Board logo

標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5] [打印本頁]
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 09:52 PM     標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

我希望佢冇事!# ^- h3 b* R( o% [! L
佢都係方便各網友啫!
* i: Q4 j5 E  ], o- t, \- l: M& K之前我都有好多套戲響佢度download.
9 {1 e. j7 F0 v' ^8 c2 f告得入就俾班仆街開到先例!. d5 u1 i' z8 K, w5 I+ _1 V$ @
我覺得bt係一個灰色地帶, 唔可能好definite話係侵權或犯法!
( `: g7 T% r8 W班友甘大回嚮甘狼都係感情因素居多!
3 R, E2 ~  k6 o) F- g( o純個人意見! 冇意開戰!亦不打算回應!7 y' X$ k. J0 i1 ~, M) B

6 c9 X/ }" L5 n. b" e# |  R[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-30 at 11:32 AM ]
作者: tony    時間: 2005-4-29 09:58 PM

冇事!
作者: Ricky00893    時間: 2005-4-29 10:02 PM

罰款 $ 5000
作者: dogson009    時間: 2005-4-29 10:03 PM

其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
作者: goonejp    時間: 2005-4-29 10:47 PM

法律已死,班友强姦法律 ( K( c* o0 x5 L1 t, d
http://jm.g.free.fr/smileys/Xsmileys/iconsex----dog.gif
9 V# d' L, ~7 z) h  G5 K# N! b5 _% e0 V! m" _) |0 ]  A$ y: G: Q/ W
[ Last edited by goonejp on 2005-4-29 at 10:48 PM ]
作者: chickenboy    時間: 2005-4-29 11:03 PM

kill chicken scare monkey.....佢起碼都要守行為
作者: 692004    時間: 2005-4-29 11:09 PM

冇罪釋放
作者: bob64    時間: 2005-4-29 11:10 PM

打靶!!
作者: king_king    時間: 2005-4-29 11:14 PM

小弟覺得會冇事,但會好似m$,要公開道歉.
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-4-29 11:15 PM

最好就冇事,否則班所謂的"電影人"就有本地案例
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:16 PM

我覺得班友成日嘈話侵版權, 但我覺得佢哋自己做就冇問題!/ u2 r* }$ f% q5 Q# ?& U, v( J( A
根本bt係灰色地域!我覺得即係未係犯法!甘邊有理由入佢罪?. E: A# `. F! q
"老鼠愛大米"甘, 人人爭黎唱, 講真, 佢哋甘正義, 自動自覺交返版權費俾個原創者囉! 咪又係食個灰色地帶話國語版冇版權邊個鍾意就攞黎唱!
5 L! D: B6 J' `1 N( g* R, ~講開又講!首歌根本唔好聽(我唔識欣賞啦!)啲詞直接係好, 但太老土了!啲人而家老土當冧歌!
6 X. Z4 _' \: p" F- @香港人有啲真係好似中咗毒甘!!!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-29 11:18 PM

美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:26 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
; P8 H- n9 b' ?' X2 x根本就荒天下之大謬!! y+ N1 m' G/ `2 Y( ^0 N/ S2 L
不知所謂!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:27 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!9 y2 ~. N# P+ @" R& S( b3 F0 Z  m
根本就荒天下之大謬!
9 M1 b( e3 q/ h  _. K1 n- I! t5 A2 T不知所謂!
作者: nkt1000    時間: 2005-4-29 11:36 PM

希望古惑天皇兄會冇事吧!!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:47 PM

我希望佢冇事之餘,仲可以挫一挫班契弟既銳氣!
作者: 短毛    時間: 2005-4-29 11:48 PM

大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好似*講明*非牟利性*的侵犯版權也算是犯法.
/ b+ O2 a+ f3 P% J$ W
0 T% v- @5 B2 \  F  b. J3 \佢放種子俾人下載, 明顯地有動機讓其他人下載." [' y1 X( Z& ]9 _4 y- m
( N1 Z! I' A& ~6 k( f
現在好似有人做錯事(非法盜版)但好多人都覺得沒有大不了.
0 T+ f* o6 B7 u5 I( c1 G6 S$ }$ e
沒有意思偏幫那一方, 只希望大家可以討論一下.
5 [2 o$ M) O( r- T  J$ c+ l/ o9 x+ D2 u3 ~( g
還有報紙中提到一百萬人下載某一部戲, 損失幾億元, 那個記者一定沒有讀經濟的, 沒有成本下需求當然大. 叫人$60買張飛都無咁多人睇啦~
作者: lijinwei    時間: 2005-4-29 11:51 PM

