Board logo

標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5] [打印本頁]
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 09:52 PM     標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

我希望佢冇事!
, B$ e) Z! o# W) [佢都係方便各網友啫!$ t: U5 H0 R& Z
之前我都有好多套戲響佢度download.% z1 ?, S3 H. b. Y
告得入就俾班仆街開到先例!2 q8 k8 H/ {+ K. \8 q# v7 |
我覺得bt係一個灰色地帶, 唔可能好definite話係侵權或犯法!: W6 O% S- a: W7 S' G
班友甘大回嚮甘狼都係感情因素居多!
, l: ?- Z. L! \8 A4 c' z5 O純個人意見! 冇意開戰!亦不打算回應!
! A& x! L/ j' q2 A2 _; B
/ _& k" O- r8 t) K1 g1 q[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-30 at 11:32 AM ]
作者: tony    時間: 2005-4-29 09:58 PM

冇事!
作者: Ricky00893    時間: 2005-4-29 10:02 PM

罰款 $ 5000
作者: dogson009    時間: 2005-4-29 10:03 PM

其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
作者: goonejp    時間: 2005-4-29 10:47 PM

法律已死,班友强姦法律   ^8 a' _! P" `9 j2 t6 H: @+ G$ B5 p
http://jm.g.free.fr/smileys/Xsmileys/iconsex----dog.gif, L% d3 D' \+ x) A
. x9 ?6 v/ }* f' ?4 N: r( m1 u
[ Last edited by goonejp on 2005-4-29 at 10:48 PM ]
作者: chickenboy    時間: 2005-4-29 11:03 PM

kill chicken scare monkey.....佢起碼都要守行為
作者: 692004    時間: 2005-4-29 11:09 PM

冇罪釋放
作者: bob64    時間: 2005-4-29 11:10 PM

打靶!!
作者: king_king    時間: 2005-4-29 11:14 PM

小弟覺得會冇事,但會好似m$,要公開道歉.
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-4-29 11:15 PM

最好就冇事,否則班所謂的"電影人"就有本地案例
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:16 PM

我覺得班友成日嘈話侵版權, 但我覺得佢哋自己做就冇問題!
. x! |% d1 p5 f+ _, S根本bt係灰色地域!我覺得即係未係犯法!甘邊有理由入佢罪?8 P7 ~  G) r0 x) F3 j  @! N; G
"老鼠愛大米"甘, 人人爭黎唱, 講真, 佢哋甘正義, 自動自覺交返版權費俾個原創者囉! 咪又係食個灰色地帶話國語版冇版權邊個鍾意就攞黎唱!! Y* e  a' v0 ~. `" N, M
講開又講!首歌根本唔好聽(我唔識欣賞啦!)啲詞直接係好, 但太老土了!啲人而家老土當冧歌!# _& q' {: {- c& g
香港人有啲真係好似中咗毒甘!!!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-29 11:18 PM

美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:26 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!: s! L' X) @; g/ x; `* x* D
根本就荒天下之大謬!3 F0 g5 S3 B' ~# x" @% k! q
不知所謂!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:27 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
' J2 v8 D& h2 {; ?根本就荒天下之大謬!
: k6 }5 ~& m8 S/ b/ l不知所謂!
作者: nkt1000    時間: 2005-4-29 11:36 PM

希望古惑天皇兄會冇事吧!!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:47 PM

我希望佢冇事之餘,仲可以挫一挫班契弟既銳氣!
作者: 短毛    時間: 2005-4-29 11:48 PM

大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好似*講明*非牟利性*的侵犯版權也算是犯法.: o% ]6 {! U6 L. L

0 e' t7 R; @" S& U1 G8 U佢放種子俾人下載, 明顯地有動機讓其他人下載.
5 u- ~- y9 j! T. m% x# n
2 _; j, ^4 f9 j7 J9 [! F4 t3 X現在好似有人做錯事(非法盜版)但好多人都覺得沒有大不了.
4 a9 g& m; O0 {/ \: C3 [
) X8 i1 Z7 ?* v% N* J7 x: \沒有意思偏幫那一方, 只希望大家可以討論一下.2 _! r5 U/ O7 n
- P) i5 P: i' |1 d2 `: J: j) R
還有報紙中提到一百萬人下載某一部戲, 損失幾億元, 那個記者一定沒有讀經濟的, 沒有成本下需求當然大. 叫人$60買張飛都無咁多人睇啦~
作者: lijinwei    時間: 2005-4-29 11:51 PM

