素居多!
& c$ J- C( H4 s' ~6 ]純個人意見! 冇意開戰!亦不打算回應!: O7 ]2 h0 H2 I  q* A3 j
; B% w* g5 Z) |4 K6 E9 L
[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-30 at 11:32 AM ]
作者: tony    時間: 2005-4-29 09:58 PM

冇事!
作者: Ricky00893    時間: 2005-4-29 10:02 PM

罰款 $ 5000
作者: dogson009    時間: 2005-4-29 10:03 PM

其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
作者: goonejp    時間: 2005-4-29 10:47 PM

法律已死,班友强姦法律 1 Q/ n9 ~$ c8 q. v. E9 a0 d" l
http://jm.g.free.fr/smileys/Xsmileys/iconsex----dog.gif
* H4 j5 g8 d. Q5 e0 {; V4 E& b7 P  i, N9 r7 U8 M) t
[ Last edited by goonejp on 2005-4-29 at 10:48 PM ]
作者: chickenboy    時間: 2005-4-29 11:03 PM

kill chicken scare monkey.....佢起碼都要守行為
作者: 692004    時間: 2005-4-29 11:09 PM

冇罪釋放
作者: bob64    時間: 2005-4-29 11:10 PM

打靶!!
作者: king_king    時間: 2005-4-29 11:14 PM

小弟覺得會冇事,但會好似m$,要公開道歉.
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-4-29 11:15 PM

最好就冇事,否則班所謂的"電影人"就有本地案例
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:16 PM

我覺得班友成日嘈話侵版權, 但我覺得佢哋自己做就冇問題!  p8 u! |7 M7 t5 Y  D
根本bt係灰色地域!我覺得即係未係犯法!甘邊有理由入佢罪?. Q9 m" X: Y1 O1 A
"老鼠愛大米"甘, 人人爭黎唱, 講真, 佢哋甘正義, 自動自覺交返版權費俾個原創者囉! 咪又係食個灰色地帶話國語版冇版權邊個鍾意就攞黎唱!
; X. M9 ?6 N# k1 H6 j2 k/ c講開又講!首歌根本唔好聽(我唔識欣賞啦!)啲詞直接係好, 但太老土了!啲人而家老土當冧歌!
3 t; w2 J9 A" i( t香港人有啲真係好似中咗毒甘!!!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-29 11:18 PM

美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:26 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
8 D  v, I1 o6 V根本就荒天下之大謬!# l" {& A0 u1 m1 M
不知所謂!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:27 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
- N2 C$ `4 o% {4 x( |根本就荒天下之大謬!* V8 q8 s  c. |+ U2 l
不知所謂!
作者: nkt1000    時間: 2005-4-29 11:36 PM

希望古惑天皇兄會冇事吧!!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:47 PM

我希望佢冇事之餘,仲可以挫一挫班契弟既銳氣!
作者: 短毛    時間: 2005-4-29 11:48 PM

大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好似*講明*非牟利性*的侵犯版權也算是犯法.6 S& k/ q. I3 B+ g& x4 @& X' J$ ?
: A+ z# `  I( V
佢放種子俾人下載, 明顯地有動機讓其他人下載.
, L, M! k1 Z, e9 q- |( K
3 A5 Y. h. \2 T( w現在好似有人做錯事(非法盜版)但好多人都覺得沒有大不了.: i7 l( z; J& ^+ u7 G, K- m

( L  X. ^7 J( j/ {沒有意思偏幫那一方, 只希望大家可以討論一下.
" n+ v$ i: s6 V$ }: |$ B/ X5 h8 c! V* S+ P
還有報紙中提到一百萬人下載某一部戲, 損失幾億元, 那個記者一定沒有讀經濟的, 沒有成本下需求當然大. 叫人$60買張飛都無咁多人睇啦~
作者: lijinwei    時間: 2005-4-29 11:51 PM

想罰錢, 但因他失業, 身家不多# T9 t2 |3 M. k/ g4 k
要坐牢, 但政府財赤, 還要出錢養一個失業的人8 s- y* ]9 P; g6 x
罰少少錢, 守行為並留案底算了吧
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:58 PM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
/ Z! x6 F# N5 v" ]大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
" m  c  e3 M/ S$ P2 Y1 b
vcd鋪通常一有新返既碟就對住大街大行黎播! 8 _4 ^- c. x* U0 ]6 `
然後啲人睇睇下入去買咗!5 s3 |+ q/ J1 _
既牟利又侵權!
5 i- Q8 i9 ~* t6 ?1 o% q5 l但亦大行其道.....& |( Z9 B& X  \
唉! 唔係話甘就唔代表bt係唔犯法定係點......& Z* M+ e) R; J
只係香港政府係多重標準!; q7 ?0 X% x+ t" |: `- R4 o
同埋bt冇先例, 始終係灰色地帶!
3 I2 u, X$ r' }9 m) S! y' ~( J2 N/ I難聽到嘔既老鼠愛大米國語版俾啲人大搖大擺攞黎唱到臭晒又冇事.....1 O# W" z7 w" X5 k6 I
所以話, 香港政府都係仆街黎! 鍾意點就點!正仆街!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 12:08 AM