想罰錢, 但因他失業, 身家不多
4 i5 ]. w* ~6 s要坐牢, 但政府財赤, 還要出錢養一個失業的人& ~; K' V" E8 k
罰少少錢, 守行為並留案底算了吧
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:58 PM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
: `+ e0 @! {+ j" q大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
, p/ e6 G7 f% D6 L
vcd鋪通常一有新返既碟就對住大街大行黎播! : d; J. k9 h% S1 n  D
然後啲人睇睇下入去買咗!' q4 s: ?2 q' C. I: R' t' o, F
既牟利又侵權!
1 _9 f1 L9 z* I2 A但亦大行其道.....
1 S/ _2 X9 x2 k: m/ u7 X& a8 T- u) E唉! 唔係話甘就唔代表bt係唔犯法定係點......6 o3 \- z- w% w8 x
只係香港政府係多重標準!  m) o+ o  G- Y6 @- ], I' X2 E; c
同埋bt冇先例, 始終係灰色地帶!
3 K$ L. v# _5 m, v3 W# A/ r難聽到嘔既老鼠愛大米國語版俾啲人大搖大擺攞黎唱到臭晒又冇事....." R/ X. y- A1 R( w- p
所以話, 香港政府都係仆街黎! 鍾意點就點!正仆街!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 12:08 AM

無得告 la~~~全世界都冇先例又冇法証參考,香港e班2打6法官點識判,陳嘉上點都惡吾過哥倫比亞或Dream Work掛,e家個個都想睇香港點死.
作者: 史艷文2    時間: 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
% s8 Y! f" e- x1 m, d5 g) ^6 N' s但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
作者: F.king    時間: 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:# N0 \" W# \* N
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
: O$ y- E+ K, {4 }I agree you points that it could be illegal6 T$ S  |( c8 S/ \$ J
but that is still a "gray area"9 }* i* w, h$ L6 o4 M
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
8 G7 J6 M- ]% W* W4 J$ t; _6 l! g6 ]) V1 o
anyway, I want to say that is" r6 h+ H9 D# p9 ^+ e2 R. W. M; |
who is supposed to be protected by laws+ C, |6 o, q2 p6 d
creators?
5 Q8 W8 |1 V& {3 A; S7 Pbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market! J$ A& c" |" m( C) ^+ D
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.) R6 Z2 N+ w8 X
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
- A6 z% T( A, WWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
作者: junob04    時間: 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:& K4 |% l/ p; ^* F( H! g8 \# \
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
: O3 ?+ Q7 l+ f) b+ L: O; v0 ~/ C
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
" P* U% M8 h2 k1 p
5 T# r! |5 J- K* M/ w: t0 T" N# z: s我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
4 t) n! e2 c6 ?唔係喎!6 e8 q2 G1 q4 X7 b9 F: Y
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!$ \- o; M, k3 Z. h/ M% F
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!. e+ x; V3 m  @4 z
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!$ f& C2 X: f. k1 ^+ d
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
作者: 大家樂1234    時間: 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事+ t* b( C  B( g8 [( z' c* |$ R
一有先例以後就死嚕
作者: jason williams    時間: 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!' p0 j4 D0 F: S' ]
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
$ y2 ?4 ?) w1 ^' t/ @if so bad, dun download la, right?" U' U: p2 g% H/ u7 w, P5 @
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
% U% p- c- [. X1 Q5 U* j$ C9 U. \but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct6 z( a7 K5 b/ d6 M
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la, J- y9 m7 i; p/ O- {
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society. z) D* Z8 O2 n/ k) Y
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
7 O5 k4 _- ]1 u' F7 V) Pwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!8 N9 Z/ J* Y0 ]) u8 Z
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
作者: coolyiceman    時間: 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!
6 [: M  ^5 [+ y" A2 W9 S佢又唔係殺人放火~~~+ ?, u& a0 C9 s: j2 N
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
- a  ]$ ]/ \( D/ v# s錢就一定罰
, H! H5 _: d1 {* }4 T未必要坐牢~~
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,
. W: t; R/ N( x, e1 s7 M  a" g唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?: h; f+ v+ U9 V: h
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?* m2 n- F6 ?$ ?) m" A
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
作者: @bcc@    時間: 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:
作者: 小虫    時間: 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^
作者: 老鬼X    時間: 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　
作者: markmk    時間: 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..
作者: 人人人人人    時間: 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈
作者: ilovefuckingyou    時間: 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!
作者: bonzi1983    時間: 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law
作者: karenmoe    時間: 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:+ F* [( G4 K; B" G& C, {
告得入我切!!!
8 ]' P4 H' S+ @) S* ~/ o4 Y我當初都估告唔入,
. E6 W- F2 x0 r/ ]* e不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,
9 ~) a, K% m8 y- z/ O/ c真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....
作者: timho1027    時間: 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇% b- A. E, h( J4 {8 @
我希望佢冇事
作者: wolfevil    時間: 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為
作者: 阿細    時間: 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

Originally posted by EV4886 at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:
% B$ \- H) M) N# S2 k* G美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
. c8 k- L: c2 f# f7 m( t: _因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...
作者: kwajc    時間: 2005-5-6 08:58 AM

香港海關想做一場大龍鳳俾電影業d人睇......講真香港有成幾廿萬人用bt download野....拉晒番去邊到有咁多錢養呢班人呀!!!



歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0