Board logo

標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5] [打印本頁]
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 09:52 PM     標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

我希望佢冇事!
2 C# o$ E/ e. L. ~佢都係方便各網友啫!
7 U" ?2 V& D6 k3 n( V% c% [之前我都有好多套戲響佢度download.
& }) D3 C; i' r- ^& l告得入就俾班仆街開到先例!
, T2 S; _- ^: K2 X8 e- i" @我覺得bt係一個灰色地帶, 唔可能好definite話係侵權或犯法!
! o7 v% \) D& l8 ^! r班友甘大回嚮甘狼都係感情因素居多!- d0 B$ s( B" x( H) F5 Z
純個人意見! 冇意開戰!亦不打算回應!2 [+ s. X" b4 ~7 Y. p
8 v7 Y9 Q: B  h6 a: Q/ i& m
[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-30 at 11:32 AM ]
作者: tony    時間: 2005-4-29 09:58 PM

冇事!
作者: Ricky00893    時間: 2005-4-29 10:02 PM

罰款 $ 5000
作者: dogson009    時間: 2005-4-29 10:03 PM

其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
作者: goonejp    時間: 2005-4-29 10:47 PM

法律已死,班友强姦法律 : \; s; W! w' J, O. Z
http://jm.g.free.fr/smileys/Xsmileys/iconsex----dog.gif$ |" X+ ~) S* f  Y3 t" Y4 b

8 z6 p% H8 ]& e: \5 E% ^4 o4 ][ Last edited by goonejp on 2005-4-29 at 10:48 PM ]
作者: chickenboy    時間: 2005-4-29 11:03 PM

kill chicken scare monkey.....佢起碼都要守行為
作者: 692004    時間: 2005-4-29 11:09 PM

冇罪釋放
作者: bob64    時間: 2005-4-29 11:10 PM

打靶!!
作者: king_king    時間: 2005-4-29 11:14 PM

小弟覺得會冇事,但會好似m$,要公開道歉.
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-4-29 11:15 PM

最好就冇事,否則班所謂的"電影人"就有本地案例
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:16 PM

我覺得班友成日嘈話侵版權, 但我覺得佢哋自己做就冇問題!
# e& }% s2 s/ U8 L0 H6 W: s$ ?根本bt係灰色地域!我覺得即係未係犯法!甘邊有理由入佢罪?4 v7 l7 @- B) ?3 n
"老鼠愛大米"甘, 人人爭黎唱, 講真, 佢哋甘正義, 自動自覺交返版權費俾個原創者囉! 咪又係食個灰色地帶話國語版冇版權邊個鍾意就攞黎唱!4 f2 f- d5 P0 x6 B- Q4 I
講開又講!首歌根本唔好聽(我唔識欣賞啦!)啲詞直接係好, 但太老土了!啲人而家老土當冧歌!# I4 f. c6 e) e. U/ X9 @$ C
香港人有啲真係好似中咗毒甘!!!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-29 11:18 PM

美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:26 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!8 b/ L" ]. e$ [4 o5 D5 D; t9 F# n
根本就荒天下之大謬!
+ @7 G, A# I. O7 U9 ?3 b不知所謂!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:27 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
: f  g' M7 J8 ]3 y! ?根本就荒天下之大謬!
( [# M  a1 s. D, H不知所謂!
作者: nkt1000    時間: 2005-4-29 11:36 PM

希望古惑天皇兄會冇事吧!!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:47 PM

我希望佢冇事之餘,仲可以挫一挫班契弟既銳氣!
作者: 短毛    時間: 2005-4-29 11:48 PM

大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好似*講明*非牟利性*的侵犯版權也算是犯法.
5 W0 T& w8 t) c' }8 h, _' f: u4 U0 w& E- n- d  ~
佢放種子俾人下載, 明顯地有動機讓其他人下載.
4 Y) J4 h$ K& w# u4 P5 x* v* C; r, Y7 ]# |+ `7 O. [
現在好似有人做錯事(非法盜版)但好多人都覺得沒有大不了.
7 i( L2 K7 T4 T8 E, C% ]
& Q* g: v' ~9 l1 w. N9 h) c沒有意思偏幫那一方, 只希望大家可以討論一下.7 ^5 ^  u. p+ w
; V6 u4 @2 ]0 ~& F+ U5 c9 {
還有報紙中提到一百萬人下載某一部戲, 損失幾億元, 那個記者一定沒有讀經濟的, 沒有成本下需求當然大. 叫人$60買張飛都無咁多人睇啦~
作者: lijinwei    時間: 2005-4-29 11:51 PM

想罰錢, 但因他失業, 身家不多$ Q, D6 q# C- v( Y: T) p
要坐牢, 但政府財赤, 還要出錢養一個失業的人
1 V5 h. \1 B% _* H罰少少錢, 守行為並留案底算了吧
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:58 PM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
, t/ n- f! h/ C  x5 \/ G! _4 B大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
  X; Q: k/ i- w8 r  Avcd鋪通常一有新返既碟就對住大街大行黎播!
, J1 k+ I9 ]. D然後啲人睇睇下入去買咗!& _2 \, u8 v' e+ t! Y  A  K
既牟利又侵權!
; a6 w9 q7 w' Z$ ^但亦大行其道.....$ n7 I& f% N6 u* d& C: G
唉! 唔係話甘就唔代表bt係唔犯法定係點......
6 V5 m" P7 z% {( A, |: [只係香港政府係多重標準!
; H* p" P2 R/ y! @5 D/ N同埋bt冇先例, 始終係灰色地帶!
$ s: I' D) `) ^8 s. u( w/ ~6 |難聽到嘔既老鼠愛大米國語版俾啲人大搖大擺攞黎唱到臭晒又冇事.....
. ^( W, H% b- i& N# l; @0 O* T所以話, 香港政府都係仆街黎! 鍾意點就點!正仆街!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 12:08 AM

無得告 la~~~全世界都冇先例又冇法証參考,香港e班2打6法官點識判,陳嘉上點都惡吾過哥倫比亞或Dream Work掛,e家個個都想睇香港點死.
作者: 史艷文2    時間: 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)7 t$ ]4 R7 ?8 q8 O. Z% q$ e/ [# M: F
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
作者: F.king    時間: 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:' h) i: W) R) B
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
) }1 _% f5 q& t0 O
I agree you points that it could be illegal% Z! D3 h8 Q* a+ c
but that is still a "gray area"
1 }- G7 E5 K/ vwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair3 ]4 E5 `2 x9 T+ D& @
% W' C1 v( T( _& i$ c
anyway, I want to say that is0 P, r, l3 }; K! q% C3 \$ f7 R+ d+ t
who is supposed to be protected by laws
/ T, Q& e' Y7 z; `# ?- ]( Wcreators?
3 a7 v$ `4 j7 |/ _4 R# D& N* Mbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market9 o8 p8 k" \9 S' [
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.! ~0 \  N1 p2 b/ L
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
7 k  ^! k" q- n) k5 C/ [5 h3 jWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
作者: junob04    時間: 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
) c: q  [) R2 q, [! w; z5 d0 F7 @其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
! ~0 x& d$ x7 u9 S" L. j: B我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
% U( C2 Y! ?  [8 [( }7 ~  t
; H1 a6 a" [# [+ p; ~+ v5 f+ c我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
5 O. Y. H3 j) W) ^" t+ ^唔係喎!
$ |# f! G( T* |2 L  [8 M古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!% Y7 {3 N1 o/ c- C+ L
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!6 ^6 ^, W# e* v" |5 O; c
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!, e, b5 ]( A1 W3 A$ `& T3 t
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
作者: 大家樂1234    時間: 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事
6 B/ Q  l8 f. w# T. P" ?一有先例以後就死嚕
作者: jason williams    時間: 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!4 P, h/ b2 k4 g+ s1 d( Y8 g
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
7 ^1 m7 ]( }2 O4 [1 bif so bad, dun download la, right?0 |) x( e* X2 c% `9 ~
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^3 g0 ^1 q/ d  L
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
- D( L: O/ Y- p' g5 j5 yno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
1 d# I2 I# z- \" }$ y7 k% \0 Iso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society: r% e. v" Y/ }6 o
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
# L: X0 W3 X5 w, rwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!7 [8 G/ n7 W+ a6 w; W3 x5 |4 \) O9 K
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
作者: coolyiceman    時間: 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!
0 a4 z) m4 h  Y; [* J2 j6 e佢又唔係殺人放火~~~' Q1 l% g3 ~. S% d
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
* Z; W9 G6 H5 L: e1 s4 z, l( f! J" f錢就一定罰; {) B9 g" w: S7 a3 A6 ?+ ?6 \
未必要坐牢~~
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,1 v2 v# J) B1 ]- M
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
9 ?0 [6 G  V" o佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
+ c8 b2 Y- c  v  [  P5 H* R2 M% S到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
作者: @bcc@    時間: 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:
作者: 小虫    時間: 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^
作者: 老鬼X    時間: 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　
作者: markmk    時間: 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..
作者: 人人人人人    時間: 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈
作者: ilovefuckingyou    時間: 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!
作者: bonzi1983    時間: 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law
作者: karenmoe    時間: 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:% f) b( H9 C6 F9 r: t/ Z/ E4 Q7 d
告得入我切!!!
+ y- ]% l; O0 x/ f! W7 f4 T我當初都估告唔入,
' N0 T6 T, s4 Z  R4 ^# V  h不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,
  L$ ]7 S& v# D+ {: K8 B; I真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....
作者: timho1027    時間: 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇
# x3 n+ c3 M) U我希望佢冇事
作者: wolfevil    時間: 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為
作者: 阿細    時間: 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

Originally posted by EV4886 at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:7 C6 s+ a$ S: f' @
美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
) W% [/ F6 D) F: @3 t" K因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...
作者: kwajc    時間: 2005-5-6 08:58 AM

香港海關想做一場大龍鳳俾電影業d人睇......講真香港有成幾廿萬人用bt download野....拉晒番去邊到有咁多錢養呢班人呀!!!



歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0