娛樂滿紛 26FUN - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 里奧個敗家仔真係...唉 [打印本頁]

作者: adamjacky123 時間: 2005-10-1 10:41 PM 標題: 里奧個敗家仔真係...唉

2球都關佢事
仲要12k周薪...唉

作者: gk1146 時間: 2005-10-1 10:52 PM

我都覺得

作者: coke123 時間: 2005-10-1 10:54 PM

突然覺得Terry 比佢值! 英國有D咁ge中堅... a.... 唔輸有鬼ar!

作者: great!! 時間: 2005-10-1 10:57 PM

ng gun yiu la
we have park ji sung!!
today play like robben!

作者: pderek 時間: 2005-10-1 10:58 PM 標題: .......唉

老實講都真係幾樣衰........希望半場出番來之後唔會個頭有個"鞋印"啦!!!!

作者: singleung 時間: 2005-10-1 10:59 PM

好樣的朴生,3球都有佢份,亞洲球員不可看小

作者: Kev 時間: 2005-10-1 11:00 PM

Originally posted by adamjacky123 at 2005-10-1 10:41 PM:
2球都關佢事
仲要12k周薪...唉

係120k

作者: YUEN_LOUIS 時間: 2005-10-1 11:01 PM

Originally posted by pderek at 2005-10-1 10:58 PM:
老實講都真係幾樣衰........希望半場出番來之後唔會個頭有個"鞋印"啦!!!!

老費飛靴~
例不虛發~

作者: singleung 時間: 2005-10-1 11:03 PM

睇老費仲識唔識笑

作者: iknow 時間: 2005-10-1 11:03 PM

朴智星同佢都同五個入球有關係...

星仔就間接幫manutd入波~~但李奧竟然做出呢d低級動作...十二萬鎊周薪==

作者: singleung 時間: 2005-10-1 11:05 PM

國家中堅,如斯表現,呸

作者: 瓦特鬼仔 時間: 2005-10-2 12:02 AM

佢今場可能表現唔係咁好....
但係一場唔代表佢既能力........你地放長雙眼睇佢後期先講啦.....
如果佢後期都係咁失....咁我無野好講

作者: tkk2p 時間: 2005-10-2 12:04 AM

一場半場啫．．．

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-10-2 12:12 AM

Originally posted by tkk2p at 2005-10-2 12:04 AM:
一場半場啫．．．

好彩贏到波,否則殺死佢呀班球迷

作者: night 時間: 2005-10-2 12:14 AM

一場半場唔洗咁既

作者: tkk2p 時間: 2005-10-2 12:20 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-2 12:12 AM:

好彩贏到波,否則殺死佢呀班球迷

咁誇張~~~

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-10-2 12:30 AM

Originally posted by night at 2005-10-2 12:14 AM:
一場半場唔洗咁既

打得好咪讚囉,打得差咪彈囉

作者: nelly 時間: 2005-10-2 12:46 AM

Surely RIO didnt play well today.....but HE's always the MAN for ENGLAND!!
u cant judge One person by HALF of a match ..rite??

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-10-2 01:23 AM

唔係既。佢一時時啦。有時就真係救到隊波。

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-10-2 01:25 AM

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-2 01:23 AM:
唔係既。佢一時時啦。有時就真係救到隊波。

第二球點解佢會縮腳既,唔通有人叫???= ="

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-10-2 01:27 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-2 01:25:

第二球點解佢會縮腳既,唔通有人叫???= ="

我林佢可能有係懶高章掛=.="

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-10-2 01:30 AM

佢可以話係好有技術、形体、身体素質都好好，不過打波有時就唔係好專心，有時就輕敵太高章(後場玩野好易出事)………………希望佢會成熟啦。佢係現今球壇最出色既中堅之一。

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-10-2 01:33 AM

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-2 01:30 AM:
佢可以話係好有技術、形体、身体素質...

