Originally posted by CHECSS at 2005-10-8 06:03 PM:
陣容討論
我的理想陣容
前鋒 ...
Originally posted by kakeidevil at 2005-10-8 06:14 PM:
又係呢d
Originally posted by CHECSS at 2005-10-8 06:03 PM:
陣容討論
我的理想陣容
前鋒 ...
Originally posted by abcde1918 at 2005-10-8 06:46 PM:
門將應該施治
Originally posted by hahalung at 2005-10-8 06:49 PM:
我覺得施治唔比卡斯拿斯好
因為車仔後防勁先小失球 所以睇數字好似好勁
但皇馬後防咁亂都可以咁小失球
就可以知卡斯拿斯既身手
Originally posted by jordi at 2005-10-8 06:51 PM:
各花入各眼 la ~
前鋒 :亨利 ...
Originally posted by CHECSS at 2005-10-8 19:19:
i don t like 洛賓 and use 軒斯 and 艾殊利高爾 can 互相補位
Originally posted by iknow at 2005-10-8 08:26 PM:
A)
------------------------雲達沙-...
Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-8 18:51:
兩個都咁勁,但係卡斯拿斯反應比較好
Originally posted by pc20001103b at 2005-10-8 23:19:
仲未有機會俾卡斯拿斯係一級後防度...
Originally posted by kiki12345 at 2005-10-9 01:30:
如果舒米高仲係年輕既話~
你地又會唔會放佢係入面呢~
Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-9 02:10:
次級後防都打得好,真係搵唔到理由一級後防會打得唔好,一級後防同次級後防都係咁打,只不過一級後防撲救次數少d甚至唔駛撲救
Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-9 02:10:
次級後防都打得好,真係搵唔到理由一級後防會打得唔好,一級後防同次級後防都係咁打,只不過一級後防撲救次數少d甚至唔駛撲救
Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-9 02:10 AM:
次級後防都打得好,真係搵唔到理由一級後防會打得唔好,一級後防同次級後防都係咁打,只不過一級後防撲救次數少d甚至唔駛撲救
Originally posted by pc20001103b at 2005-10-9 10:20 AM:
大把龍門撲到識飛咁啦
都唔定係大球會(後防好)有好發展
就因為會唔慣成日唔駛撲,突然要你撲一球,注意力好易分散
Originally posted by pc20001103b at 2005-10-9 10:20:
大把龍門撲到識飛咁啦
都唔定係大球會(後防好)有好發展
就因為會唔慣成日唔駛撲,突然要你撲一球,注意力好易分散
Originally posted by kakeidevil at 2005-10-9 10:21:
車仔既施治就係咁
歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |