
Originally posted by Preston_tron at 2005-5-11 08:40 PM:
i think 甲 should seperate into two gruops: one group should 救途人, and other group should help ABCDE五人
Originally posted by 腳指o at 2005-5-11 09:18 PM:+ |9 `* T& c* K* |. I9 H) E' d
甲...救星先..+ o4 B5 d4 l* W3 d! D! q
乙...做錯了
Originally posted by 奇 at 2005-5-11 21:28:! G: k0 t/ |/ k5 w4 g
可以看看別人意見
Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-5-11 09:59 PM:$ {- A/ A P2 U% g+ y4 ^/ X
救援部隊甲應救得就救...途人要救,再以極速去救ABCDE
救援部隊乙肯定不應車死途人! |+ B- d; m# s. P0 E1 @$ b
. b& D0 q: g1 [* W3 M7 [: G2 v
兩隊都胡亂去判斷...不是救援既方針
Originally posted by 老鬼X at 2005-5-12 12:21 AM:
全部都係生命!唔可以因為救一個(多個)而傷害另外一個(多個)生命
生命係平等既 救人係應該救急 唔應該計較多與小
我佛慈悲......?!
Originally posted by city1220 at 2005-5-12 12:59 AM:
我覺得甲同乙都做錯左
人點可以見到不救9 g' s0 u" @$ ~- c
生命係獨一無二既
唔通一個人既生命唔係生命$ A, _( T; t/ ]& J# J
而五個人既生命先係生命# p% z8 ~( u% |9 u. }' D
人更加唔可以為任何藉口去奪去任何人既生命3 }' ^$ g% `" R+ N6 E
那同殺人有咩分別
Originally posted by wolfevil at 2005-5-12 04:47 AM:* |, Q3 o. O( }( ]& k1 z( z: k
我都同意甲對, 乙錯. 甲因ABCDE 去救...
Originally posted by yuzhiliang111 at 2005-5-12 02:10 PM:" N; _! j: @/ `8 t2 i
我們常被教育要顧全大局,但公平嗎?似...
Originally posted by waithung at 2005-5-15 03:11 PM:0 \& ]( X2 |5 k7 L
甲不對!話明救援隊,應該見一個,救一個... ' c0 l) y5 R6 X7 B% ]+ d
不應該再就this意外增加死傷者!!!即使救回ABCDE~也白白犧牲一個無辜者的性命........( n, s8 N: N3 i* H! S8 D- _
Originally posted by 奇 at 19xx-6-30 12:48:9 W1 D8 ~6 t0 L$ _. ^6 w& G1 O5 ~) N
- R2 J0 ?* a5 q% h# K) n: o( p
人點可以見到不救?6 q' j. U; C6 n2 `5 h
咁你就放棄那5人??咁你是否見死不救?5 d$ L& s) H& {. R; ?4 K
唔通5個人既生命唔係生命??


Originally posted by 老鬼X at 19xx-6-30 20:12:
唉!終於有朋友同我想法差唔多!
生命係無分輕重架!![]()
Originally posted by xthmkn at 2005-5-16 08:38 PM:
甲既情況 大家都可以理解到 必要時要...
Originally posted by xthmkn at 19xx-6-30 20:38:
甲既情況 大家都可以理解到 必要時要...
Originally posted by singdotcom at 2005-5-16 08:54 PM:3 w8 J/ ]7 o J; L1 K3 O9 E
請問"見死不救"是不是結束一個人生命的一種呢?

| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |