娛樂滿紛 26FUN - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5] [打印本頁]

作者: HansChan 時間: 2005-4-29 09:52 PM 標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

我希望佢冇事!
佢都係方便各網友啫!
之前我都有好多套戲響佢度download.: ?& q! I! ^3 Q; k2 s5 W
告得入就俾班仆街開到先例!
我覺得bt係一個灰色地帶, 唔可能好definite話係侵權或犯法!: Y7 M) s2 |4 z) q( B
班友甘大回嚮甘狼都係感情因素居多!( l3 ^6 |7 I0 I5 |
純個人意見! 冇意開戰!亦不打算回應!
, w7 s5 {# X* w& ^. o6 a( u f; F
[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-30 at 11:32 AM ]

作者: tony 時間: 2005-4-29 09:58 PM

冇事!

作者: Ricky00893 時間: 2005-4-29 10:02 PM

罰款 $ 5000

作者: dogson009 時間: 2005-4-29 10:03 PM

其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=

作者: goonejp 時間: 2005-4-29 10:47 PM

法律已死,班友强姦法律 5 @! Y% [ ~+ i% h
http://jm.g.free.fr/smileys/Xsmileys/iconsex----dog.gif
6 s2 P- F/ ?& r7 u g' d
[ Last edited by goonejp on 2005-4-29 at 10:48 PM ]

作者: chickenboy 時間: 2005-4-29 11:03 PM

kill chicken scare monkey.....佢起碼都要守行為

作者: 692004 時間: 2005-4-29 11:09 PM

冇罪釋放

作者: bob64 時間: 2005-4-29 11:10 PM

打靶!!

作者: king_king 時間: 2005-4-29 11:14 PM

小弟覺得會冇事,但會好似m$,要公開道歉.

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-4-29 11:15 PM

最好就冇事,否則班所謂的"電影人"就有本地案例

作者: HansChan 時間: 2005-4-29 11:16 PM

我覺得班友成日嘈話侵版權, 但我覺得佢哋自己做就冇問題!
根本bt係灰色地域!我覺得即係未係犯法!甘邊有理由入佢罪?4 |- z! N* ^& M: x$ T. \0 [
"老鼠愛大米"甘, 人人爭黎唱, 講真, 佢哋甘正義, 自動自覺交返版權費俾個原創者囉! 咪又係食個灰色地帶話國語版冇版權邊個鍾意就攞黎唱!
講開又講!首歌根本唔好聽(我唔識欣賞啦!)啲詞直接係好, 但太老土了!啲人而家老土當冧歌!
香港人有啲真係好似中咗毒甘!!!

作者: EV4886 時間: 2005-4-29 11:18 PM

美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)

作者: HansChan 時間: 2005-4-29 11:26 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
根本就荒天下之大謬!/ X4 y7 ]7 d. b; W0 W8 G
不知所謂!

作者: HansChan 時間: 2005-4-29 11:27 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
根本就荒天下之大謬!# W0 o1 I9 y( N# `3 y# h. o
不知所謂!

作者: nkt1000 時間: 2005-4-29 11:36 PM

希望古惑天皇兄會冇事吧!!!

作者: HansChan 時間: 2005-4-29 11:47 PM

我希望佢冇事之餘,仲可以挫一挫班契弟既銳氣!

作者: 短毛 時間: 2005-4-29 11:48 PM

大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好似*講明*非牟利性*的侵犯版權也算是犯法.# x2 h+ i1 K" J- |% p. Q& L

佢放種子俾人下載, 明顯地有動機讓其他人下載.

現在好似有人做錯事(非法盜版)但好多人都覺得沒有大不了.

沒有意思偏幫那一方, 只希望大家可以討論一下.