係呀,不過有時真係高章得滯=o="

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-10-2 01:35 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-2 01:33:

係呀,不過有時真係高章得滯=o="

無計啦。錯極都唔改，都唔知幾時先生生性性。

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-10-2 01:36 AM

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-2 01:35 AM:

無計啦。錯極都唔改，都唔知幾時先生生性性。

到真係輸到比人鬧爆果次= ="

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-10-2 01:41 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-2 01:36:

到真係輸到比人鬧爆果次= ="

唉。

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-10-2 01:41 AM

如果真係輸左，佢真係抵罵啦。

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-10-2 01:42 AM

咩你地應為曼聯有更好既後衛la 咩
唔用佢無人可用lu!!!!!!!!!!!

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-10-2 01:49 AM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-10-2 01:42:
咩你地應為曼聯有更好既後衛la 咩
唔用佢無人可用lu!!!!!!!!!!!

無錯。事實上要搵個同佢同級數都唔易。又後生。

作者: ttwong 時間: 2005-10-2 01:52 AM

我唸佢都係今場失準姐....
佢下場應該唔會再係咁架啦!

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-10-2 01:55 AM

Originally posted by ttwong at 2005-10-2 01:52:
我唸佢都係今場失準姐....
佢下場應該唔會再係咁架啦!

希望啦。無論曼聯定係英格蘭都唔可以無左佢。

作者: iknow 時間: 2005-10-2 11:08 AM

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-2 01:30 AM:
佢可以話係好有技術、形体、身体素質...

佢有晒好後衛ge條件,係寸左d同自信爆棚...

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-10-2 02:13 PM

Originally posted by iknow at 2005-10-2 11:08:

佢有晒好後衛ge條件,係寸左d同自信爆棚...

係呀。可能佢條件太優越，所以就咁自大。

作者: Pharaoh 時間: 2005-10-2 02:16 PM

一向覺得佢只係一個好 sweeper 而唔係一個頂級 centre back~

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-10-2 03:17 PM

Originally posted by Pharaoh at 2005-10-2 14:16:
一向覺得佢只係一個好 sweeper 而唔係一個頂級 centre back~

不過係現今球壇又有幾多個好過佢呢？？

作者: pakho 時間: 2005-10-2 03:24 PM

傻既~~~睇左咁耐都唔知里奧既料子........一場就下判斷~每個(人)都有犯錯時候,
曼聯fans唔支持里奧,過檔阿記囉~(妄想中)

作者: adamjacky123 時間: 2005-10-2 03:42 PM

Originally posted by pakho at 2005-10-2 03:24 PM:
傻既~~~睇左咁耐都唔知里奧既料子........一場就下判斷~每個(人)都有犯錯時候,
曼聯fans唔支持里奧,過檔阿記囉~(妄想中)

曼聯fans唔支持里奧,過檔阿記
阿仙奴fans唔支持施根,過檔曼聯= =

作者: 881903 時間: 2005-10-2 04:29 PM

有些球員在隊中成必然正選, 沒有危機感, 鬥志會減少. 里奧一扭計即加了人工, 隊中亦少中堅, 自然令佢失鬥心, 交行貨.

作者: iknow 時間: 2005-10-2 04:31 PM

Originally posted by pakho at 2005-10-2 03:24 PM:
傻既~~~睇左咁耐都唔知里奧既料子........一場就下判斷~每個(人)都有犯錯時候,
曼聯fans唔支持里奧,過檔阿記囉~(妄想中)

我地都係ｏｎｌｙ講佢呢場ｊｅ．．．

作者: pakho 時間: 2005-10-2 04:37 PM

Originally posted by adamjacky123 at 2005-10-2 03:42 PM:

曼聯fans唔支持里奧,過檔阿記
阿仙奴fans唔支持施根,過檔曼聯= =

係唔係要先~~~哈哈~唔收轉會費,比你養佢

作者: abcde1918 時間: 2005-10-2 04:42 PM

Originally posted by pakho at 2005-10-2 04:37 PM:

係唔係要先~~~哈哈~唔收轉會費,比你養佢

你係話事人

作者: ciger 時間: 2005-10-2 05:01 PM

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-2 15:17:

不過係現今球壇又有幾多個好過佢呢？？

大大話話都超過20人

作者: 丹山 時間: 2005-10-2 05:02 PM

邊個人未失準過?你地d人憎曼聯見佢地有咩閃失就死踩爛踩
尤其係果d拎其他球員黎同佢比較果d人打從心底裏不喜歡他
就當然會這樣說啦加歷查以前都踢到好似食左紙咁一埸兩個烏龍球
乜野失誤都有而家大部份人都應同佢係勁啦
人生真係會平步青云有升無趺直踩上最高點既咩

仲有果d所謂曼聯迷如果曼聯球員踢衰幾埸就唔支持既
果d最多都係簡碟曼聯都衰左幾年仲有衰埋史譚碧咸咁多個咁就會話唔支持?

作者: adamjacky123 時間: 2005-10-2 05:05 PM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-2 05:01 PM:

大大話話都超過20人

曼聯點都要補個df架喇,gary仔走下坡,silvestre又麻麻,heinze復出無期
首選kompany...

作者: ciger 時間: 2005-10-2 05:06 PM

Originally posted by 丹山 at 2005-10-2 17:02:
邊個人未失準過?你地d人憎曼聯見佢地...

如果咁講以後26FUN咪唔可以有話題批評朗拿度,點計朗拿度級數地位都高過李奧好多,佢踢得唔好又唔可以批評佢呀

作者: adamjacky123 時間: 2005-10-2 05:11 PM

Originally posted by 丹山 at 2005-10-2 05:02 PM:
邊個人未失準過?你地d人憎曼聯見佢地...

冇話憎唔憎曼聯....
我自己就係曼聯fans,
就係因為我自己係曼聯fans,
先要鬧下,
如果rio唔係曼聯,
我理得佢一場擺十個烏龍咩,
曼聯條df line靠佢係中間擋,
佢失準=曼聯失準,
一場失2球都關佢事既,仲唔鬧?
人地chelsea到家下都係失1球ja,
佢再唔醒,曼聯點追呀?

[ Last edited by adamjacky123 on 2005-10-2 at 05:16 PM ]

作者: 叮叮1223 時間: 2005-10-2 05:23 PM

人點都會有失手時候~~
仲有車路士D後衛質素被曼聯較好~~
~~曼聯有時唔駛輸波都係里奧~~~:cool:

作者: ciger 時間: 2005-10-2 05:38 PM

Originally posted by 叮叮1223 at 2005-10-2 17:23:
人點都會有失手時候~~
仲有車路士D後衛質素被曼聯較好~~
~~曼聯有時唔駛輸波都係里奧~~~:cool:

冇錯係人都會有失手時候,但一場波失兩次就真係唔應該出現係李奧身上,批評佢都係睇得起佢啫,如果我落場呀,我諗失3次都比人讚踢得好,人地對佢期望越大批評就自然越多,你睇下當年巴治奧射失12碼之後比人鬧到點,你估第二個射失人地有冇咁大反應吖

作者: IT14 時間: 2005-10-2 06:10 PM

Originally posted by adamjacky123 at 2005-10-2 05:05 PM:

曼聯點都要補個df架喇,gary仔走下坡,silvestre又麻麻,heinze復出無期
首選kompany...

kompany係セ水?打邊隊架?
可否介紹下?
:cool:

作者: skjeiw 時間: 2005-10-2 06:13 PM

Originally posted by IT14 at 2005-10-2 06:10 PM:

kompany係セ水?打邊隊架?
可否介紹下?
:cool:

應該0係安德列治...打左中右,後衛防中都ok...(睇FM講架)

作者: skjeiw 時間: 2005-10-2 06:15 PM

個人認為佢太過輕挑...以為自己勁就可以慢人少少,讓下人都得...好大意...我寧願要d質素差少少,但係勤力d0既都唔要佢

作者: iknow 時間: 2005-10-2 06:24 PM

Originally posted by skjeiw at 2005-10-2 06:13 PM:

應該0係安德列治...打左中右,後衛防中都ok...(睇FM講架)

廿歲仔～～不如要埋ｖａｎｄａｎ　ｂｏｒｒｅ　ａｒ～～同一隊的～～

作者: kenny9129 時間: 2005-10-2 07:17 PM 標題: kompany is a Roma defender¬¬

He is not that good¬¬>>¬#

作者: ciger 時間: 2005-10-2 08:13 PM

Originally posted by skjeiw at 2005-10-2 18:15:
個人認為佢太過輕挑...以為自己勁就可以慢人少少,讓下人都得...好大意...我寧願要d質素差少少,但係勤力d0既都唔要佢