無得告 la~~~全世界都冇先例又冇法証參考,香港e班2打6法官點識判,陳嘉上點都惡吾過哥倫比亞或Dream Work掛,e家個個都想睇香港點死.
作者: 史艷文2    時間: 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
; |, y! A: P8 z* ^0 M4 y但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
作者: F.king    時間: 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
3 J. b9 \8 \! B" W大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
: \4 O( h& Y! x! g8 w
I agree you points that it could be illegal
- X5 v6 O. g6 _& {* F; U' Mbut that is still a "gray area"
' c; ]9 g2 i( b: c6 gwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair( r8 e' o9 K9 q! \) O" i" f8 M
- P3 F4 `2 }' K; o/ x4 j7 A+ r5 o
anyway, I want to say that is/ F3 j# a) j5 u1 |/ N) [% x( @
who is supposed to be protected by laws. g- W0 l5 d1 U( h( m) @  J  D
creators?9 G' R3 k9 s- D8 ^. O: A. }
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
0 U1 h4 p, l; m: S. e& l+ S, Klet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money." R# V3 N2 Z" l
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those. O- a" S+ N2 V/ P0 M
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
作者: junob04    時間: 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
/ B) t/ r1 o; z$ K, n其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
9 G6 R7 k+ q  i2 \# i我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:+ h2 }% g3 K+ b6 o

, f* x' ?  i: d4 d8 A" j# U我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
7 h2 e, I1 u1 P& N& Z唔係喎!& A$ b5 X' h) u
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!' H: U& T5 H+ D% q" s9 o
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
3 T( ]8 H& `4 m0 p& G' Q9 ]佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!, [" V" `& R* `/ A, ~7 o
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
作者: 大家樂1234    時間: 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事- c8 u( E# c! A
一有先例以後就死嚕
作者: jason williams    時間: 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!6 k9 @, I, }6 _1 d  C/ c1 y( `9 u
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
$ N  d+ Y' q% Kif so bad, dun download la, right?
5 {, E* B: I" ~/ W( E7 ei am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^0 K3 ~# Y2 M7 c! q  G( Q  C
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct5 V: f' G/ P0 ]2 T/ k% G
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
! w7 u4 m- W8 r7 t$ U5 {6 Y! d5 }so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
0 g) [* ]) V  J: p# p2 {  j( ousing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
! @) l, ?: R% {" k& qwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!; {# e, n( S/ y% r, c# B
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
作者: coolyiceman    時間: 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!
, Q4 B" j7 h  M8 ~) Q2 b5 w佢又唔係殺人放火~~~0 {' x2 p* B2 Z7 i$ F4 q% X) P) q
政府想比下馬威0的人~~8 m! [' k5 t: N+ @: B
錢就一定罰- f& `- ^8 Y- j9 _3 a! ]& A) I
未必要坐牢~~
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,( D8 ~/ t$ w7 V/ X( t* l
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
/ W- V- A4 l7 X% @1 Q佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?6 z7 {8 g+ Y7 B9 F! j% N
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
作者: @bcc@    時間: 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:
作者: 小虫    時間: 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^
作者: 老鬼X    時間: 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　
作者: markmk    時間: 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..
作者: 人人人人人    時間: 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈
作者: ilovefuckingyou    時間: 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!
作者: bonzi1983    時間: 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law
作者: karenmoe    時間: 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:$ R  [2 L! I; z' T
告得入我切!!!
. i7 a( n+ J' ]: y
我當初都估告唔入,2 {+ l% O6 [! S8 m3 k1 h4 M5 U
不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,
4 g1 k7 ^8 z9 y+ q4 I3 }真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....
作者: timho1027    時間: 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇0 |& T& u# j' H& {+ o0 ^
我希望佢冇事
作者: wolfevil    時間: 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為
作者: 阿細    時間: 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

Originally posted by EV4886 at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:
# X& I: q9 h- W: b: h3 T美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
* X8 b7 K9 v" ^6 a# g) p/ C因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...
作者: kwajc    時間: 2005-5-6 08:58 AM

香港海關想做一場大龍鳳俾電影業d人睇......講真香港有成幾廿萬人用bt download野....拉晒番去邊到有咁多錢養呢班人呀!!!



歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0