想罰錢, 但因他失業, 身家不多
2 p1 e+ `0 T5 B$ g要坐牢, 但政府財赤, 還要出錢養一個失業的人
0 `7 b. s7 F1 I2 P: S罰少少錢, 守行為並留案底算了吧
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:58 PM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
0 U7 F" [- c7 Z5 Q1 J大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
" x1 W3 Q3 A. i( O7 R" h# lvcd鋪通常一有新返既碟就對住大街大行黎播! / ~# g; ?2 U& E$ ^2 B$ E
然後啲人睇睇下入去買咗!0 m5 M7 F# f3 S: [5 y
既牟利又侵權!
* A  ?2 m2 ]+ e# Q  G但亦大行其道.....
! ~0 c' E8 G9 w( ^- a! b7 a唉! 唔係話甘就唔代表bt係唔犯法定係點......
9 N: S8 ^0 S' Z& n1 v: ]  a只係香港政府係多重標準!
: g: Y& u4 ?* r( ]同埋bt冇先例, 始終係灰色地帶!
+ H* Z8 x) i: N8 c- [難聽到嘔既老鼠愛大米國語版俾啲人大搖大擺攞黎唱到臭晒又冇事.....
4 n9 M3 u  Z7 [& w0 H: y所以話, 香港政府都係仆街黎! 鍾意點就點!正仆街!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 12:08 AM

無得告 la~~~全世界都冇先例又冇法証參考,香港e班2打6法官點識判,陳嘉上點都惡吾過哥倫比亞或Dream Work掛,e家個個都想睇香港點死.
作者: 史艷文2    時間: 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
6 @- g. m7 u6 a$ \: F  `: o但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
作者: F.king    時間: 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:- g6 S0 {5 D9 N& m2 K8 I
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
" }0 A0 I8 b8 w/ }; q
I agree you points that it could be illegal
7 w8 H9 P0 C! u4 n: H. ]6 j) Nbut that is still a "gray area"
# }, I: ]% k/ e+ ^9 z/ R3 K, T! Dwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
, X/ G" O% Z8 N0 Q- x& a
4 t# G1 W. ?+ E- \1 b$ ianyway, I want to say that is
% P( W" c5 W* R' jwho is supposed to be protected by laws
; D- |2 V5 G+ _$ jcreators?
! K" [) O8 n* V& u3 n+ ebut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market2 J+ Q) p# N; M  z* c
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
$ n' b3 b- b1 M2 c9 [, Q9 a( s, ~/ D# Cwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those0 c$ V7 W, ^: e; X( B+ a
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
作者: junob04    時間: 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:8 d+ G) M8 A  {; j& ^
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
; h3 L) ~5 O+ o: N$ v( T. S* V& e' i% T
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:! s6 u' U  l9 A+ z; e0 F

7 b; R3 R) k$ p2 {0 ^我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
- u" v  H4 R* p1 H' M0 n唔係喎!
4 Z9 P# F7 F- d0 c+ E7 e2 Y古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
& e5 e& `4 F. D) G3 f我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!. m6 o$ ~& \9 L+ p( r2 r6 R
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!" h6 Y& Y, {9 D( }/ W
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
作者: 大家樂1234    時間: 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事
, s7 n9 Z$ g* Q; l3 p6 r一有先例以後就死嚕
作者: jason williams    時間: 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
# g) C2 ]8 Y9 U$ Q) T! q$ U9 mdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
: X) q, K, S- Oif so bad, dun download la, right?) R* s5 i' v4 @0 B) Z* Z( m
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
7 }- L. Z: t$ P1 }4 u; f9 kbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct1 m9 {3 ]- A3 }
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la; M" D5 m/ U% c5 d" z1 _1 L3 @
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society$ y4 G& D+ R( m. B' P) n  ~5 t
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
8 m2 A- L/ H4 I/ t5 n( G* p8 f) Hwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!( h4 f1 W2 z+ p7 g; x
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
作者: coolyiceman    時間: 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!. e2 R( f: p8 T$ v6 J( a
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
4 N$ z$ y& q  V, i政府想比下馬威0的人~~
, E' V6 w6 [+ }3 q, ~錢就一定罰- R; ^: N. Q% ]% e3 s2 E0 u6 J
未必要坐牢~~
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,& x$ v6 e  O, V3 i/ r0 _1 v* |
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
  ?9 A1 R" L' T+ [- ?+ ]8 D佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
- Q$ z, R  i- Q) `到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
作者: @bcc@    時間: 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:
作者: 小虫    時間: 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^
作者: 老鬼X    時間: 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　
作者: markmk    時間: 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..
作者: 人人人人人    時間: 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈
作者: ilovefuckingyou    時間: 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!
作者: bonzi1983    時間: 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law
作者: karenmoe    時間: 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:, L' Z! M( D) M9 C9 T0 W
告得入我切!!!
6 J( e! c  }. H  o$ @我當初都估告唔入,
( Y3 M& ~& E& o4 }不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,
$ ~6 Y, g( ~( D/ I: {真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....
作者: timho1027    時間: 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇+ Z6 J: Q) g3 T8 v- f7 g7 u
我希望佢冇事
作者: wolfevil    時間: 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為
作者: 阿細    時間: 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

Originally posted by EV4886 at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:
  @  j6 {/ Z. ~' L7 q美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
: i0 \' l3 U3 _  @
因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...
作者: kwajc    時間: 2005-5-6 08:58 AM

香港海關想做一場大龍鳳俾電影業d人睇......講真香港有成幾廿萬人用bt download野....拉晒番去邊到有咁多錢養呢班人呀!!!



歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0