冇錯,打後衛最緊要穩陣,唔知有冇事都一定要清左先,懶瀟洒係大忌

作者: YUEN_LOUIS 時間: 2005-10-2 09:23 PM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-2 08:13 PM:

冇錯,打後衛最緊要穩陣,唔知有冇事都一定要清左先,懶瀟洒係大忌

agree~
大意一次就足夠比人入波

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-10-3 12:25 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-2 17:01:

大大話話都超過20人

邊有咁多呀。你數下出黎大家評下啦。哈哈

作者: adamjacky123 時間: 2005-10-3 12:54 AM

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-3 12:25 AM:

邊有咁多呀。你數下出黎大家評下啦。哈哈

20人?.....講真10個都冇

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-10-3 12:57 AM

Originally posted by adamjacky123 at 2005-10-3 00:54:

20人?.....講真10個都冇

係我心目中我數唔夠5個。

作者: ciger 時間: 2005-10-3 01:01 AM

Originally posted by adamjacky123 at 2005-10-3 00:54:

20人?.....講真10個都冇

如果計埋D已經退出國家隊但仲打緊聯賽果D,好似馬甸尼,修夫基等,就差不多有20人,剩係AC都3件啦,而且我要強調一樣野,中堅係要穩健,唔洗你係後場兩下假身呃過對手然後放個波出黎,但一定要可以清脆解圍

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-10-3 01:03 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-3 01:01:

如果計埋D已經退出國家隊但仲打緊聯...

唔係講我地呢一刻既球員能力咩？？我以為係tim

作者: adamjacky123 時間: 2005-10-3 01:06 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-3 01:01 AM:

如果計埋D已經退出國家隊但仲打緊聯...

= =
不如數埋d退左休架啦...

作者: ciger 時間: 2005-10-3 01:07 AM

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-3 01:03:

唔係講我地呢一刻既球員能力咩？？我以為係tim

咁馬甸尼修夫基算唔算一刻既球員吖?如果講歷史,李奧100名都不入啦

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-10-3 01:07 AM

Originally posted by adamjacky123 at 2005-10-3 01:06:

= =
不如數埋d退左休架啦...

哈哈~可能廿個已經計埋架啦。

作者: ciger 時間: 2005-10-3 01:08 AM

Originally posted by adamjacky123 at 2005-10-3 01:06:

= =
不如數埋d退左休架啦...

但係馬甸尼,杜林嘅表現真係好過李奧喎,點解唔可以計

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-10-3 01:08 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-3 01:07:

咁馬甸尼修夫基算唔算一刻既球員吖?如果講歷史,李奧100名都不入啦

我果呢一刻既意思，係佢呢一刻既能力喎。。。。。。唔係仲打緊就係。

作者: adamjacky123 時間: 2005-10-3 01:09 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-3 01:07 AM:

咁馬甸尼修夫基算唔算一刻既球員吖?如果講歷史,李奧100名都不入啦

但呢一刻李奧比修夫基勁吧...
馬甸尼就好唔同類型啫

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-10-3 01:09 AM

Originally posted by adamjacky123 at 2005-10-3 01:09:

但呢一刻李奧比修夫基勁吧...
馬甸尼就好唔同類型啫

馬甸尼都走晒下坡啦。。。

作者: ciger 時間: 2005-10-3 01:10 AM

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-3 01:08:

我果呢一刻既意思，係佢呢一刻既能力喎。。。。。。唔係仲打緊就係。

我覺得杜林,馬甸尼,修夫基這些老將呢一刻既表現好過李奧

作者: adamjacky123 時間: 2005-10-3 01:12 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-3 01:10 AM:

我覺得杜林,馬甸尼,修夫基這些老將呢一刻既表現好過李奧

.......馬甸尼都ok,但修夫基汶水d掛....

作者: ciger 時間: 2005-10-3 01:12 AM

Originally posted by adamjacky123 at 2005-10-3 01:09:

但呢一刻李奧比修夫基勁吧...
馬甸尼就好唔同類型啫

如果講穩陣,修夫基一定好過今季嘅李奧,上季佢都仲OK,但今季真係差左(講緊李奧)

作者: adamjacky123 時間: 2005-10-3 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-3 01:12 AM:

如果講穩陣,修夫基一定好過今季嘅李奧,上季佢都仲OK,但今季真係差左(講緊李奧)

各人有各人觀點掛...