還有報紙中提到一百萬人下載某一部戲, 損失幾億元, 那個記者一定沒有讀經濟的, 沒有成本下需求當然大. 叫人$60買張飛都無咁多人睇啦~

作者: lijinwei 時間: 2005-4-29 11:51 PM

想罰錢, 但因他失業, 身家不多; Q* \7 `/ I9 `8 T3 b( O7 w4 `
要坐牢, 但政府財赤, 還要出錢養一個失業的人: M* S) U7 F- [2 M1 q/ j
罰少少錢, 守行為並留案底算了吧

作者: HansChan 時間: 2005-4-29 11:58 PM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:: A2 d( t& s- n0 {# W
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...

vcd鋪通常一有新返既碟就對住大街大行黎播! 8 C( h- }0 T# v$ p
然後啲人睇睇下入去買咗!+ C; K! t7 |" ?, n3 n
既牟利又侵權!
但亦大行其道.....9 x# f& V; j+ W7 T8 I
唉! 唔係話甘就唔代表bt係唔犯法定係點......
只係香港政府係多重標準!$ r4 | N( O3 k
同埋bt冇先例, 始終係灰色地帶!
難聽到嘔既老鼠愛大米國語版俾啲人大搖大擺攞黎唱到臭晒又冇事.....
所以話, 香港政府都係仆街黎! 鍾意點就點!正仆街!

作者: EV4886 時間: 2005-4-30 12:08 AM

無得告 la~~~全世界都冇先例又冇法証參考,香港e班2打6法官點識判,陳嘉上點都惡吾過哥倫比亞或Dream Work掛,e家個個都想睇香港點死.

作者: 史艷文2 時間: 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)$ V) S8 P# v- {7 }
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!

作者: F.king 時間: 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
6 [- T0 l' i% L9 V( R大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...

I agree you points that it could be illegal0 _7 p+ t! I- p- n% d# g+ m
but that is still a "gray area"
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair

anyway, I want to say that is
who is supposed to be protected by laws8 c" w  n4 n1 q# K' W' ?
creators?2 S5 w$ P6 l! ]4 J7 D$ R
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market7 L6 t- X% M: X+ X( _0 e2 d  U6 _2 c
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.1 `; W' a" y9 n4 \# v% x3 F
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those5 p  D* K" i6 s5 E% F4 z" _
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???

作者: junob04 時間: 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:' c, R2 V9 p; ~
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=

我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!

作者: HansChan 時間: 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:1 M1 d# T9 q; f6 D5 q
$ G1 G/ t$ c% v6 p# i8 X
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!

3 I' w4 p$ A8 T: x
唔係喎!- h4 T U3 I4 {& m& {
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!) l5 ]/ M" L# D* w5 f
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有! `8 N H2 K( \/ y& {
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!

作者: 大家樂1234 時間: 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事
一有先例以後就死嚕

作者: jason williams 時間: 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
if so bad, dun download la, right?
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^$ c: n4 L+ o0 u' H4 G( E, W( [& U
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct6 ]& m1 t' k3 M, v, x- r+ q
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society1 ?1 d6 C: u; ]9 q
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........' F' H! Z0 _* K1 l m- `: X
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^

作者: coolyiceman 時間: 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
政府想比下馬威0的人~~, h* d4 U( y: E
錢就一定罰
未必要坐牢~~

作者: HansChan 時間: 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?+ T7 ?1 x6 f! u9 \% s
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!

作者: EV4886 時間: 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...

作者: @bcc@ 時間: 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:

作者: 小虫 時間: 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^

作者: 老鬼X 時間: 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　

作者: markmk 時間: 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..

作者: 人人人人人 時間: 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈

作者: ilovefuckingyou 時間: 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!

作者: bonzi1983 時間: 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law

作者: karenmoe 時間: 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:
- O$ t8 J$ K6 N告得入我切!!!

我當初都估告唔入,
不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,
真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....

作者: timho1027 時間: 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇. [! h* Z1 W0 W. R6 g4 w
我希望佢冇事

作者: wolfevil 時間: 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為

作者: 阿細 時間: 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

Originally posted by EV4886 at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:. k2 S, ]+ \' _# H6 J* y6 j
美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)

( D+ U$ J5 ^5 u/ }+ D
因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...

作者: kwajc 時間: 2005-5-6 08:58 AM

香港海關想做一場大龍鳳俾電影業d人睇......講真香港有成幾廿萬人用bt download野....拉晒番去邊到有咁多錢養呢班人呀!!!

歡迎光臨娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/)