Board logo

標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5] [打印本頁]
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 09:52 PM     標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

我希望佢冇事!" q0 j$ A2 S8 N+ \& O/ Y0 f
佢都係方便各網友啫!3 ]% E; R% ^. ~5 Z" Q
之前我都有好多套戲響佢度download.9 c4 B2 ]* T3 l. E
告得入就俾班仆街開到先例!
! d1 k+ |# p, _我覺得bt係一個灰色地帶, 唔可能好definite話係侵權或犯法!- Y* _. @# _2 H! a
班友甘大回嚮甘狼都係感情因素居多!# w$ O5 u/ `) p% s
純個人意見! 冇意開戰!亦不打算回應!
+ O% H4 m: M$ A! K1 r, P( t% p: l. C. H
[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-30 at 11:32 AM ]
作者: tony    時間: 2005-4-29 09:58 PM

冇事!
作者: Ricky00893    時間: 2005-4-29 10:02 PM

罰款 $ 5000
作者: dogson009    時間: 2005-4-29 10:03 PM

其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
作者: goonejp    時間: 2005-4-29 10:47 PM

法律已死,班友强姦法律
' x8 Q2 z: `  B) `; I4 l' f+ jhttp://jm.g.free.fr/smileys/Xsmileys/iconsex----dog.gif- o9 I1 ^' P" f" c' `

7 f3 m: ]/ T/ d9 w! N[ Last edited by goonejp on 2005-4-29 at 10:48 PM ]
作者: chickenboy    時間: 2005-4-29 11:03 PM

kill chicken scare monkey.....佢起碼都要守行為
作者: 692004    時間: 2005-4-29 11:09 PM

冇罪釋放
作者: bob64    時間: 2005-4-29 11:10 PM

打靶!!
作者: king_king    時間: 2005-4-29 11:14 PM

小弟覺得會冇事,但會好似m$,要公開道歉.
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-4-29 11:15 PM

最好就冇事,否則班所謂的"電影人"就有本地案例
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:16 PM

我覺得班友成日嘈話侵版權, 但我覺得佢哋自己做就冇問題!
7 F" ^# J7 l7 J$ I8 n根本bt係灰色地域!我覺得即係未係犯法!甘邊有理由入佢罪?
. w1 M. s1 o+ U4 D2 [. }"老鼠愛大米"甘, 人人爭黎唱, 講真, 佢哋甘正義, 自動自覺交返版權費俾個原創者囉! 咪又係食個灰色地帶話國語版冇版權邊個鍾意就攞黎唱!
9 x$ \2 I' K3 ^. w; q. ]: Z講開又講!首歌根本唔好聽(我唔識欣賞啦!)啲詞直接係好, 但太老土了!啲人而家老土當冧歌!3 Q6 u' D; h% A) ^; |+ m- l
香港人有啲真係好似中咗毒甘!!!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-29 11:18 PM

美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:26 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
2 w- ?1 R, G8 {* `  Z: e0 g) t根本就荒天下之大謬!3 a$ q9 y- ^' M% ]. ]+ _
不知所謂!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:27 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
# N) u1 ^/ R2 B# F" u2 Y* e# @根本就荒天下之大謬!
, O4 ]0 Z' t& D8 o不知所謂!
作者: nkt1000    時間: 2005-4-29 11:36 PM

希望古惑天皇兄會冇事吧!!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:47 PM

我希望佢冇事之餘,仲可以挫一挫班契弟既銳氣!
作者: 短毛    時間: 2005-4-29 11:48 PM

大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好似*講明*非牟利性*的侵犯版權也算是犯法.4 D  |$ I2 J" A/ U* B9 P+ n8 j- B
; I( x% s% ^& l0 [: T4 t  X) W
佢放種子俾人下載, 明顯地有動機讓其他人下載.$ r  ~; I' B: B& C& F* Z
. G/ A9 L; s7 W; [/ N4 Z: P
現在好似有人做錯事(非法盜版)但好多人都覺得沒有大不了.* G; x7 |' f3 f* R$ t& j$ Q  @

. \6 }5 }" h: _( {沒有意思偏幫那一方, 只希望大家可以討論一下.$ g* T- A/ u# g1 {9 E

/ j6 ]( {. z' ~" C- \還有報紙中提到一百萬人下載某一部戲, 損失幾億元, 那個記者一定沒有讀經濟的, 沒有成本下需求當然大. 叫人$60買張飛都無咁多人睇啦~
作者: lijinwei    時間: 2005-4-29 11:51 PM

想罰錢, 但因他失業, 身家不多
- ?# z9 y$ e! \要坐牢, 但政府財赤, 還要出錢養一個失業的人; m- S+ U7 R7 @, V8 s: o
罰少少錢, 守行為並留案底算了吧
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:58 PM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
" c% [8 A6 y# o& o) _. o大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
* L8 d  X( V6 X3 Ivcd鋪通常一有新返既碟就對住大街大行黎播!
: x' ~# `  c, X% }然後啲人睇睇下入去買咗!6 Z6 Q2 S- k! c8 @- e
既牟利又侵權!7 S! Q9 l  _# @. U+ r: l
但亦大行其道.....4 Q: _( |8 v. j4 s- X' Y
唉! 唔係話甘就唔代表bt係唔犯法定係點......
. \# [0 Y/ Y8 p3 n/ e4 |& ~只係香港政府係多重標準!4 w) F4 Y. l) a2 ~
同埋bt冇先例, 始終係灰色地帶!9 e" l0 I5 F- \7 G8 u
難聽到嘔既老鼠愛大米國語版俾啲人大搖大擺攞黎唱到臭晒又冇事.....
: f( a" b7 z7 e' ?! Y所以話, 香港政府都係仆街黎! 鍾意點就點!正仆街!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 12:08 AM

無得告 la~~~全世界都冇先例又冇法証參考,香港e班2打6法官點識判,陳嘉上點都惡吾過哥倫比亞或Dream Work掛,e家個個都想睇香港點死.
作者: 史艷文2    時間: 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
( `  {; Y. H8 \2 X# M# w但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
作者: F.king    時間: 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:' H, N. x0 c1 Y) n; ]8 T4 _
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
5 I' |+ ~$ _! X% h  EI agree you points that it could be illegal
% Y0 k0 s: z+ v5 T% ]but that is still a "gray area"
1 x; j. z% t& r7 ~+ s: J) ]0 @whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
% l! p2 ]+ h; q* W. A
3 @1 m2 A/ p8 z' z; N( oanyway, I want to say that is: T8 Q# V5 E$ G5 m) G
who is supposed to be protected by laws6 \+ [. U9 A! ]1 H8 O
creators?3 v: p$ i+ \9 A5 T2 i
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
% @) m( F: M7 L8 {let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
8 B& l* {2 I& R8 Rwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
. I- n* W5 ^# I2 `  XWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
作者: junob04    時間: 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:; e) D" C; T. b) b1 _6 ~
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
  Z6 d( Z1 t' w1 E0 J0 E2 t. [
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
" ?; P9 V8 R0 G4 j7 u! `( }% ?2 {. X( E- J; t
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
% ~# g5 m9 t' I7 |4 ^$ l唔係喎!6 _- \, [$ ]5 ]- j
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
- {6 w7 }$ P" R4 ], K& m我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
( L6 U$ p6 ^. C( G1 o佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
/ t% x; q( K( G% r就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
作者: 大家樂1234    時間: 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事/ ?: c5 ]  r8 v8 u
一有先例以後就死嚕
作者: jason williams    時間: 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!5 _/ g$ s( W7 w4 Z) u
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......2 [2 ~2 P% N: m) _& G  n& G
if so bad, dun download la, right?
& [; Y4 P" B- V3 B( X* p7 k; h: ]i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^/ V( M8 j- N, O+ l5 I) ^
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct- [/ ]7 S% e& f7 y* L8 J& k
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la. N, ]9 L8 {4 I
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society8 @0 y+ c8 a* f4 E7 Q/ w
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
, G9 D9 M: Y" a6 G1 B) ]why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!, V/ J: m8 N& i0 a
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
作者: coolyiceman    時間: 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!
! \  Y$ y+ Z3 O  @4 U; {1 l9 L佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
0 m, O, c/ e% }8 R政府想比下馬威0的人~~2 j+ E3 _; V8 X- c
錢就一定罰
0 H4 q5 o$ ?" P( q未必要坐牢~~
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,1 ?/ [; u3 i( Z1 m
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?$ r3 O( ~8 t4 e4 s: f* B" X
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
2 ^1 Y* ]1 s' @: U1 m# S: o到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
作者: @bcc@    時間: 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:
作者: 小虫    時間: 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^
作者: 老鬼X    時間: 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　
作者: markmk    時間: 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..
作者: 人人人人人    時間: 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈
作者: ilovefuckingyou    時間: 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!
作者: bonzi1983    時間: 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law
作者: karenmoe    時間: 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:$ x# w) P' n/ ]  G
告得入我切!!!
: G, {4 S4 h6 z& k5 P0 `7 E我當初都估告唔入,$ B+ p5 {$ W; P% k, N! o$ {" F
不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,
3 X$ |2 Y6 a/ U, i真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....
作者: timho1027    時間: 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇9 V* O* V2 Y0 C7 C/ J7 M$ t8 a
我希望佢冇事
作者: wolfevil    時間: 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為
作者: 阿細    時間: 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

Originally posted by EV4886 at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:+ R! V' y1 }7 g0 @# K( |
美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
/ L/ B5 |# ^6 i  f
因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...
作者: kwajc    時間: 2005-5-6 08:58 AM

香港海關想做一場大龍鳳俾電影業d人睇......講真香港有成幾廿萬人用bt download野....拉晒番去邊到有咁多錢養呢班人呀!!!



歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0