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-10-3 01:15 AM

Originally posted by adamjacky123 at 2005-10-3 01:14:

各人有各人觀點掛...

我都覺得係。每個人心目卜中都有定位，無得好爻。

作者: ciger 時間: 2005-10-3 01:17 AM

Originally posted by adamjacky123 at 2005-10-3 01:14:

各人有各人觀點掛...

今季奧沙都好過李奧呀,人工高左連D波都高章埋,一個打高章波嘅後衛冇咁3成功力

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-10-3 01:53 AM

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-3 01:15 AM:

我都覺得係。每個人心目卜中都有定位，無得好爻。

同意

作者: Beckham4072 時間: 2005-10-3 04:38 PM

大佬人黎架冇可能唔錯.....
我睇咁耐我第一定見佢咁
勁果時都唔見讚...
十足民主黨

作者: adamjacky123 時間: 2005-10-3 04:52 PM

Originally posted by Beckham4072 at 2005-10-3 04:38 PM:
大佬人黎架冇可能唔錯.....
我睇咁耐我第一定見佢咁
勁果時都唔見讚...
十足民主黨

= ="
因為佢既十二萬鎊,
勁係應該的,
錯一次ok,
一場波錯兩次就.....

民主黨= =?????去錯板

作者: Beckham4072 時間: 2005-10-3 04:59 PM

Originally posted by adamjacky123 at 2005-10-3 04:52 PM:

= ="
因為佢既十二萬鎊,
勁係應該的,
錯一次ok,
一場波錯兩次就.....

民主黨= =?????去錯板

十二萬只係一個標籤姐
人就係人人就會錯錯唔會有數次限住架
唔通勁就要無限勁咩
你有睇場波雲達沙倒戈後場比人勁開汽水
如果係布朗 3 4球都有得輸

作者: skjeiw 時間: 2005-10-3 05:02 PM

Originally posted by adamjacky123 at 2005-10-3 04:52 PM:

= ="
因為佢既十二萬鎊,
勁係應該的,
錯一次ok,
一場波錯兩次就.....

民主黨= =?????去錯板

我覺得一次半次錯唔係問題,但係如果長期都唔小心,大意的話,就真係好唔掂lor
不過里奧我越黎越覺得只係得個名...當年3000萬鎊真係唔值,佢都仲未到頂級,唔夠穩陣

作者: Beckham4072 時間: 2005-10-3 05:06 PM

打後衛就好似打龍門咁
救到就英雄救唔到就罪人
邊個唔想守住唔失
當年杜滴黑哦旦變罪人
囉歐冠做英雄.....

作者: Beckham4072 時間: 2005-10-3 05:08 PM

Originally posted by skjeiw at 2005-10-3 05:02 PM:

我覺得一次半次錯唔係問題,但係如...

有佢同冇佢係3回事
佢停賽冇左佢..mu好似有波必應咁

作者: 丹山 時間: 2005-10-3 09:33 PM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-2 05:06 PM:

如果咁講以後26FUN咪唔可以有話題批評朗拿度,點計朗拿度級數地位都高過李奧好多,佢踢得唔好又唔可以批評佢呀

唔該你唔好扭曲我d發言得唔得啊
我係話d人見高就拜見低就踩o者
我亦都無表達過你地唔應該開話題批評之類既野我見到你咁回覆我都真係有少少汗顏
可能你需要進修一下中文可能你唔太理解我既發言

作者: 丹山 時間: 2005-10-3 09:38 PM

Originally posted by adamjacky123 at 2005-10-2 05:11 PM:

冇話憎唔憎曼聯....
我自己就係曼...

可惜佢醒果陣好似上季咁條中前埸又唔醒
我相信果陣條中前埸受既壓力比李奧少大家都繼續支持

我個fd講得真係好鬼岩佢話踢學界 d後衛解唔到個波就係咁比人插
d前鋒射個波射到炒哂飛機就話gd try 好波
有時d野我覺得點都要支持既若果我連曼聯球員都唔支持我都諗唔到仲有咩理由支持曼聯

[ Last edited by 丹山 on 2005-10-3 at 09:39 PM ]

作者: Beckham4072 時間: 2005-10-3 09:51 PM

Originally posted by 丹山 at 2005-10-3 09:38 PM:

可惜佢醒果陣好似上季咁條中前埸...

