Mcdyess對活記重要or Horry對馬記重要?
i think Mcdyess因為除左佢就冇具份量後備
but
horry,關鍵時候3分靠晒佢
so
2個分別係2邊既球員
緊係2個都咁重要啦= =~
真係要揀既話 horry
因為佢總決賽經驗豐富,關鍵時刻心理質素高
當然攻守都有一定能力,但呢2點係最緊要作者: Gretzky 時間: 2005-6-16 07:42 AM
Based on the 3 games played.
McDyess is less of a bench factor...I still think reading of the game and defense is his asset...not his scoring ability. Pistons need him to contribute better from the bench....since he could be the factor in the next two games.
Horry...needless to say he's the go to guy in 3 pt shots...but I wonder if this is needed in this series....Parker and Gino has been incredible....
Conclusion: If Horry goes to sleep...Spurs is okay...if MdDyess daydreams...the Pistons are dead.作者: F.king 時間: 2005-6-16 09:08 AM
Horry
Even though I am not spurs fans, I still think that Horry is one of the best players in NBA
if you see the statistics, he is not the toppest players.
However, if you watch his games, his importance is as same as the best players in every team.
he can do everything in defense and he is also a very good offensive player
In addition, he is not a self-fish player and he could choose the best decision in the important memont
therefore, when he is in the game, his teammates can be much easier to score because Horry knows how to run to a place to break the zone (run out to three points line, screen, run inside for waiting offensive rebound or score...)
because his FG% is really good, he can always break the zone for his teammates without his directly assist and his teammates can score much easier that not have to pass to him; therefore, his statistic is not as good as "superstar" (Of course, his pass assist is very good too; but usually he is not the one assist directly to the player who score)
he defense is really good and I don't know how to explain( I am not good in basketball)
but you can see he can assist teammates to double team in the right time but not miss the player who he has to follow (and his defense is not too violence)
therefore, I think Horry is more important
because I think even though Mcdyess is very good, but he is not as good as Horry in some jobs which is not in statistics
p.s. maybe I don't really understand Mcdyess, because I didn't watch his games a lot
I feel sorry if my points are not correct作者: goodgirl1 時間: 2005-6-16 09:16 AM
Gretzky i agree with what u just said
- basically.. spurs' bench is stronger than pistons' because like you said even if horry is off fire.. they still hv guys to creat matchup problems..
- on the other hand, Mcdyess seems the only bench contributor for pistons so far in the series..作者: 秋葉林 時間: 2005-6-16 09:42 AM
no...... I am opposite than you....
R. Wallace needs to be in starting lineup..
cos he can play low posts, he can shoot in mid-range, he can block
but for McDyess, he's an interior scorer
that's why R. Wallace should be in the starting lineup,作者: 清揚 時間: 2005-6-16 10:51 PM
I got what you mean, I watched game 2 too...
but remember one thing, he could shift to play Center/SF.. that's why he could be starting no matter what's happened
I am not saying McDyess is bad..
but in this Pistons, they need R. Wallace to be starting.. cos Spurs needs to guy him tightly....
when he's on fire, then no one can stop him.. like Parker/Hamilton作者: benben 時間: 2005-6-16 11:20 PM
R.Wallace 唔係唔識攻, 只係 Detroit 有幾個進攻點, 好平均,
同MY, Final 對 San Antonio ga 內線唔係甘簡單 T. Duncan , Robert Horry ,
Nazr Mohammad , Radoslav Nesterovic 個個都好兇很作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-6-17 12:16 PM
圖片附件: horry_295_050517.jpg (2005-6-16 10:35 PM, 44.9 KB) / 下載次數 5