救到英雄救唔到罪人..
冇人想做罪人架.....所以我都係打前多
唔洗咩飛

作者: ciger 時間: 2005-10-3 10:44 PM

Originally posted by 丹山 at 2005-10-3 21:33:

唔該你唔好扭曲我d發言得唔得啊
我...

需要進修一下中文果個應該係你喎,人地批評李奧,就等於憎曼聯,你知唔知這裡有幾多人係愛之深,恨之切呀,就係覺得以佢水準唔應該犯咁嘅錯先發言批評,又唔見有人批評香港甲組

作者: ciger 時間: 2005-10-3 10:46 PM

Originally posted by Beckham4072 at 2005-10-3 17:06:
打後衛就好似打龍門咁
救到就英雄救唔到就罪人
邊個唔想守住唔失
當年杜滴黑哦旦變罪人
囉歐冠做英雄.....

佢果兩球波根本談不上個'救'字,可以話成功解圍係基本責任

作者: 丹山 時間: 2005-10-3 11:05 PM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-3 10:44 PM:

需要進修一下中文果個應該係你喎,人...

覺得人地憎唔憎係主觀
但係覺得咁就要憎里奧咁呢隊曼聯都應該要憎左好耐
呢兩年曼聯成隊波其實未必一定差左但係只不過無成績
冠軍我都想左好耐可惜費sir既方程式可能真係有d不合時宜
但係我都無辦法佢係曼聯一份子我就要支持就算我唔支持
佢都唔會因為咁而離隊我又唔係大老闆無辦法
咁既然係球迷支持同唔支持都影響唔到球會決定
咁我寧願對曼聯球員比正面既支持
乜野愛之深,恨之切呀睇唔到唔通你係到噓佢地佢地會知到你愛緊佢地?
我亦都唔相信剩係係到批評佢地就可以令佢地踢波勁d 技術有改善
佢地本身有技術但係無信心既時候球迷去支持佢地令佢地重拾信心就係最大既責任

不過我係咁諗o者我認識既大部份曼聯球迷都唔係係愛之深,恨之切呀

你話我叫d人唔應該開話題批評之類就一定我無講過半句

[ Last edited by 丹山 on 2005-10-3 at 11:11 PM ]

作者: ciger 時間: 2005-10-4 12:24 AM

Originally posted by 丹山 at 2005-10-3 23:05:

覺得人地憎唔憎係主觀
但係覺得咁...

正如你所講,批評李奧唔會令佢踢得更好,但你包容佢同樣地一樣唔會比佢知道(除非你有佢電話打比佢),係討論區見一個球員犯錯批評佢係好正常,批評佢唔等於唔支持,正如你考試肥佬你亞媽鬧你'衰仔,冇鬼用架考得咁差,第日讀唔到書做乞兒就知死'唔通佢又唔支持你?佢又好憎你?每人表達方式唔同,有人激d有人斯文d,但唔代表見高就拜,見低就踩,做得好比人讚做得差比人鬧係天經地義,冇乜唔啱

作者: 丹山 時間: 2005-10-4 09:38 PM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-4 12:24 AM:

正如你所講,批評李奧唔會令佢踢得更...

喔原來係咁解
你唔係o者你敢講其他人唔係見隊波踢到識飛就死捧爛捧
踢得唔好咁就死踩爛踩
好似皇馬咁呢兩個禮拜同九月頭就好似天堂同地獄而家個個都話佢勁到無人有
批評係好既不過都唔見大家有咩好建議可以令佢踢好d
剩係識係到鬧佢敗家話佢d波高張又話佢高傲由頭到尾都係踩
簡單d就係剩識鬧
我覺得佢踢波得閒上兩腳幾好睇你唔好理佢係呢d波有錯誤未球員唔係機器
應該有自己風格
但係起馬我諗若果佢真係上網睇到官方留言板有d人咁留言
係球埸上又比人噓都唔會踢得好

作者: srfqt1 時間: 2005-10-4 10:29 PM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-3 10:46 PM:

佢果兩球波根本談不上個'救'字,可以話成功解圍係基本責任

基本責任??
龍門既基本責任係救波
咁有失波果場味就連基本責任都做唔到

前鋒既基本責任係入波
一場波冇入波就連基本責任都做唔到

咁中場既基本責任係咩,分波,hold波or其他??
如果係hold波就好啦
全場波,有波唔踢,hold住個波就完成基本責任

[ Last edited by srfqt1 on 2005-10-4 at 10:34 PM ]

作者: ciger 時間: 2005-10-4 11:13 PM

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-10-4 22:29:

基本責任??
龍門既基本責任...

我唔知你有冇踢過波,踢波唔係一個人嘅事,有陣時隊友犯錯導致龍門失波我諗唔會有人話龍門冇盡責,李奧果兩球波要解圍絕對唔難,作為一個英超後衛被要求能夠成功解圍並唔過分,球場上冇人會只被要求hold住個波,有時間踢下波你就知乜野係責任

作者: chicken 時間: 2005-10-4 11:34 PM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-4 11:13 PM:

我唔知你有冇踢過波,踢波唔係一個人...

This time support you. The wage reflects the responsibility of the player to the team.
This means, e.g. Rio should take more responsibility to Brown for more interception, more tackle, more heading, etc. Otherwise why he get higher wage than Brown?

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-10-5 01:45 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-4 23:13:

我唔知你有冇踢過波,踢波唔係一個人...

最大問題係里奧係唔係成日做唔到你所謂既基本責任先。我睇過曼聯好多好多場波，佢做得非常稱稱。偶有失手不代表個人能力的不足。

作者: ciger 時間: 2005-10-5 01:52 AM

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-5 01:45:

最大問題係里奧係唔係成日做唔到你所謂既基本責任先。我睇過曼聯好多好多場波，佢做得非常稱稱。偶有失手不代表個人能力的不足。

你平時上堂好乖好留心聽書但有一次上堂傾計你話老師鬧唔鬧你吖

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-10-5 01:54 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-5 01:52:

你平時上堂好乖好留心聽書但有一次上堂傾計你話老師鬧唔鬧你吖

D比喻唔可以亂用架。非常牽強喎

作者: ciger 時間: 2005-10-5 02:00 AM

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-5 01:54:

D比喻唔可以亂用架。非常牽強喎

佢唔係冇能力解圍,佢係犯錯冇解圍,冇能力解圍就話冇計啦,唔抵鬧,但判決錯誤冇解圍就唔同

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-10-5 02:26 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-5 02:00:

佢唔係冇能力解圍,佢係犯錯冇解圍,冇能力解圍就話冇計啦,唔抵鬧,但判決錯誤冇解圍就唔同

當然我都覺得佢抵罵既。呢一場！！

作者: Beckham4072 時間: 2005-10-5 03:26 AM

第一球係對手射中佢個波彈返前鋒到..再出腳都踢唔到個波先舉手再追都追唔到
問題係程序應該先追波後出腳再舉手
第二球正常係解圍..但佢唔踢想比龍門接...可以話佢高章
最後第一球只係唔夠冷靜
第二球係冷靜過龍
點解有第2球呀因為想話比人聽我夠冷靜有料值12萬
點知就中招

作者: Beckham4072 時間: 2005-10-5 03:32 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-5 01:52 AM:

你平時上堂好乖好留心聽書但有一次上堂傾計你話老師鬧唔鬧你吖

鬧架.........留心係一定要架啦
點同踢波
踢都就踢到踢唔到係唔夠班有咩理由會唔留心
唔通有索女係隔離位做同學??

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-10-5 04:13 AM

Originally posted by Beckham4072 at 2005-10-5 03:26 AM:
第一球係對手射中佢個波彈返前鋒到.....

里奧都幾好野,明明想出腳,就黎到果時就收腳......真係唔知可以講咩好= ="

作者: Beckham4072 時間: 2005-10-5 05:25 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-5 04:13 AM:

里奧都幾好野,明明想出腳,就黎到果時就收腳......真係唔知可以講咩好= ="

里奧買左3比2買膽呀要輸多球

歡迎光臨娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/)